Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Waring problem"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(TeX)
(A couple of missed TeX bits, Fixed refs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TEX|done}}
+
{{TEX|done}}  
A problem in number theory formulated in 1770 by E. Waring in the following form: Any natural number is a sum of 4 squares, of 9 cubes and of 19 fourth-powers. In other words, for all $n\geq2$ there exists a $k=k(n)$, depending only on $n$, such that every natural number is the sum of $k$ $n$-th powers of non-negative integers. D. Hilbert in 1909 was the first to give a general solution of Waring's problem with a very rough estimate of the value of $k$ as a function of $n$; this is why the problem is sometimes known as the Hilbert–Waring problem. Let $J_{k,n}(N)$ be the number of solutions of the equation
+
 
 +
 
 +
A problem in number theory formulated in 1770 by
 +
E. Waring in the following form: Any natural number is a sum of 4
 +
squares, of 9 cubes and of 19 fourth-powers. In other words, for all
 +
$n\geq2$ there exists a $k=k(n)$, depending only on $n$, such that
 +
every natural number is the sum of $k$ $n$-th powers of non-negative
 +
integers. D. Hilbert in 1909 was the first to give a general solution
 +
of Waring's problem with a very rough estimate of the value of $k$ as
 +
a function of $n$; this is why the problem is sometimes known as the
 +
Hilbert–Waring problem. Let $J_{k,n}(N)$ be the number of solutions of
 +
the equation
  
 
$$x_1^n+\cdots+x_k^n=N$$
 
$$x_1^n+\cdots+x_k^n=N$$
  
in non-negative integers. Hilbert's theorem then states that there exists a $K=k(n)$ for which $J_{K,n}(N)\geq1$ for any $N\geq1$. G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood, who applied the [[Circle method|circle method]] to the Waring problem, demonstrated in 1928 that for $k\geq(n-2)2^{n-1}+5$ the value of $J_{k,n}(N)$ is given by an asymptotic formula of the type
+
in non-negative integers. Hilbert's theorem then states that there
 +
exists a $K=k(n)$ for which $J_{K,n}(N)\geq1$ for any
 +
$N\geq1$. G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood, who applied the
 +
[[Circle method|circle method]] to the Waring problem, demonstrated in
 +
1928 that for $k\geq(n-2)2^{n-1}+5$ the value of $J_{k,n}(N)$ is given
 +
by an asymptotic formula of the type
  
 
$$J_{k,n}(N)=AN^{k/n-1}+O(N^{k/n-1-\gamma}),$$
 
$$J_{k,n}(N)=AN^{k/n-1}+O(N^{k/n-1-\gamma}),$$
  
where $A=A(N)\geq c_0>0$, while $c_0$ and $\gamma>0$ are constants. Consequently, if $N\geq N_0(n)$, equation (1) has a solution. This result gave rise to three problems: Determine the order of the three quantities $G(n)$, $g(n)$, $k_0(n)$ which are the smallest integers for which: a) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq G(n)$ and $N\geq N_0(n)$; b) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq g(n)$ and $N\geq 1$; or c) the asymptotic formula (2) applies to $J_{k,n}(N)$ if $k\geq k_0(n)$.
+
where $A=A(N)\geq c_0>0$, while $c_0$ and $\gamma>0$ are
 +
constants. Consequently, if $N\geq N_0(n)$, equation (1) has a
 +
solution. This result gave rise to three problems: Determine the order
 +
of the three quantities $G(n)$, $g(n)$, $k_0(n)$ which are the
 +
smallest integers for which: a) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq
 +
G(n)$ and $N\geq N_0(n)$; b) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq g(n)$
 +
and $N\geq 1$; or c) the asymptotic formula (2) applies to
 +
$J_{k,n}(N)$ if $k\geq k_0(n)$.
  
a) It is known that $G(n)\geq n+1$. It was proved in 1934 by I.M. Vinogradov, using his own method, that
+
a) It is known that $G(n)\geq n+1$. It was proved in 1934 by
 +
I.M. Vinogradov, using his own method, that
  
 
$$G(n)\leq 3n(\ln n+9).$$
 
$$G(n)\leq 3n(\ln n+9).$$
  
Moreover, many results are available concerning $G(n)$ for small values of $n$: $G(4)=16$ (H. Davenport, 1939); $G(3)=7$ (Yu.V. Linnik, 1942).
+
Moreover, many results are available concerning $G(n)$ for small
 +
values of $n$: $G(4)=16$ (H. Davenport, 1939); $G(3)=7$ (Yu.V. Linnik,
 +
1942).
  
b) It was shown in 1936 by L. Dickson and S. Pillai, who also used the [[Vinogradov method|Vinogradov method]], that
+
b) It was shown in 1936 by L. Dickson and S. Pillai, who also used the
 +
[[Vinogradov method|Vinogradov method]], that
  
 
$$G(n)=2^n+\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]-2$$
 
$$G(n)=2^n+\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]-2$$
Line 22: Line 49:
 
for all $n>6$ for which
 
for all $n>6$ for which
  
$$\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n-\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]\leq 1-\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n\left\{\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]+2\right\}.$$
+
$$\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n-\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]\leq
 +
1-\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n\left\{\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]+2\right\}.$$
  
