Difference between revisions of "Solèr theorem"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (moved Soler theorem to Solèr theorem over redirect: accented title) |
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 76 formulas out of 76 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article, | |
+ | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | ||
+ | was used. | ||
+ | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Out of 76 formulas, 76 were replaced by TEX code.--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | Let $\mathcal{K}$ be a $*$-field, $E$ a left [[Vector space|vector space]] over $\mathcal{K}$, and $\langle \, .\, ,\, . \, \rangle$ an orthomodular form on $E$ that has an infinite orthonormal sequence (see below for definitions). Then Solèr's theorem states that $\mathcal{K}$ must be $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, or $\bf H$, and $\{ E , \mathcal{K} , \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \}$ is the corresponding [[Hilbert space|Hilbert space]] [[#References|[a7]]]. | ||
==Definitions.== | ==Definitions.== | ||
− | A | + | A $*$-field $\mathcal{K}$ is a (commutative or non-commutative) [[Field|field]] with involution. (An involution is a mapping $\alpha \mapsto \alpha ^ { * }$ of $\mathcal{K}$ onto itself that satisfies $( \alpha + \beta ) ^ { * } = \alpha ^ { * } + \beta ^ { * }$, $( \alpha \beta ) ^ { * } = \beta ^ { * } \alpha ^ { * }$, and $\alpha ^ { * * } = \alpha$ for all $\alpha , \beta \in \cal{K}$.) |
− | The set of real numbers | + | The set of real numbers $\mathbf{R}$ with the identity involution, the set of complex numbers $\mathbf{C}$ with complex conjugation as involution, and the set of real quaternions $\bf H$ with the usual quaternionic conjugation as involution are the three classical examples of $*$-fields. |
− | A Hermitian form | + | A Hermitian form $\langle \, .\, ,\, . \, \rangle$ on a left [[Vector space|vector space]] $E$ over a $*$-field $\mathcal{K}$ is a mapping $E \times E \rightarrow \mathcal{K}$ that associates to every pair of vectors $x , y \in E$ a scalar $\langle x , y \rangle \in \mathcal{K}$ in accordance with the following rules: |
− | i) it is linear in the first variable and conjugate linear with respect to | + | i) it is linear in the first variable and conjugate linear with respect to $*$ in the second variable (in short: it is conjugate bilinear); |
− | ii) | + | ii) $\langle a , x \rangle = 0$ or $\langle x , a \rangle = 0$ for all $x \in E$ implies $a = 0$ (in short: it is regular); |
− | iii) | + | iii) $\langle x , y \rangle ^ { * } = \langle y , x \rangle$ for all $x , y \in E$ (the Hermitian property). Two vectors $x$, $y$ in a Hermitian space $\{ E , \mathcal{K} , \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \}$ are orthogonal when $\langle x , y \rangle = 0$. A sequence $\{ e _ { i } : i = 1,2 , \ldots \}$ of non-zero vectors is called orthogonal when $\langle e _ { i } , e _ { j } \rangle = 0$ for $i \neq j$; and it is called orthonormal when also $\langle e _ { i } , e _ { i } \rangle = 1$, $i = 1,2 , \dots$. |
− | Given a non-empty subset | + | Given a non-empty subset $S$ of $E$, the symbol $S ^ { \perp }$ stands for the set of those elements in $E$ that are orthogonal to every element of $S$: |
− | + | \begin{equation*} S ^ { \perp } = \{ x \in E : \langle x , s \rangle = 0 \text { for all } s \in S \}. \end{equation*} | |
− | A subspace | + | A subspace $M$ of $E$ is called closed when $M = M ^ { \perp \perp }$. A Hermitian space is orthomodular when $M + M ^ { \perp } = E$ for every closed subspace $M$; in symbols: $\emptyset \neq M \subseteq E$ and $M = M ^ { \perp \perp }$ imply $M + M ^ { \perp } = E$. |
− | A Hilbert space is a Hermitian space over | + | A Hilbert space is a Hermitian space over $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, or $\bf H$ whose form is positive definite, i.e., $x \neq 0$ implies $\langle x , x \rangle > 0$, and which is complete with respect to the metric $\rho ( x , y ) = \langle x - y , x - y \rangle ^ { 1 / 2 }$ derived from that form. The well-known projection theorem asserts that a Hilbert space is orthomodular. |
==History.== | ==History.== | ||
There are two conclusions in Solèr's theorem: | There are two conclusions in Solèr's theorem: | ||
− | 1) the underlying | + | 1) the underlying $*$-field is $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$ or $\bf H$; and |
