Difference between revisions of "Trapezium formula"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | t0940301.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 26 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 26 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/T094/T.0904030 Trapezium formula | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | The special case of the [[Newton–Cotes quadrature formula|Newton–Cotes quadrature formula]] in which two nodes are taken: | |
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f ( x) dx \cong \ | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{b - a }{2} | ||
+ | } [ f ( a) + f ( b)]. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | If the integrand $ f $ | |
+ | differs strongly from a linear function, then formula (1) is not very exact. In this case the interval $ [ a, b] $ | ||
+ | is divided into $ n $ | ||
+ | subintervals $ [ x _ {i} , x _ {i + 1 } ] $, | ||
+ | $ i = 0 \dots n - 1 $, | ||
+ | of length $ h = ( b- a)/n $, | ||
+ | and for the calculation of the integral over $ [ x _ {i} , x _ {i + 1 } ] $ | ||
+ | one uses the trapezium formula | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \int\limits _ {x _ {i} } ^ { {x _ {i} + 1 } } | ||
+ | f ( x) dx \cong \ | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{h}{2} | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | [ f ( x _ {i} ) + f ( x _ {i + 1 } )]. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | Summation of the left- and right-hand sides of this approximate equality with respect to $ i $ | |
+ | from 0 to $ n - 1 $ | ||
+ | leads to the composite trapezium formula: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f ( x) dx \cong \ | ||
+ | h \left [ | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{f ( a) }{2} | ||
+ | } + | ||
+ | f ( x _ {1} ) + \dots + f ( x _ {n - 1 } ) + | ||
+ | { | ||
+ | \frac{f ( b) }{2} | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | \right ] , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | where $ x _ {j} = a + jh $, | |
+ | $ j = 0 \dots n $. | ||
+ | The quadrature formula (2) is also called the trapezium formula (without adding the word composite). The algebraic degree of accuracy of the quadrature formula (2), as well as of (1), is equal to 1. The quadrature formula (2) is exact for the trigonometric functions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \cos | ||
+ | \frac{2 \pi }{b - a } | ||
+ | kx,\ \ | ||
+ | \sin | ||
+ | \frac{2 \pi }{b - a } | ||
+ | kx,\ \ | ||
+ | k = 0 \dots n - 1. | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | In the case when $ b - a = 2 \pi $, | |
+ | formula (2) is exact for all trigonometric polynomials of order not exceeding $ n - 1 $; | ||
+ | furthermore, its trigonometric degree of accuracy is equal to $ n - 1 $. | ||
− | + | If the integrand $ f $ | |
+ | is twice-continuously differentiable on $ [ a, b] $, | ||
+ | then the error $ R ( f ) $ | ||
+ | of the quadrature formula (2), that is, the difference between the integral and the quadrature sum, is given by | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | R ( f ) = \ | ||
+ | - { | ||
+ | \frac{b - a }{12} | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | h ^ {2} f ^ { \prime\prime } ( \xi ), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $ \xi $ | ||
+ | is a point of $ [ a, b] $. | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
The complete formula | The complete formula | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f( x) dx = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | h \left [ f( | ||
+ | \frac{a)}{2} | ||
+ | + f( x _ {1} ) + \dots + f( x _ {n-} 1 ) | ||
+ | + f( | ||
+ | \frac{b)}{2} | ||
+ | \right ] - b- | ||
+ | \frac{a}{12} | ||
+ | h ^ {2} f ^ { \prime\prime } ( \xi ) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
is often referred to as the trapezoidal rule. | is often referred to as the trapezoidal rule. |
Revision as of 08:26, 6 June 2020
The special case of the Newton–Cotes quadrature formula in which two nodes are taken:
$$ \tag{1 } \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f ( x) dx \cong \ { \frac{b - a }{2} } [ f ( a) + f ( b)]. $$
If the integrand $ f $ differs strongly from a linear function, then formula (1) is not very exact. In this case the interval $ [ a, b] $ is divided into $ n $ subintervals $ [ x _ {i} , x _ {i + 1 } ] $, $ i = 0 \dots n - 1 $, of length $ h = ( b- a)/n $, and for the calculation of the integral over $ [ x _ {i} , x _ {i + 1 } ] $ one uses the trapezium formula
$$ \int\limits _ {x _ {i} } ^ { {x _ {i} + 1 } } f ( x) dx \cong \ { \frac{h}{2} } [ f ( x _ {i} ) + f ( x _ {i + 1 } )]. $$
Summation of the left- and right-hand sides of this approximate equality with respect to $ i $ from 0 to $ n - 1 $ leads to the composite trapezium formula:
$$ \tag{2 } \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f ( x) dx \cong \ h \left [ { \frac{f ( a) }{2} } + f ( x _ {1} ) + \dots + f ( x _ {n - 1 } ) + { \frac{f ( b) }{2} } \right ] , $$
where $ x _ {j} = a + jh $, $ j = 0 \dots n $. The quadrature formula (2) is also called the trapezium formula (without adding the word composite). The algebraic degree of accuracy of the quadrature formula (2), as well as of (1), is equal to 1. The quadrature formula (2) is exact for the trigonometric functions
$$ \cos \frac{2 \pi }{b - a } kx,\ \ \sin \frac{2 \pi }{b - a } kx,\ \ k = 0 \dots n - 1. $$
In the case when $ b - a = 2 \pi $, formula (2) is exact for all trigonometric polynomials of order not exceeding $ n - 1 $; furthermore, its trigonometric degree of accuracy is equal to $ n - 1 $.
If the integrand $ f $ is twice-continuously differentiable on $ [ a, b] $, then the error $ R ( f ) $ of the quadrature formula (2), that is, the difference between the integral and the quadrature sum, is given by
$$ R ( f ) = \ - { \frac{b - a }{12} } h ^ {2} f ^ { \prime\prime } ( \xi ), $$
where $ \xi $ is a point of $ [ a, b] $.
Comments
The complete formula
$$ \int\limits _ { a } ^ { b } f( x) dx = $$
$$ = \ h \left [ f( \frac{a)}{2} + f( x _ {1} ) + \dots + f( x _ {n-} 1 ) + f( \frac{b)}{2} \right ] - b- \frac{a}{12} h ^ {2} f ^ { \prime\prime } ( \xi ) $$
is often referred to as the trapezoidal rule.
References
[a1] | F.B. Hildebrand, "Introduction to numerical analysis" , Dover, reprint (1974) pp. 95ff |
[a2] | W.H. Press, B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, "Numerical recipes" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1986) pp. 105ff |
Trapezium formula. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Trapezium_formula&oldid=12696