Difference between revisions of "Abelian differential"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A | + | <!-- |
+ | a0102101.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 145 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 145 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/A010/A.0100210 Abelian differential | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A holomorphic or meromorphic differential on a compact, or closed, Riemann surface $ S $( | |
+ | cf. [[Differential on a Riemann surface|Differential on a Riemann surface]]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let $ g $ | ||
+ | be the genus of the surface $ S $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Genus of a surface|Genus of a surface]]); let $ a _ {1} b _ {1} \dots a _ {g} b _ {g} $ | ||
+ | be the cycles of a canonical basis of the homology of $ S $. | ||
+ | Depending on the nature of their singular points, one distinguishes three kinds of Abelian differentials: I, II and III, with proper inclusions $ I \subset II \subset III $. | ||
+ | Abelian differentials of the first kind are first-order differentials that are holomorphic everywhere on $ S $ | ||
+ | and that, in a neighbourhood $ U $ | ||
+ | of each point $ P _ {0} \in S $, | ||
+ | have the form $ \omega = p d z = p (z) d z $, | ||
+ | where $ z = x + iy $ | ||
+ | is a local uniformizing variable in $ U $, | ||
+ | $ d z = d x + i dy $, | ||
+ | and $ p (z) $ | ||
+ | is a holomorphic, or regular, analytic function of $ z $ | ||
+ | in $ U $. | ||
+ | The addition of Abelian differentials and multiplication by a holomorphic function are defined by natural rules: If | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \omega = p dz,\ \pi = q dz,\ a = a (z), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
then | then | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \omega + \pi = (p + q ) dz,\ a \omega = (a p ) dz. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The Abelian differentials of the first kind form a | + | The Abelian differentials of the first kind form a $ g $- |
+ | dimensional vector space $ \mathfrak A $. | ||
+ | After the introduction of the scalar product | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | ( \omega , \pi ) = {\int\limits \int\limits } _ { S } \omega \star \overline \pi \; , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ \omega \star \overline \pi \; $ |
+ | is the [[Exterior product|exterior product]] of $ \omega $ | ||
+ | with the star-conjugate differential $ \overline \pi \; $, | ||
+ | the space $ \mathfrak A $ | ||
+ | becomes a Hilbert space. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ A _ {1} , B _ {1} \dots A _ {g} , B _ {g} $ |
+ | be the $ A $- | ||
+ | and $ B $- | ||
+ | periods of the Abelian differential of the first kind $ \omega $, | ||
+ | i.e. the integrals | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | A _ {j} = \int\limits _ {a _ {j} } \omega ,\ \ | ||
+ | B _ {j} = \int\limits _ {b _ {j} } \omega ,\ \ | ||
+ | j = 1 \dots g . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
The following relation then holds: | The following relation then holds: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | \| \omega \| ^ {2} = i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { g } | ||
+ | ( A _ {j} \overline{B}\; _ {j} - B _ {j} \overline{A}\; _ {j} ) \geq 0 . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | If | + | If $ A _ {1} ^ \prime , B _ {1} ^ \prime \dots A _ {g} ^ \prime , B _ {g} ^ \prime $ |
+ | are the periods of another Abelian differential of the first kind $ \pi $, | ||
+ | then one has | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | i ( \omega , \overline \pi \; ) = \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { g } | ||
+ | ( A _ {j} B _ {j} ^ \prime - B _ {j} A _ {j} ^ \prime ) = 0 . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | The relations (1) and (2) are known as the bilinear Riemann relations for Abelian differentials of the first kind. A canonical basis of the Abelian differentials of the first kind, i.e. a canonical basis | + | The relations (1) and (2) are known as the bilinear Riemann relations for Abelian differentials of the first kind. A canonical basis of the Abelian differentials of the first kind, i.e. a canonical basis $ \phi _ {1} \dots \phi _ {g} $ |
+ | of the space $ \mathfrak A $, | ||
+ | can be chosen so that | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | A _ {ij } = \int\limits _ {a _ {j} } \phi _ {i} = \delta _ {ij } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ \delta _ {ii} = 1 $ |
