Difference between revisions of "Lexicographic order"
(MSC 06A) |
m (ce) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{MSC|06A}} | + | {{TEX|done}}{{MSC|06A}} |
A [[partial order]] on a [[direct product]] | A [[partial order]] on a [[direct product]] | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | X = \prod_{\alpha \in L} X_\alpha | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | of [[partially ordered set]]s $X_\alpha$, where the set of indices $L$ is well-ordered (cf. [[Totally well-ordered set]]), defined as follows: If $(x_\alpha), (y_\alpha) \in X$, then $(x_\alpha) \leq(y_\alpha) \in X$ if and only if either $x_\alpha = y_\alpha$ for all $\alpha \in L$ or there is an $\alpha \in L$ such that $x_\alpha < y_\alpha$ and $x_\beta = y_\beta$ for all $\beta < \alpha$. A set $X$ ordered by the lexicographic order is called the lexicographic, or ordinal, product of the sets $X_\alpha$. If all the sets $X_\alpha$ coincide ($X_\alpha = Y$ for all $\alpha \in L$), then their lexicographic product is called an ''ordinal power'' of $Y$ and is denoted by ${}^L Y$. One also says that $X$ is ordered by the principle of first difference (as words are ordered in a dictionary). Thus, if $L$ is the sequence of natural numbers, then | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | (x_1,\ldots,x_n,\ldots) < (y_1,\ldots,y_n,\ldots) | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | means that, for some $k$, | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | x_k < y_k \ \ \text { and } \ \ x_i = y_i \text{ for all } i<k\ . | ||
+ | $$ | ||
− | + | The lexicographic order is a special case of an ordered product of partially ordered sets (see [[#References|[3]]]). The lexicographic order can be defined similarly for any partially ordered set of indices $L$ (see [[#References|[1]]]), but in this case the relation on the set $L$ is not necessarily an order in the usual sense (cf. [[Order (on a set)|Order (on a set)]]). | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | The lexicographic order is a special case of an ordered product of partially ordered sets (see [[#References|[3]]]). The lexicographic order can be defined similarly for any partially ordered set of indices | ||
A lexicographic product of finitely many well-ordered sets is well-ordered. A lexicographic product of chains is a [[Chain|chain]]. | A lexicographic product of finitely many well-ordered sets is well-ordered. A lexicographic product of chains is a [[Chain|chain]]. | ||
− | For a finite | + | For a finite $L$, the lexicographic order was first considered by G. Cantor in the definition of a product of order types of totally ordered sets. |
− | |||
− | in the definition of a product of order types of totally ordered sets. | ||
The lexicographic order is widely used outside mathematics, for example in ordering words in dictionaries, reference books, etc. | The lexicographic order is widely used outside mathematics, for example in ordering words in dictionaries, reference books, etc. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Birkhoff, "Lattice theory" , ''Colloq. Publ.'' , '''25''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Kuratowski, A. Mostowski, "Set theory" , North-Holland (1968)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.A. Skornyakov, "Elements of lattice theory" , A. Hilger (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre I" ''Math. Ann.'' , '''46''' (1895) pp. 481–512</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre II" ''Math. Ann'' , '''49''' (1897) pp. 207–246</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Hausdorff, "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" , Leipzig (1914) (Reprinted (incomplete) English translation: Set theory, Chelsea (1978))</TD></TR></table> | + | <table> |
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Birkhoff, "Lattice theory" , ''Colloq. Publ.'' , '''25''' , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Kuratowski, A. Mostowski, "Set theory" , North-Holland (1968)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> L.A. Skornyakov, "Elements of lattice theory" , A. Hilger (1977) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[4a]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre I" ''Math. Ann.'' , '''46''' (1895) pp. 481–512</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[4b]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre II" ''Math. Ann'' , '''49''' (1897) pp. 207–246</TD></TR> | ||
+ | <TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> F. Hausdorff, "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" , Leipzig (1914) (Reprinted (incomplete) English translation: Set theory, Chelsea (1978))</TD></TR> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
− | The question of which totally ordered sets | + | The question of which totally ordered sets $(X,{\prec})$ admit a function $f:X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $x \prec x'$ if and only if $f(x) > f(x')$, is of interest in mathematical economics (utility function, cf. [[#References|[a1]]]). The lexicographic order on $\mathbb{R}^2$ shows that not all totally ordered sets admit a utility function. |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Debreu, "Theory of values" , Yale Univ. Press (1959)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> G. Debreu, "Theory of values" , Yale Univ. Press (1959)</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 09:37, 22 November 2014
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 06A [MSN][ZBL]
A partial order on a direct product $$ X = \prod_{\alpha \in L} X_\alpha $$ of partially ordered sets $X_\alpha$, where the set of indices $L$ is well-ordered (cf. Totally well-ordered set), defined as follows: If $(x_\alpha), (y_\alpha) \in X$, then $(x_\alpha) \leq(y_\alpha) \in X$ if and only if either $x_\alpha = y_\alpha$ for all $\alpha \in L$ or there is an $\alpha \in L$ such that $x_\alpha < y_\alpha$ and $x_\beta = y_\beta$ for all $\beta < \alpha$. A set $X$ ordered by the lexicographic order is called the lexicographic, or ordinal, product of the sets $X_\alpha$. If all the sets $X_\alpha$ coincide ($X_\alpha = Y$ for all $\alpha \in L$), then their lexicographic product is called an ordinal power of $Y$ and is denoted by ${}^L Y$. One also says that $X$ is ordered by the principle of first difference (as words are ordered in a dictionary). Thus, if $L$ is the sequence of natural numbers, then $$ (x_1,\ldots,x_n,\ldots) < (y_1,\ldots,y_n,\ldots) $$ means that, for some $k$, $$ x_k < y_k \ \ \text { and } \ \ x_i = y_i \text{ for all } i<k\ . $$
The lexicographic order is a special case of an ordered product of partially ordered sets (see [3]). The lexicographic order can be defined similarly for any partially ordered set of indices $L$ (see [1]), but in this case the relation on the set $L$ is not necessarily an order in the usual sense (cf. Order (on a set)).
A lexicographic product of finitely many well-ordered sets is well-ordered. A lexicographic product of chains is a chain.
For a finite $L$, the lexicographic order was first considered by G. Cantor in the definition of a product of order types of totally ordered sets.
The lexicographic order is widely used outside mathematics, for example in ordering words in dictionaries, reference books, etc.
References
[1] | G. Birkhoff, "Lattice theory" , Colloq. Publ. , 25 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1973) |
[2] | K. Kuratowski, A. Mostowski, "Set theory" , North-Holland (1968) |
[3] | L.A. Skornyakov, "Elements of lattice theory" , A. Hilger (1977) (Translated from Russian) |
[4a] | G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre I" Math. Ann. , 46 (1895) pp. 481–512 |
[4b] | G. Cantor, "Beiträge zur Begründung der transfiniten Mengenlehre II" Math. Ann , 49 (1897) pp. 207–246 |
[5] | F. Hausdorff, "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" , Leipzig (1914) (Reprinted (incomplete) English translation: Set theory, Chelsea (1978)) |
Comments
The question of which totally ordered sets $(X,{\prec})$ admit a function $f:X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that $x \prec x'$ if and only if $f(x) > f(x')$, is of interest in mathematical economics (utility function, cf. [a1]). The lexicographic order on $\mathbb{R}^2$ shows that not all totally ordered sets admit a utility function.
References
[a1] | G. Debreu, "Theory of values" , Yale Univ. Press (1959) |
Lexicographic order. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lexicographic_order&oldid=34790