Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Measurable decomposition"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (tex encoded by computer)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
''measurable partition, of a [[Measure space|measure space]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631801.png" />''
+
<!--
 +
m0631801.png
 +
$#A+1 = 35 n = 0
 +
$#C+1 = 35 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/M063/M.0603180 Measurable decomposition,
 +
Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics.
 +
Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below,
 +
if TeX found to be correct.
 +
-->
  
A partition (cf. [[Decomposition|Decomposition]]) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631802.png" /> of the space into disjoint subsets (called the elements of the partition) that can be obtained as the partition into level sets of some [[Measurable function|measurable function]] (with numerical values) on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631803.png" />. This definition can be restated in terms of  "intrinsic"  properties of the partition (see [[#References|[1]]]). In accordance with the general tendency in questions of measure theory to ignore sets of measure zero, a measurable partition is often understood to be a partition measurable modulo 0, that is, equivalent modulo 0 to some measurable partition (two partitions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631804.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631805.png" /> of a measure space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631806.png" /> are equivalent modulo 0 if there exists a set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631807.png" /> of measure 0 such that the partitions of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631808.png" /> consisting of the intersections with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m0631809.png" /> of the elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318010.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318011.png" /> coincide).
+
{{TEX|auto}}
 +
{{TEX|done}}
  
Although the definition given makes sense for any measure space, in fact measurable partitions are almost always considered for Lebesgue spaces (cf. [[Lebesgue space|Lebesgue space]]) (and sometimes for spaces having the properties of the latter to some extent, for example, for spaces with perfect measures; see [[#References|[2]]] and [[#References|[3]]] and [[Perfect measure|Perfect measure]]), since in these spaces measurable partitions have a number of  "good"  properties. Thus, in this case there exists a system of conditional measures (or, as used to be said in earlier times [[#References|[1]]], a canonical system of measures) belonging to measurable partitions. This is a system of measures <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318012.png" /> on the elements <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318013.png" /> of the partition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318014.png" /> which enables one to consider integration with respect to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318015.png" /> as repeated integration: first, integration is performed over the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318016.png" /> and with respect to appropriate <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318017.png" />, and then it is necessary to integrate the result, which can be looked upon as a function on the quotient space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318018.png" />, with respect to the natural measure <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318019.png" /> on the latter space (by definition, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318020.png" /> has the elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318021.png" /> as points, while its measurable subsets are those with measurable pre-images under the natural projection <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318022.png" />; the measure is defined to be <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318023.png" />). Interpreting <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318024.png" /> as a space of elementary events in probability theory, one can say that the system of conditional measures is an  "improvement"  of the conditional probability, closely connected with the specific Lebesgue space; for arbitrary spaces of elementary events, the conditional probability cannot, in general, be interpreted using some set of measures on the elements of some partition.
+
''measurable partition, of a [[Measure space|measure space]]  $  ( M, \mu ) $''
 +
 
 +
A partition (cf. [[Decomposition|Decomposition]])  $  \xi $
 +
of the space into disjoint subsets (called the elements of the partition) that can be obtained as the partition into level sets of some [[Measurable function|measurable function]] (with numerical values) on  $  M $.
 +
This definition can be restated in terms of  "intrinsic"  properties of the partition (see [[#References|[1]]]). In accordance with the general tendency in questions of measure theory to ignore sets of measure zero, a measurable partition is often understood to be a partition measurable modulo 0, that is, equivalent modulo 0 to some measurable partition (two partitions  $  \xi $
 +
and  $  \eta $
 +
of a measure space  $  M $
 +
are equivalent modulo 0 if there exists a set  $  N $
 +
of measure 0 such that the partitions of  $  M \setminus  N $
 +
consisting of the intersections with  $  M \setminus  N $
 +
of the elements of  $  \xi $
 +
and  $  \eta $
 +
coincide).
 +
 
