Difference between revisions of "Specker sequence"
(Importing text file) |
(→References: expand bibliodata) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{TEX|done}} | |
− | The first example of such a sequence was mentioned by E. Specker [[#References|[1]]]. More precisely, for a Specker sequence | + | A recursive, monotone, bounded sequence of rational numbers that is not a [[Cauchy sequence|Cauchy sequence]] in the constructive (algorithmic) sense.The first example of such a sequence was mentioned by E. Specker [[#References|[1]]]. More precisely, for a Specker sequence $\alpha$ there does not exist a [[General recursive function|general recursive function]] $\beta$ such that for any $i, j, n$ for which $i, j \ge \beta(n)$, the following inequality holds:\[|\alpha(i) - \alpha(j)| < \frac{1}{2^n}.\]The existence of a Specker sequence is fundamental both in constructive mathematics and traditional mathematical analysis. Since a Specker sequence does not converge to any constructive (computable) real number and it is impossible to select from it subsequences with such a property, it can be considered as a counterexample that contradicts, in the context of the most natural algorithmic conception of a constructive continuum, such fundamental principles as the Weierstrass theorem on the existence of a limit for a bounded monotone sequence, the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem on the choice of a converging subsequence, and the theorem on the existence of exact bounds of bounded sets of numbers. From the point of view of traditional mathematics, Specker's result shows that the objects whose existence is asserted by the above-mentioned theorems may have a rather complex nature, even though the initial situations are very simple. Specker's theorem can be considered as a first essential step in the study of the computational and the descriptive complexity of these objects.See also [[Constructive mathematics|Constructive mathematics]]; [[Constructive analysis|Constructive analysis]]. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | The existence of a Specker sequence is fundamental both in constructive mathematics and traditional mathematical analysis. Since a Specker sequence does not converge to any constructive (computable) real number and it is impossible to select from it subsequences with such a property, it can be considered as a counterexample that contradicts, in the context of the most natural algorithmic conception of a constructive continuum, such fundamental principles as the Weierstrass theorem on the existence of a limit for a bounded monotone sequence, the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem on the choice of a converging subsequence, and the theorem on the existence of exact bounds of bounded sets of numbers. From the point of view of traditional mathematics, Specker's result shows that the objects whose existence is asserted by the above-mentioned theorems may have a rather complex nature, even though the initial situations are very simple. Specker's theorem can be considered as a first essential step in the study of the computational and the descriptive complexity of these objects. | ||
− | |||
− | See also [[Constructive mathematics|Constructive mathematics]]; [[Constructive analysis|Constructive analysis]]. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Specker, "Nicht konstruktiv beweisbare Sätze der Analysis" ''J. Symbol. Logic'' , '''14''' (1949) pp. 145–158</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.A. Kushner, "Lectures on constructive mathematical analysis" , | + | <table> |
− | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E. Specker, "Nicht konstruktiv beweisbare Sätze der Analysis" ''J. Symbol. Logic'' , '''14''' (1949) pp. 145–158 {{DOI|10.2307/2267043}} {{ZBL|0033.34102}}</TD></TR> | |
− | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.A. Kushner, "Lectures on constructive mathematical analysis", Translations of Mathematical Monographs '''60''', American Mathematical Society (1984) (Translated from Russian) {{ZBL|0547.03040}}</TD></TR> | |
+ | </table> | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Line 18: | Line 13: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Calude, "Theories of computational complexity" , North-Holland (1988)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Hermes, "Aufzählbarkeit, Entscheidbarkeit, Berechenbarkeit" , Springer (1978)</TD></TR></table> | + | <table> |
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Calude, "Theories of computational complexity" , North-Holland (1988) {{ZBL|0633.03034}}</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H. Hermes, "Aufzählbarkeit, Entscheidbarkeit, Berechenbarkeit" , Springer (1978) {{ZBL|0383.03023}}</TD></TR> | ||
+ | </table> |
Latest revision as of 21:07, 28 December 2016
A recursive, monotone, bounded sequence of rational numbers that is not a Cauchy sequence in the constructive (algorithmic) sense.The first example of such a sequence was mentioned by E. Specker [1]. More precisely, for a Specker sequence $\alpha$ there does not exist a general recursive function $\beta$ such that for any $i, j, n$ for which $i, j \ge \beta(n)$, the following inequality holds:\[|\alpha(i) - \alpha(j)| < \frac{1}{2^n}.\]The existence of a Specker sequence is fundamental both in constructive mathematics and traditional mathematical analysis. Since a Specker sequence does not converge to any constructive (computable) real number and it is impossible to select from it subsequences with such a property, it can be considered as a counterexample that contradicts, in the context of the most natural algorithmic conception of a constructive continuum, such fundamental principles as the Weierstrass theorem on the existence of a limit for a bounded monotone sequence, the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem on the choice of a converging subsequence, and the theorem on the existence of exact bounds of bounded sets of numbers. From the point of view of traditional mathematics, Specker's result shows that the objects whose existence is asserted by the above-mentioned theorems may have a rather complex nature, even though the initial situations are very simple. Specker's theorem can be considered as a first essential step in the study of the computational and the descriptive complexity of these objects.See also Constructive mathematics; Constructive analysis.
References
[1] | E. Specker, "Nicht konstruktiv beweisbare Sätze der Analysis" J. Symbol. Logic , 14 (1949) pp. 145–158 DOI 10.2307/2267043 Zbl 0033.34102 |
[2] | B.A. Kushner, "Lectures on constructive mathematical analysis", Translations of Mathematical Monographs 60, American Mathematical Society (1984) (Translated from Russian) Zbl 0547.03040 |
Comments
References
[a1] | C. Calude, "Theories of computational complexity" , North-Holland (1988) Zbl 0633.03034 |
[a2] | H. Hermes, "Aufzählbarkeit, Entscheidbarkeit, Berechenbarkeit" , Springer (1978) Zbl 0383.03023 |
Specker sequence. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Specker_sequence&oldid=11278