Difference between revisions of "Talk:Borel-Cantelli lemma"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
m |
m (what symbol for probability P ?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The edit changed one formula without correcting the rest of the article accordingly. Before, a set $A$ was defined and used. After, $A$ is still defined, but replaced with $\limsup A_n$ once, and then used again. This is not serious. I revert. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 21:16, 6 October 2014 (CEST) | The edit changed one formula without correcting the rest of the article accordingly. Before, a set $A$ was defined and used. After, $A$ is still defined, but replaced with $\limsup A_n$ once, and then used again. This is not serious. I revert. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 21:16, 6 October 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What latex symbol should one use for probability P(A) in EOM? I tried texing this entry and stack with a question what is latex symbol for P ? --[[User:Nikita2|Nikita2]] ([[User talk:Nikita2|talk]]) 11:47, 8 October 2014 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 09:47, 8 October 2014
Edit by Fochsner introduces inconsistency
The edit changed one formula without correcting the rest of the article accordingly. Before, a set $A$ was defined and used. After, $A$ is still defined, but replaced with $\limsup A_n$ once, and then used again. This is not serious. I revert. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2014 (CEST)
What latex symbol should one use for probability P(A) in EOM? I tried texing this entry and stack with a question what is latex symbol for P ? --Nikita2 (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2014 (CEST)
How to Cite This Entry:
Borel-Cantelli lemma. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Borel-Cantelli_lemma&oldid=33506
Borel-Cantelli lemma. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Borel-Cantelli_lemma&oldid=33506