− | 2) the resulting space is metrically complete. The first conclusion, which materializes | + | 2) the resulting space is metrically complete. The first conclusion, which materializes $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, and $\bf H$ out of all possible $*$-fields, is Solèr's contribution. Of the two conclusions, the first is by far the most difficult to establish, the most striking in its appearance, and the most far-reaching in its consequences. The metric completeness was actually surmised earlier by C. Piron [[#References|[a5]]], then proved by I. Amemiya and H. Araki [[#References|[a1]]]. Keller's example of a "non-classical" Hilbert space shows that Solèr's result no longer holds if only orthomodularity is assumed [[#References|[a3]]]. Prior to Solèr's definitive result, a vital contribution was made by W.J. Wilbur [[#References|[a8]]]. |
− | M.P. Solèr is a student of the late Professor H. Gross. This result is her 1994 doctoral thesis at the University of Zürich. The volume [[#References|[a4]]] is a paean to the legacy of Gross. Reference [[#References|[a4]]], Article by Keller–Künzi–Solèr, discusses the orthomodular axiom in depth, and contains a detailed proof of Solèr's theorem in the case where | + | M.P. Solèr is a student of the late Professor H. Gross. This result is her 1994 doctoral thesis at the University of Zürich. The volume [[#References|[a4]]] is a paean to the legacy of Gross. Reference [[#References|[a4]]], Article by Keller–Künzi–Solèr, discusses the orthomodular axiom in depth, and contains a detailed proof of Solèr's theorem in the case where $\mathcal{K}$ is commutative with the identity involution. Another proof of Solèr's theorem in the general case has been provided by A. Prestel [[#References|[a6]]]. Solèr's theorem has applications to Baer $*$-rings, infinite-dimensional projective geometries, orthomodular lattices, and quantum logic [[#References|[a2]]]. |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table>< | + | <table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> I. Amemiya, H. Araki, "A remark on Piron's paper" ''Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.'' , '''A2''' (1966/67) pp. 423–427</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> S.S. Holland Jr., "Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions: a theorem of M. Solèr" ''Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''32''' (1995) pp. 205–234</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top"> H.A. Keller, "Ein nicht-klassischer Hilbertscher Raum" ''Math. Z.'' , '''172''' (1980) pp. 41–49</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top"> "Orthogonal geometry in infinite dimensional spaces" H.A. Keller (ed.) U.-M. Künzi (ed.) M. Wild (ed.) , ''Bayreuth. Math. Schrift.'' , '''53''' (1998)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Piron, "Axiomatique quantique" ''Helv. Phys. Acta'' , '''37''' (1964) pp. 439–468</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> A. Prestel, "On Solèr's characterization of Hilbert spaces" ''Manuscripta Math.'' , '''86''' (1995) pp. 225–238</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top"> M.P. Solèr, "Characterization of Hilbert spaces with orthomodular spaces" ''Commun. Algebra'' , '''23''' (1995) pp. 219–243</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a8]</td> <td valign="top"> W. John Wilbur, "On characterizing the standard quantum logics" ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''233''' (1977) pp. 265–292</td></tr></table> |
Latest revision as of 15:30, 1 July 2020
Let $\mathcal{K}$ be a $*$-field, $E$ a left vector space over $\mathcal{K}$, and $\langle \, .\, ,\, . \, \rangle$ an orthomodular form on $E$ that has an infinite orthonormal sequence (see below for definitions). Then Solèr's theorem states that $\mathcal{K}$ must be $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, or $\bf H$, and $\{ E , \mathcal{K} , \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \}$ is the corresponding Hilbert space [a7].
Definitions.
A $*$-field $\mathcal{K}$ is a (commutative or non-commutative) field with involution. (An involution is a mapping $\alpha \mapsto \alpha ^ { * }$ of $\mathcal{K}$ onto itself that satisfies $( \alpha + \beta ) ^ { * } = \alpha ^ { * } + \beta ^ { * }$, $( \alpha \beta ) ^ { * } = \beta ^ { * } \alpha ^ { * }$, and $\alpha ^ { * * } = \alpha$ for all $\alpha , \beta \in \cal{K}$.)
The set of real numbers $\mathbf{R}$ with the identity involution, the set of complex numbers $\mathbf{C}$ with complex conjugation as involution, and the set of real quaternions $\bf H$ with the usual quaternionic conjugation as involution are the three classical examples of $*$-fields.
