|
|
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | |
− | =Median algebra=
| |
− | A set with a [[ternary operation]] $\langle x,y,z \rangle$ satisfying a set of axioms which generalise the notion of median, or majority vote, as a [[Boolean function]].
| |
| | | |
− | The axioms are
| |
− | # $\langle x,y,y \rangle = y$
| |
− | # $\langle x,y,z \rangle = \langle z,x,y \rangle$
| |
− | # $\langle x,y,z \rangle = \langle x,z,y \rangle$
| |
− | # $\langle \langle x,w,y \rangle ,w,z \rangle = \langle x,w, \langle y,w,z \rangle \rangle$
| |
− |
| |
− | The second and third axioms imply commutativity: it is possible (but not easy) to show that in the presence of the other three, axiom (3) is redundant. The fourth axiom implies associativity.
| |
− | There are other possible axiom systems: for example the two
| |
− | * $\langle x,y,y \rangle = y$
| |
− | * $\langle u,v, \langle u,w,x \rangle \rangle = \langle u,x, \langle w,u,v \rangle \rangle$
| |
− | also suffice.
| |
− |
| |
− | In a [[Boolean algebra]] the median function $\langle x,y,z \rangle = (x \vee y) \wedge (y \vee z) \wedge (z \vee x)$ satisfies these axioms, so that every Boolean algebra is a median algebra.
| |
− |
| |
− | Birkhoff and Kiss showed that a median algebra with elements 0 and 1 satisfying $\langle 0,x,1 \rangle = x$ is a [[distributive lattice]].
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last=Birkhoff | first=Garrett | authorlink=Garrett Birkhoff | last2=Kiss | fitst2=S.A. | title=A ternary operation in distributive lattices | journal=[[Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society|Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.]] | volume=53 | date=1947 | pages=749-752 }}
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last=Isbell | first=John R. | title=Median algebra | journal=[[Transactions of the American Mathematical Society|Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.]] | volume=260 | issue=2 | date=August 1980 | pages=319-362 }}
| |
− | * {{ User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last=Knuth | first=Donald E. | authorlink=Donald Knuth | title=Introduction to combinatorial algorithms and Boolean functions | series=[[The Art of Computer Programming]] | volume=4.0 | date=2008 | isbn=0-321-53496-4 | pages=64-74 }}
| |
− |
| |
− | =Monogenic field=
| |
− |
| |
− | An [[algebraic number field]] for which there exists an element
| |
− | $\alpha$ such that the [[ring of integers]] $O_K$ is a polynomial ring $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha]$. The powers of such a element $\alpha$ constitute a '''power integral basis'''.
| |
− |
| |
− | In a monogenic field $K$, the [[Discriminant of an algebraic number field|field discriminant]] of $K$ is equal to the [[discriminant of a polynomial|discriminant]] of the [[Minimal polynomial (field theory)|minimal polynomial]] of $\alpha$.
| |
− |
| |
− | Examples of monogenic fields include:
| |
− | * [[Quadratic field]]s: if $K = \mathbf{Q}(\sqrt d)$ with $d$ a [[square-free integer]] then $O_K = \mathbf{Z}[\alpha]$ where $\alpha = (1+\sqrt d)/2$ if $d \equiv 1 \pmod 4$ and $\alpha = \sqrt d$ otherwise.
| |
− | * [[Cyclotomic field]]s: if $K = \mathbf{Q}(\zeta)$ with $\zeta$ a root of unity, then $O_K = \mathbf{Z}[\zeta]$.
| |
− |
| |
− | Not all number fields are monogenic: Dirichlet gave the example of the [[cubic field]] generated by a root of the polynomial $X^3 - X^2 - 2X - 8$.
