Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paving"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Definition of compact== The definition of compactness in terms of the finite intersection property here seems wrong. The text says :A compact paving is a paving $\mathcal{...")
 
(strange article)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
I don't think these are the same.  [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 19:17, 14 October 2017 (CEST)
 
I don't think these are the same.  [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 19:17, 14 October 2017 (CEST)
 +
 +
:Surely not. Looking for instance at [http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1978-069-01/S0002-9939-1978-0466469-X/S0002-9939-1978-0466469-X.pdf Alan Sultan 1978] I see that, first, a paving is required to be a lattice of subsets, and second, compactness is defined in a way equivalent to yours, not to one in our (strange) article. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 20:13, 14 October 2017 (CEST)

Revision as of 18:13, 14 October 2017

Definition of compact

The definition of compactness in terms of the finite intersection property here seems wrong. The text says

A compact paving is a paving $\mathcal{C}$ with the FIP: for every finite subset $\{C_1,\ldots,C_n\} \subset \mathcal{C}$, $\cap_{i=1}^n C_i \ne \emptyset$.

The reference says that

any $\mathcal{F} \subset \mathcal{C}$ having the FIP has non-empty intersection

I don't think these are the same. Richard Pinch (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2017 (CEST)

Surely not. Looking for instance at Alan Sultan 1978 I see that, first, a paving is required to be a lattice of subsets, and second, compactness is defined in a way equivalent to yours, not to one in our (strange) article. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 20:13, 14 October 2017 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Paving. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Paving&oldid=42072