Difference between revisions of "Distortion theorems"
(Importing text file) |
m (fixing \ln) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | d0334602.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 123 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 123 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/D033/D.0303460 Distortion theorems | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''under conformal mapping of planar domains'' | ''under conformal mapping of planar domains'' | ||
− | Theorems characterizing the distortion of line elements at a given point of a domain, as well as the distortion of the domain and its subsets, and the distortion of the boundary of the domain under a [[Conformal mapping|conformal mapping]]. Estimates of the modulus of the derivatives of an analytic function at a point of a domain belong first of all to distortion theorems. The statement, for functions in the class | + | Theorems characterizing the distortion of line elements at a given point of a domain, as well as the distortion of the domain and its subsets, and the distortion of the boundary of the domain under a [[Conformal mapping|conformal mapping]]. Estimates of the modulus of the derivatives of an analytic function at a point of a domain belong first of all to distortion theorems. The statement, for functions in the class $ \Sigma $ |
+ | of functions | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + | ||
+ | \alpha _ {0} + | ||
− | + | \frac{\alpha _ {1} } \zeta | |
+ | + \dots , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | meromorphic and univalent in | + | meromorphic and univalent in $ | \zeta | > 1 $, |
+ | that for all $ \zeta _ {0} $, | ||
+ | $ 1 < | \zeta _ {0} | < \infty $, | ||
+ | the inequality | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | 1 - | ||
+ | \frac{1}{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} } | ||
+ | |||
+ | \leq | F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \frac{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} }{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} - 1 } | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
holds, is a distortion theorem. | holds, is a distortion theorem. | ||
Line 13: | Line 43: | ||
Equality at the left-hand side of (1) holds only for the functions | Equality at the left-hand side of (1) holds only for the functions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | F _ {1} ( \zeta ) = \zeta + | ||
+ | \alpha _ {0} + \zeta _ {0} ( \overline \zeta_ {0} \zeta ) ^ {- 1} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
while at the right-hand side equality holds only for the functions | while at the right-hand side equality holds only for the functions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | F _ {2} ( \zeta ) = \ | ||
− | + | \frac{\zeta - \zeta _ {0} }{1 - ( \overline \zeta_ {0} \zeta ) ^ {- 1} } | |
− | + | + \beta _ {0} . | |
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | Here $ \alpha _ {0} $ | |
+ | and $ \beta _ {0} $ | ||
+ | are two arbitrary fixed numbers. The functions $ w = F _ {1} ( \zeta ) $ | ||
+ | map the domain $ | \zeta | > 1 $ | ||
+ | onto the $ w $-plane with slit along the interval connecting the points $ \alpha _ {0} - 2 \zeta _ {0} / | \zeta _ {0} | $ | ||
+ | and $ \alpha _ {0} + 2 \zeta _ {0} / | \zeta _ {0} | $. | ||
+ | The functions $ w = F _ {2} ( \zeta ) $ | ||
+ | map the domain $ | \zeta | > 1 $ | ||
+ | onto the $ w $-plane with slit along an arc of the circle $ | w- \beta _ {0} | = | \zeta _ {0} | $ | ||
+ | with mid-point $ \beta _ {0} - \zeta _ {0} $. | ||
+ | Inequality (1) is easily obtained from the Grunsky inequality | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | | \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | ||
+ | - \ln \left ( 1 - | ||
+ | \frac{1}{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} } | ||
+ | \right ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | which determines the range of values of the functional $ \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) $ | |
+ | on the class $ \Sigma $. | ||
+ | On the other hand, inequality (1) is a direct consequence of Goluzin's theorem: If $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $, | ||
+ | then for any two points $ \zeta _ {1} , \zeta _ {2} $ | ||
+ | with $ | \zeta _ {1} | = | \zeta _ {2} | = \rho $, | ||
+ | $ 1 < \rho < \infty $, | ||