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last = Narkiewicz | first = Władysław | title = Elementary and Analytic Theory of Algebraic Numbers | publisher = [[Springer-Verlag]] | year = 2004 | pages = 64 | isbn = 3540219021}}
| |
− |
| |
− | =Moore determinant=
| |
− | A [[determinant]], named after [[E. H. Moore]], defined over a [[finite field]] from a square '''Moore [[matrix]]'''. A Moore matrix has successive powers of the [[Frobenius automorphism]] applied to the first column, i.e., an $m \times n$
| |
− | $$
| |
− | M=\begin{bmatrix}
| |
− | \alpha_1 & \alpha_1^q & \dots & \alpha_1^{q^{n-1}}\\
| |
− | \alpha_2 & \alpha_2^q & \dots & \alpha_2^{q^{n-1}}\\
| |
− | \alpha_3 & \alpha_3^q & \dots & \alpha_3^{q^{n-1}}\\
| |
− | \vdots & \vdots & \ddots &\vdots \\
| |
− | \alpha_m & \alpha_m^q & \dots & \alpha_m^{q^{n-1}}\\
| |
− | \end{bmatrix}
| |
− | $$
| |
− | or
| |
− | $$
| |
− | M_{i,j} = \alpha_i^{q^{j-1}}
| |
− | $$
| |
− | for all indices $i$ and $j$. (Some authors use the [[transpose]] of the above matrix.)
| |
− |
| |
− | The Moore determinant of a square Moore matrix (so $m=n$) can be expressed as:
| |
− | $$
| |
− | \det(V) = \prod_{\mathbf{c}} \left( c_1\alpha_1 + \cdots c_n\alpha_n \right) \,,
| |
− | $$
| |
− | where $c$ runs over a complete set of direction vectors, made specific by having the last non-zero entry equal to 1.
| |
− |
| |
− | ==See also==
| |
− | * [[Alternant matrix]]
| |
− | * [[Vandermonde determinant]]
| |
− | * [[List of matrices]]
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=David Goss | title=Basic Structures of Function Field Arithmetic | date=1996 | publisher=Springer Verlag | isbn=3-540-63541-6}} Chapter 1.
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | =Morita conjectures=
| |
− | The '''Morita conjectures''' in [[topology]] ask
| |
− |
| |
− | # If ''X'' × ''Y'' is [[normal space|normal]] for every normal space ''Y'', is ''X'' [[discrete space|discrete]]?
| |
− | # If ''X'' × ''Y'' is normal for every normal P-space ''Y'', is ''X'' [[metrizable]] <ref>K. Morita, "Some problems on normality of products of spaces" J. Novák (ed.) , Proc. Fourth Prague Topological Symp. (Prague, August 1976) , Soc. Czech. Math. and Physicists , Prague (1977) pp. 296–297</ref>?
| |
− | # If ''X'' × ''Y'' is normal for every normal countably [[paracompact]] space ''Y'', is ''X'' metrizable and [[sigma-locally compact]]?
| |
− |
| |
− | Here a '''normal P-space''' ''Y'' is characterised by the property that the product with every metrizable ''X'' is normal; it is thus conjectured that the converse holds.
| |
− |
| |
− | K. Chiba, T.C. Przymusiński and [[Mary Ellen Rudin|M.E. Rudin]]
| |
− | <ref>K. Chiba, T.C. Przymusiński, M.E. Rudin, "Normality of products and Morita's conjectures" ''Topol. Appl.'' '''22''' (1986) 19–32</ref> proved conjecture (1) and showed that conjecture (2) is true if the [[axiom of constructibility]] ''V=L'', holds.
| |
− |
| |
− | [[Zoltán Tibor Balogh|Z. Balogh]] proved conjectures (2) and (3)<ref>Z. Balogh, Non-shrinking open covers and K. Morita's duality conjectures, ''Topology Appl.'', '''115''' (2001) 333-341</ref>.
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | <references/>
| |
− | * A.V. Arhangelskii, K.R. Goodearl, B. Huisgen-Zimmermann, ''Kiiti Morita 1915-1995'', Notices of the AMS, June 1997 [http://www.ams.org/notices/199706/morita.pdf]
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | =Normal order of an arithmetic function=
| |
− | A function, perhaps simpler or better-understood, which "usually" takes the same or closely approximate values as a given [[arithmetic function]].