+ | and $ \delta _ {ij} = 0 $ | ||
+ | if $ j \neq i $. | ||
+ | The matrix $ (B _ {ij} ) $, | ||
+ | $ i, j = 1 \dots g $, | ||
+ | of the $ B $- | ||
+ | periods | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | B _ {ij} = \int\limits _ {b _ {j} } \phi _ {i} $$ | ||
− | is then symmetric, and the matrix of the imaginary parts | + | is then symmetric, and the matrix of the imaginary parts $ ( \mathop{\rm Im} B _ {ij} ) $ |
+ | is positive definite. An Abelian differential of the first kind for which all the $ A $- | ||
+ | periods or all the $ B $- | ||
+ | periods are zero is identically equal to zero. If all the periods of an Abelian differential of the first kind $ \omega $ | ||
+ | are real, then $ \omega = 0 $. | ||
− | Abelian differentials of the second and third kinds are, in general, meromorphic differentials, i.e. analytic differentials which have on | + | Abelian differentials of the second and third kinds are, in general, meromorphic differentials, i.e. analytic differentials which have on $ S $ |
+ | not more than a finite set of singular points that are poles and which have local representations | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{3 } | |
+ | \left ( a _ | ||
+ | \frac{-n}{z} | ||
+ | ^ {n} | ||
+ | + \dots + a _ | ||
+ | \frac{-1}{z} | ||
+ | + f ( z ) \right ) dz, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ f(z) $ |
+ | is a regular function, $ n $ | ||
+ | is the order of the pole (if $ a _ {-n} \neq 0 $), | ||
+ | and $ a _ {-1} $ | ||
+ | is the residue of the pole. If $ n = 1 $, | ||
+ | the pole is said to be simple. An Abelian differential of the second kind is a meromorphic differential all residues of which are zero, i.e. a meromorphic differential with local representation | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \left ( a _ | ||
+ | \frac{-n}{z} | ||
+ | ^ {n} | ||
+ | + \dots + a _ | ||
+ | \frac{-2}{z} | ||
+ | ^ {2} + f ( z ) \right ) dz, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
An Abelian differential of the third kind is an arbitrary Abelian differential. | An Abelian differential of the third kind is an arbitrary Abelian differential. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ \omega $ |
+ | be an arbitrary Abelian differential with $ A $- | ||
+ | periods $ A _ {1} \dots A _ {g} $; | ||
+ | the Abelian differential $ \omega ^ \prime = \omega - A _ {1} \phi _ {1} - \dots -A _ {g} \phi _ {g} $ | ||
+ | then has zero $ A $- | ||
+ | periods and is known as a normalized Abelian differential. In particular, if $ P _ {1} $ | ||
+ | and $ P _ {2} $ | ||
+ | are any two points on $ S $, | ||
+ | one can construct a normalized Abelian differential $ \omega _ {1,2} $ | ||
+ | with the singularities $ (1/z) d z $ | ||
+ | in $ P _ {1} $ | ||
+ | and $ (-1/z) d z $ | ||
+ | in $ P _ {2} $, | ||
+ | which is known as a normal Abelian differential of the third kind. Let $ \omega $ | ||
+ | be an arbitrary Abelian differential with residues $ c _ {1} \dots c _ {n} $ | ||
+ | at the respective points $ P _ {1} \dots P _ {n} $; | ||
+ | then, always, $ c _ {1} + \dots + c _ {n} = 0 $. | ||
+ | If $ P _ {0} $ | ||
+ | is any arbitrary point on $ S $ | ||
+ | such that $ P _ {0} \neq P _ {j} $, | ||
+ | $ j = 1 \dots n $, | ||
+ | then $ \omega $ | ||
+ | can be represented as a linear combination of a normalized Abelian differential of the second kind $ \omega _ {2} $, | ||
+ | a finite number of normal Abelian differentials of the third kind $ \omega _ {j,0} $, | ||
+ | and basis Abelian differentials of the first kind $ \phi _ {k} $: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \omega = \omega _ {2} + \sum _ {j=1 } ^ { n } c _ {j} \omega _ {j,0} + | ||
+ | \sum _ {k= 1 } ^ { g } A _ {k} \phi _ {k} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ \omega _ {3} $ |
+ | be an Abelian differential of the third kind with only simple poles with residues $ c _ {j} $ | ||
+ | at the points $ P _ {j} $, | ||
+ | $ j = 1 \dots n $, | ||
+ | and let $ \omega _ {1} $ | ||
+ | be an arbitrary Abelian differential of the first kind: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | A _ {k} = \int\limits _ {a _ {k} } \omega _ {1} ,\ \ | ||
+ | B _ {k} = \int\limits _ {b _ {k} } \omega _ {1} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | A _ {k} ^ \prime = \int\limits _ {a _ {k} } \omega _ {3} ,\ \ | ||