 +
Although the definition given makes sense for any measure space, in fact measurable partitions are almost always considered for Lebesgue spaces (cf. [[Lebesgue space|Lebesgue space]]) (and sometimes for spaces having the properties of the latter to some extent, for example, for spaces with perfect measures; see [[#References|[2]]] and [[#References|[3]]] and [[Perfect measure|Perfect measure]]), since in these spaces measurable partitions have a number of  "good"  properties. Thus, in this case there exists a system of conditional measures (or, as used to be said in earlier times [[#References|[1]]], a canonical system of measures) belonging to measurable partitions. This is a system of measures $  \mu ( \cdot \mid  C) $
 +
on the elements $  C $
 +
of the partition $  \xi $
 +
which enables one to consider integration with respect to $  \mu $
 +
as repeated integration: first, integration is performed over the $  C $
 +
and with respect to appropriate $  \mu ( \cdot \mid  C) $,  
 +
and then it is necessary to integrate the result, which can be looked upon as a function on the quotient space $  M/ \xi $,  
 +
with respect to the natural measure $  \mu _  \xi  $
 +
on the latter space (by definition, $  M/ \xi $
 +
has the elements of $  \xi $
 +
as points, while its measurable subsets are those with measurable pre-images under the natural projection $  \pi : M \rightarrow M/ \xi $;  
 +
the measure is defined to be $  \mu _  \xi  ( A) = \mu ( \pi  ^ {-} 1 ( A)) $).  
 +
Interpreting $  ( M, \mu ) $
 +
as a space of elementary events in probability theory, one can say that the system of conditional measures is an  "improvement"  of the conditional probability, closely connected with the specific Lebesgue space; for arbitrary spaces of elementary events, the conditional probability cannot, in general, be interpreted using some set of measures on the elements of some partition.
  
 
Non-measurable (and non-measurable modulo 0) partitions are by no means always  "pathological"  objects, like non-measurable sets or functions. For example, the partition of the phase space of an ergodic dynamical system into its trajectories can have a completely  "classical"  origin; it is simply that its properties are different from those of a measurable partition.
 
Non-measurable (and non-measurable modulo 0) partitions are by no means always  "pathological"  objects, like non-measurable sets or functions. For example, the partition of the phase space of an ergodic dynamical system into its trajectories can have a completely  "classical"  origin; it is simply that its properties are different from those of a measurable partition.
Line 9: Line 44:
 
====References====
 
====References====
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V.A. Rokhlin,  "On mean notions of measure theory"  ''Mat. Sb.'' , '''25''' :  1  (1949)  pp. 107–150  (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B.V. Gnedenko,  A.N. Kolmogorov,  "Limit distributions for sums of independent random variables" , Addison-Wesley  (1954)  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V.V. Sazonov,  "On perfect measures"  ''Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat.'' , '''26''' :  3  (1962)  pp. 391–414  (In Russian)</TD></TR></table>
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V.A. Rokhlin,  "On mean notions of measure theory"  ''Mat. Sb.'' , '''25''' :  1  (1949)  pp. 107–150  (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B.V. Gnedenko,  A.N. Kolmogorov,  "Limit distributions for sums of independent random variables" , Addison-Wesley  (1954)  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V.V. Sazonov,  "On perfect measures"  ''Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat.'' , '''26''' :  3  (1962)  pp. 391–414  (In Russian)</TD></TR></table>
 
 
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
A useful result in ergodic theory concerning Lebesgue spaces and measurable partitions is the Rokhlin–Halmos theorem. In its strong form it states: Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318025.png" /> be a finite measurable partition of a Lebesgue space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318026.png" /> and let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318027.png" /> be an [[Automorphism|automorphism]] of this space. Then, for any <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318028.png" /> and any <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318029.png" /> there exists an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318030.png" /> such that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318031.png" /> are pairwise disjoint, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318032.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318033.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318034.png" />. (The weak form results by taking the trivial partition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/m/m063/m063180/m06318035.png" />.)
+
A useful result in ergodic theory concerning Lebesgue spaces and measurable partitions is the Rokhlin–Halmos theorem. In its strong form it states: Let $  \pi = ( A _ {1} \dots A _ {r} ) $
 +
be a finite measurable partition of a Lebesgue space $  ( M, {\mathcal A} , \mu ) $
 +
and let $  T $
 +
be an [[Automorphism|automorphism]] of this space. Then, for any $  \epsilon > 0 $
 +
and any $  n \in \mathbf N $
 +
there exists an $  E \in {\mathcal A} $
 +
such that $  E, TE \dots T  ^ {n-} 1 E $
 +
are pairwise disjoint, $  \mu ( \cup _ {i=} 0 ^ {n-} 1 T  ^ {i} E) > 1- \epsilon $
 +
and $  \mu ( E \cap A _ {j} ) = \mu ( E) \mu ( A _ {j} ) $,  
 +
$  j = 1 \dots r $.  
 +
(The weak form results by taking the trivial partition $  ( M) $.)
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd,  S.V. Fomin,  Ya.G. Sinai,  "Ergodic theory" , Springer  (1982)  pp. Chapt. 10, §5  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table>
 