+ | the sharp inequality | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | \left | | ||
+ | \ln | ||
+ | |||
+ | \frac{F ( \zeta _ {1} ) - F ( \zeta _ {0} ) }{\zeta _ {1} - \zeta _ {2} } | ||
+ | |||
+ | \right | \leq - | ||
+ | \ln | ||
+ | \left ( 1 - | ||
+ | \frac{1}{\rho ^ {2} } | ||
+ | \right ) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | holds, where, moreover, the equality sign is attained for the functions $ F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + e ^ {i \alpha } / \zeta $, | ||
+ | where $ \alpha $ | ||
+ | is a real constant. Inequality (2) also implies the chord-distortion theorem (cf. [[#References|[1]]]). If $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $, | ||
+ | then for any two points $ \zeta _ {1} , \zeta _ {2} $ | ||
+ | on the circle $ | \zeta | = \rho > 1 $ | ||
+ | the sharp inequality | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \left | | ||
+ | |||
+ | \frac{F ( \zeta _ {1} ) - F ( \zeta _ {2} ) }{\zeta _ {1} - \zeta _ {2} } | ||
+ | \ | ||
+ | \right | \geq \ | ||
+ | 1 - | ||
+ | \frac{1}{\rho ^ {2} } | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
holds. Equality in this case is only attained for the functions | holds. Equality in this case is only attained for the functions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + C + | ||
+ | |||
+ | \frac{e ^ {2 i \phi } } \zeta | ||
+ | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $ C $ | ||
+ | is a constant and $ \phi = ( \mathop{\rm arg} \zeta _ {1} + \mathop{\rm arg} \zeta _ {2} ) / 2 $. | ||
+ | Various generalizations of (2) are known. These give the ranges of values of corresponding functionals and are sharpened versions of distortion theorems for $ \Sigma $ | ||
+ | or its subclasses (cf., e.g., [[#References|[1]]]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the class $ S $ | ||
+ | of functions | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | f ( z) = z + | ||
+ | c _ {2} z ^ {2} + \dots | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | that are regular and univalent in the disc $ | z | < 1 $, | |
+ | the following sharp inequalities are valid for $ 0 < | z _ {0} | < 1 $: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{3 } | |
− | + | \frac{1 - | z _ {0} | }{( 1 + | z _ {0} | ) ^ {3} } | |
− | + | \leq | f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) | \leq \ | |
− | + | \frac{1 + | z _ {0} | }{( 1 - | z _ {0} | ) ^ {3} } | |
+ | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{4 } | |
− | + | \frac{| z _ {0} | }{( 1 + | z _ {0} | ) | |
+ | ^ {2} } | ||
+ | \leq | f ( z _ {0} ) | \leq | ||
+ | \frac{| z _ {0} | }{( 1 - | z _ {0} | ) ^ {2} } | ||
+ | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{5 } | |
− | + | \frac{1 - | z _ {0} | }{1 + | z _ {0} | } | |
+ | \leq \left | | ||
+ | \frac{z _ {0} f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) }{f ( z _ {0} ) } | ||
+ | \right | \leq | ||
+ | \frac{1 | ||
+ | + | z _ {0} | }{1 - | z _ {0} | } | ||
+ | . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | The estimates (4) and (5) follow from (3). The inequalities (3)–(5) are called the distortion theorems for $ S $. | ||
+ | The lower bounds are realized only by the functions | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | f _ \alpha ( z) = \ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \frac{z}{( 1 + e ^ {- i \alpha } z ) ^ {2} } | ||
+ | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
while the upper bounds are realized only by the functions | while the upper bounds are realized only by the functions | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | f _ {\pi + \alpha } ( z) = \ | ||
− | where | + | \frac{z}{( 1 - e ^ {- i \alpha } z ) ^ {2} } |
+ | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where $ \alpha = \mathop{\rm arg} z _ {0} $. | ||
+ | The functions $ w = f _ \alpha ( z) $, | ||
+ | $ 0 \leq \alpha < 2 \pi $, | ||
+ | known as the Koebe functions, map the disc $ | z | < 1 $ | ||
+ | onto the $ w $-plane with slit along the ray $ \mathop{\rm arg} w = \alpha $, | ||
+ | $ | w | \geq 1 / 4 $. | ||
+ | They are extremal in a number of problems in the theory of univalent functions. Koebe's $ 1 / 4 $-theorem holds: The domain that is the image of the disc $ | z | < 1 $ | ||
+ | under a mapping $ w = f ( z) $, | ||
+ | $ f \in S $, | ||
+ | always contains the disc $ | w | < 1 / 4 $, | ||
+ | and the point $ w = e ^ {i \alpha } / 4 $ | ||
