Difference between revisions of "Defect(2)"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | d1100801.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 71 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 71 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/D110/D.1100080 Defect, | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
''ramification deficiency'' | ''ramification deficiency'' | ||
− | An invariant of finite extensions | + | An invariant of finite extensions $ L \mid K $ |
+ | of fields equipped with a [[Valuation|valuation]] (cf. also [[Extension of a field|Extension of a field]]). If a valuation $ w $ | ||
+ | on $ L $ | ||
+ | is the unique extension of a valuation $ v $ | ||
+ | on $ K $, | ||
+ | then the defect (or ramification deficiency) $ d = d ( w \mid v ) $ | ||
+ | is defined by the formula $ [ L:K ] = d \cdot e \cdot f $, | ||
+ | where $ [ L:K ] $ | ||
+ | is the degree of $ L \mid K $( | ||
+ | i.e., the dimension of $ L $ | ||
+ | as a $ K $- | ||
+ | vector space), $ e = e ( w \mid v ) = ( wL:vK ) $ | ||
+ | is the ramification index and $ f = f ( w \mid v ) = [ Lw:Kv ] $ | ||
+ | is the inertia degree. Here, $ wL,vK $ | ||
+ | denote the respective value groups and $ Lw,Kv $ | ||
+ | the respective residue fields. If $ v $ | ||
+ | admits several extensions to $ L $, | ||
+ | the defect $ d = d ( w \mid v ) $ | ||
+ | can be defined by $ [ L:K ] = d \cdot e \cdot f \cdot g $, | ||
+ | where $ g $ | ||
+ | is the number of distinct extensions, provided that $ L \mid K $ | ||
+ | is normal (since in that case the ramification index and the inertia degree are the same for all extensions; cf. also [[Normal extension|Normal extension]]). | ||
− | In the above cases, | + | In the above cases, $ e $, |
+ | $ f $, | ||
+ | $ g $ | ||
+ | are divisors of $ [ L:K ] $. | ||
+ | The defect $ d $ | ||
+ | is either equal to $ 1 $ | ||
+ | or is a power of the characteristic $ p $ | ||
+ | of $ Kv $ | ||
+ | if $ p > 0 $; | ||
+ | otherwise, it is always equal to $ 1 $( | ||
+ | this is the Ostrowski lemma, cf. [[Ramification theory of valued fields|Ramification theory of valued fields]]). | ||
==Henselian defect.== | ==Henselian defect.== | ||
− | To avoid considering several valuations and to have a defect available for arbitrary finite extensions, one can pass to a Henselization | + | To avoid considering several valuations and to have a defect available for arbitrary finite extensions, one can pass to a Henselization $ ( L ^ {H} ,w ^ {H} ) $ |
+ | of $ ( L,w ) $ | ||
+ | and a Henselization $ ( K ^ {H} ,v ^ {H} ) $ | ||
+ | of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | inside $ ( L ^ {H} ,w ^ {H} ) $( | ||
+ | cf. [[Henselization of a valued field|Henselization of a valued field]]). The Henselian defect $ \delta ( w \mid v ) $ | ||
+ | is then defined to be the defect of $ w ^ {H} \mid v ^ {H} $( | ||
+ | by the definition of the Henselization, $ w ^ {H} $ | ||
+ | is the unique extension of $ v ^ {H} $). | ||
+ | In the above cases, $ \delta ( w \mid v ) = d ( w \mid v ) $. | ||
==Defectless fields.== | ==Defectless fields.== | ||
− | A field | + | A field $ K $ |
+ | with a valuation $ v $ | ||
+ | is called a defectless field if $ d ( w \mid v ) = 1 $ | ||
+ | for every finite normal extension. This holds if and only if the Henselian defect is equal to $ 1 $ | ||
+ | for every finite extension. It follows that $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is a defectless field if and only some Henselization of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is (or equivalently, all Henselizations are). | ||
− | It follows from the Ostrowski lemma that all valued fields with residue field of characteristic | + | It follows from the Ostrowski lemma that all valued fields with residue field of characteristic $ 0 $ |
+ | are defectless fields. Also, valued fields of characteristic $ 0 $ | ||
+ | with value group isomorphic to $ \mathbf Z $ | ||
+ | are defectless. Combining both facts, it is shown that finitely ramified fields, and hence also fields with $ p $- | ||
+ | valuations (see [[P-adically closed field| $ p $- | ||
+ | adically closed field]]), are defectless. | ||
