Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Absolutely continuous measures"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(fixed spelling of "Nikodym")
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MSC|28A33}}
+
{{MSC|28A15}}
  
 
[[Category:Classical measure theory]]
 
[[Category:Classical measure theory]]
Line 7: Line 7:
 
A concept in measure theory (see also [[Absolute continuity]]). If and \nu are two measures on a [[Algebra of sets|σ-algebra]]  \mathcal{B} of  
 
A concept in measure theory (see also [[Absolute continuity]]). If \mu and \nu are two measures on a [[Algebra of sets|σ-algebra]]  \mathcal{B} of  
 
subsets of X, we say that \nu is absolutely continuous with respect to \mu if \nu (A) =0 for
 
subsets of X, we say that \nu is absolutely continuous with respect to \mu if \nu (A) =0 for
any A\in\mathcal{B} such that \mu (A) =0. The absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu
+
any A\in\mathcal{B} such that \mu (A) =0 (cp. with Defininition 2.11 of {{Cite|Ma}}). The absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu
 
is denoted by \nu\ll\mu. If the measure \nu is finite, i.e. \nu (X) <\infty, the property \nu\ll\mu is equivalent
 
is denoted by \nu\ll\mu. If the measure \nu is finite, i.e. \nu (X) <\infty, the property \nu\ll\mu is equivalent
 
to the following stronger statement: for any \varepsilon>0 there is a \delta>0 such that \nu (A)<\varepsilon for every
 
to the following stronger statement: for any \varepsilon>0 there is a \delta>0 such that \nu (A)<\varepsilon for every
A with \mu (A)<\delta.
+
A with \mu (A)<\delta (this follows from the Radon-Nikodym theorem, see below, and the absolute continuity of the integral, see for instance
 +
Theorem 12.34 of {{Cite|HS}}).
  
 
This definition can be generalized to [[Signed measure|signed measures]] \nu
 
This definition can be generalized to [[Signed measure|signed measures]] \nu
and even to vector-valued measure \nu. Some authors generalize it further to vector-valued \mu's: in
+
and even to vector-valued measures \nu. Some authors generalize it further to vector-valued \mu's: in
 
that case the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu amounts to the requirement that
 
that case the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu amounts to the requirement that
\nu (A) = 0 for any A\in\mathcal{B} such that |\mu| (A)=0, where |\mu| is the total variation of \mu
+
\nu (A) = 0 for any A\in\mathcal{B} such that |\mu| (A)=0, where |\mu| is the [[Signed measure|total variation]] of \mu
(see [[Signed measure]] for the relevant definition).
+
(see for instance Theorem B, Section 31 of {{Cite|Ha}}).
  
The [[Radon-Nikodym theorem]] characterizes the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu with
+
Under the assumption that \mu is \sigma-finite, the [[Radon-Nikodym theorem]] (see Theorem B of Section 31 in {{Cite|Ha}}) characterizes the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu with
 
the existence of a function f\in L^1 (\mu) such that \nu = f \mu, i.e. such that  
 
the existence of a function f\in L^1 (\mu) such that \nu = f \mu, i.e. such that  
 
\[
 
\[
\nu (A) = \int_A f\rd\mu \qquad \text{for every $A\in\mathcal{B}$.}
+
\nu (A) = \int_A f\, \rd\mu \qquad \text{for every } A\in\mathcal{B}.
 
\]
 
\]
A corollary of the Radon-Nikodym, the Hahn decomposition theorem, characterizes signed measures
+
A corollary of the Radon-Nikodym theorem, the [[Jordan decomposition (of a signed measure)|Jordan decomposition theorem]], characterizes signed measures
as differences of nonnegative measures. We refer to [[Signed measure]] for more on this topic.
+
as differences of nonnegative measures (see Theorems A and B of Section 29 in {{Cite|Ha}}). We refer to [[Signed measure]] for more on this topic. See also [[Hahn decomposition]].
  
 
Two measures which are mutually absolutely continuous are sometimes called equivalent.
 
Two measures which are mutually absolutely continuous are sometimes called equivalent.
  
