Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Salem number"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
(Tex done)
Line 1: Line 1:
An algebraic integer <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200101.png" /> (cf. [[Algebraic number|Algebraic number]]) such that all other Galois conjugates of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200102.png" /> lie inside the closed unit disc <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200103.png" />, with at least one lying on the boundary (cf. also [[Galois theory|Galois theory]]). One should compare this definition with that of a [[Pisot number|Pisot number]]. The set of Salem numbers is traditionally denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200104.png" />. If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200105.png" /> is a Salem number, then it is reciprocal in the sense that its minimal polynomial <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200106.png" /> satisfies <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200107.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200108.png" /> is the degree of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s1200109.png" />, so <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001010.png" /> is even and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001011.png" />. Two of the conjugates of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001012.png" /> are real, namely <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001013.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001014.png" />, and the rest lie on the unit circle. The field <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001015.png" /> is thus a quadratic extension (cf. [[Extension of a field|Extension of a field]]) of the totally real field <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001016.png" />, so not all number fields contain Salem numbers, in contrast to the situation for Pisot numbers [[#References|[a1]]].
+
An algebraic integer $\theta > 1$ (cf. [[Algebraic number]]) such that all other Galois conjugates of $\theta$ lie inside the closed unit disc $|z| \le 1$, with at least one lying on the boundary (cf. also [[Galois theory]]). One should compare this definition with that of a [[Pisot number]]. The set of Salem numbers is traditionally denoted by $T$. If $\theta$ is a Salem number, then it is reciprocal in the sense that its minimal polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies $P(x) = x^d P(1/x)$, where $d$ is the degree of $P$, so $d$ is even and $\ge 4$. Two of the conjugates of $\theta$ are real, namely $\theta$ and $1/\theta$, and the rest lie on the unit circle. The field $\mathbf{Q}(\theta)$ is thus a quadratic extension (cf. [[Extension of a field]]) of the totally real field $\mathbf{Q}(\theta+1/\theta)$, so not all number fields contain Salem numbers, in contrast to the situation for Pisot numbers [[#References|[a1]]].
  
If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001017.png" /> is a Pisot or Salem number, then, given <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001018.png" />, there is a positive number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001019.png" /> such that every interval of real numbers contains a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001020.png" /> such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001021.png" /> for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001022.png" />. Here <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001023.png" /> denotes the distance from <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001024.png" /> to the nearest integer. This property characterizes the Pisot and Salem numbers among the real numbers [[#References|[a3]]]. This property leads to applications in [[Harmonic analysis|harmonic analysis]], dynamical systems theory (cf. also [[Dynamical system|Dynamical system]]) and the theory of quasi-crystals, cf. also [[Pisot number|Pisot number]].
+
If $\theta$ is a Pisot or Salem number, then, given $\epsilon > 0$, there is a positive number $T$ such that every interval of real numbers contains a $\lambda$ such that $\Vert \lambda\theta^n\Vert < \epsilon$ for all $n\ge 1$. Here $\Vert x \Vert$ denotes the distance from $x$ to the nearest integer. This property characterizes the Pisot and Salem numbers among the real numbers [[#References|[a3]]]. This property leads to applications in [[harmonic analysis]], dynamical systems theory (cf. also [[Dynamical system]]) and the theory of quasi-crystals, cf. also [[Pisot number]].
  
Each Pisot number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001025.png" /> is the limit from both sides of a sequence of Salem numbers. The proof of this gives an explicit construction of infinitely many Salem numbers from each Pisot number. In fact, every Salem number arises infinitely many times in this construction [[#References|[a2]]].
+
Each Pisot number is the limit from both sides of a sequence of Salem numbers. The proof of this gives an explicit construction of infinitely many Salem numbers from each Pisot number. In fact, every Salem number arises infinitely many times in this construction [[#References|[a2]]].
  
