Difference between revisions of "Holomorphy, criteria for"
m |
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 59 formulas out of 59 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article, | ||
+ | the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist | ||
+ | was used. | ||
+ | If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Out of 59 formulas, 59 were replaced by TEX code.--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|done}} | ||
''criteria for analyticity'' | ''criteria for analyticity'' | ||
− | The natural criteria for holomorphy (analyticity) of a | + | The natural criteria for holomorphy (analyticity) of a $C ^ { 1 }$ (or continuous) function $f$ in a domain $\Omega$ of the complex plane are "infinitesimal" (cf. [[Analytic function|Analytic function]]), namely: power series expansions, the [[Cauchy-Riemann equations]], and even the [[Morera theorem|Morera theorem]], since it states that |
− | + | \begin{equation*} \int _ { \Gamma } f ( z ) d z = 0 \end{equation*} | |
− | for all Jordan curves | + | for all Jordan curves $\Gamma$ such that $\Gamma \cup \text { int } ( \Gamma ) \subset \Omega$, is a necessary and sufficient condition for $f$ being analytic in $\Omega$. The condition (and the usual proofs) depend on the fact that $\Gamma$ can be taken to be arbitrarily small. |
− | The first "non-infinitesimal" condition is due to M. Agranovsky and R.E. Val'skii (see [[#References|[a2]]] and [[#References|[a6]]] for all relevant references): Let | + | The first "non-infinitesimal" condition is due to M. Agranovsky and R.E. Val'skii (see [[#References|[a2]]] and [[#References|[a6]]] for all relevant references): Let $\gamma$ be a piecewise smooth Jordan curve, then a function $f$ continuous in $\mathbf{C}$ is entire (analytic everywhere) if and only if for every transformation $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ and $k = 0,1,2 , \dots$ it satisfies |
− | + | \begin{equation*} \int _ { \sigma ( \gamma ) } f ( z ) d z = 0. \end{equation*} | |
− | (Recall that | + | (Recall that $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ means that $\sigma ( z ) = e ^ { i \theta } z + a$, $\theta \in \mathbf{R}$, $a \in \mathbf{C}$.) |
A generalization of this theorem and of Morera's theorem which is both local and non-infinitesimal is the following Berenstein–Gay theorem [[#References|[a3]]]. | A generalization of this theorem and of Morera's theorem which is both local and non-infinitesimal is the following Berenstein–Gay theorem [[#References|[a3]]]. | ||
− | Let | + | Let $\Gamma$ be a Jordan polygon contained in $B ( 0 , r / 2 )$ and $f \in C ( B ( 0 , r ) )$; then $f$ is analytic in $B ( 0 , r )$ if and only if for any $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ such that $\sigma ( \Gamma ) \subseteq B ( 0 , r )$, |
− | + | \begin{equation*} \int _ { \sigma ( \Gamma ) } f ( z ) d z = 0. \end{equation*} | |
This theorem can be extended to several complex variables and other geometries (see [[#References|[a2]]], [[#References|[a5]]], and [[#References|[a6]]] for references). | This theorem can be extended to several complex variables and other geometries (see [[#References|[a2]]], [[#References|[a5]]], and [[#References|[a6]]] for references). | ||
− | A different kind of conditions for holomorphy occur when one considers the problem of extending a [[Continuous function|continuous function]] defined on a curve in | + | A different kind of conditions for holomorphy occur when one considers the problem of extending a [[Continuous function|continuous function]] defined on a curve in $\mathbf{C}$ (or in a real $( 2 n - 1 )$-manifold in $\mathbf{C} ^ { n }$) to an analytic function defined in a domain that contains the curve (or hypersurface) on its boundary. This is sometimes called a CR extension. An example of this type, generalizing the moment conditions of the Berenstein–Gay theorem, appears in the work of L. Aizenberg and collaborators (cf. also [[Analytic continuation into a domain of a function given on part of the boundary|Analytic continuation into a domain of a function given on part of the boundary]]; [[Carleman formulas|Carleman formulas]]): Let $D$ be a subdomain of $B ( 0,1 ) \subseteq \mathbf C$, bounded by an arc of the unit circle and a smooth simple curve $\Gamma \subseteq B ( 0,1 )$ and assume that $f \in C ( \Gamma )$. Then there is a function $F$, holomorphic inside $D$ and continuous on its closure, such that $F | _ { \Gamma } = f$ if and only if |
− | + | \begin{equation*} \operatorname { limsup } _ { k \rightarrow \infty } \left| \int _ { \Gamma } \frac { f ( \xi ) } { \xi ^ { k + 1 } } d \xi \right| ^ { 1 / k } \leq 1. \end{equation*} | |