====Radon-Nikdoym decomposition====
+
====Radon-Nikodym decomposition====
If \mu is a nonnegative measure on a \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} and \nu another nonnegative measure on the same \sigma-algebra (which might be a signed measure, or even taking values in a finite-dimensional
+
If \mu is a \sigma-finite nonnegative measure on a \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} and \nu another \sigma-finite nonnegative measure on the same \sigma-algebra (which might be a signed measure, or even taking values in a finite-dimensional
 
vector space), then \nu can be decomposed in a unique way as \nu=\nu_a+\nu_s where
 
vector space), then \nu can be decomposed in a unique way as \nu=\nu_a+\nu_s where
- \nu_a is absolutey continuous with respect to \mu;
+
* \nu_a is absolutely continuous with respect to \mu;
- \nu_s is singular with respect to \mu, i.e. there is a set A of \mu-measure zero such that \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 (this property is often denoted by \nu_s\perp \mu.
+
* \nu_s is [[Singular measures|singular]] with respect to \mu, i.e. there is a set A of \mu-measure zero such that \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 (this property is often denoted by \nu_s\perp \mu).
This decomposition is called Radon-Nikodym decompoition by some authors and Lebesgue decomposition by some other.
+
This decomposition is called Radon-Nikodym decomposition by some authors and Lebesgue decomposition by some other (see Theorem C of Section 32 in {{Cite|Ha}}).
 
The same decomposition holds even if \nu is a [[Signed measure|signed measure]] or, more generally, a vector-valued
 
The same decomposition holds even if \nu is a [[Signed measure|signed measure]] or, more generally, a vector-valued
measure. In these cases the property \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 is substituted by |\nu_s| (X\setminus A)=0, where |\nu_s|
+
measure. In these cases the property \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 is substituted by $\left|\nu_s\right| (X\setminus A)=0, where \left|\nu_s\right| denotes the total variation measure of \nu_s$ (we refer to [[Signed measure]] for the relevant definition).
denotes the total variation measure of \nu_s (we refer to [[Signed measure]] for the relevant definition).
+
 
 +
Some authors use the name "Differentiation of measures" for the decomposition above and the density f is sometimes denoted by \frac{d\nu}{d\mu} or D_\mu \nu (see for instance Section 32 of {{Cite|Ha}}). Other authors use the term "Differentiation of measures" for a theorem, due to Besicovitch, which, for [[Radon measure|Radon measures]] in the Euclidean space, characterizes f(x) as the limit of a suitable quantity, see [[Differentiation of measures]] for the precise statement.
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
A set of non-zero measure that has no subsets of smaller, but still positive, measure is called an atom of the measure. When considering
+
A set of non-zero measure that has no subsets of smaller, but still positive, measure is called an [[Atom|atom]] of the measure. When considering
the \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} of [[Borel set|Borel sets]] in the euclidean space and the measure \lambda as reference measure, it is a common mistake to claim that the singular part of a second measure \nu must be concentrated on points which are atoms. A singular measure may be atomless, as is shown by the measure concentrated on the standard [[Cantor set|Cantor set]] which puts zero on each gap of the set and 2^{-n} on the intersection of the set with the interval of generation n (such measure is also the [[Generalized derivative|distributional derivative]]
+
the \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} of [[Borel set|Borel sets]] in the euclidean space and the Lebesgue measure \lambda as reference measure, it is a common mistake to claim that the singular part of a second measure \nu must be concentrated on points which are atoms. A singular measure may be atomless, as is shown by the measure concentrated on the standard [[Cantor set|Cantor set]] which puts zero on each gap of the set and 2^{-n} on the intersection of the set with the interval of generation n (such measure is also the [[Generalized derivative|distributional derivative]]
of the Cantor ternary function or devil staircase).  
+
of the [[Cantor ternary function]] or devil staircase, (see Problem 46 in Chapter 2 of {{Cite|Ro}}).  
  
 
When some canonical measure \mu is fixed, (as the [[Lebesgue measure|Lebesgue measure]] on \mathbb R^n or its subsets or, more generally, the [[Haar measure|Haar measure]] on a [[Topological group|topological group]]), one says that \nu is absolutely continuous meaning that \nu\ll\mu.
 
When some canonical measure \mu is fixed, (as the [[Lebesgue measure|Lebesgue measure]] on \mathbb R^n or its subsets or, more generally, the [[Haar measure|Haar measure]] on a [[Topological group|topological group]]), one says that \nu is absolutely continuous meaning that \nu\ll\mu.
 
