Difference between revisions of "Derivation in a ring"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <!-- | |
+ | d0312101.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 98 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 98 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/D031/D.0301210 Derivation in a ring | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
− | + | {{TEX|auto}} | |
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | + | A mapping $ \partial $ | |
+ | of a ring $ R $ | ||
+ | into itself which is an endomorphism of the additive group of $ R $ | ||
+ | and satisfies the relation usually referred to as the [[Leibniz rule]] | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \partial ( x \cdot y ) = x \partial ( y) + \partial ( x) y . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | Let $ M $ | |
+ | be a left $ R $- | ||
+ | module. A derivation in $ R $ | ||
+ | with values in $ M $ | ||
+ | is a homomorphism of the respective additive groups which satisfies the condition | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \partial ( x \cdot y ) = x \partial ( y) + y \partial ( x) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | defines the structure of a | + | for all $ x , y $ |
+ | from $ R $. | ||
+ | For any element $ c $ | ||
+ | from the centre $ C $ | ||
+ | of $ R $, | ||
+ | the mapping $ x \rightarrow c \partial ( x) $, | ||
+ | where $ \partial $ | ||
+ | is a derivation, is a derivation. The sum of two derivations is also a derivation. This defines the structure of a $ C $- | ||
+ | module on the set of all derivations in $ R $ | ||
+ | with values in $ M $, | ||
+ | denoted by $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $. | ||
+ | If $ S $ | ||
+ | is a subring in $ R $, | ||
+ | a derivation $ \partial $ | ||
+ | such that $ \partial ( s) = 0 $ | ||
+ | for all $ s \in S $ | ||
+ | is known as an $ S $- | ||
+ | derivation. The set of all $ S $- | ||
+ | derivations forms a submodule in $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $, | ||
+ | denoted by $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $. | ||
+ | The operation | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | [ \partial , \partial ^ \prime ] = \partial \circ \partial ^ \prime - \partial ^ \prime \circ \partial | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | defines the structure of a Lie $ S $- | |
+ | algebra on the $ S $- | ||
+ | module $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $. | ||
+ | If $ \phi : R \rightarrow M $ | ||
+ | is a homomorphism of $ R $- | ||
+ | modules, then the composition $ \phi \circ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $ | ||
+ | for any $ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R ) $. | ||
− | + | Let $ R $ | |
+ | be a ring of polynomials $ A [ T _ {1} \dots T _ {n} ] $ | ||
+ | with coefficients in a commutative ring $ A $. | ||
+ | The mapping | ||
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | \frac \partial {\partial T _ {j} } | |
+ | : F ( T _ {1} \dots T _ {n} ) = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = \ | ||
+ | \sum a _ {i _ {1} \dots i _ {n} } T _ {1} ^ {i _ {1} } \dots | ||
+ | T _ {n} ^ {i _ {n} } \rightarrow \sum a _ {i _ {1} \dots i _ {n} } i _ {j} T _ {1} ^ {i _ {1} } \dots T _ {j} ^ {i _ {j} - 1 } \dots T _ {n} ^ {i _ {n} } | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | is an $ A $- | |
+ | derivation in $ R $, | ||
+ | and the $ R $- | ||
+ | module $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {A} ( R , R ) $ | ||
+ | is a free module with basis $ \partial / \partial T _ {1} \dots \partial / \partial T _ {n} $. | ||
− | + | For any element $ a $ | |
+ | of an associative ring (or a Lie algebra) $ R $ | ||
+ | the mapping $ x \rightarrow ax - xa $( | ||
+ | or $ x \rightarrow ax $) | ||
+ | is a derivation in $ R $, | ||
+ | known as an inner derivation. Derivations which are not inner are known as outer. | ||
− | is an | + | If $ R $ |
+ | is a subring of a ring $ R ^ { \prime } $ | ||
+ | and if $ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R ) $, | ||
+ | one says that $ \overline \partial \; \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R ^ { \prime } , R ^ { \prime } ) $ | ||
+ | is an extension of $ \partial $ | ||
+ | if the restriction of $ \overline \partial \; $ | ||
+ | to $ R $ | ||
+ | coincides with $ \partial $. | ||
+ | If $ R $ | ||
+ | is a commutative integral ring and $ R ^ { \prime } $ | ||
+ | is its field of fractions, and also if $ R ^ { \prime } $ | ||
+ | is a separable algebraic extension of the field $ R $ | ||
+ | or if $ R $ | ||
+ | is a Lie algebra over a field $ k $ | ||
+ | and $ R ^ { \prime } $ | ||
+ | is its enveloping algebra, there exists a unique extension of any derivation $ \partial : R \rightarrow R $ | ||
+ | to $ R ^ { \prime } $. | ||
