Difference between revisions of "Simple ring"
(Simple nil rings do exist) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TEX|done}} | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | A ring, containing more than one element, without two-sided ideals (cf. [[Ideal|Ideal]]) different from 0 and the entire ring. An associative simple ring with an identity element and containing a minimal one-sided ideal is isomorphic to a matrix ring over a some skew-field (cf. also [[Associative rings and algebras|Associative rings and algebras]]). Without the assumption on the existence of an identity, such a ring is locally matrix over some skew-field $D$, i.e. each of its finite subsets is contained in a subring isomorphic to a matrix ring over $D$ (cf. [[#References|[2]]]). There are simple rings without zero divisors (even Noetherian simple rings, cf. also [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian ring]]) different from a skew-field, as well as Noetherian simple rings with zero divisors but without idempotents [[#References|[3]]]. Simple rings that are radical in the sense of N. Jacobson are known (cf. [[#References|[1]]]). | + | A ring, containing more than one element, without two-sided ideals (cf. [[Ideal|Ideal]]) different from 0 and the entire ring. An associative simple ring with an identity element and containing a minimal one-sided ideal is isomorphic to a matrix ring over a some skew-field (cf. also [[Associative rings and algebras|Associative rings and algebras]]). Without the assumption on the existence of an identity, such a ring is locally matrix over some skew-field $D$, i.e. each of its finite subsets is contained in a subring isomorphic to a matrix ring over $D$ (cf. [[#References|[2]]]). There are simple rings without zero divisors (even Noetherian simple rings, cf. also [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian ring]]) different from a skew-field, as well as Noetherian simple rings with zero divisors but without idempotents [[#References|[3]]]. Simple rings that are radical in the sense of N. Jacobson are known (cf. [[#References|[1]]]). Simple nil rings were constructed by Smoktunowicz in 2002 (cf. [[#References|[6]]]). |
Latest revision as of 09:55, 26 November 2016
A ring, containing more than one element, without two-sided ideals (cf. Ideal) different from 0 and the entire ring. An associative simple ring with an identity element and containing a minimal one-sided ideal is isomorphic to a matrix ring over a some skew-field (cf. also Associative rings and algebras). Without the assumption on the existence of an identity, such a ring is locally matrix over some skew-field $D$, i.e. each of its finite subsets is contained in a subring isomorphic to a matrix ring over $D$ (cf. [2]). There are simple rings without zero divisors (even Noetherian simple rings, cf. also Noetherian ring) different from a skew-field, as well as Noetherian simple rings with zero divisors but without idempotents [3]. Simple rings that are radical in the sense of N. Jacobson are known (cf. [1]). Simple nil rings were constructed by Smoktunowicz in 2002 (cf. [6]).
The description of the structure of alternative simple rings reduces to the associative case (cf. Alternative rings and algebras). See also Simple algebra.
References
[1] | L.A. Bokut', "Associative rings" , 1–2 , Novosibirsk (1977–1981) (In Russian) |
[2] | N. Jacobson, "Structure of rings" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1956) |
[3] | A.E. Zalesskii, O. Neroslavskii, "There exist simple Noetherian rings with zero division but without idempotents" Comm. in Algebra , 5 : 3 (1977) pp. 231–244 (In Russian) (English abstract) |
[4] | C. Faith, "Algebra" , 1–2 , Springer (1973–1976) |
[5] | J. Cozzens, C. Faith, "Simple Noetherian rings" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1975) |
[6] | A. Smoktunowicz, "A Simple Nil Ring Exists", Comm. in Algebra 30 (2002), pp. 27-59. |
Simple ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Simple_ring&oldid=39824