A Hermitian form $\langle \, .\, ,\, . \, \rangle$ on a left vector space $E$ over a $*$-field $\mathcal{K}$ is a mapping $E \times E \rightarrow \mathcal{K}$ that associates to every pair of vectors $x , y \in E$ a scalar $\langle x , y \rangle \in \mathcal{K}$ in accordance with the following rules:
i) it is linear in the first variable and conjugate linear with respect to $*$ in the second variable (in short: it is conjugate bilinear);
ii) $\langle a , x \rangle = 0$ or $\langle x , a \rangle = 0$ for all $x \in E$ implies $a = 0$ (in short: it is regular);
iii) $\langle x , y \rangle ^ { * } = \langle y , x \rangle$ for all $x , y \in E$ (the Hermitian property). Two vectors $x$, $y$ in a Hermitian space $\{ E , \mathcal{K} , \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle \}$ are orthogonal when $\langle x , y \rangle = 0$. A sequence $\{ e _ { i } : i = 1,2 , \ldots \}$ of non-zero vectors is called orthogonal when $\langle e _ { i } , e _ { j } \rangle = 0$ for $i \neq j$; and it is called orthonormal when also $\langle e _ { i } , e _ { i } \rangle = 1$, $i = 1,2 , \dots$.
Given a non-empty subset $S$ of $E$, the symbol $S ^ { \perp }$ stands for the set of those elements in $E$ that are orthogonal to every element of $S$:
\begin{equation*} S ^ { \perp } = \{ x \in E : \langle x , s \rangle = 0 \text { for all } s \in S \}. \end{equation*}
A subspace $M$ of $E$ is called closed when $M = M ^ { \perp \perp }$. A Hermitian space is orthomodular when $M + M ^ { \perp } = E$ for every closed subspace $M$; in symbols: $\emptyset \neq M \subseteq E$ and $M = M ^ { \perp \perp }$ imply $M + M ^ { \perp } = E$.
A Hilbert space is a Hermitian space over $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, or $\bf H$ whose form is positive definite, i.e., $x \neq 0$ implies $\langle x , x \rangle > 0$, and which is complete with respect to the metric $\rho ( x , y ) = \langle x - y , x - y \rangle ^ { 1 / 2 }$ derived from that form. The well-known projection theorem asserts that a Hilbert space is orthomodular.
History.
There are two conclusions in Solèr's theorem:
1) the underlying $*$-field is $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$ or $\bf H$; and
2) the resulting space is metrically complete. The first conclusion, which materializes $\mathbf{R}$, $\mathbf{C}$, and $\bf H$ out of all possible $*$-fields, is Solèr's contribution. Of the two conclusions, the first is by far the most difficult to establish, the most striking in its appearance, and the most far-reaching in its consequences. The metric completeness was actually surmised earlier by C. Piron [a5], then proved by I. Amemiya and H. Araki [a1]. Keller's example of a "non-classical" Hilbert space shows that Solèr's result no longer holds if only orthomodularity is assumed [a3]. Prior to Solèr's definitive result, a vital contribution was made by W.J. Wilbur [a8].
M.P. Solèr is a student of the late Professor H. Gross. This result is her 1994 doctoral thesis at the University of Zürich. The volume [a4] is a paean to the legacy of Gross. Reference [a4], Article by Keller–Künzi–Solèr, discusses the orthomodular axiom in depth, and contains a detailed proof of Solèr's theorem in the case where $\mathcal{K}$ is commutative with the identity involution. Another proof of Solèr's theorem in the general case has been provided by A. Prestel [a6]. Solèr's theorem has applications to Baer $*$-rings, infinite-dimensional projective geometries, orthomodular lattices, and quantum logic [a2].
References
[a1] | I. Amemiya, H. Araki, "A remark on Piron's paper" Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , A2 (1966/67) pp. 423–427 |
[a2] | S.S. Holland Jr., "Orthomodularity in infinite dimensions: a theorem of M. Solèr" Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 32 (1995) pp. 205–234 |
[a3] | H.A. Keller, "Ein nicht-klassischer Hilbertscher Raum" Math. Z. , 172 (1980) pp. 41–49 |
[a4] | "Orthogonal geometry in infinite dimensional spaces" H.A. Keller (ed.) U.-M. Künzi (ed.) M. Wild (ed.) , Bayreuth. Math. Schrift. , 53 (1998) |
[a5] | C. Piron, "Axiomatique quantique" Helv. Phys. Acta , 37 (1964) pp. 439–468 |
[a6] | A. Prestel, "On Solèr's characterization of Hilbert spaces" Manuscripta Math. , 86 (1995) pp. 225–238 |
[a7] | M.P. Solèr, "Characterization of Hilbert spaces with orthomodular spaces" Commun. Algebra , 23 (1995) pp. 219–243 |
[a8] | W. John Wilbur, "On characterizing the standard quantum logics" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 233 (1977) pp. 265–292 |
Solèr theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Sol%C3%A8r_theorem&oldid=23532