+ | lies on the boundary of this domain only for $ f ( z) = f _ \alpha ( z ) $. | ||
The estimates (3)–(5) are simple consequences of results on the ranges of the functionals | The estimates (3)–(5) are simple consequences of results on the ranges of the functionals | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \ln f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) ,\ \ | ||
+ | \ln | ||
− | + | \frac{f ( z _ {0} ) }{z _ {0} } | |
+ | ,\ \ | ||
+ | \ln | ||
+ | \frac{z f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) }{f ( z _ {0} ) } | ||
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | on $ S $( | |
+ | cf. [[#References|[2]]]). | ||
− | + | Let $ \Sigma _ {0} $ | |
+ | be the class of functions $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $ | ||
+ | with $ F ( \zeta ) \neq 0 $ | ||
+ | for $ 1 < | \zeta | < \infty $. | ||
+ | Between functions in $ S $ | ||
+ | and $ \Sigma _ {0} $ | ||
+ | there is the following relation: If $ f ( z) \in S $, | ||
+ | then $ F ( \zeta ) = 1 / f ( 1 / \zeta ) \in \Sigma _ {0} $, | ||
+ | and, conversely, if $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma _ {0} $, | ||
+ | then $ f ( z) = 1 / F ( 1 / z ) \in S $. | ||
+ | Hence, the range of some functional (or system of functionals) on $ S $ | ||
+ | is determined by the range of the corresponding functional (system of functionals) on $ \Sigma _ {0} $, | ||
+ | vice versa. E.g., the range of $ \ln f ( z _ {0} ) / z _ {0} $, | ||
+ | $ 0 < | z _ {0} | < 1 $, | ||
+ | on $ S $ | ||
+ | is easily obtained from that of $ \ln F ( \zeta _ {0} ) / \zeta _ {0} $, | ||
+ | $ 1 < | \zeta _ {0} | < \infty $, | ||
+ | on $ \Sigma _ {0} $. | ||
− | < | + | For functions that are regular and bounded in a disc, the [[Schwarz lemma|Schwarz lemma]] (cf. [[#References|[1]]]) and its generalizations, as well as the following boundary-distortion theorem of Löwner are examples of distortion theorems. Löwner's theorem: For a function $ \phi ( z) $ |
+ | that is regular in $ | z | < 1 $ | ||
+ | with $ \phi ( 0) = 0 $, | ||
+ | $ | \phi ( z) | < 1 $ | ||
+ | in $ | z | < 1 $ | ||
+ | and $ | \phi ( z) | = 1 $ | ||
+ | on an arc $ A $ | ||
+ | of $ | z | = 1 $, | ||
+ | the length of the image of $ A $ | ||
+ | is not smaller than the length of $ A $ | ||
+ | itself, and equality only holds for the functions $ \phi ( z) = e ^ {i \alpha } z $, | ||
+ | with $ \alpha $ | ||
+ | a real number. | ||
− | + | In the class of functions that are univalent in a given multiply-connected domain, the minimum (respectively, maximum) modulus of the derivative at a given point of the domain is attained only for mappings of this domain onto a domain with radial (resp. circular concentric) slits. For unbounded mappings the following theorem holds: Let $ D $ | |
+ | be a finitely-connected domain in the $ \zeta $-plane containing the point at infinity, let $ \Sigma ( D) $ | ||
+ | be the class of univalent functions $ F ( \zeta ) $ | ||
+ | in $ D $ | ||
+ | that have in a neighbourhood of $ \zeta = \infty $ | ||
+ | the expansion | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | F ( \zeta ) = \zeta | ||
+ | + \alpha _ {0} + | ||
− | + | \frac{\alpha _ {1} } \zeta | |
− | + | + \dots , | |
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | and let $ \zeta _ {0} \neq \infty $ | |
+ | be a point in $ D $. | ||
+ | Let $ F _ \theta ( \zeta ) $, | ||
+ | $ F _ \theta ( \zeta _ {0} ) = 0 $, | ||
+ | be a function in $ \Sigma ( D) $ | ||
+ | mapping $ D $ | ||
+ | onto the plane with slits along the arcs of the logarithmic spirals that make an angle $ \theta $ | ||
+ | with rays emanating from the origin (it is a sufficient to take $ - \pi / 2 \leq \theta \leq \pi / 2 $; | ||
+ | for $ \theta = 0 $ | ||
+ | the logarithmic spiral degenerates into a ray emanating from the origin, while for $ \theta = \pm \pi / 2 $ | ||
+ | it degenerates into a circle with centre at the origin). Let | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | p ( \zeta ) = \ | ||
+ | \sqrt {F _ {0} ( \zeta ) F _ {\pi / 2 } ( \zeta ) } ,\ \ | ||
+ | q ( \zeta ) = \ | ||
+ | \sqrt { | ||
+ | \frac{F _ {0} ( \zeta ) }{F _ {\pi / 2 } ( \zeta ) } | ||
+ | } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | where those branches of the square root are taken that give first coefficients 1 in the Laurent expansions of $ p ( \zeta ) $ | |
+ | and $ q ( \zeta ) $ | ||