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
 
{|
 
{|
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|AmFuPa}}||    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, D. Pallara, "Functions of bounded variations    and  free discontinuity problems". Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The    Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.    {{MR|1857292}}{{ZBL|0957.49001}}  
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|AFP}}||    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, D. Pallara, "Functions of bounded variations    and  free discontinuity problems". Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The    Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.    {{MR|1857292}}{{ZBL|0957.49001}}
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Bi}}||    P. Billingsley, "Convergence  of probability measures", Wiley (1968)    {{MR|0233396}}  {{ZBL|0172.21201}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Bo}}||    N. Bourbaki, "Elements of mathematics. Integration", Addison-Wesley    (1975) pp. Chapt.6;7;8 (Translated from French) {{MR|0583191}}    {{ZBL|1116.28002}} {{ZBL|1106.46005}} {{ZBL|1106.46006}}    {{ZBL|1182.28002}} {{ZBL|1182.28001}} {{ZBL|1095.28002}}    {{ZBL|1095.28001}} {{ZBL|0156.06001}}
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Bo}}||    N. Bourbaki, "Elements of mathematics. Integration", Addison-Wesley    (1975) pp. Chapt.6;7;8 (Translated from French) {{MR|0583191}}    {{ZBL|1116.28002}} {{ZBL|1106.46005}} {{ZBL|1106.46006}}    {{ZBL|1182.28002}} {{ZBL|1182.28001}} {{ZBL|1095.28002}}    {{ZBL|1095.28001}} {{ZBL|0156.06001}}
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|DS}}||    N. Dunford, J.T. Schwartz, "Linear operators. General theory",    '''1''', Interscience (1958) {{MR|0117523}}
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|DS}}||    N. Dunford, J.T. Schwartz, "Linear operators. General theory",    '''1''', Interscience (1958) {{MR|0117523}} {{ZBL|0635.47001}}
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Bi}}||    P. Billingsley, "Convergence of probability measures", Wiley (1968)    {{MR|0233396}} {{ZBL|0172.21201}}
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ha}}|| P.R. Halmos,  "Measure theory", v. Nostrand  (1950) {{MR|0033869}} {{ZBL|0040.16802}}
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ha}}|| P.R. Halmos,  "Measure theory", v. Nostrand  (1950) {{MR|0033869}} {{ZBL|0040.16802}}
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|He}}||  E. Hewitt,  K.R. Stromberg,  "Real and abstract analysis", Springer  (1965) {{MR|0188387}} {{ZBL|0137.03202}}
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|HS}}||  E. Hewitt,  K.R. Stromberg,  "Real and abstract analysis", Springer  (1965) {{MR|0188387}} {{ZBL|0137.03202}}
 
|-|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ma}}||    P. Mattila, "Geometry of sets and measures in euclidean spaces".    Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 44. Cambridge University    Press, Cambridge,  1995. {{MR|1333890}} {{ZBL|0911.28005}}
 
|-|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ma}}||    P. Mattila, "Geometry of sets and measures in euclidean spaces".    Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 44. Cambridge University    Press, Cambridge,  1995. {{MR|1333890}} {{ZBL|0911.28005}}
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ro}}|| H.L. Royden,  "Real analysis", Macmillan  (1968)
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ro}}|| H.L. Royden,  "Real analysis", Macmillan  (1969) {{MR|0151555}} {{ZBL|0197.03501}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 07:56, 15 December 2016

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 28A15 [MSN][ZBL]

A concept in measure theory (see also Absolute continuity). If \mu and \nu are two measures on a σ-algebra \mathcal{B} of subsets of X, we say that \nu is absolutely continuous with respect to \mu if \nu (A) =0 for any A\in\mathcal{B} such that \mu (A) =0 (cp. with Defininition 2.11 of [Ma]). The absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu is denoted by \nu\ll\mu. If the measure \nu is finite, i.e. \nu (X) <\infty, the property \nu\ll\mu is equivalent to the following stronger statement: for any \varepsilon>0 there is a \delta>0 such that \nu (A)<\varepsilon for every A with \mu (A)<\delta (this follows from the Radon-Nikodym theorem, see below, and the absolute continuity of the integral, see for instance Theorem 12.34 of [HS]).

This definition can be generalized to signed measures \nu and even to vector-valued measures \nu. Some authors generalize it further to vector-valued \mu's: in that case the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu amounts to the requirement that \nu (A) = 0 for any A\in\mathcal{B} such that |\mu| (A)=0, where |\mu| is the total variation of \mu (see for instance Theorem B, Section 31 of [Ha]).

