Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lojasiewicz inequality"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(it was not an error) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
About (1): probably, $|f(x)|$ is meant? Also, I guess what is $Z_f$, but it could be said explicitly. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 20:24, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | About (1): probably, $|f(x)|$ is meant? Also, I guess what is $Z_f$, but it could be said explicitly. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 20:24, 7 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
: Indeed! Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 08:59, 8 April 2014 (CEST) | : Indeed! Thanks for pointing it out. [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 08:59, 8 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | About the recent edit by [[Special:Contributions/Bark10731|Bark10731]]: I'm afraid, the former "$V\subset\subset U$" by [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] was not an error; rather, its meaning was "the closure of $V$ is contained in $U$". [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 17:33, 10 February 2015 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 10 February 2015
About (1): probably, $|f(x)|$ is meant? Also, I guess what is $Z_f$, but it could be said explicitly. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
About the recent edit by Bark10731: I'm afraid, the former "$V\subset\subset U$" by Camillo was not an error; rather, its meaning was "the closure of $V$ is contained in $U$". Boris Tsirelson (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2015 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
Lojasiewicz inequality. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lojasiewicz_inequality&oldid=31422
Lojasiewicz inequality. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lojasiewicz_inequality&oldid=31422