Difference between revisions of "Cauchy-Hadamard theorem"
(Importing text file) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
+ | c0208701.png | ||
+ | $#A+1 = 30 n = 0 | ||
+ | $#C+1 = 30 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/C020/C.0200870 Cauchy\ANDHadamard theorem | ||
+ | Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics. | ||
+ | Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below, | ||
+ | if TeX found to be correct. | ||
+ | --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|auto}} | ||
+ | {{TEX|done}} | ||
+ | |||
Consider a complex power series | Consider a complex power series | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{1 } | |
+ | f (z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {k = 0 } ^ \infty | ||
+ | c _ {k} (z - a) ^ {k} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
and let | and let | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | \Lambda = \ | ||
+ | \lim\limits _ {k \rightarrow \infty } \ | ||
+ | \sup \ | ||
+ | | c _ {k} | ^ {1/k} . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | If | + | If $ \Lambda = \infty $, |
+ | then the series (1) is convergent only at the point $ z = a $; | ||
+ | if $ 0 < \Lambda < \infty $, | ||
+ | then the series (1) is absolutely convergent in the disc $ | z - a | < R $ | ||
+ | where | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{2 } | |
+ | R = { | ||
+ | \frac{1} \Lambda | ||
+ | } , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | and divergent outside the disc, where | + | and divergent outside the disc, where $ | z - a | > R $; |
+ | if $ \Lambda = 0 $, | ||
+ | the series (1) is absolutely convergent for all $ z \in \mathbf C $. | ||
+ | The content of the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is thus expressed by the Cauchy–Hadamard formula (2), which should be understood in this context in a broad sense, including $ 1/ \infty = 0 $ | ||
+ | and $ 1/0 = \infty $. | ||
+ | In other words, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem states that the interior of the set of points at which the series (1) is (absolutely) convergent is the disc $ | z - a | < R $ | ||
+ | of radius (2). In the case of a real power series (1), formula (2) defines the "radius" of the interval of convergence: $ a - R < x < a + R $. | ||
+ | Essentially, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem was stated by A.L. Cauchy in his lectures [[#References|[1]]] in 1821; it was J. Hadamard [[#References|[2]]] who made the formulation and the proof fully explicit. | ||
For power series | For power series | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{3 } | |
+ | f (z) = \ | ||
+ | \sum _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} = 0 } ^ \infty | ||
+ | c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } | ||
+ | (z _ {1} - a _ {1} ) ^ {k _ {1} } \dots | ||
+ | (z _ {n} - a _ {n} ) ^ {k _ {n} } | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | in | + | in $ n $ |
+ | complex variables $ z = (z _ {1} \dots z _ {n} ) $, | ||
+ | $ n \geq 1 $, | ||
+ | one has the following generalization of the Cauchy–Hadamard formula: | ||
− | + | $$ \tag{4 } | |
+ | \lim\limits _ {| k | \rightarrow \infty } \ | ||
+ | | c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } | ^ {1 / | k | } | ||
+ | r _ {1} ^ {k _ {1} } \dots r _ {n} ^ {k _ {n} } | ||
+ | = 1, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | | k | = k _ {1} + \dots + k _ {n} , | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | which is valid for the associated radii of convergence | + | which is valid for the associated radii of convergence $ r _ {1} \dots r _ {n} $ |
+ | of the series (3) (see [[Disc of convergence|Disc of convergence]]). Writing (4) in the form $ \Phi (r _ {1} \dots r _ {n} ) = 0 $, | ||
+ | one obtains an equation defining the boundary of a certain logarithmically convex [[Reinhardt domain|Reinhardt domain]] with centre $ a $, | ||
+ | which is the interior of the set of points at which the series (3) is absolutely convergent ( $ n > 1 $). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.L. Cauchy, "Analyse algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars , Leipzig (1894) (German translation: Springer, 1885)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Hadamard, "Essai sur l'etude des fonctions données par leur développement de Taylor" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''8''' : 4 (1892) pp. 101–186 (Thesis)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.I. Markushevich, "Theory of functions of a complex variable" , '''1''' , Chelsea (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.V. Shabat, "Introduction of complex analysis" , '''1–2''' , Moscow (1976) (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.L. Cauchy, "Analyse algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars , Leipzig (1894) (German translation: Springer, 1885)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Hadamard, "Essai sur l'etude des fonctions données par leur développement de Taylor" ''J. Math. Pures Appl.'' , '''8''' : 4 (1892) pp. 101–186 (Thesis)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A.I. Markushevich, "Theory of functions of a complex variable" , '''1''' , Chelsea (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.V. Shabat, "Introduction of complex analysis" , '''1–2''' , Moscow (1976) (In Russian)</TD></TR></table> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is related to Abel's lemma: Let in (3) | + | The Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is related to Abel's lemma: Let in (3) $ a _ {1} = \dots = a _ {n} = 0 $ |
