Difference between revisions of "User talk:Eljose"
(→Questions: I have explain ed at Talk:Möbius function why the formula there seems incorrect) |
(→Questions: Please clarify) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome! --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 22:33, 20 March 2013 (CET) | Welcome! --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 22:33, 20 March 2013 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
:This is our [[Encyclopedia of Mathematics:Policy|Policy]]: "The editorial board monitors any changes of articles and has full scientific authority over alterations and deletions." (By the way, it would be nice if you signed your contributions.) --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 23:33, 3 September 2013 (CEST) | :This is our [[Encyclopedia of Mathematics:Policy|Policy]]: "The editorial board monitors any changes of articles and has full scientific authority over alterations and deletions." (By the way, it would be nice if you signed your contributions.) --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 23:33, 3 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
− | ::In response to the comment "you can check the equations and see they are correct", I have | + | ::In response to the comment "you can check the equations and see they are correct", I have explained at [[Talk:Möbius function]] why the formula there seems incorrect. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 20:05, 4 September 2013 (CEST) |
+ | |||
+ | At [[Talk:Möbius function]] you write as if you were the author ("unfortunately i am not famous so i can not publish on important math journals") whereas a few lines above you claimed not to be the author. Please clarify? [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] ([[User talk:Richard Pinch|talk]]) 20:25, 4 September 2013 (CEST) |
Revision as of 18:25, 4 September 2013
Welcome! --Boris Tsirelson (talk) 22:33, 20 March 2013 (CET)
Questions
Hello. Your edits, to Möbius function, Integral equation and Zeta-function method for regularization, seem to be entirely about adding references by one author, Jose Javier Garcia, in one journal, Prespacetime Journal. This raises two questions. Firstly, do you have any connection with that person? Secondly, is that journal an acceptable scholarly source? It seems to me that it is not. Your comments would be welcome. Richard Pinch (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2013 (CEST)
we studied together :D so he is somehow a friend of mine, the ISSN of the journal is ISSN: 2153-8301 anway you can check the equations and see they are correct.
- Having an ISSN does not make it a scholarly journal. Richard Pinch (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2013 (CEST)
Hi, I have removed the critical text from the above mentioned pages into the respective discussion page, as it is based on a source not covered by MR or ZBL. Please don't move it back until further notice. --Ulf Rehmann 19:46, 3 September 2013 (CEST)
Who decides that ?? anyone can get a book published if he pays enough money also anyone can check that the equations are CORRECT :)
- This is our Policy: "The editorial board monitors any changes of articles and has full scientific authority over alterations and deletions." (By the way, it would be nice if you signed your contributions.) --Ulf Rehmann 23:33, 3 September 2013 (CEST)
- In response to the comment "you can check the equations and see they are correct", I have explained at Talk:Möbius function why the formula there seems incorrect. Richard Pinch (talk) 20:05, 4 September 2013 (CEST)
At Talk:Möbius function you write as if you were the author ("unfortunately i am not famous so i can not publish on important math journals") whereas a few lines above you claimed not to be the author. Please clarify? Richard Pinch (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2013 (CEST)
Eljose. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Eljose&oldid=30348