It is an open question whether the Salem numbers are dense in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001026.png" />, but it has been conjectured that if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001027.png" /> is the set of Pisot numbers, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001028.png" /> is closed. This would imply that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001029.png" /> is nowhere dense. All the Salem numbers smaller than <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001030.png" /> and of degree at most <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001031.png" /> are known, see [[#References|[a4]]]. The smallest known Salem number is the number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001032.png" /> of degree <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001033.png" /> known as Lehmer's number. The minimum polynomial of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001034.png" /> is Lehmer's polynomial: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001035.png" />. This is also the smallest known value <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/s/s120/s120010/s12001036.png" /> of the [[Mahler measure|Mahler measure]].
+
It is an open question whether the Salem numbers are dense in $[1,\infty)$, but it has been conjectured that if $S$ is the set of Pisot numbers, then $S \cup T$ is closed. This would imply that $T$ is nowhere dense. All the Salem numbers smaller than $13/10$ and of degree at most $40$ are known, see [[#References|[a4]]]. The smallest known Salem number is the number $\sigma_1 = 1.1762808\ldots$ of degree $10$ known as Lehmer's number. The minimum polynomial of $\sigma_1$ is Lehmer's polynomial: $x^{10} + x^9 - x^7 - x^6 - x^5 - x^4 -x^3 + x + 1$. This is also the smallest known value $>1$ of the [[Mahler measure]].
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.J. Bertin,  A. Decomps–Guilloux,  M. Grandet–Hugot,  M. Pathiaux–Delefosse,  J.P. Schreiber,  "Pisot and Salem Numbers" , Birkhäuser  (1992)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  D.W. Boyd,  "Small Salem numbers"  ''Duke Math. J.'' , '''44'''  (1977)  pp. 315–328</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  Y. Meyer,  "Algebraic numbers and harmonic analysis" , North-Holland  (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.J. Mossinghoff,  "Small Salem numbers" , web page: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~mjm/lc/lists/SalemList.html  (1998)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.J. Bertin,  A. Decomps–Guilloux,  M. Grandet–Hugot,  M. Pathiaux–Delefosse,  J.P. Schreiber,  "Pisot and Salem Numbers" , Birkhäuser  (1992)</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  D.W. Boyd,  "Small Salem numbers"  ''Duke Math. J.'' , '''44'''  (1977)  pp. 315–328</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  Y. Meyer,  "Algebraic numbers and harmonic analysis" , North-Holland  (1972)</TD></TR>
 +
<TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.J. Mossinghoff,  "Small Salem numbers" , web page: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~mjm/lc/lists/SalemList.html  (1998)</TD></TR>
 +
</table>
 +
 
 +
{{TEX|done}}

Revision as of 16:36, 10 December 2016

An algebraic integer $\theta > 1$ (cf. Algebraic number) such that all other Galois conjugates of $\theta$ lie inside the closed unit disc $|z| \le 1$, with at least one lying on the boundary (cf. also Galois theory). One should compare this definition with that of a Pisot number. The set of Salem numbers is traditionally denoted by $T$. If $\theta$ is a Salem number, then it is reciprocal in the sense that its minimal polynomial $P(x)$ satisfies $P(x) = x^d P(1/x)$, where $d$ is the degree of $P$, so $d$ is even and $\ge 4$. Two of the conjugates of $\theta$ are real, namely $\theta$ and $1/\theta$, and the rest lie on the unit circle. The field $\mathbf{Q}(\theta)$ is thus a quadratic extension (cf. Extension of a field) of the totally real field $\mathbf{Q}(\theta+1/\theta)$, so not all number fields contain Salem numbers, in contrast to the situation for Pisot numbers [a1].

If $\theta$ is a Pisot or Salem number, then, given $\epsilon > 0$, there is a positive number $T$ such that every interval of real numbers contains a $\lambda$ such that $\Vert \lambda\theta^n\Vert < \epsilon$ for all $n\ge 1$. Here $\Vert x \Vert$ denotes the distance from $x$ to the nearest integer. This property characterizes the Pisot and Salem numbers among the real numbers [a3]. This property leads to applications in harmonic analysis, dynamical systems theory (cf. also Dynamical system) and the theory of quasi-crystals, cf. also Pisot number.

Each Pisot number is the limit from both sides of a sequence of Salem numbers. The proof of this gives an explicit construction of infinitely many Salem numbers from each Pisot number. In fact, every Salem number arises infinitely many times in this construction [a2].

It is an open question whether the Salem numbers are dense in $[1,\infty)$, but it has been conjectured that if $S$ is the set of Pisot numbers, then $S \cup T$ is closed. This would imply that $T$ is nowhere dense. All the Salem numbers smaller than $13/10$ and of degree at most $40$ are known, see [a4]. The smallest known Salem number is the number $\sigma_1 = 1.1762808\ldots$ of degree $10$ known as Lehmer's number. The minimum polynomial of $\sigma_1$ is Lehmer's polynomial: $x^{10} + x^9 - x^7 - x^6 - x^5 - x^4 -x^3 + x + 1$. This is also the smallest known value $>1$ of the Mahler measure.

References

[a1] M.J. Bertin, A. Decomps–Guilloux, M. Grandet–Hugot, M. Pathiaux–Delefosse, J.P. Schreiber, "Pisot and Salem Numbers" , Birkhäuser (1992)
[a2] D.W. Boyd, "Small Salem numbers" Duke Math. J. , 44 (1977) pp. 315–328
[a3] Y. Meyer, "Algebraic numbers and harmonic analysis" , North-Holland (1972)
[a4] M.J. Mossinghoff, "Small Salem numbers" , web page: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~mjm/lc/lists/SalemList.html (1998)
How to Cite This Entry:
Salem number. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Salem_number&oldid=12578
This article was adapted from an original article by David Boyd (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article