+ | B _ {k} ^ \prime = \int\limits _ {b _ {k} } \omega _ {3} ,\ k = 1 \dots g, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where the cycles | + | where the cycles $ a _ {k} , b _ {k} $ |
+ | do not pass through the poles of $ \omega _ {3} $. | ||
+ | Let the point $ P _ {0} \in S $ | ||
+ | not lie on the cycles $ a _ {k} , b _ {k} $ | ||
+ | and let $ L _ {j} $ | ||
+ | be a path from $ P _ {0} $ | ||
+ | to $ P _ {j} $. | ||
+ | One then obtains bilinear relations for Abelian differentials of the first and third kinds: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { g } ( A _ {k} B _ {k} ^ \prime - B _ {k} A _ {k} ^ \prime ) = 2 \pi i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { n } | ||
+ | c _ {j} \int\limits _ {L _ {j} } \omega _ {1} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Bilinear relations of a similar type also exist between Abelian differentials of the first and second kinds. | Bilinear relations of a similar type also exist between Abelian differentials of the first and second kinds. | ||
− | In addition to the | + | In addition to the $ A $- |
+ | and $ B $- | ||
+ | periods $ A _ {k} , B _ {k} $, | ||
+ | $ k = 1 \dots g $, | ||
+ | known as the cyclic periods, an arbitrary Abelian differential of the third kind also has polar periods of the form $ 2 \pi i c _ {j} $ | ||
+ | along zero-homologous cycles which encircle the poles $ P _ {j} $. | ||
+ | One thus has, for an arbitrary cycle $ \gamma $, | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \int\limits _ \gamma \omega _ {3} = \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { g } | ||
+ | ( l _ {k} A _ {k} + l _ {g+k} B _ {k} ) + | ||
+ | 2 \pi i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { n } m _ {j} c _ {j} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | where | + | where $ l _ {k} , l _ {g+k} $, |
+ | and $ m _ {j} $ | ||
+ | are integers. | ||
− | Important properties of Abelian differentials are described in terms of divisors. Let | + | Important properties of Abelian differentials are described in terms of divisors. Let $ ( \omega ) $ |
+ | be the divisor of the Abelian differential $ \omega $, | ||
+ | i.e. $ ( \omega ) $ | ||
+ | is an expression of the type $ ( \omega ) = P _ {1} ^ {\alpha _ {1} } {} \dots P _ {n} ^ {\alpha _ {n} } $, | ||
+ | where the $ P _ {j} $- | ||
+ | s are all the zeros and poles of $ \omega $ | ||
+ | and where the $ \alpha _ {j} $- | ||
+ | s are their multiplicities or orders. The degree $ \textrm{ d } [( \omega )] = \alpha _ {1} + \dots + \alpha _ {n} $ | ||
+ | of the divisor of the Abelian differential $ \omega $ | ||
+ | depends only on the genus of $ S $, | ||
+ | and one always has $ \textrm{ d } [( \omega )] = 2g - 2 $. | ||
+ | Let $ \mathfrak a $ | ||
+ | be some given divisor. Let $ \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) $ | ||
+ | denote the complex vector space of Abelian differentials $ \omega $ | ||
+ | of which the divisors $ ( \omega ) $ | ||
+ | are multiples of $ \mathfrak a $, | ||
+ | and let $ L ( \mathfrak a ) $ | ||
+ | denote the vector space of meromorphic functions $ f $ | ||
+ | on $ S $ | ||
+ | of which the divisors $ (f) $ | ||
+ | are multiples of $ \mathfrak a $. | ||
+ | Then $ { \mathop{\rm dim} } \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) = { \mathop{\rm dim} } L ( \mathfrak a / ( \omega )) $. | ||
+ | Other important information on the dimension of these spaces is contained in the Riemann–Roch theorem: The equality | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \mathop{\rm dim} L ( \mathfrak a ^ {-1} ) - \mathop{\rm dim} \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) = \ | ||
+ | \textrm{ d } [ \mathfrak a ] - g + 1 | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | is valid for any divisor | + | is valid for any divisor $ \mathfrak a $. |
+ | It follows from the above, for example, that if $ g = 1 $, | ||
+ | i.e. on the surface of a torus, a meromorphic function cannot have a single simple pole. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ S $ |
+ | be an arbitrary compact Riemann surface on which there are meromorphic functions $ z $ | ||
+ | and $ w $ | ||
+ | which satisfy an irreducible algebraic equation $ F (z, w ) = 0 $. | ||
+ | Any arbitrary Abelian differential on $ S $ | ||
+ | can then be expressed as $ \omega = R (z, w ) d z $ | ||
+ | where $ R (z, w ) $ | ||
+ | is some rational function in $ z $ | ||
+ | and $ w $; | ||
+ | conversely, the expression $ \omega = R (z, w) dz $ | ||
