Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "User:Matteo.focardi/sandbox"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MSC|28A}}
 
  
[[Category:Classical measure theory]]
 
  
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Linear and multilinear algebra; matrix theory]]
 +
{{MSC|15Axx|}}
 
{{TEX|done}}
 
{{TEX|done}}
  
A theorem on the relation between the concepts of  almost-everywhere convergence and uniform convergence of a sequence of  functions. In literature it is sometimes cited as Egorov-Severini's
 
theorem since it was proved independently and almost contemporarily by the two authors (see
 
refs. {{Cite|Ego}}, {{Cite|Sev}}).
 
  
Let $\mu$ be a [[Set function|$\sigma$-additive measure]] defined on a set $X$ endowed with a [[Algebra of sets|$\sigma$-algebra]] ${\mathcal A}$, i.e. $(X,{\mathcal A})$ is a [[Measurable space|measurable space]].
+
A formula aimed at expressing the determinant of the product of two matrices $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$  
Let $E\in{\mathcal A}$, $\mu(E)<+\infty$, and let $f_k:E\to\mathbb{R}$ be a sequence of $\mu$-measurable functions converging $\mu$-almost-everywhere to a function $f$. Then, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there exists a measurable set $E_\varepsilon\subset E$ such that $\mu(E\setminus E_\varepsilon)<\varepsilon$, and the sequence $f_k$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $E_\varepsilon$.  
+
and $B\in\mathrm{M}_{n,m}(\mathbb{R})$, in terms of the sum of the products of all possible higher order minors
 +
of $A$ with corresponding minors of the same order of $B$. More precisely, if $\alpha=(1,\ldots,m)$ and $\beta$
 +
denotes any [[Multiindex|multi-index]] $(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_m)$ with $1\leq \beta_1<\ldots<\beta_m\leq n$ of length $m$, then
 +
\[
 +
\det(AB)=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\,\beta}\det B_{\beta\,\alpha},
 +
\]
 +
where $A_{\alpha\,\beta}=(a_{\alpha_i\beta_j})$ and $B_{\beta\,\alpha}=(a_{\beta_j\alpha_i})$.
 +
In case $m>n$, no such $\beta$ exists and the right-hand side above is set to be $0$ by definition.
  
The result is in general false if the condition $\mu(E)<+\infty$ is dropped. Despite of this, Luzin noted that if $X$, ${\mathcal A}$, $\mu$, $f_k$ and $f$ are as above, and $E\in{\mathcal A}$ is the countable union of sets $E_n$ with finite measure, then there exist a sequence
+
Note that if $n=m$ the formula reduces to
$\{A_n\}\subset\mathcal{A}$ and $H\in{\mathcal  A}$, with $\mu(H)=0$, such that $E=(\cup_nA_n)\cup H$, and $f_k$ converges uniformly to $f$ on each $A_n$.
+
\[
 +
\det (AB)=\det A\,\det B.
 +
\]
 +
More generally, if $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$, $B\in\mathrm{M}_{n,q}(\mathbb{R})$  
 +
and $p\leq\min\{m,q\}$, then any minor of order $p$ of the product matrix $AB$ can be expressed
 +
as follows by Cauchy-Binet's formula
 +
\[
 +
\det((AB)_{\alpha\,\gamma})=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\,\beta}\det B_{\beta\,\gamma},
 +
\]
 +
where $\alpha=(\alpha_1\ldots,\alpha_p)$ with $1\leq\alpha_1<\ldots<\alpha_p\leq m$,  
 +
$\gamma=(\gamma_1,\ldots,\gamma_p)$ with $1\leq\gamma_1<\ldots<\gamma_p\leq q$, and
 +
$\beta=(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_m)$ with $1\leq \beta_1<\ldots<\beta_m\leq n$.
  
A typical application is when $\mu$ is a positive [[Radon measure|Radon measure]] defined on a topological space $X$
+
A number of interesting consequence of Cauchy-Binet's formula is listed below.
(cf. [[Measure in a topological vector space|Measure in a topological vector space]]) and $E$ is a compact set.
+
First of all, an inequality for the [[Rank|rank]] of the product matrix
The case of the Lebesgue measure on the line  was first proved by D.F. Egorov ({{Cite|Ego}}).
+
follows straightforwardly, i.e.,
 +
\[
 +
\mathrm{rank}(AB)\leq\min\{\mathrm{rank}A,\mathrm{rank}B\}.
 +
\]
 +
Moreover, if $m=2$, $\mathbf{a}$, $\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ are two vectors,
 +
by taking
 +
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}
 +
a_{1}&\dots&a_{n}\\
 +
b_{1}&\dots&b_{n}\\
 +
\end{pmatrix}
 +
\quad\text{and}\quad
 +
B=\begin{pmatrix}
 +
a_{1}&b_{1}\\
 +
\dots&\dots\\
 +
a_{n}&b_{n}\\
 +
\end{pmatrix}
 +
$$
 +
Cauchy-Binet's formula yields
 +
\[
 +
\sum_{1\leq i<j\leq n}\begin{vmatrix}
 +
a_{i}&a_{j}\\
 +
b_{i}&b_{j}\\
 +
\end{vmatrix}^2=
 +
\begin{vmatrix}
 +
\|\mathbf{a}\|^2&\langle\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\rangle\\
 +
\langle\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}\rangle&\|\mathbf{b}\|^2\\
 +
\end{vmatrix},
 +
\]
 +
in turn implying Cauchy-Schwartz's inequality. Here, $\|\cdot\|$ and
 +
$\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ are the Euclidean norm and scalar product, respectively.
  
