Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cantor ternary function"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(I did) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Definitely. Unfortunately I have almost no experience in any type of software to do it, so please go ahead if you feel like doing it! [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 12:28, 5 December 2012 (CET) | ::Definitely. Unfortunately I have almost no experience in any type of software to do it, so please go ahead if you feel like doing it! [[User:Camillo.delellis|Camillo]] ([[User talk:Camillo.delellis|talk]]) 12:28, 5 December 2012 (CET) | ||
− | ::Boris, | + | ::: Well, I did; feel free to improve. --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 09:49, 8 December 2012 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 08:49, 8 December 2012
I think there should be the graph of this function.
- Indeed! And we have a nice mean for doing it: the "Asymptote". Do you want to do it yourself? If not, probably I'll try. --Boris Tsirelson (talk) 12:21, 5 December 2012 (CET)
- Well, I did; feel free to improve. --Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:49, 8 December 2012 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
Cantor ternary function. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Cantor_ternary_function&oldid=29089
Cantor ternary function. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Cantor_ternary_function&oldid=29089