Difference between revisions of "Unconditional summability"
(TeX) |
m (label) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Summability of a series for all possible rearrangements of its terms. The series | Summability of a series for all possible rearrangements of its terms. The series | ||
− | + | $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n\label{*}\tag{*}$$ | |
− | is called unconditionally summable by some summation method A (unconditionally A-summable) if it is summable by this method to a sum s whatever the ordering of its terms, where the value of s may depend on the particular rearrangement (cf. [[Summation methods|Summation methods]]). The study of unconditional summability originated with W. Orlicz [[#References|[1]]]; he showed, in particular, that if \lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=0, then absolute summability of the series by a linear regular method (cf. [[Regular summation methods|Regular summation methods]]) implies [[Unconditional convergence|unconditional convergence]]. It was subsequently shown that this condition may be replaced by a weaker one: \varliminf_{n\to\infty}a_n=0 [[#References|[2]]]. Unconditional summability by a matrix method does not imply unconditional convergence; in fact, take the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty1. If A is a regular [[Matrix summation method|matrix summation method]] and if the series \ | + | is called unconditionally summable by some summation method A (unconditionally A-summable) if it is summable by this method to a sum s whatever the ordering of its terms, where the value of s may depend on the particular rearrangement (cf. [[Summation methods|Summation methods]]). The study of unconditional summability originated with W. Orlicz [[#References|[1]]]; he showed, in particular, that if \lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=0, then absolute summability of the series by a linear regular method (cf. [[Regular summation methods|Regular summation methods]]) implies [[Unconditional convergence|unconditional convergence]]. It was subsequently shown that this condition may be replaced by a weaker one: \varliminf_{n\to\infty}a_n=0 [[#References|[2]]]. Unconditional summability by a matrix method does not imply unconditional convergence; in fact, take the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty1. If A is a regular [[Matrix summation method|matrix summation method]] and if the series \eqref{*} is unconditionally A-summable, then all its terms have the form a_n=c+\eta_n, where c is a constant and the series with terms \eta_n is absolutely convergent: \sum_{n=1}^\infty|\eta_n|<\infty; moreover, c=0 if the method A does not sum the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty1 [[#References|[3]]]. |
In the case of series of functions one distinguishes between summability in measure, everywhere summability, almost-everywhere summability, etc. For unconditional summability of a series of functions, the following statement is valid almost-everywhere: If the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n(x) of measurable functions f_n on a set E is unconditionally A-summable almost-everywhere on E, then the terms of this series have the form f_n(x)=f(x)+\eta_n(x), where f is a finite measurable function on E and the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty\eta_n(x) is unconditionally almost-everywhere convergent on E; also, f=0 if A does not sum \sum_{n=1}^\infty1 [[#References|[2]]]. | In the case of series of functions one distinguishes between summability in measure, everywhere summability, almost-everywhere summability, etc. For unconditional summability of a series of functions, the following statement is valid almost-everywhere: If the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n(x) of measurable functions f_n on a set E is unconditionally A-summable almost-everywhere on E, then the terms of this series have the form f_n(x)=f(x)+\eta_n(x), where f is a finite measurable function on E and the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty\eta_n(x) is unconditionally almost-everywhere convergent on E; also, f=0 if A does not sum \sum_{n=1}^\infty1 [[#References|[2]]]. |
Latest revision as of 15:11, 14 February 2020
Summability of a series for all possible rearrangements of its terms. The series
\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n\label{*}\tag{*}
is called unconditionally summable by some summation method A (unconditionally A-summable) if it is summable by this method to a sum s whatever the ordering of its terms, where the value of s may depend on the particular rearrangement (cf. Summation methods). The study of unconditional summability originated with W. Orlicz [1]; he showed, in particular, that if \lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=0, then absolute summability of the series by a linear regular method (cf. Regular summation methods) implies unconditional convergence. It was subsequently shown that this condition may be replaced by a weaker one: \varliminf_{n\to\infty}a_n=0 [2]. Unconditional summability by a matrix method does not imply unconditional convergence; in fact, take the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty1. If A is a regular matrix summation method and if the series \eqref{*} is unconditionally A-summable, then all its terms have the form a_n=c+\eta_n, where c is a constant and the series with terms \eta_n is absolutely convergent: \sum_{n=1}^\infty|\eta_n|<\infty; moreover, c=0 if the method A does not sum the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty1 [3].
In the case of series of functions one distinguishes between summability in measure, everywhere summability, almost-everywhere summability, etc. For unconditional summability of a series of functions, the following statement is valid almost-everywhere: If the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty f_n(x) of measurable functions f_n on a set E is unconditionally A-summable almost-everywhere on E, then the terms of this series have the form f_n(x)=f(x)+\eta_n(x), where f is a finite measurable function on E and the series \sum_{n=1}^\infty\eta_n(x) is unconditionally almost-everywhere convergent on E; also, f=0 if A does not sum \sum_{n=1}^\infty1 [2].
References
[1] | W. Orlicz, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math., Astr. Phys. : 3A (1927) pp. 117–125 |
[2] | P.L. Ul'yanov, "Unconditional summability" Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. , 23 (1959) pp. 781–808 (In Russian) |
[3] | V.F. Gaposhkin, A.M. Olevskii, Nauchn. Dokl. Vyssh. Shkoly Fiz.-Mat. Nauk. , 6 (1958) pp. 81–86 |
Comments
References
[a1] | K. Zeller, W. Beekmann, "Theorie der Limitierungsverfahren" , Springer (1970) |
Unconditional summability. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Unconditional_summability&oldid=38919