Difference between revisions of "Hausdorff gap"
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 41 formulas out of 42 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.) |
m (Automatically changed introduction) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | ||
was used. | was used. | ||
− | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. | + | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct and if all png images have been replaced by TeX code, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. |
Out of 42 formulas, 41 were replaced by TEX code.--> | Out of 42 formulas, 41 were replaced by TEX code.--> |
Revision as of 17:41, 1 July 2020
If $A$ and $B$ are subsets of $\omega$, then one writes $A \subseteq_{*} B$ provided that $A \backslash B$ is finite. In addition, $A \subset_{*} B$ means that $A \subseteq_{*} B$ while, moreover, $B \backslash A$ is infinite. Finally, $A \cap B =_{*} \emptyset$ means that $A \cap B$ is finite.
Let $\kappa$ and $\lambda$ be infinite cardinal numbers (cf. also Cardinal number), and consider the following statement:
$G ( \kappa , \lambda )$: There are a $\kappa$-sequence $\{ U _ { \xi } : \xi < \kappa \}$ of subsets of $\omega$ and a $\lambda$-sequence $\{ V _ { \xi } : \xi < \lambda \}$ of subsets of $\omega$ such that:
1) $U _ { \xi } \subset _{*} U _ { \eta }$ if $\xi < \eta < \kappa$;
2) $V _ { \xi } \subset_{*} V _ { \eta }$ if $\xi < \eta < \lambda$;
3) if $\xi < \kappa$ and $\eta < \lambda$, then $U _ { \xi } \cap V _ { \eta } =_{*} \emptyset$;
4) there does not exist a subset $W$ of $\omega$ such that $V _ { \xi } \subseteq_{ * } W$ for all $\xi < \kappa$ and $W \cap U _ { \xi } =_{*} \emptyset$ for all $\xi < \lambda$.
In [a2], F. Hausdorff proved that $G ( \omega , \omega )$) is false while $G ( \omega _ { 1 } , \omega _ { 1 } )$) is true. The sets that witness the fact that $G ( \omega _ { 1 } , \omega _ { 1 } )$) holds are called a Hausdorff gap. K. Kunen has shown in [a3] that it is consistent with Martin's axiom (cf. also Suslin hypothesis) and the negation of the continuum hypothesis that $G ( \omega _ { 1 } , c )$) and $G ( \mathfrak c , \mathfrak c )$) both are false. Here, is the cardinality of the continuum (cf. also Continuum, cardinality of the). He also proved that it is consistent with Martin's axiom and the negation of the continuum hypothesis that $G ( \omega _ { 1 } , c )$) and $G ( \mathfrak c , \mathfrak c )$) both are true. See [a1] for more details.
References
[a1] | J.E. Baumgartner, "Applications of the Proper Forcing Axiom" K. Kunen (ed.) J.E. Vaughan (ed.) , Handbook of Set Theoretic Topology , North-Holland (1984) pp. 913–959 |
[a2] | F. Hausdorff, "Summen von $\aleph_1$ Mengen" Fund. Math. , 26 (1936) pp. 241–255 |
[a3] | K. Kunen, "$( \kappa , \lambda ^ { * } )$-gaps under MA" Unpublished manuscript |
Hausdorff gap. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Hausdorff_gap&oldid=50552