The last condition was demonstrated in 1957 by K. Mahler for all sufficiently large $n$.
+
The last condition was demonstrated in 1957 by K. Mahler for all
 +
sufficiently large $n$.
  
c) The best result of all must be credited to Vinogradov, who showed that
+
c) The best result of all must be credited to Vinogradov, who showed
 +
that
 
$$k_0(n)\leq 4n^2\ln n.$$
 
$$k_0(n)\leq 4n^2\ln n.$$
  
  
An elementary proof of Waring's problem was given in 1942 by Yu.V. Linnik. There exist many different generalizations of Waring's problem (the variables run through a certain subset of the set of natural numbers; the number $N$ is represented by polynomials $f_1(x_1),\ldots,f_k(x_k)$ rather than by monomials $x_1^n,\ldots,x_k^n$; equation (1) is replaced by a congruence, etc.).
+
An elementary proof of Waring's problem was given in 1942 by
 +
Yu.V. Linnik. There exist many different generalizations of Waring's
 +
problem (the variables run through a certain subset of the set of
 +
natural numbers; the number $N$ is represented by polynomials
 +
$f_1(x_1),\ldots,f_k(x_k)$ rather than by monomials
 +
$x_1^n,\ldots,x_k^n$; equation (1) is replaced by a congruence, etc.).
  
The special importance of Waring's problem consists in the fact that in trying to solve it, powerful methods in [[Analytic number theory|analytic number theory]] had to be created.
+
The special importance of Waring's problem consists in the fact that
 +
in trying to solve it, powerful methods in
 +
[[Analytic number theory|analytic number theory]] had to be created.
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  I.M. Vinogradov,  "Selected works" , Springer  (1985)  (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  I.M. Vinogradov,   "The method of trigonometric sums in the theory of numbers" , Interscience  (1954) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"L.-K. Hua,   "Abschätzungen von Exponentialsummen und ihre Anwendung in der Zahlentheorie" , ''Enzyklopaedie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen'' , '''1''' : 2 (1959) (Heft 13, Teil 1)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B.N. Delone,   "The Peterburg school of number theory" , Moscow-Leningrad  (1947) (In Russian)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A.Ya. Khinchin,   "Three pearls of number theory" , Graylock  (1952) (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR></table>
+
{|
 
+
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|De}}||valign="top"| B.N. Delone, "The Peterburg school of number theory", Moscow-Leningrad (1947) (In Russian)
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Hu}}||valign="top"| L.-K. Hua, "Abschätzungen von Exponentialsummen und ihre Anwendung in der Zahlentheorie", ''Enzyklopaedie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen'', '''1''' : 2 (1959) (Heft 13, Teil 1)
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Kh}}||valign="top"| A.Ya. Khinchin, "Three pearls of number theory", Graylock (1952) (Translated from Russian)
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Vi}}||valign="top"| I.M. Vinogradov, "Selected works", Springer (1985) (Translated from Russian)
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Vi2}}||valign="top"| I.M. Vinogradov, "The method of trigonometric sums in the theory of numbers", Interscience (1954) (Translated from Russian)
 +
|-
 +
|}
  
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
It is known that <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/w/w097/w097100/w09710043.png" /> (J.L. Lagrange, 1770), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/w/w097/w097100/w09710044.png" /> (A. Wieferich, A. Kempner, 1912), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/w/w097/w097100/w09710045.png" /> (R. Balusabramanian, J. Deshouillers, F. Dress, 1986), <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/w/w097/w097100/w09710046.png" /> (Chen-Jingrun, 1964). See also [[Circle method|Circle method]] and [[#References|[a1]]][[#References|[a3]]].
+
It is known that $g(2)=4$ (J.L. Lagrange, 1770), $g(3)=9$
 +
(A. Wieferich, A. Kempner, 1912), $g(4)=19$ (R. Balusabramanian,
 +
J. Deshouillers, F. Dress, 1986), $g(5)=37$ (Chen-Jingrun, 1964). See also
 +
[[Circle method|Circle method]] and
 +
{{Cite|HaWr}}{{Cite|Sh}}.
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"G.H. Hardy,   E.M. Wright,   "An introduction to the theory of numbers" , Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. 6</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R.C. Vaughan,   "The Hardy–Littlewood method" , Cambridge Univ. Press  (1981)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  D. Shanks,   "Solved and unsolved problems in number theory" , Chelsea, reprint  (1978)</TD></TR></table>
+
{|
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|HaWr}}||valign="top"| G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, "An introduction to the theory of numbers", Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. 6
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Sh}}||valign="top"| D. Shanks, "Solved and unsolved problems in number theory", Chelsea, reprint (1978)
 +
|-
 +
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Va}}||valign="top"| R.C. Vaughan, "The Hardy–Littlewood method", Cambridge Univ. Press (1981)
 +
|-
 +
|}