− | + | There is a close connection between derivations and ring isomorphisms. Thus, if $ \partial $ | |
− | + | is a nilpotent derivation, that is, for some $ n $, | |
+ | $ \partial ^ {n} = 0 $, | ||
+ | and $ R $ | ||
+ | is an algebra over a field of characteristic zero, the mapping | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm exp} ( \partial ) = 1 + \partial + | ||
+ | \frac{\partial ^ {2} }{2!} | ||
+ | + \dots + | ||
+ | \frac{\partial ^ {n-} 1 }{( n - 1 ) ! } | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | is an automorphism of the $ k $- | ||
+ | algebra $ R $. | ||
+ | If $ R $ | ||
+ | is a local commutative ring with maximal ideal $ \mathfrak m $, | ||
+ | there is a bijection between the set of derivations $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R / \mathfrak m ) $ | ||
+ | and the set of automorphisms of the ring $ R / \mathfrak m ^ {2} $ | ||
+ | which induces the identity automorphism of the residue field $ R / \mathfrak m $. | ||
+ | Derivations of non-separable field extensions play the role of elements of the Galois group of separable extensions in the Galois theory of such extensions [[#References|[4]]]. | ||
+ | ====References==== | ||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Bourbaki, "Algebra" , ''Elements of mathematics'' , '''1''' , Addison-Wesley (1973) (Translated from French)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> N. Jacobson, "The theory of rings" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1943)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Mordeson, B. Vinograde, "Structure of arbitrary purely inseparable extension fields" , Springer (1970)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The | + | The $ S $- |
+ | derivations in $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $ | ||
+ | are precisely the $ S $- | ||
+ | linear mappings from $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $. | ||
+ | If $ A $ | ||
+ | is an $ R $- | ||
+ | algebra, then a derivation in $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( A , R ) $ | ||
+ | is a [[Crossed homomorphism|crossed homomorphism]] $ A \rightarrow R $ | ||
+ | or, equivalently, a Hochschild $ 1 $- | ||
+ | cocycle. | ||
− | If the Lie algebra | + | If the Lie algebra $ \mathfrak g $ |
+ | is semi-simple, all derivations $ \mathfrak g \rightarrow \mathfrak g $ | ||
+ | are inner, i.e. in that case $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( \mathfrak g , \mathfrak g ) \simeq \mathfrak g $. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $ R $ |
+ | be any algebra (or ring), not necessarily commutative or associative. The algebra is said to be [[Lie-admissible algebra|Lie admissible]] if the associated algebra $ \overline{R}\; $ | ||
+ | with multiplication $ [ a , b ] = a b - b a $ | ||
+ | is a Lie algebra. Associative algebras and Lie algebras are Lie admissible, but there are also other examples. These algebras were introduced by A.A. Albert in 1948. | ||
− | A ring | + | A ring $ R $ |
+ | together with a derivation $ \partial $ | ||
+ | is a [[differential ring]], cf. also [[Differential-algebra(2)|Differential algebra]] and [[Differential field]]. |
Latest revision as of 17:32, 5 June 2020
A mapping $ \partial $
of a ring $ R $
into itself which is an endomorphism of the additive group of $ R $
and satisfies the relation usually referred to as the Leibniz rule
$$ \partial ( x \cdot y ) = x \partial ( y) + \partial ( x) y . $$
Let $ M $ be a left $ R $- module. A derivation in $ R $ with values in $ M $ is a homomorphism of the respective additive groups which satisfies the condition
$$ \partial ( x \cdot y ) = x \partial ( y) + y \partial ( x) $$
for all $ x , y $ from $ R $. For any element $ c $ from the centre $ C $ of $ R $, the mapping $ x \rightarrow c \partial ( x) $, where $ \partial $ is a derivation, is a derivation. The sum of two derivations is also a derivation. This defines the structure of a $ C $- module on the set of all derivations in $ R $ with values in $ M $, denoted by $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $. If $ S $ is a subring in $ R $, a derivation $ \partial $ such that $ \partial ( s) = 0 $ for all $ s \in S $ is known as an $ S $- derivation. The set of all $ S $- derivations forms a submodule in $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $, denoted by $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $. The operation
$$ [ \partial , \partial ^ \prime ] = \partial \circ \partial ^ \prime - \partial ^ \prime \circ \partial $$
defines the structure of a Lie $ S $- algebra on the $ S $- module $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $. If $ \phi : R \rightarrow M $ is a homomorphism of $ R $- modules, then the composition $ \phi \circ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $ for any $ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R ) $.