+ | is an Abelian differential. This means that an arbitrary [[Abelian integral|Abelian integral]] | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \int\limits R ( z, w ) dz = \int\limits \omega | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | is the integral of some Abelian differential on a compact Riemann surface | + | is the integral of some Abelian differential on a compact Riemann surface $ S $. |
See also [[Algebraic function|Algebraic function]]. | See also [[Algebraic function|Algebraic function]]. | ||
Line 85: | Line 275: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Springer, "Introduction to Riemann surfaces" , Addison-Wesley (1957) pp. Chapt.10 {{MR|0092855}} {{ZBL|0078.06602}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Nevanlinna, "Uniformisierung" , Springer (1953) pp. Chapt.5 {{MR|0057335}} {{ZBL|0053.05003}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt.3;8 (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Springer, "Introduction to Riemann surfaces" , Addison-Wesley (1957) pp. Chapt.10 {{MR|0092855}} {{ZBL|0078.06602}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Nevanlinna, "Uniformisierung" , Springer (1953) pp. Chapt.5 {{MR|0057335}} {{ZBL|0053.05003}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt.3;8 (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Latest revision as of 16:08, 1 April 2020
A holomorphic or meromorphic differential on a compact, or closed, Riemann surface $ S $(
cf. Differential on a Riemann surface).
Let $ g $ be the genus of the surface $ S $( cf. Genus of a surface); let $ a _ {1} b _ {1} \dots a _ {g} b _ {g} $ be the cycles of a canonical basis of the homology of $ S $. Depending on the nature of their singular points, one distinguishes three kinds of Abelian differentials: I, II and III, with proper inclusions $ I \subset II \subset III $. Abelian differentials of the first kind are first-order differentials that are holomorphic everywhere on $ S $ and that, in a neighbourhood $ U $ of each point $ P _ {0} \in S $, have the form $ \omega = p d z = p (z) d z $, where $ z = x + iy $ is a local uniformizing variable in $ U $, $ d z = d x + i dy $, and $ p (z) $ is a holomorphic, or regular, analytic function of $ z $ in $ U $. The addition of Abelian differentials and multiplication by a holomorphic function are defined by natural rules: If
$$ \omega = p dz,\ \pi = q dz,\ a = a (z), $$
then
$$ \omega + \pi = (p + q ) dz,\ a \omega = (a p ) dz. $$
The Abelian differentials of the first kind form a $ g $- dimensional vector space $ \mathfrak A $. After the introduction of the scalar product
$$ ( \omega , \pi ) = {\int\limits \int\limits } _ { S } \omega \star \overline \pi \; , $$
where $ \omega \star \overline \pi \; $ is the exterior product of $ \omega $ with the star-conjugate differential $ \overline \pi \; $, the space $ \mathfrak A $ becomes a Hilbert space.
Let $ A _ {1} , B _ {1} \dots A _ {g} , B _ {g} $ be the $ A $- and $ B $- periods of the Abelian differential of the first kind $ \omega $, i.e. the integrals
$$ A _ {j} = \int\limits _ {a _ {j} } \omega ,\ \ B _ {j} = \int\limits _ {b _ {j} } \omega ,\ \ j = 1 \dots g . $$
The following relation then holds:
$$ \tag{1 } \| \omega \| ^ {2} = i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { g } ( A _ {j} \overline{B}\; _ {j} - B _ {j} \overline{A}\; _ {j} ) \geq 0 . $$
If $ A _ {1} ^ \prime , B _ {1} ^ \prime \dots A _ {g} ^ \prime , B _ {g} ^ \prime $ are the periods of another Abelian differential of the first kind $ \pi $, then one has
$$ \tag{2 } i ( \omega , \overline \pi \; ) = \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { g } ( A _ {j} B _ {j} ^ \prime - B _ {j} A _ {j} ^ \prime ) = 0 . $$
The relations (1) and (2) are known as the bilinear Riemann relations for Abelian differentials of the first kind. A canonical basis of the Abelian differentials of the first kind, i.e. a canonical basis $ \phi _ {1} \dots \phi _ {g} $ of the space $ \mathfrak A $, can be chosen so that
$$ A _ {ij } = \int\limits _ {a _ {j} } \phi _ {i} = \delta _ {ij } , $$
where $ \delta _ {ii} = 1 $ and $ \delta _ {ij} = 0 $ if $ j \neq i $. The matrix $ (B _ {ij} ) $, $ i, j = 1 \dots g $, of the $ B $- periods
$$ B _ {ij} = \int\limits _ {b _ {j} } \phi _ {i} $$
is then symmetric, and the matrix of the imaginary parts $ ( \mathop{\rm Im} B _ {ij} ) $ is positive definite. An Abelian differential of the first kind for which all the $ A $- periods or all the $ B $- periods are zero is identically equal to zero. If all the periods of an Abelian differential of the first kind $ \omega $ are real, then $ \omega = 0 $.
