Difference between revisions of "Osgood criterion"
m (→References) |
m |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{TEX|done}} | {{TEX|done}} | ||
− | The term refers to a classical criterion, due to Osgood, see {{Cite|Os}} for the uniqueness of solutions of ordinary differential equations which generalizes the Cauchy-Lipschitz | + | The term refers to a classical criterion, due to Osgood, see {{Cite|Os}} for the uniqueness of solutions of ordinary differential equations which generalizes the [[Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem]]. More precisely, we first introduce the so-called Osgood condition: |
'''Definition 1''' | '''Definition 1''' | ||
− | A continuous nondecreasing | + | A continuous nondecreasing function $\omega:[0, \infty[\to [0, \infty[$ with $\omega (0)=0$ and |
$\omega(\xi)>0$ for $\xi>0$ is said to satisfy Osgood's condition if | $\omega(\xi)>0$ for $\xi>0$ is said to satisfy Osgood's condition if | ||
\[ | \[ | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Theorem 2''' | '''Theorem 2''' | ||
Let $U\subset \mathbb R^n$ be open, $f:U \times [0,T] \to \mathbb R^n$ a continuous function and $\omega:[0, \infty[\to [0, \infty[$ be | Let $U\subset \mathbb R^n$ be open, $f:U \times [0,T] \to \mathbb R^n$ a continuous function and $\omega:[0, \infty[\to [0, \infty[$ be | ||
− | a function satisfying the | + | a function satisfying the requirements of Definition 1. Assume |
\[ | \[ | ||
|f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)|\leq \omega (|x_1-x_2|) \qquad \mbox{for all } (x_1, t), (x_2, t)\in U\, . | |f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)|\leq \omega (|x_1-x_2|) \qquad \mbox{for all } (x_1, t), (x_2, t)\in U\, . | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
'''Remarks''' | '''Remarks''' | ||
* The existence of the solutions is actually valid for merely continuous functions (see [[Peano theorem|Peano's theorem]]). Thus the most interesting point is the uniqueness. | * The existence of the solutions is actually valid for merely continuous functions (see [[Peano theorem|Peano's theorem]]). Thus the most interesting point is the uniqueness. | ||
− | * The classical Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem gives the same conclusion under the stronger assumption that there is a constant $M$ such that $|f (x_1, t) - f(x_2, t)|\leq M |x_1-x_2|$ (see also [[Lipschitz condition]]). Typical examples of functions $f$ satisfying Osgood's criterion, but which do not satisfy the assumptions of the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, are those for which the bound $|f(x_1, t)-f(x_2, t)|\leq |x_1-x_2| \log |x_1-x_2|$ holds. | + | * The classical Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem gives the same conclusion under the stronger assumption that there is a constant $M$ such that $|f (x_1, t) - f(x_2, t)|\leq M |x_1-x_2|$ (see also [[Lipschitz condition]]). Typical examples of functions $f$ satisfying Osgood's criterion, but which do not satisfy the assumptions of the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, are those for which the bound $|f(x_1, t)-f(x_2, t)|\leq |x_1-x_2| |\log |x_1-x_2||$ holds. |
* Classical examples of functions which do not satisfy the Osgood conditions are $\mathbb R \ni \xi \mapsto |\xi|^\alpha$, for $\alpha < 1$ (see also [[Holder condition]]). In fact for such functions it is easy to see that there are infinitely many solutions of the corresponding ordinary differential equation for the initial condition $x(0)=0$. | * Classical examples of functions which do not satisfy the Osgood conditions are $\mathbb R \ni \xi \mapsto |\xi|^\alpha$, for $\alpha < 1$ (see also [[Holder condition]]). In fact for such functions it is easy to see that there are infinitely many solutions of the corresponding ordinary differential equation for the initial condition $x(0)=0$. | ||
− | * The requirements in Theorem 2 can be | + | * The requirements in Theorem 2 can be considerably weakened. For instance, the same conclution holds for maps $f$ satisfying the bound |
\[ | \[ | ||
|f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)| \leq \phi (t) \omega (|x_1-x_2|)\, , | |f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)| \leq \phi (t) \omega (|x_1-x_2|)\, , | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |valign="top"|{{Ref|Os}}|| W.F. Osgood, | + | |valign="top"|{{Ref|Os}}|| W.F. Osgood, "Beweis der Existenz einer Lösung der Differentialgleichung $\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x,y)$ ohne Hinzunahme der Cauchy-Lipschitz'schen Bedingung." (German) '' Monatsh. Math. Phys.'' '''9''' (1898), no. 1, 331–345. |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 10:01, 29 November 2013
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 34A12 [MSN][ZBL]
The term refers to a classical criterion, due to Osgood, see [Os] for the uniqueness of solutions of ordinary differential equations which generalizes the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem. More precisely, we first introduce the so-called Osgood condition:
Definition 1 A continuous nondecreasing function $\omega:[0, \infty[\to [0, \infty[$ with $\omega (0)=0$ and $\omega(\xi)>0$ for $\xi>0$ is said to satisfy Osgood's condition if \[ \int_0^1 \frac{d\xi}{\omega (\xi)} = \infty\, . \]
Theorem 2 Let $U\subset \mathbb R^n$ be open, $f:U \times [0,T] \to \mathbb R^n$ a continuous function and $\omega:[0, \infty[\to [0, \infty[$ be a function satisfying the requirements of Definition 1. Assume \[ |f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)|\leq \omega (|x_1-x_2|) \qquad \mbox{for all } (x_1, t), (x_2, t)\in U\, . \] Then, for any $x_0\in U$ there is a $\delta> 0$ for which there exists a unique solution $x : [0, \delta] \to U$ of the ordinary differential equation $\dot{x} (t) = f (x(t), t)$ with $x (0) = x_0$.
Remarks
- The existence of the solutions is actually valid for merely continuous functions (see Peano's theorem). Thus the most interesting point is the uniqueness.
- The classical Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem gives the same conclusion under the stronger assumption that there is a constant $M$ such that $|f (x_1, t) - f(x_2, t)|\leq M |x_1-x_2|$ (see also Lipschitz condition). Typical examples of functions $f$ satisfying Osgood's criterion, but which do not satisfy the assumptions of the Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem, are those for which the bound $|f(x_1, t)-f(x_2, t)|\leq |x_1-x_2| |\log |x_1-x_2||$ holds.
- Classical examples of functions which do not satisfy the Osgood conditions are $\mathbb R \ni \xi \mapsto |\xi|^\alpha$, for $\alpha < 1$ (see also Holder condition). In fact for such functions it is easy to see that there are infinitely many solutions of the corresponding ordinary differential equation for the initial condition $x(0)=0$.
- The requirements in Theorem 2 can be considerably weakened. For instance, the same conclution holds for maps $f$ satisfying the bound
\[ |f(x_1, t)- f(x_2, t)| \leq \phi (t) \omega (|x_1-x_2|)\, , \] where $\phi$ is a positive summable function. Consistently the continuity assumption in the time variable can also be relaxed, see Caratheodory conditions.
References
[Os] | W.F. Osgood, "Beweis der Existenz einer Lösung der Differentialgleichung $\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x,y)$ ohne Hinzunahme der Cauchy-Lipschitz'schen Bedingung." (German) Monatsh. Math. Phys. 9 (1898), no. 1, 331–345. |
Osgood criterion. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Osgood_criterion&oldid=30787