+ | in a neighbourhood of $ \zeta = \infty $. | ||
+ | Then the range of $ \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) $ | ||
+ | on $ \Sigma ( D) $ | ||
+ | is the disc defined by | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | | \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) - | ||
+ | \ln p ^ \prime ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | ||
+ | - \ln q ( \zeta _ {0} ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | where to each boundary point only the functions $ F ( \zeta ) = F _ \theta ( \zeta ) + C $ | ||
+ | with suitable $ \theta $, | ||
+ | and $ C $ | ||
+ | a constant, correspond. In particular, one has the sharp inequalities | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | | F _ {0} ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | ||
+ | | F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | ||
+ | | F _ {\pi / 2 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm arg} F _ {\pi / 4 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) \leq \mathop{\rm arg} F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) \leq \ | ||
+ | \mathop{\rm arg} F _ {- \pi / 4 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.M. Goluzin, "Geometric theory of functions of a complex variable" , ''Transl. Math. Monogr.'' , '''26''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1969) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.A. Jenkins, "Univalent functions and conformal mapping" , Springer (1958)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.V. Chernikov, "Extremal properties of univalent conformal mappings" , ''Results of investigation in mathematics and mechanics during 50 years: 1917–1967'' , Tomsk (1967) pp. 23–51 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.E. Bazilevich, , ''Mathematics in the USSR during 40 years: 1917–1957'' , '''1''' , Moscow (1959) pp. 444–472 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.P. Belinskii, "General properties of quasi-conformal mappings" , Novosibirsk (1974) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Kühnau, "Verzerrungssätze und Koeffizientenbedingungen vom Grunskyschen Typ für quasikonforme Abbildungen" ''Math. Nachrichten'' , '''48''' (1971) pp. 77–105</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G.M. Goluzin, "Geometric theory of functions of a complex variable" , ''Transl. Math. Monogr.'' , '''26''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1969) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.A. Jenkins, "Univalent functions and conformal mapping" , Springer (1958)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> V.V. Chernikov, "Extremal properties of univalent conformal mappings" , ''Results of investigation in mathematics and mechanics during 50 years: 1917–1967'' , Tomsk (1967) pp. 23–51 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> I.E. Bazilevich, , ''Mathematics in the USSR during 40 years: 1917–1957'' , '''1''' , Moscow (1959) pp. 444–472 (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.P. Belinskii, "General properties of quasi-conformal mappings" , Novosibirsk (1974) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Kühnau, "Verzerrungssätze und Koeffizientenbedingungen vom Grunskyschen Typ für quasikonforme Abbildungen" ''Math. Nachrichten'' , '''48''' (1971) pp. 77–105</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Latest revision as of 02:42, 14 September 2022
under conformal mapping of planar domains
Theorems characterizing the distortion of line elements at a given point of a domain, as well as the distortion of the domain and its subsets, and the distortion of the boundary of the domain under a conformal mapping. Estimates of the modulus of the derivatives of an analytic function at a point of a domain belong first of all to distortion theorems. The statement, for functions in the class $ \Sigma $ of functions
$$ F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + \alpha _ {0} + \frac{\alpha _ {1} } \zeta + \dots , $$
meromorphic and univalent in $ | \zeta | > 1 $, that for all $ \zeta _ {0} $, $ 1 < | \zeta _ {0} | < \infty $, the inequality
$$ \tag{1 } 1 - \frac{1}{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} } \leq | F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ \frac{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} }{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} - 1 } $$
holds, is a distortion theorem.