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | Let $f$ be a function on the [[natural number]]s. We say that the ''normal order'' of $f$ is $g$ if for every $\epsilon > 0$, the inequalities
| |
− | $$
| |
− | (1-\epsilon) g(n) \le f(n) \le (1+\epsilon) g(n)
| |
− | $$
| |
− | hold for ''[[almost all]]'' $n$: that is, the proportion of $n < x$ for which this does not hold tends to 0 as $x$ tends to infinity.
| |
− |
| |
− | It is conventional to assume that the approximating function $g$ is [[Continuous function|continuous]] and [[Monotonic function|monotone]].
| |
− |
| |
− | ==Examples==
| |
− | * The [[Hardy–Ramanujan theorem]]: the normal order of $\omega(n)$, the number of distinct [[prime factor]]s of $n$, is $\log\log n$;
| |
− | * The normal order of $\log d(n))$, where $d(n)$ is the [[number of divisors function|number of divisors]] of $n$, is $\log 2 \log\log n$.
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=G.H. Hardy| authorlink=G. H. Hardy| coauthors=S. Ramanujan|title=The normal number of prime factors of a number |journal= Quart. J. Math. |volume= 48 |year=1917|pages= 76–92}}
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=G.H. Hardy | authorlink=G. H. Hardy | coauthors=E.M. Wright | title=An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers | edition=6th ed. | publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] | pages=473 | year=2008 | isbn=0-19-921986-5 }}
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | title=Introduction to Analytic and Probabilistic Number Theory | author=Gérald Tenenbaum | series=Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics | volume=46 | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | pages=299-324 | year=1995 | isbn=0-521-41261-7 }}
| |
− |
| |
− | =Partition function (number theory)=
| |
− | The function $p(n)$ that counts the number of [[partition]]s of a positive integer $n$, that is, the number of ways of expressing $n$ as a sum of positive integers (where order is not significant).
| |
− |
| |
− | Thus ''p''(3) = 3, since the number 3 has 3 partitions:
| |
− | * $3$
| |
− | * $2+1$
| |
− | * $1+1+1$
| |
− |
| |
− | The partition function satisfies an asymptotic relation
| |
− | $$
| |
− | p(n) \sim \frac{\exp\left(\pi\sqrt{2/3}\sqrt n\right)}{4n\sqrt3} \ .
| |
− | $$
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=Tom M. Apostol | title=Modular functions and Dirichlet Series in Number Theory | edition=2nd ed | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]] | volume=41 | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1990 | isbn=0-387-97127-0 | pages=94-112 }}
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=G.H. Hardy | authorlink=G. H. Hardy | coauthors=[[E. M. Wright]] | title=An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers | edition=6th ed. | publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] | year=2008 | isbn=0-19-921986-5 | pages=361-392 }}
| |
− |
| |
− | =Preparata code=
| |
− |
| |
− | A class of non-linear double-[[error-correcting code]]s. They are named after [[Franco P. Preparata]] who first described them in 1968.
| |
− |
| |
− | Let ''m'' be an odd number, and ''n'' = 2<sup>''m''</sup>-1. We first describe the '''extended Preparata code''' of length 2''n''+2 = 2<sup>''m''+1</sup>: the Preparata code is then derived by deleting one position. The words of the extended code are regarded as pairs (''X'',''Y'') of 2<sup>''m''</sup>-tuples, each corresponding to subsets of the [[finite field]] GF(2<sup>''m''</sup>) in some fixed way.
| |
− |
| |
− | The extended code contains the words (''X'',''Y'') satisfying three conditions
| |
− |
| |
− | # ''X'', ''Y'' each have even weight;
| |
− | # <math>\sum_{x \in X} x = \sum_{y \in Y} y</math>;
| |
− | # <math>\sum_{x \in x} x^3 + \left(\sum_{x \in X} x\right)^3 = \sum_{y \in Y} y^3</math>.
| |
− |
| |
− | The Peparata code is obtained by deleting the position in ''X'' corresponding to 0 in GF(2<sup>''m''</sup>).
| |
− |
| |
− | The Preparata code is of length 2<sup>''m''+1</sup>-1, size 2<sup>''k''</sup> where ''k'' = 2<sup>''m''+1</sup> - 2''m'' - 2, and minimum distance 5.
| |
− |
| |
− | When ''m''=3, the Preparata code of length 15 is also called the '''Nordstrom–Robinson code'''.
