Difference between revisions of "Representation of the symmetric groups"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Weyl, "The classical groups, their invariants and representations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1946) {{MR|0000255}} {{ZBL|1024.20502}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F.D. Murnagan, "The theory of group representations" , Johns Hopkins Univ. Press (1938)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Hamermesh, "Group theory and its application to physical problems" , Addison-Wesley (1962) {{MR|0136667}} {{ZBL|0100.36704}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C.W. Curtis, I. Reiner, "Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras" , Interscience (1962) {{MR|0144979}} {{ZBL|0131.25601}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.D. James, "The representation theory of the symmetric groups" , Springer (1978) {{MR|0513828}} {{ZBL|0393.20009}} </TD></TR></table> |
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470190.png" /></td> </tr></table> | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470190.png" /></td> </tr></table> | ||
− | The individual components <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470191.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470192.png" /> are also rings in themselves under the product of representations <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470193.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470194.png" />. This defines a second multiplication on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470195.png" />, which is distributive over the first, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470196.png" /> becomes a ring object in the category of co-algebras over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470197.png" />. Such objects have been called Hopf algebras, [[#References|[a6]]], and quite a few of them occur naturally in algebraic topology. The ring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470198.png" /> occurs in algebraic topology as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470199.png" />, the cohomology of the [[Classifying space|classifying space]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470200.png" /> of complex <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470201.png" />-theory, and there is a | + | The individual components <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470191.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470192.png" /> are also rings in themselves under the product of representations <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470193.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470194.png" />. This defines a second multiplication on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470195.png" />, which is distributive over the first, and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470196.png" /> becomes a ring object in the category of co-algebras over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470197.png" />. Such objects have been called Hopf algebras, [[#References|[a6]]], and quite a few of them occur naturally in algebraic topology. The ring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470198.png" /> occurs in algebraic topology as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470199.png" />, the cohomology of the [[Classifying space|classifying space]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470200.png" /> of complex <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470201.png" />-theory, and there is a "natural direct isomorphism" <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470202.png" />, [[#References|[a3]]]. (This explains the notation used above for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470203.png" />: the "ci" stand for Chern classes, cf. [[Chern class|Chern class]].) |
There is also an inner product on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470204.png" />: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470205.png" /> counts the number of irreducible representations that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470206.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470207.png" /> have in common, and with respect to this inner product <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470208.png" /> is (graded) self-dual. In particular, the multiplication and comultiplication are adjoint to one another: | There is also an inner product on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470204.png" />: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470205.png" /> counts the number of irreducible representations that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470206.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470207.png" /> have in common, and with respect to this inner product <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470208.png" /> is (graded) self-dual. In particular, the multiplication and comultiplication are adjoint to one another: | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Liulevicius, "Arrows, symmetries, and representation rings" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''19''' (1980) pp. 259–273 {{MR|0593256}} {{ZBL|0448.55013}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Hazewinkel, "Formal rings and applications" , Acad. Press (1978)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.F. Atiyah, "Power operations in K-theory" ''Quarterly J. Math. (2)'' , '''17''' (1966) pp. 165–193 {{MR|0202130}} {{ZBL|0144.44901}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Knutson, "<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470226.png" />-rings and the representation theory of the symmetric group" , Springer (1973) {{MR|0364425}} {{ZBL|0272.20008}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.V. Zelevinsky, "Representations of finite classical groups" , Springer (1981) {{MR|0643482}} {{ZBL|0465.20009}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D.C. Ravenel, "The Hopf ring for complex cobordism" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''9''' (1977) pp. 241–280 {{MR|0448337}} {{ZBL|0373.57020}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Roman, "The umbral calculus" , Acad. Press (1984) {{MR|0741185}} {{ZBL|0536.33001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. James, A. Kerber, "The representation theory of the symmetric group" , Addison-Wesley (1981) {{MR|0644144}} {{ZBL|0491.20010}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. de B. Robinson, "Representation theory of the symmetric group" , Univ. Toronto Press (1961) {{MR|1531490}} {{MR|0125885}} {{ZBL|0102.02002}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.A. Green, "Polynomial representations of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/r/r081/r081470/r081470227.png" />" , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''830''' , Springer (1980) {{MR|0606556}} {{ZBL|0451.20037}} </TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 17:34, 31 March 2012
A linear representation of the group over a field
. If
, then all finite-dimensional representations of the symmetric groups are completely reducible (cf. Reducible representation) and defined over
(in other words, irreducible finite-dimensional representations over
are absolutely irreducible).