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd,  S.V. Fomin,  Ya.G. Sinai,  "Ergodic theory" , Springer  (1982)  pp. Chapt. 10, §5  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table>

Latest revision as of 08:00, 6 June 2020


measurable partition, of a measure space $ ( M, \mu ) $

A partition (cf. Decomposition) $ \xi $ of the space into disjoint subsets (called the elements of the partition) that can be obtained as the partition into level sets of some measurable function (with numerical values) on $ M $. This definition can be restated in terms of "intrinsic" properties of the partition (see [1]). In accordance with the general tendency in questions of measure theory to ignore sets of measure zero, a measurable partition is often understood to be a partition measurable modulo 0, that is, equivalent modulo 0 to some measurable partition (two partitions $ \xi $ and $ \eta $ of a measure space $ M $ are equivalent modulo 0 if there exists a set $ N $ of measure 0 such that the partitions of $ M \setminus N $ consisting of the intersections with $ M \setminus N $ of the elements of $ \xi $ and $ \eta $ coincide).

Although the definition given makes sense for any measure space, in fact measurable partitions are almost always considered for Lebesgue spaces (cf. Lebesgue space) (and sometimes for spaces having the properties of the latter to some extent, for example, for spaces with perfect measures; see [2] and [3] and Perfect measure), since in these spaces measurable partitions have a number of "good" properties. Thus, in this case there exists a system of conditional measures (or, as used to be said in earlier times [1], a canonical system of measures) belonging to measurable partitions. This is a system of measures $ \mu ( \cdot \mid C) $ on the elements $ C $ of the partition $ \xi $ which enables one to consider integration with respect to $ \mu $ as repeated integration: first, integration is performed over the $ C $ and with respect to appropriate $ \mu ( \cdot \mid C) $, and then it is necessary to integrate the result, which can be looked upon as a function on the quotient space $ M/ \xi $, with respect to the natural measure $ \mu _ \xi $ on the latter space (by definition, $ M/ \xi $ has the elements of $ \xi $ as points, while its measurable subsets are those with measurable pre-images under the natural projection $ \pi : M \rightarrow M/ \xi $; the measure is defined to be $ \mu _ \xi ( A) = \mu ( \pi ^ {-} 1 ( A)) $). Interpreting $ ( M, \mu ) $ as a space of elementary events in probability theory, one can say that the system of conditional measures is an "improvement" of the conditional probability, closely connected with the specific Lebesgue space; for arbitrary spaces of elementary events, the conditional probability cannot, in general, be interpreted using some set of measures on the elements of some partition.

Non-measurable (and non-measurable modulo 0) partitions are by no means always "pathological" objects, like non-measurable sets or functions. For example, the partition of the phase space of an ergodic dynamical system into its trajectories can have a completely "classical" origin; it is simply that its properties are different from those of a measurable partition.

References

[1] V.A. Rokhlin, "On mean notions of measure theory" Mat. Sb. , 25 : 1 (1949) pp. 107–150 (In Russian)
[2] B.V. Gnedenko, A.N. Kolmogorov, "Limit distributions for sums of independent random variables" , Addison-Wesley (1954) (Translated from Russian)
[3] V.V. Sazonov, "On perfect measures" Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser. Mat. , 26 : 3 (1962) pp. 391–414 (In Russian)

Comments

A useful result in ergodic theory concerning Lebesgue spaces and measurable partitions is the Rokhlin–Halmos theorem. In its strong form it states: Let $ \pi = ( A _ {1} \dots A _ {r} ) $ be a finite measurable partition of a Lebesgue space $ ( M, {\mathcal A} , \mu ) $ and let $ T $ be an automorphism of this space. Then, for any $ \epsilon > 0 $ and any $ n \in \mathbf N $ there exists an $ E \in {\mathcal A} $ such that $ E, TE \dots T ^ {n-} 1 E $ are pairwise disjoint, $ \mu ( \cup _ {i=} 0 ^ {n-} 1 T ^ {i} E) > 1- \epsilon $ and $ \mu ( E \cap A _ {j} ) = \mu ( E) \mu ( A _ {j} ) $, $ j = 1 \dots r $. (The weak form results by taking the trivial partition $ ( M) $.)

References

[a1] I.P. [I.P. Kornfel'd] Cornfel'd, S.V. Fomin, Ya.G. Sinai, "Ergodic theory" , Springer (1982) pp. Chapt. 10, §5 (Translated from Russian)
How to Cite This Entry:
Measurable decomposition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Measurable_decomposition&oldid=18413
This article was adapted from an original article by D.V. Anosov (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article