| |
− |
| |
− | == References ==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=F.P. Preparata | authorlink=Franco P. Preparata | title=A class of optimum nonlinear double-error-correcting codes | journal=Information and Control | volume=13 | year=1968 | pages=378-400 | doi=10.1016/S0019-9958(68)90874-7 }}
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=J.H. van Lint | title=Introduction to Coding Theory | edition=2nd ed | publisher=Springer-Verlag | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics|GTM]] | volume=86 | date=1992 | isbn=3-540-54894-7 | pages=111-113}}
| |
| =Selberg sieve= | | =Selberg sieve= |
| A technique for estimating the size of "sifted sets" of [[positive integer]]s which satisfy a set of conditions which are expressed by [[Congruence relation#Modular arithmetic|congruence]]s. It was developed by [[Atle Selberg]] in the 1940s. | | A technique for estimating the size of "sifted sets" of [[positive integer]]s which satisfy a set of conditions which are expressed by [[Congruence relation#Modular arithmetic|congruence]]s. It was developed by [[Atle Selberg]] in the 1940s. |
Line 195: |
Line 45: |
| | | |
| =Separation axioms= | | =Separation axioms= |
− |
| |
− | {{subpages}}
| |
| In [[topology]], '''separation axioms''' describe classes of [[topological space]] according to how well the [[open set]]s of the topology distinguish between distinct points. | | In [[topology]], '''separation axioms''' describe classes of [[topological space]] according to how well the [[open set]]s of the topology distinguish between distinct points. |
| | | |
Line 236: |
Line 84: |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last1=Steen | first1=Lynn Arthur | last2=Seebach | first2=J. Arthur Jr. | title=Counterexamples in Topology | year=1978 | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=0-387-90312-7 }} | | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | last1=Steen | first1=Lynn Arthur | last2=Seebach | first2=J. Arthur Jr. | title=Counterexamples in Topology | year=1978 | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | isbn=0-387-90312-7 }} |
− |
| |
− | =Stably free module=
| |
− | In [[mathematics]], a '''stably free module''' is a [[module (mathematics)|module]] which is close to being [[free module|free]].
| |
− |
| |
− | ==Definition==
| |
− | A module ''M'' over a ring ''R'' is ''stably free'' if there exist free modules ''F'' and ''G'' over ''R'' such that
| |
− |
| |
− | :<math> M \oplus F = G . \, </math>
| |
− |
| |
− | ==Properties==
| |
− | * A module is stably free if and only if it possesses a finite [[free resolution]].
| |
− |
| |
− | == See also ==
| |
− | * [[Free object]]
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{User:Richard Pinch/sandbox/Ref | author=Serge Lang | authorlink=Serge Lang | title=Algebra | edition=3rd ed. | publisher=[[Addison-Wesley]] | year=1993 | isbn=0-201-55540-9 | page=840}}
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | =Stirling numbers=
| |
− |
| |
− | In [[combinatorics]], the '''Stirling numbers''' count certain arrangements of objects into a given number of structures. There are two kinds of Stirling number, depending on the nature of the structure being counted.
| |
− |
| |
− | The Stirling number of the first kind ''S''(''n'',''k'') counts the number of ways ''n'' labelled objects can be arranged into ''k'' cycles: cycles are regarded as equivalent, and counted only once, if they differ by a [[cyclic permutation]], thus [ABC] = [BCA] = [CAB] but is counted as different from [CBA] = [BAC] = [ACB]. The order of the cycles in the list is irrelevant.
| |
− |
| |
− | For example, 4 objects can be arranged into 2 cycles in eleven ways, so ''S''(4,2) = 11:
| |
− |
| |
− | * [ABC],[D]
| |
− | * [ACB],[D]
| |
− | * [ABD],[C]
| |
− | * [ADB],[C]
| |
− | * [ACD],[B]
| |
− | * [ADC],[B]
| |
− | * [BCD],[A]
| |
− | * [BDC],[A]
| |
− | * [AB],[CD]
| |
− | * [AC],[BD]
| |
− | * [AD],[BC]
| |
− |
| |
− | The Stirling number of the second kind ''s''(''n'',''k'') counts the number of ways ''n'' labelled objects can be arranged into ''k'' subsets: cycles are regarded as equivalent, and counted only once, if they have the same elements, thus {ABC} = {BCA} = {CAB} = {CBA} = {BAC} = {ACB}. The order of the subsets in the list is irrelevant.
