Difference between revisions of "Talk:Equivalence relation"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(why comment?) |
(Not really, just following the style of other articles) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there a good reason to add a comment? Saturated sets could fit into the main text. See also [[Talk:EoM:This_project#Preferred_style]]. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 21:33, 30 December 2014 (CET) | Is there a good reason to add a comment? Saturated sets could fit into the main text. See also [[Talk:EoM:This_project#Preferred_style]]. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 21:33, 30 December 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | :Not really, just following the style of other articles. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 21:37, 30 December 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:37, 30 December 2014
Is there a good reason to add a comment? Saturated sets could fit into the main text. See also Talk:EoM:This_project#Preferred_style. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2014 (CET)
- Not really, just following the style of other articles. Richard Pinch (talk) 21:37, 30 December 2014 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
Equivalence relation. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equivalence_relation&oldid=35987
Equivalence relation. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Equivalence_relation&oldid=35987