The irreducible finite-dimensional representations of over
are classified as follows. Let
be a Young diagram corresponding to a partition
of the number
, let
(respectively,
) be the subgroup of
consisting of all permutations mapping each of the numbers
into a number in the same row (respectively, column) of
. Then
![]() |
and
![]() |
where is the partition of
dual to
. There exists a unique irreducible representation
of
(depending on
only) with the following properties: 1) in the space
there is a non-zero vector
such that
for any
; and 2) in
there exists a non-zero vector
such that
for any
, where
is the parity (sign) of
. Representations corresponding to distinct partitions are not equivalent, and they exhaust all irreducible representations of
over
.
The vectors and
are defined uniquely up to multiplication by a scalar. For all diagrams corresponding to a partition
these vectors are normalized such that
and
for any
. Here
denotes the diagram obtained from
by applying to all numbers the permutation
. The vectors
(respectively,
) corresponding to standard diagrams
form a basis for
. In this basis the operators of the representation
have the form of integral matrices. The dimension of
is
![]() |
where ,
, and the product in the denominator of the last expression is taken over all cells
of the Young tableau
;
denotes the length of the corresponding hook.
To the partition corresponds the trivial one-dimensional representation of
, while to the partition
corresponds the non-trivial one-dimensional representation
(the parity or sign representation). To the partition
dual to
corresponds the representation
. The space
can be identified (in a canonical way, up to a homothety) with
, so that
for any
. Moreover, one may take
, where
is the diagram obtained from
by transposition.
The construction of a complete system of irreducible representations of a symmetric group invokes the use of the Young symmetrizer, and allows one to obtain the decomposition of the regular representation. If is the Young diagram corresponding to a partition
, then the representation
is equivalent to the representation of
in the left ideal of the group algebra
generated by the Young symmetrizer
. An a posteriori description of
is the following:
for
, and
is the operator, of rank 1, acting by the formula
for any
. Here
denotes the invariant scalar product in
, normalized in a suitable manner. Moreover,
![]() |
The Frobenius formula gives a generating function for the characters of . However, recurrence relations are more convenient to use when computing individual values of characters. The Murnagan–Nakayama rule is most effective: Let
be the value of a character of
on the class
of conjugate elements of
defined by a partition
of
, and suppose that
contains a number
. Denote by
the partition of
obtained from
by deleting
. Then
![]() |
where the sum is over all partitions of
obtained by deleting a skew hook of length
from the Young tableau
, and where
denotes the height of the skew hook taken out.
There is also a method (cf. [5]) by which one can find the entire table of characters of , i.e. the matrix
. Let
be the representation of
induced by the trivial one-dimensional representation of the subgroup
, where
is the Young diagram corresponding to the partition
. Let
and
. If one assumes that the rows and columns of
are positioned in order of lexicographically decreasing indices (partitions), then
is a lower-triangular matrix with 1's on the diagonal. The value of a character of
on a class
is equal to
![]() |
where is the order of the centralizer of the permutations (a representative) from
. The matrix
is upper triangular, and one has
, where
, from which
can be uniquely found. Then the matrix
is determined by
![]() |
The restriction of a representation of
to the subgroup
can be found by the ramification rule
![]() |
where the summation extends over all for which
(including
). The restriction of
to the subgroup
is absolutely irreducible for
and splits for
over a quadratic extension of
into a sum of two non-equivalent absolutely-irreducible representations of equal dimension. The representations of
thus obtained exhaust all its irreducible representations over
.
For representations of the symmetric groups in tensors see Representation of the classical groups.
The theory of modular representations of the symmetric groups has also been developed (see, e.g. [5]).