| |
− |
| |
− | For example, 4 objects can be arranged into 2 subsets in seven ways, so ''s''(4,2) = 7:
| |
− |
| |
− | * {ABC},{D}
| |
− | * {ABD},{C}
| |
− | * {ACD},{B}
| |
− | * {BCD},{A}
| |
− | * {AB},{CD}
| |
− | * {AC},{BD}
| |
− | * {AD},{BC}
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | * {{cite book | author=Ronald L. Graham | coauthors=Donald E. Knuth, Oren Patashnik | title=Concrete Mathematics | publisher=[[Addison Wesley]] | year=1989 | isbn=0-201-14236-8 | pages=243-253 }}
| |
− | =Tau function=
| |
− | In [[mathematics]], Ramanujan's '''tau function''' is an [[arithmetic function]] which may defined in terms of the [[Delta form]] by the formal infinite product
| |
− |
| |
− | :<math>q \prod_{n=1}^\infty \left(1-q^n\right)^{24} = \sum_n \tau(n) q^n .\,</math>
| |
− |
| |
− | Since Δ is a [[Hecke operator|Hecke]] [[eigenform]], the tau function is multiplicative, with [[formal Dirichlet series]] and Euler product
| |
− |
| |
− | :<math> \sum_n \tau(n) n^{-s} = \prod_p \left(1 - \tau(p) p^{-s} + p^{11-2s} \right)^{-1} .\,</math>
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| =Turan sieve= | | =Turan sieve= |
Line 333: |
Line 119: |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| * {{cite book | author=Alina Carmen Cojocaru | coauthors=M. Ram Murty | title=An introduction to sieve methods and their applications | series=London Mathematical Society Student Texts | volume=66 | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | isbn=0-521-61275-6 | pages=47-62 }} | | * {{cite book | author=Alina Carmen Cojocaru | coauthors=M. Ram Murty | title=An introduction to sieve methods and their applications | series=London Mathematical Society Student Texts | volume=66 | publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] | isbn=0-521-61275-6 | pages=47-62 }} |
− | =Tutte matrix=
| |
− | In [[graph theory]], the '''Tutte matrix''' <math>A</math> of a [[Graph (mathematics)|graph]] ''G'' = (''V'',''E'') is a matrix used to determine the existence of a [[perfect matching]]: that is, a set of edges which is incident with each vertex exactly once.
| |
− |
| |
− | If the set of vertices ''V'' has 2''n'' elements then the Tutte matrix is a 2''n'' × 2''n'' matrix A with entries
| |
− |
| |
− | ::: <math>A_{ij} = \begin{cases} x_{ij}\;\;\mbox{if}\;(i,j) \in E \mbox{ and } i<j\\
| |
− | -x_{ji}\;\;\mbox{if}\;(i,j) \in E \mbox{ and } i>j\\
| |
− | 0\;\;\;\;\mbox{otherwise} \end{cases}</math>
| |
− |
| |
− | where the ''x''<sub>''ij''</sub> are indeterminates. The [[determinant]] of this [[skew-symmetric]] matrix is then a polynomial (in the variables ''x<sub>ij</sub>'', ''i<j'' ): this coincides with the square of the [[pfaffian]] of the matrix ''A'' and is non-zero (as a polynomial) if and only if a perfect matching exists. (It should be noted that this is not the [[Tutte polynomial]] of ''G''.)
| |
− |
| |
− | The Tutte matrix is a generalisation of the [[Edmonds matrix]] for a balanced [[bipartite graph]].
| |
− |
| |
− | ==References==
| |
− | *{{cite book|author=R. Motwani, P. Raghavan |title=Randomized Algorithms|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1995|page=167}}
| |
− | *{{cite book|author=Allen B. Tucker|title=Computer Science Handbook|publisher=CRC Press|date=2004|isbn=158488360X|page=12.19}}
| |
− | * {{cite journal|url= http://jlms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/s1-22/2/107.pdf|title= The factorization of linear graphs.
