Difference between revisions of "Fatou ring"
(Completed TeX.) |
(\hdots does not seem to work, so replaced with ...) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
$$a_{n+s}+q_1a_{n+1}+\cdots+q_sa_n=0\textrm{ for }n\geq 0,$$ | $$a_{n+s}+q_1a_{n+1}+\cdots+q_sa_n=0\textrm{ for }n\geq 0,$$ | ||
− | where $q_1, | + | where $q_1,...,q_s\in K$ and $s$ is as small as possible, then $q_1,...,q_s\in A$. |
If $A$ is a Fatou ring, then its quotient field $K$ is a [[Fatou extension|Fatou extension]] of $A$, but the converse does not hold. This is the reason why Fatou rings are sometimes called strong Fatou rings, while the domains $A$ such that $K$ is a Fatou extension of $A$ are called weak Fatou rings (in this latter case, every $R\in K(X)\cap A[[X]]$ has a unitary (not necessarily irreducible) representation with coefficients in $A$). | If $A$ is a Fatou ring, then its quotient field $K$ is a [[Fatou extension|Fatou extension]] of $A$, but the converse does not hold. This is the reason why Fatou rings are sometimes called strong Fatou rings, while the domains $A$ such that $K$ is a Fatou extension of $A$ are called weak Fatou rings (in this latter case, every $R\in K(X)\cap A[[X]]$ has a unitary (not necessarily irreducible) representation with coefficients in $A$). |
Revision as of 18:57, 19 April 2012
An integral domain $A$ with quotient field $K$ such that if each rational function $R\in K(X)$ that has a Taylor expansion at $0$ with coefficients in $A$, has a unitary and irreducible representation with coefficients in $A$; that is, for each $R\in K(X)\cap A[[X]]$ there are $P,Q\in A[X]$ such that $R=P/Q$, $Q(0)=1$ and $P$ and $Q$ are relatively prime in $K[X]$. Fatou's lemma [a1] states that $\mathbb{Z}$ is a Fatou ring.
Equivalently, $A$ is a Fatou ring means that if a sequence $\{ a_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ of elements of $A$ satisfies a linear recursion formula
$$a_{n+s}+q_1a_{n+1}+\cdots+q_sa_n=0\textrm{ for }n\geq 0,$$
where $q_1,...,q_s\in K$ and $s$ is as small as possible, then $q_1,...,q_s\in A$.
If $A$ is a Fatou ring, then its quotient field $K$ is a Fatou extension of $A$, but the converse does not hold. This is the reason why Fatou rings are sometimes called strong Fatou rings, while the domains $A$ such that $K$ is a Fatou extension of $A$ are called weak Fatou rings (in this latter case, every $R\in K(X)\cap A[[X]]$ has a unitary (not necessarily irreducible) representation with coefficients in $A$).
The coefficients of the unitary and irreducible representation of every element of $K(X)\cap A((X))$ are almost integral over $A$ (see Fatou extension). An integral domain $A$ is a Fatou ring if and only if every element of $K$ which is almost integral over $A$ belongs to $A$ [a2]; such domains are said to be completely integrally closed. For instance, a Noetherian domain (cf. also Noetherian ring) is completely integrally closed if and only if it is integrally closed (cf. also Integral domain). The rings of integers of number fields are completely integrally closed, and hence, Fatou rings.
The notion may be extended by considering formal power series in non-commuting variables. The characterization of this generalized property is still (1998) an open question.
References
[a1] | P. Fatou, "Sur les séries entières à coefficients entiers" C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. A , 138 (1904) pp. 342–344 |
[a2] | S. Eilenberg, "Automata, languages and machines" , A , Acad. Press (1974) |
Fatou ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Fatou_ring&oldid=24794