Difference between revisions of "User:Matteo.focardi/sandbox"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
− | A formula aimed at expressing the determinant of a | + | A formula aimed at expressing the determinant of a matrix $C\in M_{m,m}(\mathbb{R})$ that is the |
− | of the products of all possible higher order minors of $A$ with corresponding minors of the | + | product of $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$ and $B\mathrm{M}_{n,m}(\mathbb{R})$, in terms of |
− | same order of $B$. | + | the sum of the products of all possible higher order minors of $A$ with corresponding minors of |
− | More precisely, if $\alpha=(1,\ldots,m)$ and $\beta$ denotes any [[Multiindex|multi-index]] | + | the same order of $B$. More precisely, if $\alpha=(1,\ldots,m)$ and $\beta$ denotes any |
− | $(k_1,\ldots,k_m)$ with $1\leq k_1<\ldots<k_m\leq n$ of length $m$, then | + | [[Multiindex|multi-index]] $(k_1,\ldots,k_m)$ with $1\leq k_1<\ldots<k_m\leq n$ of length $m$, then |
\[ | \[ | ||
\det C=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\beta}\det B_{\beta\alpha}. | \det C=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\beta}\det B_{\beta\alpha}. | ||
\] | \] | ||
In case $m>n$, no such $\beta$ exists and the right-hand side above is set to be $0$ by definition. | In case $m>n$, no such $\beta$ exists and the right-hand side above is set to be $0$ by definition. | ||
− | + | Moreover, if $n=m$ the formula reduce to | |
− | + | \[ | |
+ | \det C=\det A\,\det B. | ||
+ | \] | ||
+ | A numberber of interesting consequence of Cauchy-Binet formula is listed below. | ||
+ | First of all, we get straightforwardly an inequality for the [[Rank|rank]] of the product matrix | ||
+ | $C$, i.e., | ||
\[ | \[ | ||
\mathrm{rank}C\leq\min\{\mathrm{rank}A,\mathrm{rank}B\}. | \mathrm{rank}C\leq\min\{\mathrm{rank}A,\mathrm{rank}B\}. | ||
\] | \] |
Revision as of 14:19, 23 November 2012
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 15Axx [MSN][ZBL]
A formula aimed at expressing the determinant of a matrix $C\in M_{m,m}(\mathbb{R})$ that is the product of $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$ and $B\mathrm{M}_{n,m}(\mathbb{R})$, in terms of the sum of the products of all possible higher order minors of $A$ with corresponding minors of the same order of $B$. More precisely, if $\alpha=(1,\ldots,m)$ and $\beta$ denotes any multi-index $(k_1,\ldots,k_m)$ with $1\leq k_1<\ldots<k_m\leq n$ of length $m$, then \[ \det C=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\beta}\det B_{\beta\alpha}. \] In case $m>n$, no such $\beta$ exists and the right-hand side above is set to be $0$ by definition. Moreover, if $n=m$ the formula reduce to \[ \det C=\det A\,\det B. \] A numberber of interesting consequence of Cauchy-Binet formula is listed below. First of all, we get straightforwardly an inequality for the rank of the product matrix $C$, i.e., \[ \mathrm{rank}C\leq\min\{\mathrm{rank}A,\mathrm{rank}B\}. \]
Matteo.focardi/sandbox. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Matteo.focardi/sandbox&oldid=28820