If a valued field does not admit any non-trivial immediate extension (cf. also [[Valuation|Valuation]]), then it is called a maximal valued field. Fields of formal [[Laurent series|Laurent series]] with their canonical valuations are maximal. Every maximal valued field is defectless. | If a valued field does not admit any non-trivial immediate extension (cf. also [[Valuation|Valuation]]), then it is called a maximal valued field. Fields of formal [[Laurent series|Laurent series]] with their canonical valuations are maximal. Every maximal valued field is defectless. | ||
==Fundamental inequality.== | ==Fundamental inequality.== | ||
− | If | + | If $ w _ {1} \dots w _ {m} $ |
+ | are all extensions of $ v $ | ||
+ | from $ K $ | ||
+ | to $ L $, | ||
+ | then one has the fundamental inequality | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | [ L:K ] \geq \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } e ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot f ( w _ {i} \mid w ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | This is an equality for every finite | + | This is an equality for every finite $ L \mid K $ |
+ | if and only if $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | is defectless. Also, in general it can be written as an equality. For this, choose Henselizations $ ( L ^ {H _ {i} } ,w ^ {H _ {i} } ) $ | ||
+ | of $ ( L,w _ {i} ) $ | ||
+ | and $ ( K ^ {H _ {i} } ,v ^ {H _ {i} } ) $ | ||
+ | of $ ( K,v ) $ | ||
+ | inside $ ( L ^ {H _ {i} } ,w ^ {H _ {i} } ) $. | ||
+ | It is known that | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | [ L:K ] = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } [ L ^ {H _ {i} } :K ^ {H _ {i} } ] . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Further, | Further, | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | [ L ^ {H _ {i} } :K ^ {H _ {i} } ] = | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | = | ||
+ | d ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) \cdot e ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) \cdot f ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Since Henselizations are immediate extensions, | + | Since Henselizations are immediate extensions, $ e ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = e ( w \mid v ) $ |
+ | and $ f ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = f ( w \mid v ) $. | ||
+ | By definition, $ d ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = \delta ( w _ {i} \mid v ) $. | ||
+ | Hence, | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | [ L:K ] = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } \delta ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot e ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot f ( w _ {i} \mid w ) . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
Several other notions of defects were introduced. For a detailed theory of the defect, see [[#References|[a1]]]. See also [[Valued function field|Valued function field]]. | Several other notions of defects were introduced. For a detailed theory of the defect, see [[#References|[a1]]]. See also [[Valued function field|Valued function field]]. |
Latest revision as of 17:32, 5 June 2020
ramification deficiency
An invariant of finite extensions $ L \mid K $ of fields equipped with a valuation (cf. also Extension of a field). If a valuation $ w $ on $ L $ is the unique extension of a valuation $ v $ on $ K $, then the defect (or ramification deficiency) $ d = d ( w \mid v ) $ is defined by the formula $ [ L:K ] = d \cdot e \cdot f $, where $ [ L:K ] $ is the degree of $ L \mid K $( i.e., the dimension of $ L $ as a $ K $- vector space), $ e = e ( w \mid v ) = ( wL:vK ) $ is the ramification index and $ f = f ( w \mid v ) = [ Lw:Kv ] $ is the inertia degree. Here, $ wL,vK $ denote the respective value groups and $ Lw,Kv $ the respective residue fields. If $ v $ admits several extensions to $ L $, the defect $ d = d ( w \mid v ) $ can be defined by $ [ L:K ] = d \cdot e \cdot f \cdot g $, where $ g $ is the number of distinct extensions, provided that $ L \mid K $ is normal (since in that case the ramification index and the inertia degree are the same for all extensions; cf. also Normal extension).