Abelian differentials of the second and third kinds are, in general, meromorphic differentials, i.e. analytic differentials which have on $ S $ not more than a finite set of singular points that are poles and which have local representations
$$ \tag{3 } \left ( a _ \frac{-n}{z} ^ {n} + \dots + a _ \frac{-1}{z} + f ( z ) \right ) dz, $$
where $ f(z) $ is a regular function, $ n $ is the order of the pole (if $ a _ {-n} \neq 0 $), and $ a _ {-1} $ is the residue of the pole. If $ n = 1 $, the pole is said to be simple. An Abelian differential of the second kind is a meromorphic differential all residues of which are zero, i.e. a meromorphic differential with local representation
$$ \left ( a _ \frac{-n}{z} ^ {n} + \dots + a _ \frac{-2}{z} ^ {2} + f ( z ) \right ) dz, $$
An Abelian differential of the third kind is an arbitrary Abelian differential.
Let $ \omega $ be an arbitrary Abelian differential with $ A $- periods $ A _ {1} \dots A _ {g} $; the Abelian differential $ \omega ^ \prime = \omega - A _ {1} \phi _ {1} - \dots -A _ {g} \phi _ {g} $ then has zero $ A $- periods and is known as a normalized Abelian differential. In particular, if $ P _ {1} $ and $ P _ {2} $ are any two points on $ S $, one can construct a normalized Abelian differential $ \omega _ {1,2} $ with the singularities $ (1/z) d z $ in $ P _ {1} $ and $ (-1/z) d z $ in $ P _ {2} $, which is known as a normal Abelian differential of the third kind. Let $ \omega $ be an arbitrary Abelian differential with residues $ c _ {1} \dots c _ {n} $ at the respective points $ P _ {1} \dots P _ {n} $; then, always, $ c _ {1} + \dots + c _ {n} = 0 $. If $ P _ {0} $ is any arbitrary point on $ S $ such that $ P _ {0} \neq P _ {j} $, $ j = 1 \dots n $, then $ \omega $ can be represented as a linear combination of a normalized Abelian differential of the second kind $ \omega _ {2} $, a finite number of normal Abelian differentials of the third kind $ \omega _ {j,0} $, and basis Abelian differentials of the first kind $ \phi _ {k} $:
$$ \omega = \omega _ {2} + \sum _ {j=1 } ^ { n } c _ {j} \omega _ {j,0} + \sum _ {k= 1 } ^ { g } A _ {k} \phi _ {k} . $$
Let $ \omega _ {3} $ be an Abelian differential of the third kind with only simple poles with residues $ c _ {j} $ at the points $ P _ {j} $, $ j = 1 \dots n $, and let $ \omega _ {1} $ be an arbitrary Abelian differential of the first kind:
$$ A _ {k} = \int\limits _ {a _ {k} } \omega _ {1} ,\ \ B _ {k} = \int\limits _ {b _ {k} } \omega _ {1} , $$
$$ A _ {k} ^ \prime = \int\limits _ {a _ {k} } \omega _ {3} ,\ \ B _ {k} ^ \prime = \int\limits _ {b _ {k} } \omega _ {3} ,\ k = 1 \dots g, $$
where the cycles $ a _ {k} , b _ {k} $ do not pass through the poles of $ \omega _ {3} $. Let the point $ P _ {0} \in S $ not lie on the cycles $ a _ {k} , b _ {k} $ and let $ L _ {j} $ be a path from $ P _ {0} $ to $ P _ {j} $. One then obtains bilinear relations for Abelian differentials of the first and third kinds:
$$ \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { g } ( A _ {k} B _ {k} ^ \prime - B _ {k} A _ {k} ^ \prime ) = 2 \pi i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { n } c _ {j} \int\limits _ {L _ {j} } \omega _ {1} . $$
Bilinear relations of a similar type also exist between Abelian differentials of the first and second kinds.
