Difference between revisions of "Logical matrix"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <!-- | ||
| + | l0607401.png | ||
| + | $#A+1 = 28 n = 0 | ||
| + | $#C+1 = 28 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L060/L.0600740 Logical matrix | ||
| + | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
| + | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
| + | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
| + | --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
| + | {{TEX|done}} | ||
| + | |||
A system | A system | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \mathfrak M = \langle M ; D , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | where | + | where $ M $ |
| + | is a non-empty set; $ D \subseteq M $; | ||
| + | $ \& , \lor , \supset $ | ||
| + | are [[binary operation]]s; and $ \neg $ | ||
| + | is a [[unary operation]] on $ M $. | ||
| + | Any formula of propositional logic, constructed from propositional variables $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ | ||
| + | by means of the logical connectives $ \& , \lor , \supset , \neg $, | ||
| + | can be regarded as an $ n $- | ||
| + | place function on $ M $ | ||
| + | if $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ | ||
| + | are assumed to be variables with range of values $ M $ | ||
| + | and the logical connectives are interpreted as the corresponding operations of the logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $. | ||
| + | A formula $ \mathfrak A $ | ||
| + | is said to be generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
| + | if for any values of the variables in $ M $ | ||
| + | the value of $ \mathfrak A $ | ||
| + | belongs to $ D $. | ||
| + | A logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
| + | is said to be characteristic for a propositional calculus $ K $ | ||
| + | if the formulas that are generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ | ||
| + | are exactly those that are deducible in $ K $. | ||
| + | An example of a logical matrix is the system | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | \langle \{ 0 , 1 \} ; \{ 1 \} , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
where | where | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | x \& y = \min \{ x , y \} , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| + | x \lor y = \max \{ x , y \} , | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| − | + | $$ | |
| − | + | x \supset y = \max \{ 1 - x , y \} , | |
| − | + | $$ | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | \neg x = 1 - x . | ||
| + | $$ | ||
| + | This logical matrix is characteristic for the classical propositional calculus. t logic','../p/p110060.htm','Set theory','../s/s084750.htm','Syntax','../s/s091900.htm','Undecidability','../u/u095140.htm','Unsolvability','../u/u095800.htm','ZFC','../z/z130100.htm')" style="background-color:yellow;">K. Gödel proved that it is impossible to construct a logical matrix with a finite set $ M $ | ||
| + | that is characteristic for the intuitionistic propositional calculus. | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
| − | |||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988)</TD></TR></table> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:11, 6 June 2020
A system
$$ \mathfrak M = \langle M ; D , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , $$
where $ M $ is a non-empty set; $ D \subseteq M $; $ \& , \lor , \supset $ are binary operations; and $ \neg $ is a unary operation on $ M $. Any formula of propositional logic, constructed from propositional variables $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ by means of the logical connectives $ \& , \lor , \supset , \neg $, can be regarded as an $ n $- place function on $ M $ if $ p _ {1} \dots p _ {n} $ are assumed to be variables with range of values $ M $ and the logical connectives are interpreted as the corresponding operations of the logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $. A formula $ \mathfrak A $ is said to be generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ if for any values of the variables in $ M $ the value of $ \mathfrak A $ belongs to $ D $. A logical matrix $ \mathfrak M $ is said to be characteristic for a propositional calculus $ K $ if the formulas that are generally valid in $ \mathfrak M $ are exactly those that are deducible in $ K $. An example of a logical matrix is the system
$$ \langle \{ 0 , 1 \} ; \{ 1 \} , \& , \lor , \supset , \neg \rangle , $$
where
$$ x \& y = \min \{ x , y \} , $$
$$ x \lor y = \max \{ x , y \} , $$
$$ x \supset y = \max \{ 1 - x , y \} , $$
$$ \neg x = 1 - x . $$
This logical matrix is characteristic for the classical propositional calculus. t logic','../p/p110060.htm','Set theory','../s/s084750.htm','Syntax','../s/s091900.htm','Undecidability','../u/u095140.htm','Unsolvability','../u/u095800.htm','ZFC','../z/z130100.htm')" style="background-color:yellow;">K. Gödel proved that it is impossible to construct a logical matrix with a finite set $ M $ that is characteristic for the intuitionistic propositional calculus.
Comments
References
| [a1] | R. Wójcicki, "Theory of logical calculi" , Kluwer (1988) |
Logical matrix. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Logical_matrix&oldid=16307