Under the assumption that \mu is \sigma-finite, the Radon-Nikodym theorem (see Theorem B of Section 31 in [Ha]) characterizes the absolute continuity of \nu with respect to \mu with the existence of a function f\in L^1 (\mu) such that \nu = f \mu, i.e. such that \nu (A) = \int_A f\, \rd\mu \qquad \text{for every } A\in\mathcal{B}. A corollary of the Radon-Nikodym theorem, the Jordan decomposition theorem, characterizes signed measures as differences of nonnegative measures (see Theorems A and B of Section 29 in [Ha]). We refer to Signed measure for more on this topic. See also Hahn decomposition.

Two measures which are mutually absolutely continuous are sometimes called equivalent.

Radon-Nikodym decomposition

If \mu is a \sigma-finite nonnegative measure on a \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} and \nu another \sigma-finite nonnegative measure on the same \sigma-algebra (which might be a signed measure, or even taking values in a finite-dimensional vector space), then \nu can be decomposed in a unique way as \nu=\nu_a+\nu_s where

  • \nu_a is absolutely continuous with respect to \mu;
  • \nu_s is singular with respect to \mu, i.e. there is a set A of \mu-measure zero such that \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 (this property is often denoted by \nu_s\perp \mu).

This decomposition is called Radon-Nikodym decomposition by some authors and Lebesgue decomposition by some other (see Theorem C of Section 32 in [Ha]). The same decomposition holds even if \nu is a signed measure or, more generally, a vector-valued measure. In these cases the property \nu_s (X\setminus A)=0 is substituted by \left|\nu_s\right| (X\setminus A)=0, where \left|\nu_s\right| denotes the total variation measure of \nu_s (we refer to Signed measure for the relevant definition).

Some authors use the name "Differentiation of measures" for the decomposition above and the density f is sometimes denoted by \frac{d\nu}{d\mu} or D_\mu \nu (see for instance Section 32 of [Ha]). Other authors use the term "Differentiation of measures" for a theorem, due to Besicovitch, which, for Radon measures in the Euclidean space, characterizes f(x) as the limit of a suitable quantity, see Differentiation of measures for the precise statement.

Comments

A set of non-zero measure that has no subsets of smaller, but still positive, measure is called an atom of the measure. When considering the \sigma-algebra \mathcal{B} of Borel sets in the euclidean space and the Lebesgue measure \lambda as reference measure, it is a common mistake to claim that the singular part of a second measure \nu must be concentrated on points which are atoms. A singular measure may be atomless, as is shown by the measure concentrated on the standard Cantor set which puts zero on each gap of the set and 2^{-n} on the intersection of the set with the interval of generation n (such measure is also the distributional derivative of the Cantor ternary function or devil staircase, (see Problem 46 in Chapter 2 of [Ro]).

When some canonical measure \mu is fixed, (as the Lebesgue measure on \mathbb R^n or its subsets or, more generally, the Haar measure on a topological group), one says that \nu is absolutely continuous meaning that \nu\ll\mu.

References

[AFP] L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, D. Pallara, "Functions of bounded variations and free discontinuity problems". Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000. MR1857292Zbl 0957.49001
[Bi] P. Billingsley, "Convergence of probability measures", Wiley (1968) MR0233396 Zbl 0172.21201
[Bo] N. Bourbaki, "Elements of mathematics. Integration", Addison-Wesley (1975) pp. Chapt.6;7;8 (Translated from French) MR0583191 Zbl 1116.28002 Zbl 1106.46005 Zbl 1106.46006 Zbl 1182.28002 Zbl 1182.28001 Zbl 1095.28002 Zbl 1095.28001 Zbl 0156.06001
[DS] N. Dunford, J.T. Schwartz, "Linear operators. General theory", 1, Interscience (1958) MR0117523 Zbl 0635.47001
[Ha] P.R. Halmos, "Measure theory", v. Nostrand (1950) MR0033869 Zbl 0040.16802
[HS] E. Hewitt, K.R. Stromberg, "Real and abstract analysis", Springer (1965) MR0188387 Zbl 0137.03202
[Ro] H.L. Royden, "Real analysis", Macmillan (1969) MR0151555 Zbl 0197.03501
How to Cite This Entry:
Absolutely continuous measures. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolutely_continuous_measures&oldid=27263
This article was adapted from an original article by T. Nowicki (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article