References
[1] | H. Weyl, "The classical groups, their invariants and representations" , Princeton Univ. Press (1946) MR0000255 Zbl 1024.20502 |
[2] | F.D. Murnagan, "The theory of group representations" , Johns Hopkins Univ. Press (1938) |
[3] | M. Hamermesh, "Group theory and its application to physical problems" , Addison-Wesley (1962) MR0136667 Zbl 0100.36704 |
[4] | C.W. Curtis, I. Reiner, "Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras" , Interscience (1962) MR0144979 Zbl 0131.25601 |
[5] | G.D. James, "The representation theory of the symmetric groups" , Springer (1978) MR0513828 Zbl 0393.20009 |
Comments
Let be the free Abelian group generated by the complex irreducible representations of the symmetric group on
letters,
. Now consider the direct sum
![]() |
It is possible to define a Hopf algebra structure on , as follows. First the multiplication. Let
and
be, respectively, representations of
and
. Taking the tensor product defines a representation
of
. Consider
as a subgroup of
in the natural way. The product of
and
in
is now defined by taking the induced representation to
:
![]() |
For the comultiplication restriction is used. Let be a representation of
. For every
,
, consider the restriction of
to
to obtain an element of
. The comultiplication of
is now defined by
![]() |
There is a unit mapping , defined by identifying
and
, and an augmentation
, defined by
identity on
and
if
. It is a theorem that
define a graded bi-algebra structure on
. There is also an antipode, making
a graded Hopf algebra.
This Hopf algebra can be explicitly described as follows. Consider the commutative ring of polynomials in infinitely many variables ,
,
,
![]() |
A co-algebra structure is given by
![]() |
and a co-unit by ,
for
. There is also an antipode, making
also a graded Hopf algebra. Perhaps the basic result in the representation theory of the symmetric groups is that
and
are isomorphic as Hopf algebras. The isomorphism is very nearly unique because, [a1],
![]() |
The individual components of
are also rings in themselves under the product of representations
,
. This defines a second multiplication on
, which is distributive over the first, and
becomes a ring object in the category of co-algebras over
. Such objects have been called Hopf algebras, [a6], and quite a few of them occur naturally in algebraic topology. The ring
occurs in algebraic topology as
, the cohomology of the classifying space
of complex
-theory, and there is a "natural direct isomorphism"
, [a3]. (This explains the notation used above for
: the "ci" stand for Chern classes, cf. Chern class.)
There is also an inner product on :
counts the number of irreducible representations that
and
have in common, and with respect to this inner product
is (graded) self-dual. In particular, the multiplication and comultiplication are adjoint to one another:
![]() |
which is the same as Frobenius reciprocity, cf. Induced representation, in this case.
As a coring object in the category of algebras , being the representing object
of the functor of Witt vectors, [a2], plays an important role in formal group theory. But, so far, no direct natural isomorphism has been found linking
with
in this manifestation.
The ring also carries the structure of a
-ring and it is in fact the universal
-ring on one generator,
, [a4], and this gives a natural isomorphism
, cf.
-ring for some more details.
Finally there is a canonical notion of positivity on : the actual (i.e. not virtual) representations are positive and the multiplication and comultiplication preserve positivity. This has led to the notion of a PSH-algebra, which stands for positive self-adjoint Hopf algebra, [a5]. Essentially,
is the unique PSH-algebra on one generator and all other are tensor products of graded shifted copies of
. This can be applied to other series of classical groups than the
, [a5].
In combinatorics the algebra also has a long history. In modern terminology it is at the basis of the so-called umbral calculus, [a7].
A modern reference to the representation theory of the symmetric groups, both ordinary and modular, is [a8].
References
[a1] | A. Liulevicius, "Arrows, symmetries, and representation rings" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 19 (1980) pp. 259–273 MR0593256 Zbl 0448.55013 |
[a2] | M. Hazewinkel, "Formal rings and applications" , Acad. Press (1978) |
[a3] | M.F. Atiyah, "Power operations in K-theory" Quarterly J. Math. (2) , 17 (1966) pp. 165–193 MR0202130 Zbl 0144.44901 |
[a4] | D. Knutson, "![]() |
[a5] | A.V. Zelevinsky, "Representations of finite classical groups" , Springer (1981) MR0643482 Zbl 0465.20009 |
[a6] | D.C. Ravenel, "The Hopf ring for complex cobordism" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 9 (1977) pp. 241–280 MR0448337 Zbl 0373.57020 |
[a7] | S. Roman, "The umbral calculus" , Acad. Press (1984) MR0741185 Zbl 0536.33001 |
[a8] | G. James, A. Kerber, "The representation theory of the symmetric group" , Addison-Wesley (1981) MR0644144 Zbl 0491.20010 |
[a9] | G. de B. Robinson, "Representation theory of the symmetric group" , Univ. Toronto Press (1961) MR1531490 MR0125885 Zbl 0102.02002 |
[a10] | J.A. Green, "Polynomial representations of ![]() |
Representation of the symmetric groups. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Representation_of_the_symmetric_groups&oldid=15150