In the above cases, $ e $, $ f $, $ g $ are divisors of $ [ L:K ] $. The defect $ d $ is either equal to $ 1 $ or is a power of the characteristic $ p $ of $ Kv $ if $ p > 0 $; otherwise, it is always equal to $ 1 $( this is the Ostrowski lemma, cf. Ramification theory of valued fields).
Henselian defect.
To avoid considering several valuations and to have a defect available for arbitrary finite extensions, one can pass to a Henselization $ ( L ^ {H} ,w ^ {H} ) $ of $ ( L,w ) $ and a Henselization $ ( K ^ {H} ,v ^ {H} ) $ of $ ( K,v ) $ inside $ ( L ^ {H} ,w ^ {H} ) $( cf. Henselization of a valued field). The Henselian defect $ \delta ( w \mid v ) $ is then defined to be the defect of $ w ^ {H} \mid v ^ {H} $( by the definition of the Henselization, $ w ^ {H} $ is the unique extension of $ v ^ {H} $). In the above cases, $ \delta ( w \mid v ) = d ( w \mid v ) $.
Defectless fields.
A field $ K $ with a valuation $ v $ is called a defectless field if $ d ( w \mid v ) = 1 $ for every finite normal extension. This holds if and only if the Henselian defect is equal to $ 1 $ for every finite extension. It follows that $ ( K,v ) $ is a defectless field if and only some Henselization of $ ( K,v ) $ is (or equivalently, all Henselizations are).
It follows from the Ostrowski lemma that all valued fields with residue field of characteristic $ 0 $ are defectless fields. Also, valued fields of characteristic $ 0 $ with value group isomorphic to $ \mathbf Z $ are defectless. Combining both facts, it is shown that finitely ramified fields, and hence also fields with $ p $- valuations (see $ p $- adically closed field), are defectless.
If a valued field does not admit any non-trivial immediate extension (cf. also Valuation), then it is called a maximal valued field. Fields of formal Laurent series with their canonical valuations are maximal. Every maximal valued field is defectless.
Fundamental inequality.
If $ w _ {1} \dots w _ {m} $ are all extensions of $ v $ from $ K $ to $ L $, then one has the fundamental inequality
$$ [ L:K ] \geq \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } e ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot f ( w _ {i} \mid w ) . $$
This is an equality for every finite $ L \mid K $ if and only if $ ( K,v ) $ is defectless. Also, in general it can be written as an equality. For this, choose Henselizations $ ( L ^ {H _ {i} } ,w ^ {H _ {i} } ) $ of $ ( L,w _ {i} ) $ and $ ( K ^ {H _ {i} } ,v ^ {H _ {i} } ) $ of $ ( K,v ) $ inside $ ( L ^ {H _ {i} } ,w ^ {H _ {i} } ) $. It is known that
$$ [ L:K ] = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } [ L ^ {H _ {i} } :K ^ {H _ {i} } ] . $$
Further,
$$ [ L ^ {H _ {i} } :K ^ {H _ {i} } ] = $$
$$ = d ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) \cdot e ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) \cdot f ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) . $$
Since Henselizations are immediate extensions, $ e ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = e ( w \mid v ) $ and $ f ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = f ( w \mid v ) $. By definition, $ d ( w ^ {H _ {i} } \mid v ^ {H _ {i} } ) = \delta ( w _ {i} \mid v ) $. Hence,
$$ [ L:K ] = \sum _ {i = 1 } ^ { m } \delta ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot e ( w _ {i} \mid v ) \cdot f ( w _ {i} \mid w ) . $$
Several other notions of defects were introduced. For a detailed theory of the defect, see [a1]. See also Valued function field.
References
[a1] | F.-V. Kuhlmann, "Valuation theory of fields, abelian groups and modules" , Algebra, Logic and Applications , Gordon&Breach (to appear) |
Defect(2). Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Defect(2)&oldid=17106