+ | and suppose that for some constant $ a $, | ||
+ | some $ \omega \in \mathbf C ^ {n} $ | ||
+ | and for all $ k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} \geq 0 $: | ||
− | + | $$ | |
+ | | c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } | ||
+ | w _ {1} ^ {k _ {1} } \dots w _ {n} ^ {k _ {n} } | | ||
+ | \leq A . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | Then the power series in (3) converges absolutely in the [[Polydisc|polydisc]] < | + | Then the power series in (3) converges absolutely in the [[Polydisc|polydisc]] $ \{ {z \in \mathbf C ^ {n} } : {| z _ {j} | < | w _ {j} | , j = 1 \dots n } \} $( |
+ | see [[#References|[a1]]], Sect. 2.4). This fact makes power series an effective tool in the [[Analytic continuation|analytic continuation]] of analytic functions of several variables (see also [[Hartogs theorem|Hartogs theorem]]). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Hörmander, "An introduction to complex analysis in several variables" , North-Holland (1973) pp. Chapt. 2.4</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L. Hörmander, "An introduction to complex analysis in several variables" , North-Holland (1973) pp. Chapt. 2.4</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 15:35, 4 June 2020
Consider a complex power series
$$ \tag{1 } f (z) = \ \sum _ {k = 0 } ^ \infty c _ {k} (z - a) ^ {k} $$
and let
$$ \Lambda = \ \lim\limits _ {k \rightarrow \infty } \ \sup \ | c _ {k} | ^ {1/k} . $$
If $ \Lambda = \infty $, then the series (1) is convergent only at the point $ z = a $; if $ 0 < \Lambda < \infty $, then the series (1) is absolutely convergent in the disc $ | z - a | < R $ where
$$ \tag{2 } R = { \frac{1} \Lambda } , $$
and divergent outside the disc, where $ | z - a | > R $; if $ \Lambda = 0 $, the series (1) is absolutely convergent for all $ z \in \mathbf C $. The content of the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is thus expressed by the Cauchy–Hadamard formula (2), which should be understood in this context in a broad sense, including $ 1/ \infty = 0 $ and $ 1/0 = \infty $. In other words, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem states that the interior of the set of points at which the series (1) is (absolutely) convergent is the disc $ | z - a | < R $ of radius (2). In the case of a real power series (1), formula (2) defines the "radius" of the interval of convergence: $ a - R < x < a + R $. Essentially, the Cauchy–Hadamard theorem was stated by A.L. Cauchy in his lectures [1] in 1821; it was J. Hadamard [2] who made the formulation and the proof fully explicit.
For power series
$$ \tag{3 } f (z) = \ \sum _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} = 0 } ^ \infty c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } (z _ {1} - a _ {1} ) ^ {k _ {1} } \dots (z _ {n} - a _ {n} ) ^ {k _ {n} } $$
in $ n $ complex variables $ z = (z _ {1} \dots z _ {n} ) $, $ n \geq 1 $, one has the following generalization of the Cauchy–Hadamard formula:
$$ \tag{4 } \lim\limits _ {| k | \rightarrow \infty } \ | c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } | ^ {1 / | k | } r _ {1} ^ {k _ {1} } \dots r _ {n} ^ {k _ {n} } = 1, $$
$$ | k | = k _ {1} + \dots + k _ {n} , $$
which is valid for the associated radii of convergence $ r _ {1} \dots r _ {n} $ of the series (3) (see Disc of convergence). Writing (4) in the form $ \Phi (r _ {1} \dots r _ {n} ) = 0 $, one obtains an equation defining the boundary of a certain logarithmically convex Reinhardt domain with centre $ a $, which is the interior of the set of points at which the series (3) is absolutely convergent ( $ n > 1 $).
References
[1] | A.L. Cauchy, "Analyse algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars , Leipzig (1894) (German translation: Springer, 1885) |
[2] | J. Hadamard, "Essai sur l'etude des fonctions données par leur développement de Taylor" J. Math. Pures Appl. , 8 : 4 (1892) pp. 101–186 (Thesis) |
[3] | A.I. Markushevich, "Theory of functions of a complex variable" , 1 , Chelsea (1977) (Translated from Russian) |
[4] | B.V. Shabat, "Introduction of complex analysis" , 1–2 , Moscow (1976) (In Russian) |
Comments
The Cauchy–Hadamard theorem is related to Abel's lemma: Let in (3) $ a _ {1} = \dots = a _ {n} = 0 $ and suppose that for some constant $ a $, some $ \omega \in \mathbf C ^ {n} $ and for all $ k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} \geq 0 $:
$$ | c _ {k _ {1} \dots k _ {n} } w _ {1} ^ {k _ {1} } \dots w _ {n} ^ {k _ {n} } | \leq A . $$
Then the power series in (3) converges absolutely in the polydisc $ \{ {z \in \mathbf C ^ {n} } : {| z _ {j} | < | w _ {j} | , j = 1 \dots n } \} $( see [a1], Sect. 2.4). This fact makes power series an effective tool in the analytic continuation of analytic functions of several variables (see also Hartogs theorem).
References
[a1] | L. Hörmander, "An introduction to complex analysis in several variables" , North-Holland (1973) pp. Chapt. 2.4 |
Cauchy-Hadamard theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Cauchy-Hadamard_theorem&oldid=13956