Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Venn diagram"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
(OldImage template added)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A graphic representation of formulas of mathematical logic, mainly formulas of the [[Propositional calculus|propositional calculus]]. A Venn diagram of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965501.png" /> variables <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965502.png" /> of classical propositional logic is a selection of closed contours <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965503.png" /> (with homeomorphic circumferences) which subdivides the plane into <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965504.png" /> domains, some of which (e.g. <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965505.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965506.png" />) are marked. Each marked domain <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965507.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965508.png" />, is put into correspondence with the formula <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v0965509.png" /> where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655010.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655011.png" />, is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655012.png" /> if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655013.png" /> lies within the contour <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655014.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655015.png" /> is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655016.png" /> otherwise. The formula corresponding to the diagram as a whole is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655017.png" />. Thus, the Venn diagram in the figure corresponds to the formula
+
{{TEX|done}}
 +
A graphic representation of formulas of mathematical logic, mainly formulas of the [[Propositional calculus|propositional calculus]]. A Venn diagram of $n$ variables $a_1,\dotsc,a_n$ of classical propositional logic is a selection of closed contours $C_1,\dotsc,C_n$ (with homeomorphic circumferences) which subdivides the plane into $2^n$ domains, some of which (e.g. $v_1,\dotsc,v_k$, $0\leq k\leq2^n$) are marked. Each marked domain $v_i$, $0<i\leq k$, is put into correspondence with the formula $B_i=b_1\mathbin{\&}\dotsb\mathbin{\&}b_n$ where $b_j$, $0<j\leq n$, is $a_j$ if $v_i$ lies within the contour $C_j$ and $b_j$ is $\neg a_j$ otherwise. The formula corresponding to the diagram as a whole is $B_1\lor\dotsb\lor B_n$. Thus, the Venn diagram in the figure corresponds to the formula
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655018.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$(\neg a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_2\mathbin{\&}\neg a_3)\lor(a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_2\mathbin{\&}a_3)\lor(\neg a_1\mathbin{\&}a_2\mathbin{\&}\neg a_3).$$
  
If there are no marked domains (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655019.png" />), the diagram corresponds to an identically-false formula, e.g. <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/v/v096/v096550/v09655020.png" />. In propositional logic, Venn diagrams are used to solve decision problems, the problem of deducing all possible pairwise non-equivalent logical consequences from given premises, etc. Propositional logic may be constructed as operations over Venn diagrams brought into correspondence with logical operations.
+
If there are no marked domains ($k=0$), the diagram corresponds to an identically-false formula, e.g. $a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_1$. In propositional logic, Venn diagrams are used to solve decision problems, the problem of deducing all possible pairwise non-equivalent logical consequences from given premises, etc. Propositional logic may be constructed as operations over Venn diagrams brought into correspondence with logical operations.
  
 
<img style="border:1px solid;" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/common_img/v096550a.gif" />
 
<img style="border:1px solid;" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/common_img/v096550a.gif" />
Line 10: Line 11:
  
 
The apparatus of diagrams was proposed by J. Venn [[#References|[1]]] to solve problems in the logic of classes. The method was then extended to the classical many-place predicate calculus. Venn diagrams are used in applications of mathematical logic and theory of automata, in particular in solving the problems of neural nets.
 
The apparatus of diagrams was proposed by J. Venn [[#References|[1]]] to solve problems in the logic of classes. The method was then extended to the classical many-place predicate calculus. Venn diagrams are used in applications of mathematical logic and theory of automata, in particular in solving the problems of neural nets.
 
====References====
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Venn,  "Symbolic logic" , London  (1894)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A.S. Kuzichev,  "Venn diagrams" , Moscow  (1968)  (In Russian)</TD></TR></table>
 
 
 
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
 
The idea of Venn diagrams goes back to L. Euler and they are sometimes also called Euler diagrams.
 
The idea of Venn diagrams goes back to L. Euler and they are sometimes also called Euler diagrams.
  
 +
 +
{{OldImage}}
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  P. Suppes,  "Introduction to logic" , v. Nostrand  (1957)  pp. §9.8</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  G. Birkhoff,  S. MacLane,  "A survey of modern algebra" , Macmillan  (1953)  pp. 336ff</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B. Rosser,  "Logic for mathematicians" , McGraw-Hill  (1953)  pp. 227–228; 237ff</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Venn,  "Symbolic logic" , London  (1894)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A.S. Kuzichev,  "Venn diagrams" , Moscow  (1968)  (In Russian)</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  P. Suppes,  "Introduction to logic" , v. Nostrand  (1957)  pp. §9.8</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  G. Birkhoff,  S. MacLane,  "A survey of modern algebra" , Macmillan  (1953)  pp. 336ff</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B. Rosser,  "Logic for mathematicians" , McGraw-Hill  (1953)  pp. 227–228; 237ff</TD></TR></table>

Latest revision as of 13:11, 29 July 2024

A graphic representation of formulas of mathematical logic, mainly formulas of the propositional calculus. A Venn diagram of $n$ variables $a_1,\dotsc,a_n$ of classical propositional logic is a selection of closed contours $C_1,\dotsc,C_n$ (with homeomorphic circumferences) which subdivides the plane into $2^n$ domains, some of which (e.g. $v_1,\dotsc,v_k$, $0\leq k\leq2^n$) are marked. Each marked domain $v_i$, $0<i\leq k$, is put into correspondence with the formula $B_i=b_1\mathbin{\&}\dotsb\mathbin{\&}b_n$ where $b_j$, $0<j\leq n$, is $a_j$ if $v_i$ lies within the contour $C_j$ and $b_j$ is $\neg a_j$ otherwise. The formula corresponding to the diagram as a whole is $B_1\lor\dotsb\lor B_n$. Thus, the Venn diagram in the figure corresponds to the formula

$$(\neg a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_2\mathbin{\&}\neg a_3)\lor(a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_2\mathbin{\&}a_3)\lor(\neg a_1\mathbin{\&}a_2\mathbin{\&}\neg a_3).$$

If there are no marked domains ($k=0$), the diagram corresponds to an identically-false formula, e.g. $a_1\mathbin{\&}\neg a_1$. In propositional logic, Venn diagrams are used to solve decision problems, the problem of deducing all possible pairwise non-equivalent logical consequences from given premises, etc. Propositional logic may be constructed as operations over Venn diagrams brought into correspondence with logical operations.

Figure: v096550a

The apparatus of diagrams was proposed by J. Venn [1] to solve problems in the logic of classes. The method was then extended to the classical many-place predicate calculus. Venn diagrams are used in applications of mathematical logic and theory of automata, in particular in solving the problems of neural nets.

Comments

The idea of Venn diagrams goes back to L. Euler and they are sometimes also called Euler diagrams.



🛠️ This page contains images that should be replaced by better images in the SVG file format. 🛠️

References

[1] J. Venn, "Symbolic logic" , London (1894)
[2] A.S. Kuzichev, "Venn diagrams" , Moscow (1968) (In Russian)
[a1] P. Suppes, "Introduction to logic" , v. Nostrand (1957) pp. §9.8
[a2] G. Birkhoff, S. MacLane, "A survey of modern algebra" , Macmillan (1953) pp. 336ff
[a3] B. Rosser, "Logic for mathematicians" , McGraw-Hill (1953) pp. 227–228; 237ff
How to Cite This Entry:
Venn diagram. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Venn_diagram&oldid=12932
This article was adapted from an original article by A.S. Kuzichev (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article