Equality at the left-hand side of (1) holds only for the functions
$$ F _ {1} ( \zeta ) = \zeta + \alpha _ {0} + \zeta _ {0} ( \overline \zeta_ {0} \zeta ) ^ {- 1} , $$
while at the right-hand side equality holds only for the functions
$$ F _ {2} ( \zeta ) = \ \frac{\zeta - \zeta _ {0} }{1 - ( \overline \zeta_ {0} \zeta ) ^ {- 1} } + \beta _ {0} . $$
Here $ \alpha _ {0} $ and $ \beta _ {0} $ are two arbitrary fixed numbers. The functions $ w = F _ {1} ( \zeta ) $ map the domain $ | \zeta | > 1 $ onto the $ w $-plane with slit along the interval connecting the points $ \alpha _ {0} - 2 \zeta _ {0} / | \zeta _ {0} | $ and $ \alpha _ {0} + 2 \zeta _ {0} / | \zeta _ {0} | $. The functions $ w = F _ {2} ( \zeta ) $ map the domain $ | \zeta | > 1 $ onto the $ w $-plane with slit along an arc of the circle $ | w- \beta _ {0} | = | \zeta _ {0} | $ with mid-point $ \beta _ {0} - \zeta _ {0} $. Inequality (1) is easily obtained from the Grunsky inequality
$$ | \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ - \ln \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{| \zeta _ {0} | ^ {2} } \right ) , $$
which determines the range of values of the functional $ \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) $ on the class $ \Sigma $. On the other hand, inequality (1) is a direct consequence of Goluzin's theorem: If $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $, then for any two points $ \zeta _ {1} , \zeta _ {2} $ with $ | \zeta _ {1} | = | \zeta _ {2} | = \rho $, $ 1 < \rho < \infty $, the sharp inequality
$$ \tag{2 } \left | \ln \frac{F ( \zeta _ {1} ) - F ( \zeta _ {0} ) }{\zeta _ {1} - \zeta _ {2} } \right | \leq - \ln \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{\rho ^ {2} } \right ) $$
holds, where, moreover, the equality sign is attained for the functions $ F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + e ^ {i \alpha } / \zeta $, where $ \alpha $ is a real constant. Inequality (2) also implies the chord-distortion theorem (cf. [1]). If $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $, then for any two points $ \zeta _ {1} , \zeta _ {2} $ on the circle $ | \zeta | = \rho > 1 $ the sharp inequality
$$ \left | \frac{F ( \zeta _ {1} ) - F ( \zeta _ {2} ) }{\zeta _ {1} - \zeta _ {2} } \ \right | \geq \ 1 - \frac{1}{\rho ^ {2} } $$
holds. Equality in this case is only attained for the functions
$$ F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + C + \frac{e ^ {2 i \phi } } \zeta , $$
where $ C $ is a constant and $ \phi = ( \mathop{\rm arg} \zeta _ {1} + \mathop{\rm arg} \zeta _ {2} ) / 2 $. Various generalizations of (2) are known. These give the ranges of values of corresponding functionals and are sharpened versions of distortion theorems for $ \Sigma $ or its subclasses (cf., e.g., [1]).