− | A boundary version of the Berenstein–Gay theorem can be proven when regarding the Heisenberg group | + | A boundary version of the Berenstein–Gay theorem can be proven when regarding the Heisenberg group $H ^ { n }$ (cf. also [[Nil manifold|Nil manifold]]) as the boundary of the Siegel upper half-space |
− | + | \begin{equation*} S _ { n + 1 } = \left\{ z \in \mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1 } : \operatorname { Im } z _ { n + 1 } > \sum ^ { n _ { j = 1 } } | z _ { j } | ^ { 2 } \right\}, \end{equation*} | |
− | but the boundary values are restricted to be in | + | but the boundary values are restricted to be in $L ^ { p } ( H ^ { n } )$, $1 \leq p \leq \infty$, [[#References|[a1]]]. Related analytic extension theorems from continuous boundary values have been proven by J. Globevnik and E.L. Stout, E. Grinberg, W. Rudin, and others (see [[#References|[a2]]] for references) in the bounded "version" of $H ^ { n }$, namely the unit ball $B$ of $\mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1}$, or, more generally, for bounded domains, by essentially considering extensions from the boundary to complex subspaces. An example is the following Globevnik–Stout theorem, [[#References|[a4]]]. |
− | Let | + | Let $\Omega$ be a bounded domain in $\mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1}$ with $C ^ { 2 }$ boundary. Let $1 \leq k \leq n$ and assume $f \in C ( \partial \Omega )$ is such that |
− | + | \begin{equation*} \int _ { \Lambda \bigcap \partial \Omega} f \beta = 0 \end{equation*} | |
− | for all complex | + | for all complex $k$-planes intersecting $\partial \Omega$ transversally, and all $( k , k - 1 )$-forms $\beta$ with constant coefficients. Then $f$ is a $C R$-function, i.e. has an extension as an analytic function to $\Omega$. |
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table>< | + | <table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top"> M. Agranovsky, C. Berenstein, D.C. Chang, "Morera theorem for holomorphic $H _ { p }$ functions in the Heisenberg group" ''J. Reine Angew. Math.'' , '''443''' (1993) pp. 49–89</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Berenstein, D.C. Chang, D. Pascuas, L. Zalcman, "Variations on the theorem of Morera" ''Contemp. Math.'' , '''137''' (1992) pp. 63–78</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top"> C. Berenstein, R. Gay, "Le probléme de Pompeiu local" ''J. Anal. Math.'' , '''52''' (1988) pp. 133–166</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top"> J. Globevnik, E.L. Stout, "Boundary Morera theorems for holomorphic functions of several complex variables" ''Duke Math. J.'' , '''64''' (1991) pp. 571–615</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Zalcman, "Offbeat integral geometry" ''Amer. Math. Monthly'' , '''87''' (1980) pp. 161–175</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top"> L. Zalcman, "A bibliographic survey of the Pompeiu problem" B. Fuglede (ed.) et al. (ed.) , ''Approximation by Solutions of Partial Differential equations'' , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1992) pp. 185–194</td></tr></table> |
Latest revision as of 16:45, 1 July 2020
criteria for analyticity
The natural criteria for holomorphy (analyticity) of a $C ^ { 1 }$ (or continuous) function $f$ in a domain $\Omega$ of the complex plane are "infinitesimal" (cf. Analytic function), namely: power series expansions, the Cauchy-Riemann equations, and even the Morera theorem, since it states that
\begin{equation*} \int _ { \Gamma } f ( z ) d z = 0 \end{equation*}
for all Jordan curves $\Gamma$ such that $\Gamma \cup \text { int } ( \Gamma ) \subset \Omega$, is a necessary and sufficient condition for $f$ being analytic in $\Omega$. The condition (and the usual proofs) depend on the fact that $\Gamma$ can be taken to be arbitrarily small.
The first "non-infinitesimal" condition is due to M. Agranovsky and R.E. Val'skii (see [a2] and [a6] for all relevant references): Let $\gamma$ be a piecewise smooth Jordan curve, then a function $f$ continuous in $\mathbf{C}$ is entire (analytic everywhere) if and only if for every transformation $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ and $k = 0,1,2 , \dots$ it satisfies
\begin{equation*} \int _ { \sigma ( \gamma ) } f ( z ) d z = 0. \end{equation*}
(Recall that $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ means that $\sigma ( z ) = e ^ { i \theta } z + a$, $\theta \in \mathbf{R}$, $a \in \mathbf{C}$.)
A generalization of this theorem and of Morera's theorem which is both local and non-infinitesimal is the following Berenstein–Gay theorem [a3].