Revision as of 11:32, 20 April 2012


A problem in number theory formulated in 1770 by E. Waring in the following form: Any natural number is a sum of 4 squares, of 9 cubes and of 19 fourth-powers. In other words, for all $n\geq2$ there exists a $k=k(n)$, depending only on $n$, such that every natural number is the sum of $k$ $n$-th powers of non-negative integers. D. Hilbert in 1909 was the first to give a general solution of Waring's problem with a very rough estimate of the value of $k$ as a function of $n$; this is why the problem is sometimes known as the Hilbert–Waring problem. Let $J_{k,n}(N)$ be the number of solutions of the equation

$$x_1^n+\cdots+x_k^n=N$$

in non-negative integers. Hilbert's theorem then states that there exists a $K=k(n)$ for which $J_{K,n}(N)\geq1$ for any $N\geq1$. G.H. Hardy and J.E. Littlewood, who applied the circle method to the Waring problem, demonstrated in 1928 that for $k\geq(n-2)2^{n-1}+5$ the value of $J_{k,n}(N)$ is given by an asymptotic formula of the type

$$J_{k,n}(N)=AN^{k/n-1}+O(N^{k/n-1-\gamma}),$$

where $A=A(N)\geq c_0>0$, while $c_0$ and $\gamma>0$ are constants. Consequently, if $N\geq N_0(n)$, equation (1) has a solution. This result gave rise to three problems: Determine the order of the three quantities $G(n)$, $g(n)$, $k_0(n)$ which are the smallest integers for which: a) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq G(n)$ and $N\geq N_0(n)$; b) equation (1) is solvable for $k\geq g(n)$ and $N\geq 1$; or c) the asymptotic formula (2) applies to $J_{k,n}(N)$ if $k\geq k_0(n)$.

a) It is known that $G(n)\geq n+1$. It was proved in 1934 by I.M. Vinogradov, using his own method, that

$$G(n)\leq 3n(\ln n+9).$$

Moreover, many results are available concerning $G(n)$ for small values of $n$: $G(4)=16$ (H. Davenport, 1939); $G(3)=7$ (Yu.V. Linnik, 1942).

b) It was shown in 1936 by L. Dickson and S. Pillai, who also used the Vinogradov method, that

$$G(n)=2^n+\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]-2$$

for all $n>6$ for which

$$\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n-\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]\leq 1-\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^n\left\{\left[\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^n\right]+2\right\}.$$

The last condition was demonstrated in 1957 by K. Mahler for all sufficiently large $n$.

c) The best result of all must be credited to Vinogradov, who showed that $$k_0(n)\leq 4n^2\ln n.$$


An elementary proof of Waring's problem was given in 1942 by Yu.V. Linnik. There exist many different generalizations of Waring's problem (the variables run through a certain subset of the set of natural numbers; the number $N$ is represented by polynomials $f_1(x_1),\ldots,f_k(x_k)$ rather than by monomials $x_1^n,\ldots,x_k^n$; equation (1) is replaced by a congruence, etc.).

The special importance of Waring's problem consists in the fact that in trying to solve it, powerful methods in analytic number theory had to be created.

References

[De] B.N. Delone, "The Peterburg school of number theory", Moscow-Leningrad (1947) (In Russian)
[Hu] L.-K. Hua, "Abschätzungen von Exponentialsummen und ihre Anwendung in der Zahlentheorie", Enzyklopaedie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften mit Einschluss ihrer Anwendungen, 1 : 2 (1959) (Heft 13, Teil 1)
[Kh] A.Ya. Khinchin, "Three pearls of number theory", Graylock (1952) (Translated from Russian)
[Vi] I.M. Vinogradov, "Selected works", Springer (1985) (Translated from Russian)
[Vi2] I.M. Vinogradov, "The method of trigonometric sums in the theory of numbers", Interscience (1954) (Translated from Russian)


Comments

It is known that $g(2)=4$ (J.L. Lagrange, 1770), $g(3)=9$ (A. Wieferich, A. Kempner, 1912), $g(4)=19$ (R. Balusabramanian, J. Deshouillers, F. Dress, 1986), $g(5)=37$ (Chen-Jingrun, 1964). See also Circle method and [HaWr][Sh].

References

[HaWr] G.H. Hardy, E.M. Wright, "An introduction to the theory of numbers", Oxford Univ. Press (1979) pp. Chapt. 6
[Sh] D. Shanks, "Solved and unsolved problems in number theory", Chelsea, reprint (1978)
[Va] R.C. Vaughan, "The Hardy–Littlewood method", Cambridge Univ. Press (1981)
How to Cite This Entry:
Waring problem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Waring_problem&oldid=24851
This article was adapted from an original article by A.A. Karatsuba (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article