Difference between revisions of "Propositional connective"
(TeX) |
m (mathbin) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The symbol \equiv is usually not introduced as an independent propositional connective, but as an abbreviation: | The symbol \equiv is usually not introduced as an independent propositional connective, but as an abbreviation: | ||
− | A\equiv B\Leftrightarrow((A\supset B)\&(B\supset A)).\tag{1} | + | $$A\equiv B\Leftrightarrow((A\supset B)\mathbin{\&}(B\supset A)).\tag{1}$$ |
If a language contains the propositional constant \bot, denoting "untruth", then negation can be regarded as an abbreviation: \neg A\Leftrightarrow(A\supset\bot). | If a language contains the propositional constant \bot, denoting "untruth", then negation can be regarded as an abbreviation: \neg A\Leftrightarrow(A\supset\bot). | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset, and \neg are not independent in classical logic, since the following equivalences hold: | The propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset, and \neg are not independent in classical logic, since the following equivalences hold: | ||
− | A\&B\equiv\neg(\neg A\lor\neg B)\equiv\neg(A\supset\neg B),\tag{2} | + | $$A\mathbin{\&}B\equiv\neg(\neg A\lor\neg B)\equiv\neg(A\supset\neg B),\tag{2}$$ |
− | A\lor B\equiv\neg(\neg A\&\neg B)\equiv(\neg A\supset B)\equiv((A\supset B)\supset B),\tag{3} | + | $$A\lor B\equiv\neg(\neg A\mathbin{\&}\neg B)\equiv(\neg A\supset B)\equiv((A\supset B)\supset B),\tag{3}$$ |
− | A\supset B\equiv(\neg A\lor B)\equiv\neg(A\&\neg B).\tag{4} | + | $$A\supset B\equiv(\neg A\lor B)\equiv\neg(A\mathbin{\&}\neg B).\tag{4}$$ |
Thus, each of the propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset can be expressed in terms of \neg and one of the others. Therefore, in formulating the classical [[Propositional calculus|propositional calculus]] of expressions, one can choose two propositional connectives as primitive: \neg and one of \&,\lor,\supset; the others are regarded as abbreviations, according to (1)–(4). In intuitionistic logic, \&,\lor\supset, and \neg are independent. | Thus, each of the propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset can be expressed in terms of \neg and one of the others. Therefore, in formulating the classical [[Propositional calculus|propositional calculus]] of expressions, one can choose two propositional connectives as primitive: \neg and one of \&,\lor,\supset; the others are regarded as abbreviations, according to (1)–(4). In intuitionistic logic, \&,\lor\supset, and \neg are independent. |
Latest revision as of 15:56, 14 February 2020
A symbol in a formal language used for denoting a logical operation by means of which a new statement can be obtained from given statements. The most important propositional connectives are: the conjunction \& (or \land), the disjunction \lor, the implication \supset (or \to, or \Rightarrow), the negation \neg (or \sim), and equivalence \equiv (or \leftrightarrow, or \Leftrightarrow). These propositional connectives correspond in the English language to the expressions "and", "or", "implies", "it is not true that", and "is equivalent with". Sometimes one considers other propositional connectives; for example, the Sheffer stroke.
The symbol \equiv is usually not introduced as an independent propositional connective, but as an abbreviation:
A\equiv B\Leftrightarrow((A\supset B)\mathbin{\&}(B\supset A)).\tag{1}
If a language contains the propositional constant \bot, denoting "untruth", then negation can be regarded as an abbreviation: \neg A\Leftrightarrow(A\supset\bot).
The propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset, and \neg are not independent in classical logic, since the following equivalences hold:
A\mathbin{\&}B\equiv\neg(\neg A\lor\neg B)\equiv\neg(A\supset\neg B),\tag{2}
A\lor B\equiv\neg(\neg A\mathbin{\&}\neg B)\equiv(\neg A\supset B)\equiv((A\supset B)\supset B),\tag{3}
A\supset B\equiv(\neg A\lor B)\equiv\neg(A\mathbin{\&}\neg B).\tag{4}
Thus, each of the propositional connectives \&,\lor,\supset can be expressed in terms of \neg and one of the others. Therefore, in formulating the classical propositional calculus of expressions, one can choose two propositional connectives as primitive: \neg and one of \&,\lor,\supset; the others are regarded as abbreviations, according to (1)–(4). In intuitionistic logic, \&,\lor\supset, and \neg are independent.
Comments
References
[a1] | J.L. Bell, M. Machover, "A course in mathematical logic" , North-Holland (1977) |
Propositional connective. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Propositional_connective&oldid=33362