Let $\Gamma$ be a Jordan polygon contained in $B ( 0 , r / 2 )$ and $f \in C ( B ( 0 , r ) )$; then $f$ is analytic in $B ( 0 , r )$ if and only if for any $\sigma \in M ( 2 )$ such that $\sigma ( \Gamma ) \subseteq B ( 0 , r )$,
\begin{equation*} \int _ { \sigma ( \Gamma ) } f ( z ) d z = 0. \end{equation*}
This theorem can be extended to several complex variables and other geometries (see [a2], [a5], and [a6] for references).
A different kind of conditions for holomorphy occur when one considers the problem of extending a continuous function defined on a curve in $\mathbf{C}$ (or in a real $( 2 n - 1 )$-manifold in $\mathbf{C} ^ { n }$) to an analytic function defined in a domain that contains the curve (or hypersurface) on its boundary. This is sometimes called a CR extension. An example of this type, generalizing the moment conditions of the Berenstein–Gay theorem, appears in the work of L. Aizenberg and collaborators (cf. also Analytic continuation into a domain of a function given on part of the boundary; Carleman formulas): Let $D$ be a subdomain of $B ( 0,1 ) \subseteq \mathbf C$, bounded by an arc of the unit circle and a smooth simple curve $\Gamma \subseteq B ( 0,1 )$ and assume that $f \in C ( \Gamma )$. Then there is a function $F$, holomorphic inside $D$ and continuous on its closure, such that $F | _ { \Gamma } = f$ if and only if
\begin{equation*} \operatorname { limsup } _ { k \rightarrow \infty } \left| \int _ { \Gamma } \frac { f ( \xi ) } { \xi ^ { k + 1 } } d \xi \right| ^ { 1 / k } \leq 1. \end{equation*}
A boundary version of the Berenstein–Gay theorem can be proven when regarding the Heisenberg group $H ^ { n }$ (cf. also Nil manifold) as the boundary of the Siegel upper half-space
\begin{equation*} S _ { n + 1 } = \left\{ z \in \mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1 } : \operatorname { Im } z _ { n + 1 } > \sum ^ { n _ { j = 1 } } | z _ { j } | ^ { 2 } \right\}, \end{equation*}
but the boundary values are restricted to be in $L ^ { p } ( H ^ { n } )$, $1 \leq p \leq \infty$, [a1]. Related analytic extension theorems from continuous boundary values have been proven by J. Globevnik and E.L. Stout, E. Grinberg, W. Rudin, and others (see [a2] for references) in the bounded "version" of $H ^ { n }$, namely the unit ball $B$ of $\mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1}$, or, more generally, for bounded domains, by essentially considering extensions from the boundary to complex subspaces. An example is the following Globevnik–Stout theorem, [a4].
Let $\Omega$ be a bounded domain in $\mathbf{C} ^ { n + 1}$ with $C ^ { 2 }$ boundary. Let $1 \leq k \leq n$ and assume $f \in C ( \partial \Omega )$ is such that
\begin{equation*} \int _ { \Lambda \bigcap \partial \Omega} f \beta = 0 \end{equation*}
for all complex $k$-planes intersecting $\partial \Omega$ transversally, and all $( k , k - 1 )$-forms $\beta$ with constant coefficients. Then $f$ is a $C R$-function, i.e. has an extension as an analytic function to $\Omega$.
References
[a1] | M. Agranovsky, C. Berenstein, D.C. Chang, "Morera theorem for holomorphic $H _ { p }$ functions in the Heisenberg group" J. Reine Angew. Math. , 443 (1993) pp. 49–89 |
[a2] | C. Berenstein, D.C. Chang, D. Pascuas, L. Zalcman, "Variations on the theorem of Morera" Contemp. Math. , 137 (1992) pp. 63–78 |
[a3] | C. Berenstein, R. Gay, "Le probléme de Pompeiu local" J. Anal. Math. , 52 (1988) pp. 133–166 |
[a4] | J. Globevnik, E.L. Stout, "Boundary Morera theorems for holomorphic functions of several complex variables" Duke Math. J. , 64 (1991) pp. 571–615 |
[a5] | L. Zalcman, "Offbeat integral geometry" Amer. Math. Monthly , 87 (1980) pp. 161–175 |
[a6] | L. Zalcman, "A bibliographic survey of the Pompeiu problem" B. Fuglede (ed.) et al. (ed.) , Approximation by Solutions of Partial Differential equations , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1992) pp. 185–194 |
Holomorphy, criteria for. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Holomorphy,_criteria_for&oldid=31195