|
|
| (90 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==The intermediate value theorem==
| + | Each statement of a syllogism is one of 4 types, as follows: |
| | | | |
| − | As noted above, Gauss' 1816 proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra assumed as obvious, and hence did not prove, the intermediate value theorem. Bolzano was the first to offer a correct proof of the theorem, which he stated as follows:<ref>Jarnik</ref>
| + | ::{| class="wikitable" |
| − | :If a function, continuous in a closed interval, assumes values of opposite signs at the endpoints of this interval, then this function equals zero at one inner point of the interval at least. | + | |- |
| − | Certainly the theorem seems ''intuitively'' plausible, for a continuous curve which passes partly under, partly above the x-axis, ''necessarily'' intersects the x-axis. But it was Bolzano's insight that the theorem needed to be proved ''as a consequence of the definition of continuity'' and he undertook to do.
| + | ! Type !! Statement !! Alternative |
| − | | + | |- |
| − | ====Bolzano's proof====
| + | | style="text-align: center;" | '''A''' || '''All''' $A$ '''are''' $B$ || |
| − | | + | |- |
| − | In his paper of 1817, Bolzano stated the theorem in terms of the roots of a polynomial equation in one real variable, as follows:<ref>Russ p. 181</ref>
| + | | style="text-align: center;" | '''I''' || '''Some''' $A$ '''are''' $B$ || |
| − | :If a function of the form
| + | |- |
| − | ::$x^n + ax^{n-1} + bx^{n-2} + ... + px + q$
| + | | style="text-align: center;" | '''E''' || '''No''' $A$ '''are''' $B$ || (= '''All''' $A$ '''are not''' $B$) |
| − | :in which $n$ denotes a whole positive number, is positive for $x = \alpha$ and negative for $x = \beta$, then the equation
| + | |- |
| − | ::$x^n + ax^{n-1} + bx^{n-2} + ... + px + q = 0$
| + | | style="text-align: center;" | '''O''' || '''Not All''' $A$ '''are''' $B$ || (= '''Some''' $A$ '''are not''' $B$) |
| − | :has at least one real root lying between $\alpha$ and $\beta$. | + | |} |
| − | In his prefatory remarks, Bolzano discussed in detail previous proofs of the intermediate value theorem. Many of those proofs (alike with Gauss' 1799 proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra) depended "on a truth borrowed from geometry." Bolzano rejected all such proofs in totality and unequivocally:<ref>Russ p. 160</ref>
| |
| − | :It is an intolerable offense against correct method to derive truths of pure (or general) mathematics (i.e., arithmetic, algebra, analysis) from considerations which belong to a merely applied (or special) part, namely, geometry.... A strictly scientific proof, or the objective reason, of a truth which holds equally for all quantities, whether in space or not, cannot possibly lie in a truth which holds merely for quantities which are in space.
| |
| − | Other proofs that Bolzano examined and rejected were based "on an incorrect concept of continuity":
| |
| − | :No less objectionable is the proof which some have constructed from the concept of the continuity of a function with the inclusion of the concepts of time and motion.... No one will deny that the concepts of time and motion are just as foreign to general mathematics as the concept of space.
| |
| − | Bolzano caped his prefatory remarks with the first mathematical achievement of his paper, namely, a formal definition of the continuity of a function of one real variable, which he stated as follows:<ref>Russ p. 162</ref>
| |
| − | :If a function $f(x)$ varies according to the law of continuity for all values of $x$ inside or outside certain limits, then if $x$ is some such value, the difference $f(x + \omega) - f(x)$ can be made smaller than any given quantity provided $\omega$ can be taken as small as we please.
| |
| − | Bolzano's proof of the main theorem stated above achieved the following additional mathematical results:<ref>Russ p. 157</ref>
| |
| − | * FIrst, Bolzano introduced the (necessary and sufficient) condtition for the (pointwise) convergence of an infinite series, known today as the [[Cauchy test|Cauchy condition]] (on occasion the Bolzano-Cauchy condition), as follows:
| |
| − | :: If a series of quantities
| |
| − | :::$F_1x$, $F_2x$, $F_3x$, . . . , $F_nx$, . . . , $F_{n+r}x$, . . .
| |
| − | ::has the property that the difference between its.$n$th term $F_nx$ and every later term $F_{n+r}x$, however far from the former, remains smaller than any given quantity if $n$ has been taken large enough, then there is always a certain constant quantity, and indeed only one, which the terms of this series approach, and to which they can come as close as desired if the series is continued far enough.
| |
| − | :As noted previously, Bolzano demonstrate only the ''plausibility'' of the criterion, but did not provide a proof of its sufficiency.
| |
| − | :Bolzano provided here also a proof of the fact that a sequence has at most one limit. The significance of this proof lies not in its achievement (it is very easy) but in the fact that Bolzano may have been the first to realize the need for a proof.<ref>Jarnik</ref>
| |
| − | * Next, Bolzano used the [[Cauchy test|Cauchy condition]] in a proof of the following theorem:
| |
| − | ::If a property M does not belong to all values of a variable x, but does belong to all values which are less than a certain u, then there is always a quantity U which is the greatest of those of which it can be asserted that all smaller x have property M.
| |
| − | :In effect, Bolzano here proved the greatest lower bound theorem -- the infinum theorem. The number U is in fact the greatest lower bound of those numbers which do not possess the property M.<ref>Jarnik</ref> The theorem proved is also equivalent to the following form of the [[Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem]] and is in fact therefore the original statement of that theorem:<ref>Russ</ref>
| |
| − | ::Every bounded infinite set has an accumulation point.
| |
| − | :A complete proof of the greatest lower bound theorem, alike with the condition of convergence on which it depends, needed to await the building of the theory of real numbers. However, Bolzano here demonstrated the ''plausibility'' of the theorem.
| |
| − | * Next, Bolzano stated and proved the intermediate value theorem, which he stated in a form that is now sometimes called Bolzano's theorem and that Bolzano himself believed to be "a more general truth" than the main theorem he set out to prove:
| |
| − | :If two functions of $x$, $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, vary according to the law of continuity either for all values $x$ or only for those which lie between $\alpha$ and $\beta$, and if $f(\alpha) < g(\alpha)$ and $f(\beta) > g(\beta)$, then there is always a certain value of $x$ between $\alpha$ and $\beta$ for which $f(x) = g(x)$
| |
| − | * Finally, Bolzano stated and proved the main theorem noted at the outset.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ====Cauchy's proof==== | |
| − | | |
| − | Quite independently of Bolzano, Cauchy formulated the intermediate value theorem in 1821 in the following, simpler form:<ref>[[Cauchy theorem]]</ref>
| |
| − | :If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of a real variable $x$ and $c$ is a number between $f(a)$ and $f(b)$, then there is a point $x$ in this interval such that $f(x) = c$.
| |
| − | Indeed, some authors identify the theorem as Cauchy's (intermediate-value) theorem.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Notes==
| |
| − | <references/>
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Primary sources==
| |
| − | * Bolzano, Bernard (1817). ''Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes, dass zwischen je zwey Werthen, die ein entgegengesetzes Resultat gewahren, wenigstens eine reelle Wurzel der Gleichung liege''. ["Purely analytic proof of the theorem that between any two values which give results of opposite sign there lies at least one real root of the equation"]. Prague.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==References==
| |
| − | * Russ, S. B. "A Translation of Bolzano's Paper on the Intermediate Value Theorem," ''Historia Mathematica'' 7 (1980), 156-185.
| |