Difference between revisions of "Equivalence relation"
Thomas Unger (talk | contribs) (tex, partial rewrite) |
(→References: isbn) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Let $X$ be a set. An equivalence relation on $X$ is a subset $R\subseteq X\times X$ that satisfies the following three properties: | Let $X$ be a set. An equivalence relation on $X$ is a subset $R\subseteq X\times X$ that satisfies the following three properties: | ||
− | 1) Reflexivity: for all $x\in X$, $(x,x)\in R$; | + | 1) [[Reflexivity]]: for all $x\in X$, $(x,x)\in R$; |
− | 2) Symmetry: for all $x,y\in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ then $(y,x)\in R$; | + | 2) [[Symmetry (of a relation)|Symmetry]]: for all $x,y\in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ then $(y,x)\in R$; |
− | 3) Transitivity: for all $x,y,z \in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ and $(y,z)\in R$ then $(x,z)\in R$. | + | 3) [[Transitive relation|Transitivity]]: for all $x,y,z \in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ and $(y,z)\in R$ then $(x,z)\in R$. |
When $(x,y)\in R$ we say that $x$ is equivalent to $y$. | When $(x,y)\in R$ we say that $x$ is equivalent to $y$. | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
An equivalence relation is a [[Binary relation|binary relation]]. | An equivalence relation is a [[Binary relation|binary relation]]. | ||
+ | Example: If $f$ maps the set $X$ into a set $Y$, then $R=\{(x_1,x_2)\in X\times X\,:\, f(x_1)=f(x_2)\}$ is an equivalence relation (cf. [[Kernel of a function]]). | ||
− | + | For any $y\in X$ the subset of $X$ that consists of all $x$ that are equivalent to $y$ is called the equivalence class of $y$, denoted $[y]_R$. Any two equivalence classes either are disjoint or coincide, that is, any equivalence relation on $X$ defines a [[partition]] (decomposition) of $X$, and vice versa. | |
+ | A subset $A$ of $X$ is ''saturated'' with respect to $R$ if $a \in A,\, b \in X,\,a R b \Rightarrow b \in A$: so $A$ is saturated if and only if it is a union of equivalence classes of $R$. For any subset $A$ of $X$, the ''saturation'' $A^R$ is the set $\{ b \in X : \exists a \in A,\,a R b \} = \cup_{a \in A} [a]_R$, the union of the equivalence classes that meet $A$. | ||
− | + | ====References==== | |
+ | * N. Bourbaki, ''Theory of Sets'', Eléments de mathématiques '''1''', reprint ed. Springer (2004) {{ISBN|3-540-22525-0}} {{ZBL|1061.03001}} |
Latest revision as of 18:10, 14 October 2023
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 03E [MSN][ZBL]
Let $X$ be a set. An equivalence relation on $X$ is a subset $R\subseteq X\times X$ that satisfies the following three properties:
1) Reflexivity: for all $x\in X$, $(x,x)\in R$;
2) Symmetry: for all $x,y\in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ then $(y,x)\in R$;
3) Transitivity: for all $x,y,z \in X$, if $(x,y)\in R$ and $(y,z)\in R$ then $(x,z)\in R$.
When $(x,y)\in R$ we say that $x$ is equivalent to $y$.
Instead of $(x,y)\in R$, the notation $xRy$, or even $x\sim y$, is also used.
An equivalence relation is a binary relation.
Example: If $f$ maps the set $X$ into a set $Y$, then $R=\{(x_1,x_2)\in X\times X\,:\, f(x_1)=f(x_2)\}$ is an equivalence relation (cf. Kernel of a function).
For any $y\in X$ the subset of $X$ that consists of all $x$ that are equivalent to $y$ is called the equivalence class of $y$, denoted $[y]_R$. Any two equivalence classes either are disjoint or coincide, that is, any equivalence relation on $X$ defines a partition (decomposition) of $X$, and vice versa.
A subset $A$ of $X$ is saturated with respect to $R$ if $a \in A,\, b \in X,\,a R b \Rightarrow b \in A$: so $A$ is saturated if and only if it is a union of equivalence classes of $R$. For any subset $A$ of $X$, the saturation $A^R$ is the set $\{ b \in X : \exists a \in A,\,a R b \} = \cup_{a \in A} [a]_R$, the union of the equivalence classes that meet $A$.
References
- N. Bourbaki, Theory of Sets, Eléments de mathématiques 1, reprint ed. Springer (2004) ISBN 3-540-22525-0 Zbl 1061.03001
Equivalence relation. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equivalence_relation&oldid=26964