Difference between revisions of "Conductor of an Abelian extension"
(cf Modulus in algebraic number theory) |
m (better) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{TEX|done}}{{MSC|11R}} | |
− | + | Let $L/K$ be an Abelian extension of [[global field]]s and let $N_{L/K} C_L$ be the corresponding subgroup of the idèle class group $C_K$ (cf. [[Class field theory]]). The conductor of an Abelian extension is the greatest common divisor of all positive divisors $n$ such that $L$ is contained in the ray class field $K^n$ (cf [[Modulus in algebraic number theory]]). | |
− | + | For an Abelian extension of local fields $L/K$ the conductor of $L/K$ is $\mathfrak{p}_K^n$, where $\mathfrak{p}_K$ is the maximal ideal of (the ring of integers $A_K$ of) $K$ and $n$ is the smallest integer such that $N_{L/K} L^* \subset U_K^n = \{ x \in A_K : x \equiv 1 \pmod{\mathfrak{p}_K^n} \}$, $U_K^0 = U_k = A_K^*$. (Thus, an Abelian extension is unramified if and only if its conductor is $A_K$.) The link between the local and global notion of a conductor of an Abelian extension is given by the theorem that the conductor $\mathfrak{f}$ of an Abelian extension $L/K$ of number fields is equal to $\prod_{\mathfrak{p}} \mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}}$, where $\mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is the conductor of the corresponding local extension $L_{\mathfrak{p}} / K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. Here for the infinite primes, $\mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}} = \mathfrak{p}$ or $1$ according to whether $L_{\mathfrak{p}} \neq K_{\mathfrak{p}}$ or $L_{\mathfrak{p}} = K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. | |
− | If $L/K$ is the cyclic extension of a local field $K$ with finite or algebraically closed residue field defined by a character $\chi$ of degree 1 of $\mathrm{Gal}(K^{\mathrm{s}}/K)$, then the conductor of $L/K$ is equal to $\mathfrak{p}_K^{\mathfrak{f}(\chi)}$, where $\mathfrak{f}(\chi)$ is the Artin conductor of the character $\chi$ (cf. [[ | + | The conductor ramification theorem of [[Class field theory|class field theory]] says that if $\mathfrak{f}$ is the conductor of a class field $L/K$, then $\mathfrak{f}$ is not divisible by any prime divisor which is unramified for $L/K$ and $\mathfrak{f}$ is divisible by any prime divisor that does ramify for $L/K$ (cf [[Ramification theory of valued fields]]). |
+ | |||
+ | If $L/K$ is the cyclic extension of a local field $K$ with finite or algebraically closed residue field defined by a character $\chi$ of degree 1 of $\mathrm{Gal}(K^{\mathrm{s}}/K)$, then the conductor of $L/K$ is equal to $\mathfrak{p}_K^{\mathfrak{f}(\chi)}$, where $\mathfrak{f}(\chi)$ is the Artin conductor of the character $\chi$ (cf. [[Conductor of a character]]). Here $K^{\mathrm{s}}$ is the separable algebraic closure of $K$. There is no such interpretation known for characters of higher degree. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
<TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Neukirch, "Class field theory" , Springer (1986) pp. Chapt. 4, Sect. 8</TD></TR> | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Neukirch, "Class field theory" , Springer (1986) pp. Chapt. 4, Sect. 8</TD></TR> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 19:42, 7 March 2018
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 11R [MSN][ZBL]
Let $L/K$ be an Abelian extension of global fields and let $N_{L/K} C_L$ be the corresponding subgroup of the idèle class group $C_K$ (cf. Class field theory). The conductor of an Abelian extension is the greatest common divisor of all positive divisors $n$ such that $L$ is contained in the ray class field $K^n$ (cf Modulus in algebraic number theory).
For an Abelian extension of local fields $L/K$ the conductor of $L/K$ is $\mathfrak{p}_K^n$, where $\mathfrak{p}_K$ is the maximal ideal of (the ring of integers $A_K$ of) $K$ and $n$ is the smallest integer such that $N_{L/K} L^* \subset U_K^n = \{ x \in A_K : x \equiv 1 \pmod{\mathfrak{p}_K^n} \}$, $U_K^0 = U_k = A_K^*$. (Thus, an Abelian extension is unramified if and only if its conductor is $A_K$.) The link between the local and global notion of a conductor of an Abelian extension is given by the theorem that the conductor $\mathfrak{f}$ of an Abelian extension $L/K$ of number fields is equal to $\prod_{\mathfrak{p}} \mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}}$, where $\mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is the conductor of the corresponding local extension $L_{\mathfrak{p}} / K_{\mathfrak{p}}$. Here for the infinite primes, $\mathfrak{f}_{\mathfrak{p}} = \mathfrak{p}$ or $1$ according to whether $L_{\mathfrak{p}} \neq K_{\mathfrak{p}}$ or $L_{\mathfrak{p}} = K_{\mathfrak{p}}$.
The conductor ramification theorem of class field theory says that if $\mathfrak{f}$ is the conductor of a class field $L/K$, then $\mathfrak{f}$ is not divisible by any prime divisor which is unramified for $L/K$ and $\mathfrak{f}$ is divisible by any prime divisor that does ramify for $L/K$ (cf Ramification theory of valued fields).
If $L/K$ is the cyclic extension of a local field $K$ with finite or algebraically closed residue field defined by a character $\chi$ of degree 1 of $\mathrm{Gal}(K^{\mathrm{s}}/K)$, then the conductor of $L/K$ is equal to $\mathfrak{p}_K^{\mathfrak{f}(\chi)}$, where $\mathfrak{f}(\chi)$ is the Artin conductor of the character $\chi$ (cf. Conductor of a character). Here $K^{\mathrm{s}}$ is the separable algebraic closure of $K$. There is no such interpretation known for characters of higher degree.
References
[a1] | J.-P. Serre, "Local fields" , Springer (1979) (Translated from French) |
[a2] | J. Neukirch, "Class field theory" , Springer (1986) pp. Chapt. 4, Sect. 8 |
Conductor of an Abelian extension. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Conductor_of_an_Abelian_extension&oldid=34000