In the class $ S $ of functions
$$ f ( z) = z + c _ {2} z ^ {2} + \dots $$
that are regular and univalent in the disc $ | z | < 1 $, the following sharp inequalities are valid for $ 0 < | z _ {0} | < 1 $:
$$ \tag{3 } \frac{1 - | z _ {0} | }{( 1 + | z _ {0} | ) ^ {3} } \leq | f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) | \leq \ \frac{1 + | z _ {0} | }{( 1 - | z _ {0} | ) ^ {3} } , $$
$$ \tag{4 } \frac{| z _ {0} | }{( 1 + | z _ {0} | ) ^ {2} } \leq | f ( z _ {0} ) | \leq \frac{| z _ {0} | }{( 1 - | z _ {0} | ) ^ {2} } , $$
$$ \tag{5 } \frac{1 - | z _ {0} | }{1 + | z _ {0} | } \leq \left | \frac{z _ {0} f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) }{f ( z _ {0} ) } \right | \leq \frac{1 + | z _ {0} | }{1 - | z _ {0} | } . $$
The estimates (4) and (5) follow from (3). The inequalities (3)–(5) are called the distortion theorems for $ S $. The lower bounds are realized only by the functions
$$ f _ \alpha ( z) = \ \frac{z}{( 1 + e ^ {- i \alpha } z ) ^ {2} } , $$
while the upper bounds are realized only by the functions
$$ f _ {\pi + \alpha } ( z) = \ \frac{z}{( 1 - e ^ {- i \alpha } z ) ^ {2} } , $$
where $ \alpha = \mathop{\rm arg} z _ {0} $. The functions $ w = f _ \alpha ( z) $, $ 0 \leq \alpha < 2 \pi $, known as the Koebe functions, map the disc $ | z | < 1 $ onto the $ w $-plane with slit along the ray $ \mathop{\rm arg} w = \alpha $, $ | w | \geq 1 / 4 $. They are extremal in a number of problems in the theory of univalent functions. Koebe's $ 1 / 4 $-theorem holds: The domain that is the image of the disc $ | z | < 1 $ under a mapping $ w = f ( z) $, $ f \in S $, always contains the disc $ | w | < 1 / 4 $, and the point $ w = e ^ {i \alpha } / 4 $ lies on the boundary of this domain only for $ f ( z) = f _ \alpha ( z ) $.
The estimates (3)–(5) are simple consequences of results on the ranges of the functionals
$$ \ln f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) ,\ \ \ln \frac{f ( z _ {0} ) }{z _ {0} } ,\ \ \ln \frac{z f ^ { \prime } ( z _ {0} ) }{f ( z _ {0} ) } $$
on $ S $( cf. [2]).
Let $ \Sigma _ {0} $ be the class of functions $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma $ with $ F ( \zeta ) \neq 0 $ for $ 1 < | \zeta | < \infty $. Between functions in $ S $ and $ \Sigma _ {0} $ there is the following relation: If $ f ( z) \in S $, then $ F ( \zeta ) = 1 / f ( 1 / \zeta ) \in \Sigma _ {0} $, and, conversely, if $ F ( \zeta ) \in \Sigma _ {0} $, then $ f ( z) = 1 / F ( 1 / z ) \in S $. Hence, the range of some functional (or system of functionals) on $ S $ is determined by the range of the corresponding functional (system of functionals) on $ \Sigma _ {0} $, vice versa. E.g., the range of $ \ln f ( z _ {0} ) / z _ {0} $, $ 0 < | z _ {0} | < 1 $, on $ S $ is easily obtained from that of $ \ln F ( \zeta _ {0} ) / \zeta _ {0} $, $ 1 < | \zeta _ {0} | < \infty $, on $ \Sigma _ {0} $.
For functions that are regular and bounded in a disc, the Schwarz lemma (cf. [1]) and its generalizations, as well as the following boundary-distortion theorem of Löwner are examples of distortion theorems. Löwner's theorem: For a function $ \phi ( z) $ that is regular in $ | z | < 1 $ with $ \phi ( 0) = 0 $, $ | \phi ( z) | < 1 $ in $ | z | < 1 $ and $ | \phi ( z) | = 1 $ on an arc $ A $ of $ | z | = 1 $, the length of the image of $ A $ is not smaller than the length of $ A $ itself, and equality only holds for the functions $ \phi ( z) = e ^ {i \alpha } z $, with $ \alpha $ a real number.
