Difference between revisions of "Euler-Lagrange equation"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (MR/ZBL numbers added) |
(TeX) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''for a minimal surface | + | {{TEX|done}} |
+ | ''for a minimal surface $z=z(x,y)$'' | ||
The equation | The equation | ||
− | + | $$\left(1+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)^2\right)\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y^2}-2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x\partial y}+\left(1+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right)^2\right)\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x^2}=0.$$ | |
− | It was derived by J.L. Lagrange (1760) and interpreted by J. Meusnier as signifying that the mean curvature of the surface | + | It was derived by J.L. Lagrange (1760) and interpreted by J. Meusnier as signifying that the mean curvature of the surface $z=z(x,y)$ is zero. Particular integrals for it were obtained by G. Monge. The Euler–Lagrange equation was systematically investigated by S.N. Bernshtein, who showed that it is a quasi-linear elliptic equation of order $p=2$ and that, consequently, its solutions have a number of properties that distinguish them sharply from those of linear equations. Such properties include, for example, the removability of isolated singularities of a solution without the a priori assumption that the solution is bounded in a neighbourhood of the singular point, the maximum principle, which holds under the same conditions, the impossibility of obtaining a uniform a priori estimate for $z(x,y)$ in an arbitrary compact subdomain of a disc in terms of the value of $z$ at the centre of the disc (that is, the absence of an exact analogue of Harnack's inequality), facts relating to the [[Dirichlet problem|Dirichlet problem]], the non-existence of a non-linear solution defined in the entire plane (the [[Bernstein theorem|Bernstein theorem]]), etc. |
− | The Euler–Lagrange equation can be generalized with respect to the dimension: The equation corresponding to a minimal hypersurface | + | The Euler–Lagrange equation can be generalized with respect to the dimension: The equation corresponding to a minimal hypersurface $z=z(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ in $\mathbf R^{n+1}$ has the form |
− | + | $$\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\left(\frac{\partial z/\partial x_i}{\sqrt{1+|\nabla z|^2}}\right)=0,\quad\nabla z=\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_1},\dots,\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_n}\right).$$ | |
− | For this equation | + | For this equation $(n\geq3)$ the solvability of the Dirichlet problem has been studied, the removability of the singularities of a solution, provided that they are concentrated inside the domain on a set of zero $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure, has been proved, and the validity of Bernstein's theorem for $n\leq7$ and the existence of counter-examples for $n\geq8$ has been proved. |
Latest revision as of 18:46, 13 November 2014
for a minimal surface $z=z(x,y)$
The equation
$$\left(1+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)^2\right)\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial y^2}-2\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x\partial y}+\left(1+\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right)^2\right)\frac{\partial^2z}{\partial x^2}=0.$$
It was derived by J.L. Lagrange (1760) and interpreted by J. Meusnier as signifying that the mean curvature of the surface $z=z(x,y)$ is zero. Particular integrals for it were obtained by G. Monge. The Euler–Lagrange equation was systematically investigated by S.N. Bernshtein, who showed that it is a quasi-linear elliptic equation of order $p=2$ and that, consequently, its solutions have a number of properties that distinguish them sharply from those of linear equations. Such properties include, for example, the removability of isolated singularities of a solution without the a priori assumption that the solution is bounded in a neighbourhood of the singular point, the maximum principle, which holds under the same conditions, the impossibility of obtaining a uniform a priori estimate for $z(x,y)$ in an arbitrary compact subdomain of a disc in terms of the value of $z$ at the centre of the disc (that is, the absence of an exact analogue of Harnack's inequality), facts relating to the Dirichlet problem, the non-existence of a non-linear solution defined in the entire plane (the Bernstein theorem), etc.
The Euler–Lagrange equation can be generalized with respect to the dimension: The equation corresponding to a minimal hypersurface $z=z(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ in $\mathbf R^{n+1}$ has the form
$$\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\left(\frac{\partial z/\partial x_i}{\sqrt{1+|\nabla z|^2}}\right)=0,\quad\nabla z=\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_1},\dots,\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_n}\right).$$
For this equation $(n\geq3)$ the solvability of the Dirichlet problem has been studied, the removability of the singularities of a solution, provided that they are concentrated inside the domain on a set of zero $(n-1)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure, has been proved, and the validity of Bernstein's theorem for $n\leq7$ and the existence of counter-examples for $n\geq8$ has been proved.
Comments
For Bernshtein's paper see [a3].
References
[a1] | E. Giusti, "Minimal surfaces and functions of bounded variation" , Birkhäuser (1984) MR0775682 Zbl 0545.49018 |
[a2] | J.C.C. Nitsche, "Vorlesungen über Minimalflächen" , Springer (1975) pp. §455 MR0448224 Zbl 0319.53003 |
[a3] | S.N. [S.N. Bernshtein] Bernstein, "Sur les surfaces définies au moyen de leur courbure moyenne ou totale" Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. , 27 (1910) pp. 233–256 |
[a4] | E. Bombieri, E. Degiorgi, E. Giusti, "Minimal cones and the Bernstein problem" Inv. Math. , 7 (1969) pp. 243–268 |
Euler-Lagrange equation. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Euler-Lagrange_equation&oldid=24435