Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sobolev space"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m |
(→notation: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Yes, bibs can be glued together. You may want to use [[Help:Normalize_EoM_references#Perl_script_to_normalize_old_EoM_reference_table | this script]] to handle references, which does also get the entries into right order. | : Yes, bibs can be glued together. You may want to use [[Help:Normalize_EoM_references#Perl_script_to_normalize_old_EoM_reference_table | this script]] to handle references, which does also get the entries into right order. | ||
: But see the warning there. --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 11:17, 5 May 2012 (CEST) | : But see the warning there. --[[User:Ulf Rehmann|Ulf Rehmann]] 11:17, 5 May 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == notation == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we use $D^{\alpha}_xf$ or $D^{\alpha}f$ instead of $f^{(k)}$ for derivatives? Because $f^{(k)}$ looks like $k$-th derivative of single variable function. | ||
Revision as of 05:13, 23 November 2012
In the original page, there are two bibliographies and an empty comment section. Should there be just one bibliography? Remove comments section?--Juan José Torrens 01:59, 5 May 2012 (CEST)
- Yes, bibs can be glued together. You may want to use this script to handle references, which does also get the entries into right order.
- But see the warning there. --Ulf Rehmann 11:17, 5 May 2012 (CEST)
notation
Should we use $D^{\alpha}_xf$ or $D^{\alpha}f$ instead of $f^{(k)}$ for derivatives? Because $f^{(k)}$ looks like $k$-th derivative of single variable function.
How to Cite This Entry:
Sobolev space. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Sobolev_space&oldid=26036
Sobolev space. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Sobolev_space&oldid=26036