Let $ R $ be a ring of polynomials $ A [ T _ {1} \dots T _ {n} ] $ with coefficients in a commutative ring $ A $. The mapping
$$ \frac \partial {\partial T _ {j} } : F ( T _ {1} \dots T _ {n} ) = $$
$$ = \ \sum a _ {i _ {1} \dots i _ {n} } T _ {1} ^ {i _ {1} } \dots T _ {n} ^ {i _ {n} } \rightarrow \sum a _ {i _ {1} \dots i _ {n} } i _ {j} T _ {1} ^ {i _ {1} } \dots T _ {j} ^ {i _ {j} - 1 } \dots T _ {n} ^ {i _ {n} } $$
is an $ A $- derivation in $ R $, and the $ R $- module $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {A} ( R , R ) $ is a free module with basis $ \partial / \partial T _ {1} \dots \partial / \partial T _ {n} $.
For any element $ a $ of an associative ring (or a Lie algebra) $ R $ the mapping $ x \rightarrow ax - xa $( or $ x \rightarrow ax $) is a derivation in $ R $, known as an inner derivation. Derivations which are not inner are known as outer.
If $ R $ is a subring of a ring $ R ^ { \prime } $ and if $ \partial \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R ) $, one says that $ \overline \partial \; \in \mathop{\rm Der} ( R ^ { \prime } , R ^ { \prime } ) $ is an extension of $ \partial $ if the restriction of $ \overline \partial \; $ to $ R $ coincides with $ \partial $. If $ R $ is a commutative integral ring and $ R ^ { \prime } $ is its field of fractions, and also if $ R ^ { \prime } $ is a separable algebraic extension of the field $ R $ or if $ R $ is a Lie algebra over a field $ k $ and $ R ^ { \prime } $ is its enveloping algebra, there exists a unique extension of any derivation $ \partial : R \rightarrow R $ to $ R ^ { \prime } $.
There is a close connection between derivations and ring isomorphisms. Thus, if $ \partial $ is a nilpotent derivation, that is, for some $ n $, $ \partial ^ {n} = 0 $, and $ R $ is an algebra over a field of characteristic zero, the mapping
$$ \mathop{\rm exp} ( \partial ) = 1 + \partial + \frac{\partial ^ {2} }{2!} + \dots + \frac{\partial ^ {n-} 1 }{( n - 1 ) ! } $$
is an automorphism of the $ k $- algebra $ R $. If $ R $ is a local commutative ring with maximal ideal $ \mathfrak m $, there is a bijection between the set of derivations $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , R / \mathfrak m ) $ and the set of automorphisms of the ring $ R / \mathfrak m ^ {2} $ which induces the identity automorphism of the residue field $ R / \mathfrak m $. Derivations of non-separable field extensions play the role of elements of the Galois group of separable extensions in the Galois theory of such extensions [4].
References
[1] | N. Bourbaki, "Algebra" , Elements of mathematics , 1 , Addison-Wesley (1973) (Translated from French) |
[2] | N. Jacobson, "The theory of rings" , Amer. Math. Soc. (1943) |
[3] | S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974) |
[4] | J. Mordeson, B. Vinograde, "Structure of arbitrary purely inseparable extension fields" , Springer (1970) |
Comments
The $ S $- derivations in $ \mathop{\rm Der} _ {S} ( R , M ) $ are precisely the $ S $- linear mappings from $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( R , M ) $. If $ A $ is an $ R $- algebra, then a derivation in $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( A , R ) $ is a crossed homomorphism $ A \rightarrow R $ or, equivalently, a Hochschild $ 1 $- cocycle.
If the Lie algebra $ \mathfrak g $ is semi-simple, all derivations $ \mathfrak g \rightarrow \mathfrak g $ are inner, i.e. in that case $ \mathop{\rm Der} ( \mathfrak g , \mathfrak g ) \simeq \mathfrak g $.
Let $ R $ be any algebra (or ring), not necessarily commutative or associative. The algebra is said to be Lie admissible if the associated algebra $ \overline{R}\; $ with multiplication $ [ a , b ] = a b - b a $ is a Lie algebra. Associative algebras and Lie algebras are Lie admissible, but there are also other examples. These algebras were introduced by A.A. Albert in 1948.
A ring $ R $ together with a derivation $ \partial $ is a differential ring, cf. also Differential algebra and Differential field.
Derivation in a ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Derivation_in_a_ring&oldid=17037