In addition to the $ A $- and $ B $- periods $ A _ {k} , B _ {k} $, $ k = 1 \dots g $, known as the cyclic periods, an arbitrary Abelian differential of the third kind also has polar periods of the form $ 2 \pi i c _ {j} $ along zero-homologous cycles which encircle the poles $ P _ {j} $. One thus has, for an arbitrary cycle $ \gamma $,
$$ \int\limits _ \gamma \omega _ {3} = \sum _ {k = 1 } ^ { g } ( l _ {k} A _ {k} + l _ {g+k} B _ {k} ) + 2 \pi i \sum _ {j = 1 } ^ { n } m _ {j} c _ {j} , $$
where $ l _ {k} , l _ {g+k} $, and $ m _ {j} $ are integers.
Important properties of Abelian differentials are described in terms of divisors. Let $ ( \omega ) $ be the divisor of the Abelian differential $ \omega $, i.e. $ ( \omega ) $ is an expression of the type $ ( \omega ) = P _ {1} ^ {\alpha _ {1} } {} \dots P _ {n} ^ {\alpha _ {n} } $, where the $ P _ {j} $- s are all the zeros and poles of $ \omega $ and where the $ \alpha _ {j} $- s are their multiplicities or orders. The degree $ \textrm{ d } [( \omega )] = \alpha _ {1} + \dots + \alpha _ {n} $ of the divisor of the Abelian differential $ \omega $ depends only on the genus of $ S $, and one always has $ \textrm{ d } [( \omega )] = 2g - 2 $. Let $ \mathfrak a $ be some given divisor. Let $ \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) $ denote the complex vector space of Abelian differentials $ \omega $ of which the divisors $ ( \omega ) $ are multiples of $ \mathfrak a $, and let $ L ( \mathfrak a ) $ denote the vector space of meromorphic functions $ f $ on $ S $ of which the divisors $ (f) $ are multiples of $ \mathfrak a $. Then $ { \mathop{\rm dim} } \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) = { \mathop{\rm dim} } L ( \mathfrak a / ( \omega )) $. Other important information on the dimension of these spaces is contained in the Riemann–Roch theorem: The equality
$$ \mathop{\rm dim} L ( \mathfrak a ^ {-1} ) - \mathop{\rm dim} \Omega ( \mathfrak a ) = \ \textrm{ d } [ \mathfrak a ] - g + 1 $$
is valid for any divisor $ \mathfrak a $. It follows from the above, for example, that if $ g = 1 $, i.e. on the surface of a torus, a meromorphic function cannot have a single simple pole.
Let $ S $ be an arbitrary compact Riemann surface on which there are meromorphic functions $ z $ and $ w $ which satisfy an irreducible algebraic equation $ F (z, w ) = 0 $. Any arbitrary Abelian differential on $ S $ can then be expressed as $ \omega = R (z, w ) d z $ where $ R (z, w ) $ is some rational function in $ z $ and $ w $; conversely, the expression $ \omega = R (z, w) dz $ is an Abelian differential. This means that an arbitrary Abelian integral
$$ \int\limits R ( z, w ) dz = \int\limits \omega $$
is the integral of some Abelian differential on a compact Riemann surface $ S $.
See also Algebraic function.
References
[1] | G. Springer, "Introduction to Riemann surfaces" , Addison-Wesley (1957) pp. Chapt.10 MR0092855 Zbl 0078.06602 |
[2] | R. Nevanlinna, "Uniformisierung" , Springer (1953) pp. Chapt.5 MR0057335 Zbl 0053.05003 |
[3] | N.G. Chebotarev, "The theory of algebraic functions" , Moscow-Leningrad (1948) pp. Chapt.3;8 (In Russian) |
Comments
Another good reference, replacing [3], is [a1].
References
[a1] | S. Lang, "Introduction to algebraic and abelian functions" , Addison-Wesley (1972) MR0327780 Zbl 0255.14001 |
Abelian differential. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Abelian_differential&oldid=44998