Hypercontractive semi-group
A semi-group
of Hermitian operators (cf. also Semi-group of operators) on a Hilbert space
such that:
1)
for all
,
and
;
2) there exist
and
such that
for all
. Semi-groups having properties similar to 1) and 2) were first introduced by E. Nelson [a9] to prove that the Hamiltonian operators arising in some models of quantum field theory are bounded below. In the important case that
, condition 2) can be replaced by the following more natural condition, to which 2) is equivalent in the presence of 1):
3) for every
there exists a
, depending on
and
, such that
(restricted or extended to
) is a bounded operator from
to
. Interpolation theorems are used in the proof. Below, all
spaces are taken to be real for simplicity and it is assumed that
, this being the case of principal interest.
The prototypical example of a hypercontractive semi-group is given by choosing
and
![]() |
Denote by
the adjoint of differentiation computed in
. Let
![]() |
(This should be interpreted as a closed version of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operator with
as a core.) Then
is a hypercontractive semi-group. In fact,
can be taken equal to one in condition 2). Furthermore, for this semi-group the smallest time
for boundedness in condition 3) is known. One has Nelson's family of hypercontractive inequalities: for
,
![]() | (a1) |
Moreover,
if
. In (a1) one should regard the operators
as restricted or extended to
.
If in (a1) one chooses
and
, then (a1) yields
![]() | (a2) |
This inequality becomes an equality for
. Therefore it can be differentiated at
for
smooth enough. One gets the following logarithmic Sobolev inequality [a7]:
![]() | (a3) |
![]() |
Nelson's family of hypercontractive inequalities (a1) can be recovered easily from the single logarithmic Sobolev inequality (a3) [a7]. More generally, L. Gross [a7] established an equivalence between hypercontractivity conditions such as 1) and 2), on the one hand, and, on the other hand, coercivity inequalities for
of the form
![]() | (a4) |
![]() |
(which reduces to (a3) in the previous example if one takes
and
). These coercivity inequalities have come to be known in general as logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. Because of this equivalence the theory of hypercontractive semi-groups has, to a great extent, been developed in conjunction with the theory of logarithmic Sobolev inequalities. The equivalence of (a4) with 1) and 2) is valid only for a class of operators
which includes the important category of Dirichlet-form operators. See the survey [a8] for further generality and for references to the early history of these two topics.
By way of application, if one can establish inequalities of the form (a4) for an elliptic partial differential operator
on a Riemannian manifold, then one half of the equivalence theorem shows that the semi-group
has boundedness properties similar to 3), with a specifically given function
. Since
is an integral operator, with kernel
say, these norm bounds on
can be converted into direct estimates on the size of the so-called "heat kernel"
. See [a4] for a self-contained exposition of this method of obtaining pointwise heat kernel bounds for elliptic partial differential operators.
There are three basic consequences of the logarithmic Sobolev inequality (a4) which do not require
to be a Dirichlet-form operator but merely self-adjoint (cf. Self-adjoint operator).
i) The Federbush–Faris semi-boundedness theorem asserts that (a4) is equivalent to the condition that the (generally unbounded) operator
is in fact bounded below for all real-valued measurable functions
on
satisfying
.
ii) The Segal–Faris additivity theorem asserts that if
and
both satisfy (a4), then so does the independent sum
.
iii) The Rothaus–Simon spectral gap theorem asserts that if (a4) holds with
and if
, then
has no spectrum (cf. Spectrum of an operator) in the interval
. For precise statements of these theorems and proofs see the survey [a8].
A very simple example of another semi-group satisfying Nelson's hypercontractivity inequalities (a1) is as follows. Denote by
the two-point set
. Define
. Let
be the projection onto the orthogonal complement of the constant functions in
. Then (a1) holds. Moreover, (a4) holds with
and
. Since
is two-dimensional, the proof of (a4) reduces in this example to a few lines of elementary calculus (see, e.g., [a8], Example 2.6). The resulting inequality is known as the two-point logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Now, by the Segal–Faris additivity theorem there follows by induction a logarithmic Sobolev inequality on the product space
for the product measure. An application of the central limit theorem then allows one to take the limit as
and arrive at the inequality (a3) (first for
, then, by additivity, for general
). This method of deriving the differential inequalities (a1) from discrete inequalities via the central limit theorem [a3], [a7] has also been used [a2] to derive the sharp Hausdorff–Young inequality (cf. Hausdorff–Young inequalities) for the Fourier transform on
.
The notions of hypercontractivity and logarithmic Sobolev inequalities can also be formulated in the context of non-commutative integration theory, specifically over Clifford algebras (cf. Clifford algebra). See [a8], Sect. 6(v), for a survey.
Applications of both concepts to statistical mechanics are rapidly increasing at the present time (1996). For a survey of work through 1992, see [a10]. For applications to the theory of large deviations, see [a5]. For recent applications to statistics, see the survey [a6].
Unlike the classical Sobolev inequalities, logarithmic Sobolev inequalities tend to be dimension independent and valid in many infinite-dimensional settings. For example, the inequality (a3) is meaningful and correct when
. One need only interpret the first integrand on the right as
![]() |
The dimension independence accounts, in part, for their usefulness in statistical mechanics (cf. also Statistical mechanics, mathematical problems in), statistics, and large deviations, and for their origin in constructive quantum field theory.
The survey [a8] discusses the topics up through 1992. [a1] also surveys related topics and describes various methods for proving logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for specific operators
.
References
| [a1] | D. Bakry, "L'hypercontractivité et son utilisation en théorie des semi-groups" P. Bernard (ed.) , Lectures on Probability Theory , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 1581 , Springer (1994) pp. 1–114 |
| [a2] | W. Beckner, "Inequalities in Fourier analysis" Ann. of Math. , 102 (1975) pp. 159–182 |
| [a3] | A. Bonami, "Études des coefficients de Fourier des fonctions de " Ann. Inst. Fourier , 20 : 2 (1970) pp. 335–402 |
| [a4] | E.B. Davies, "Heat kernels and spectral theory" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1989) |
| [a5] | J. D. Deuschel, D. W. Stroock, "Large deviations" , Pure Appl. Math. , 137 , Acad. Press (1989) |
| [a6] | P. Diaconis, L. Saloff-Coste, "Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for finite Markov chains" Ann. Appl. Probab. (1996) |
| [a7] | L. Gross, "Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities" Amer. J. of Math. , 97 (1975) pp. 1061–1083 |
| [a8] | L. Gross, "Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and contractivity properties of semigroups" G. Dell'Antonio (ed.) U. Mosco (ed.) , Dirichlet Forms , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 1563 , Springer (1993) pp. 54–88 |
| [a9] | E. Nelson, "A quartic interaction in two dimensions" R. Goodman (ed.) I.E. Segal (ed.) , Mathematical Theory of Elementary Particles , MIT (1966) pp. 69–73 |
| [a10] | D. Stroock, "Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities for Gibbs states" G. Dell'Antonio (ed.) U. Mosco (ed.) , Dirichlet Forms , Lecture Notes in Mathematics , 1563 , Springer (1993) pp. 194–228 |
Hypercontractive semi-group. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Hypercontractive_semi-group&oldid=47294









" Ann. Inst. Fourier , 20 : 2 (1970) pp. 335–402