Difference between revisions of "Sperner lemma"
(Importing text file) |
(TeX) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | If a covering of a closed | + | {{TEX|done}} |
+ | If a covering of a closed $n$-dimensional simplex (cf. [[Simplex (abstract)|Simplex (abstract)]]) $T^n$ consists of $n+1$ closed sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$ that correspond to the vertices $a_0,\dots,a_n$ of $T^n$ in such a way that each face $T_r=(a_{i_0},\dots,a_{i_r})$ of this simplex is covered by the sets $A_{i_0},\dots,A_{i_r}$ corresponding to its vertices, then there exists a point that belongs to all the sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$. This lemma was established by E. Sperner (see [[#References|[1]]]). Sperner's lemma implies that the [[Lebesgue dimension|Lebesgue dimension]] of the space $\mathbf R^n$ is $n$. Sperner's lemma can also be used in a proof of Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and Brouwer's theorem on the invariance of domain (cf. [[Brouwer theorem|Brouwer theorem]]). | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
The theorem stated in the main article above is not known as Sperner's lemma in the West, and, in fact, it is not proved in [[#References|[1]]]. | The theorem stated in the main article above is not known as Sperner's lemma in the West, and, in fact, it is not proved in [[#References|[1]]]. | ||
− | Sperner's lemma is the following: Let | + | Sperner's lemma is the following: Let $\sigma=a_0\dots a_n$ be an $n$-dimensional simplex, let $T$ be a simplicial subdivision of $\sigma$ and let $f$ be a mapping from $V$ (the vertex set of $T$) to $\{0,\dots,n\}$ such that $f(v)\in\{i_0,\dots,i_k\}$ whenever $v$ belongs to the face $a_{i_0}\dots a_{i_k}$ of $\sigma$. Then the number of $n$-dimensional simplices in $T$ on which $f$ is surjective is odd. |
− | A mapping like | + | A mapping like $f$ above is called a Sperner labelling. Sperner proved this lemma in [[#References|[1]]], and obtained as a consequence a somewhat weaker form of the theorem stated in the main article above: his requirement on the sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$ was that for every $i$ the set $A_i$ should contain the point $a_i$ and that it should be disjoint from the face of $\sigma$ opposite to $a_i$. This requirement readily implies the conditions stated in the item. |
The theorem stated in the main article above was proved by B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski and S. Mazurkiewicz in [[#References|[a2]]], where it was used to prove Brouwer's fixed-point theorem. This form of the theorem is also very useful in infinite-dimensional situations, see [[#References|[a1]]], and is sometimes called the KKM-theorem. | The theorem stated in the main article above was proved by B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski and S. Mazurkiewicz in [[#References|[a2]]], where it was used to prove Brouwer's fixed-point theorem. This form of the theorem is also very useful in infinite-dimensional situations, see [[#References|[a1]]], and is sometimes called the KKM-theorem. | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
− | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Dugundji, A. Granas, "Fixed point theory" , PWN (1982)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski, S. Mazurkiewicz, "Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für | + | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J. Dugundji, A. Granas, "Fixed point theory" , PWN (1982)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski, S. Mazurkiewicz, "Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für $n$-dimensionale Simplexe" ''Fund. Math.'' , '''14''' (1929) pp. 132–137</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> H.E. Scarf, "The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping" ''SIAM J. Appl. Math.'' , '''15''' (1967) pp. 1328–1343</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> E.L. Allgower, K. Georg, "Simplicial and continuation methods for approximations to fixed points and solutions to systems of equations" ''SIAM Review'' , '''22''' (1980) pp. 28–85</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.C. Eaves, "A short course in solving equations with PL homotopies" , ''Proc. SIAM-AMS'' , '''9''' , Amer. Math. Soc. & SIAM (1976) pp. 73–143</TD></TR></table> |
Latest revision as of 19:01, 4 November 2014
If a covering of a closed $n$-dimensional simplex (cf. Simplex (abstract)) $T^n$ consists of $n+1$ closed sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$ that correspond to the vertices $a_0,\dots,a_n$ of $T^n$ in such a way that each face $T_r=(a_{i_0},\dots,a_{i_r})$ of this simplex is covered by the sets $A_{i_0},\dots,A_{i_r}$ corresponding to its vertices, then there exists a point that belongs to all the sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$. This lemma was established by E. Sperner (see [1]). Sperner's lemma implies that the Lebesgue dimension of the space $\mathbf R^n$ is $n$. Sperner's lemma can also be used in a proof of Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and Brouwer's theorem on the invariance of domain (cf. Brouwer theorem).
References
[1] | E. Sperner, "Neuer Beweis für die Invarianz der Dimensionszahl und des Gebietes" Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg , 6 (1928) pp. 265–272 |
[2] | P.S. Aleksandrov, B.A. Pasynkov, "Introduction to dimension theory" , Moscow (1973) (In Russian) |
[3] | R. Engelking, "General topology" , Heldermann (1989) |
Comments
The theorem stated in the main article above is not known as Sperner's lemma in the West, and, in fact, it is not proved in [1].
Sperner's lemma is the following: Let $\sigma=a_0\dots a_n$ be an $n$-dimensional simplex, let $T$ be a simplicial subdivision of $\sigma$ and let $f$ be a mapping from $V$ (the vertex set of $T$) to $\{0,\dots,n\}$ such that $f(v)\in\{i_0,\dots,i_k\}$ whenever $v$ belongs to the face $a_{i_0}\dots a_{i_k}$ of $\sigma$. Then the number of $n$-dimensional simplices in $T$ on which $f$ is surjective is odd.
A mapping like $f$ above is called a Sperner labelling. Sperner proved this lemma in [1], and obtained as a consequence a somewhat weaker form of the theorem stated in the main article above: his requirement on the sets $A_0,\dots,A_n$ was that for every $i$ the set $A_i$ should contain the point $a_i$ and that it should be disjoint from the face of $\sigma$ opposite to $a_i$. This requirement readily implies the conditions stated in the item.
The theorem stated in the main article above was proved by B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski and S. Mazurkiewicz in [a2], where it was used to prove Brouwer's fixed-point theorem. This form of the theorem is also very useful in infinite-dimensional situations, see [a1], and is sometimes called the KKM-theorem.
Sperner labellings, and Sperner's lemma on subdivisions as given above, have been used to develop effective ways to compute Brouwer fixed points, [a3], and hence such things as equilibria of economics, and, in turn, this development is at the basis of homology methods for the computation of roots of non-linear equations, etc., [a4], [a5].
References
[a1] | J. Dugundji, A. Granas, "Fixed point theory" , PWN (1982) |
[a2] | B. Knaster, K. Kuratowski, S. Mazurkiewicz, "Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes für $n$-dimensionale Simplexe" Fund. Math. , 14 (1929) pp. 132–137 |
[a3] | H.E. Scarf, "The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping" SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 15 (1967) pp. 1328–1343 |
[a4] | E.L. Allgower, K. Georg, "Simplicial and continuation methods for approximations to fixed points and solutions to systems of equations" SIAM Review , 22 (1980) pp. 28–85 |
[a5] | B.C. Eaves, "A short course in solving equations with PL homotopies" , Proc. SIAM-AMS , 9 , Amer. Math. Soc. & SIAM (1976) pp. 73–143 |
Sperner lemma. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Sperner_lemma&oldid=11509