| |
− | |accessdate= 2008-06-15|author= W.T. Tutte|authorlink=W. T. Tutte|year= 1947|month= April|volume=22|journal=J. London Math. Soc.|pages=107-111|doi=10.1112/jlms/s1-22.2.107}}
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
| =Weierstrass preparation theorem= | | =Weierstrass preparation theorem= |
| In [[algebra]], the '''Weierstrass preparation theorem''' describes a canonical form for [[formal power series]] over a [[complete local ring]]. | | In [[algebra]], the '''Weierstrass preparation theorem''' describes a canonical form for [[formal power series]] over a [[complete local ring]]. |
Selberg sieve
A technique for estimating the size of "sifted sets" of positive integers which satisfy a set of conditions which are expressed by congruences. It was developed by Atle Selberg in the 1940s.
Description
In terms of sieve theory the Selberg sieve is of combinatorial type: that is, derives from a careful use of the inclusion-exclusion principle. Selberg replaced the values of the Möbius function which arise in this by a system of weights which are then optimised to fit the given problem. The result gives an upper bound for the size of the sifted set.
Let A be a set of positive integers ≤ x and let P be a set of primes. For each p in P, let Ap denote the set of elements of A divisible by p and extend this to let Ad the intersection of the Ap for p dividing d, when d is a product of distinct primes from P. Further let A1 denote A itself. Let z be a positive real number and P(z) denote the product of the primes in P which are ≤ z. The object of the sieve is to estimate
\[S(A,P,z) = \left\vert A \setminus \bigcup_{p \in P(z)} A_p \right\vert . \]
We assume that |Ad| may be estimated by
\[ \left\vert A_d \right\vert = \frac{1}{f(d)} X + R_d . \]
where f is a multiplicative function and X = |A|. Let the function g be obtained from f by Möbius inversion, that is
\[ g(n) = \sum_{d \mid n} \mu(d) f(n/d) \]
\[ f(n) = \sum_{d \mid n} g(d) \]
where μ is the Möbius function.
Put
\[ V(z) = \sum_{\begin{smallmatrix}d < z \\ d \mid P(z)\end{smallmatrix}} \frac{\mu^2(d)}{g(d)} . \]
Then
\[ S(A,P,z) \le \frac{X}{V(z)} + O\left({\sum_{\begin{smallmatrix} d_1,d_2 < z \\ d_1,d_2 \mid P(z)\end{smallmatrix}} \left\vert R_{[d_1,d_2]} \right\vert} \right) .\]
It is often useful to estimate V(z) by the bound
\[ V(z) \ge \sum_{d \le z} \frac{1}{f(d)} . \, \]
Applications
- The Brun-Titchmarsh theorem on the number of primes in an arithmetic progression;
- The number of n ≤ x such that n is coprime to φ(n) is asymptotic to e-γ x / log log log (x) .
References
- Alina Carmen Cojocaru; M. Ram Murty; An introduction to sieve methods and their applications, ser. London Mathematical Society Student Texts 66 , pp. 113-134, Cambridge University Press ISBN: 0-521-61275-6
- George Greaves; Sieves in number theory, , Springer-Verlag ISBN: 3-540-41647-1
- Heini Halberstam; H.E. Richert; Sieve Methods, , Academic Press ISBN: 0-12-318250-6
- Christopher Hooley; Applications of sieve methods to the theory of numbers, , pp. 7-12, Cambridge University Press ISBN: 0-521-20915-3
- Atle Selberg; On an elementary method in the theory of primes, Norske Vid. Selsk. Forh. Trondheim, 19 (1947), pp. 64-67
Separation axioms
In topology, separation axioms describe classes of topological space according to how well the open sets of the topology distinguish between distinct points.
Terminology
A neighbourhood of a point x in a topological space X is a set N such that x is in the interior of N; that is, there is an open set U such that \(x \in U \subseteq N\).
A neighbourhood of a set A in X is a set N such that A is contained in the interior of N; that is, there is an open set U such that \(A \subseteq U \subseteq N\).
Subsets U and V are separated in X if U is disjoint from the closure of V and V is disjoint from the closure of U.
A Urysohn function for subsets A and B of X is a continuous function f from X to the real unit interval such that f is 0 on A and 1 on B.