In the class of functions that are univalent in a given multiply-connected domain, the minimum (respectively, maximum) modulus of the derivative at a given point of the domain is attained only for mappings of this domain onto a domain with radial (resp. circular concentric) slits. For unbounded mappings the following theorem holds: Let $ D $ be a finitely-connected domain in the $ \zeta $-plane containing the point at infinity, let $ \Sigma ( D) $ be the class of univalent functions $ F ( \zeta ) $ in $ D $ that have in a neighbourhood of $ \zeta = \infty $ the expansion
$$ F ( \zeta ) = \zeta + \alpha _ {0} + \frac{\alpha _ {1} } \zeta + \dots , $$
and let $ \zeta _ {0} \neq \infty $ be a point in $ D $. Let $ F _ \theta ( \zeta ) $, $ F _ \theta ( \zeta _ {0} ) = 0 $, be a function in $ \Sigma ( D) $ mapping $ D $ onto the plane with slits along the arcs of the logarithmic spirals that make an angle $ \theta $ with rays emanating from the origin (it is a sufficient to take $ - \pi / 2 \leq \theta \leq \pi / 2 $; for $ \theta = 0 $ the logarithmic spiral degenerates into a ray emanating from the origin, while for $ \theta = \pm \pi / 2 $ it degenerates into a circle with centre at the origin). Let
$$ p ( \zeta ) = \ \sqrt {F _ {0} ( \zeta ) F _ {\pi / 2 } ( \zeta ) } ,\ \ q ( \zeta ) = \ \sqrt { \frac{F _ {0} ( \zeta ) }{F _ {\pi / 2 } ( \zeta ) } } , $$
where those branches of the square root are taken that give first coefficients 1 in the Laurent expansions of $ p ( \zeta ) $ and $ q ( \zeta ) $ in a neighbourhood of $ \zeta = \infty $. Then the range of $ \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) $ on $ \Sigma ( D) $ is the disc defined by
$$ | \ln F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) - \ln p ^ \prime ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ - \ln q ( \zeta _ {0} ) , $$
where to each boundary point only the functions $ F ( \zeta ) = F _ \theta ( \zeta ) + C $ with suitable $ \theta $, and $ C $ a constant, correspond. In particular, one has the sharp inequalities
$$ | F _ {0} ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | \leq \ | F _ {\pi / 2 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) | , $$
$$ \mathop{\rm arg} F _ {\pi / 4 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) \leq \mathop{\rm arg} F ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) \leq \ \mathop{\rm arg} F _ {- \pi / 4 } ^ { \prime } ( \zeta _ {0} ) , $$
References
[1] | G.M. Goluzin, "Geometric theory of functions of a complex variable" , Transl. Math. Monogr. , 26 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1969) (Translated from Russian) |
[2] | J.A. Jenkins, "Univalent functions and conformal mapping" , Springer (1958) |
[3] | V.V. Chernikov, "Extremal properties of univalent conformal mappings" , Results of investigation in mathematics and mechanics during 50 years: 1917–1967 , Tomsk (1967) pp. 23–51 (In Russian) |
[4] | I.E. Bazilevich, , Mathematics in the USSR during 40 years: 1917–1957 , 1 , Moscow (1959) pp. 444–472 (In Russian) |
[5] | P.P. Belinskii, "General properties of quasi-conformal mappings" , Novosibirsk (1974) (In Russian) |
[6] | R. Kühnau, "Verzerrungssätze und Koeffizientenbedingungen vom Grunskyschen Typ für quasikonforme Abbildungen" Math. Nachrichten , 48 (1971) pp. 77–105 |
Comments
Other distortion theorems are, e.g., Landau's theorems (cf. Landau theorems), Bloch's theorem (cf. Bloch constant) and the Pick theorem.
References
[a1] | P.L. Duren, "Univalent functions" , Springer (1983) pp. Chapt. 3 |
[a2] | C. Pommerenke, "Univalent functions" , Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (1975) |
Distortion theorems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Distortion_theorems&oldid=14492