Axioms
A topological space X is
- T0 if for any two distinct points there is an open set which contains just one
- T1 if for any two points x, y there are open sets U and V such that U contains x but not y, and V contains y but not x
- T2 if any two distinct points have disjoint neighbourhoods
- T2½ if distinct points have disjoint closed neighbourhoods
- T3 if a closed set A and a point x not in A have disjoint neighbourhoods
- T3½ if for any closed set A and point x not in A there is a Urysohn function for A and {x}
- T4 if disjoint closed sets have disjoint neighbourhoods
- T5 if separated sets have disjoint neighbourhoods
- Hausdorff is a synonym for T2
- completely Hausdorff is a synonym for T2½
- regular if T0 and T3
- completely regular if T0 and T3½
- Tychonoff is completely regular and T1
- normal if T0 and T4
- completely normal if T1 and T5
- perfectly normal if normal and every closed set is a Gδ
Properties
- A space is T1 if and only if each point (singleton) forms a closed set.
- Urysohn's Lemma: if A and B are disjoint closed subsets of a T4 space X, there is a Urysohn function for A and B'.
References
- Steen, Lynn Arthur; Seebach, J. Arthur Jr.; Counterexamples in Topology, (1978), Springer-Verlag ISBN: 0-387-90312-7
Turan sieve
In mathematics, in the field of number theory, the Turán sieve is a technique for estimating the size of "sifted sets" of positive integers which satisfy a set of conditions which are expressed by congruences. It was developed by Pál Turán in 1934.
Description
In terms of sieve theory the Turán sieve is of combinatorial type: deriving from a rudimentary form of the inclusion-exclusion principle. The result gives an upper bound for the size of the sifted set.
Let A be a set of positive integers ≤ x and let P be a set of primes. For each p in P, let Ap denote the set of elements of A divisible by p and extend this to let Ad the intersection of the Ap for p dividing d, when d is a product of distinct primes from P. Further let A1 denote A itself. Let z be a positive real number and P(z) denote the product of the primes in P which are ≤ z. The object of the sieve is to estimate
\[S(A,P,z) = \left\vert A \setminus \bigcup_{p \in P(z)} A_p \right\vert . \]
We assume that |Ad| may be estimated, when d is a prime p by
\[ \left\vert A_p \right\vert = \frac{1}{f(p)} X + R_p \]
and when d is a product of two distinct primes d = p q by
\[ \left\vert A_{pq} \right\vert = \frac{1}{f(p)f(q)} X + R_{p,q} \]
where X = |A| and f is a function with the property that 0 ≤ f(d) ≤ 1. Put
\[ U(z) = \sum_{p \mid P(z)} f(p) . \]
Then
\[ S(A,P,z) \le \frac{X}{U(z)} + \frac{2}{U(z)} \sum_{p \mid P(z)} \left\vert R_p \right\vert +
\frac{1}{U(z)^2} \sum_{p,q \mid P(z)} \left\vert R_{p,q} \right\vert . \]
Applications
References
Weierstrass preparation theorem
In algebra, the Weierstrass preparation theorem describes a canonical form for formal power series over a complete local ring.
Let O be a complete local ring and f a formal power series in O''X''. Then f can be written uniquely in the form
\[f = (X^n + b_{n-1}X^{n-1} + \cdots + b_0) u(x) , \,\]
where the bi are in the maximal ideal m of O and u is a unit of O''X''.
The integer n defined by the theorem is the Weierstrass degree of f.
References
- Serge Lang; Algebra, (1993), pp. 208-209, Addison-Wesley ISBN: 0-201-55540-9
Zipf distribution
In probability theory and statistics, the Zipf distribution and zeta distribution refer to a class of discrete probability distributions. They have been used to model the distribution of words in words in a text , of text strings and keys in databases, and of the sizes of businesses and towns.
The Zipf distribution with parameter n assigns probability proportional to 1/r to an integer r ≤ n and zero otherwise, with normalization factor Hn, the n-th harmonic number.
A Zipf-like distribution with parameters n and s assigns probability proportional to 1/rs to an integer r ≤ n and zero otherwise, with normalization factor \(\sum_{r=1}^n 1/r^s\).
The zeta distribution with parameter s assigns probability proportional to 1/rs to all integers r with normalization factor given by the Riemann zeta function 1/ζ(s).
References