Egorov's theorem has various generalizations. For instance, it works for sequences of measurable functions defined on a
+
Let us finally interpret geometrically the result. Take $B=A^T$, then
measure space [[Measure space|$(X,{\mathcal A},\mu)$]] with values into a separable metric space $Y$. The conclusion  of  
+
$\det(A_{\alpha\beta})=\det(A^T_{\beta,\alpha})$, so that by Cauchy-Binet's formula
Egorov's theorem might be false if $Y$ is not metrizable.
+
\[\label{p}
 +
\det(A^T\,A)=\sum_\beta(\det(A_{\alpha\beta}))^2.
 +
\]
 +
This is a generalization of the Pythagorean formula, corresponding to $m=1$. Indeed,
 +
if $\mathcal{B}:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ is the linear map associated to $A^T$,
 +
and $Q\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ is the unitary cube, the $n$-th dimensional volume of the
 +
parallelepiped $\mathcal{A}(Q)\subset\mathbb{R}^m$ is given by $\sqrt{\det(A^T\,A)}$
 +
due to [[Polar decomposition|polar decomposition]] of $A$, recall that $n\leq m$.
  
Another generalization is due to  G. Mokobodzki  (see  {{Cite|DeMe}}, {{Cite|Rev}}):
+
Formula (1) above then expresses the square of the $n$-th dimensional volume of  
Let $\mu$, ${\mathcal A}$ and $E$ be as above, and let $U$ be a set of $\mu$-measurable finite functions that is compact in the topology of [[Pointwise  convergence|pointwise convergence]].
+
$\mathcal{A}(Q)$ as the sum of the squares of the volumes of the projections on
Then there is a sequence $\{A_n\}$ of disjoint sets  belonging to ${\mathcal A}$ such that the  
+
all coordinates $n$ planes (cp. with [[Area formula|Area formula]]).
support of $\mu$ is contained in $\cup_nA_n$ and such that,  for every $n$, the restrictions
 
to $A_n$ of the elements of $U$ is compact in the topology of
 
[[Uniform convergence|uniform convergence]].
 
  
  
 
+
===References===
====References====
 
 
{|
 
{|
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Bou}}||     N. Bourbaki, "Elements of mathematics. Integration", Addison-Wesley    (1975) pp. Chapt.6;7;8 (Translated from French) {{MR|0583191}}    {{ZBL|1116.28002}} {{ZBL|1106.46005}} {{ZBL|1106.46006}}    {{ZBL|1182.28002}} {{ZBL|1182.28001}} {{ZBL|1095.28002}}    {{ZBL|1095.28001}} {{ZBL|0156.06001}}
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|EG}}||   L.C. Evans, R.F. Gariepy,  "Measure theory  and fine properties of   functions" Studies in Advanced MathematicsCRC Press, Boca RatonFL1992. {{MR|1158660}} {{ZBL|0804.2800}}  
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|DeMe}}||
 
C. Dellacherie,   P.A. Meyer,  "Probabilities and potential" , '''C''' , North-Holland  (1988)  (Translated from French)  {{MR|0939365}} {{ZBL|0716.60001}}
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ego}}|| D.F. Egorov,   "Sur les suites de fonctions mesurables"  ''C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris'' ,  '''152'''  (1911)  pp. 244–246 {{MR|}} {{ZBL|}}
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Ha}}|| P.R. Halmos,  "Measure theory", v. Nostrand  (1950) {{MR|0033869}} {{ZBL|0040.16802}}
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Sev}}||  A.N. Kolmogorov,   S.V. Fomin,   "Elements of  the theory of functions and functional analysis" , '''1–2''' , Graylock  (1957–1961)  (Translated from Russian)  {{MR|1025126}} {{MR|0708717}}  {{MR|0630899}}  {{MR|0435771}} {{MR|0377444}} {{MR|0234241}}  {{MR|0215962}}  {{MR|0118796}} {{MR|1530727}} {{MR|0118795}}  {{MR|0085462}}  {{MR|0070045}} {{ZBL|0932.46001}} {{ZBL|0672.46001}} {{ZBL|0501.46001}} {{ZBL|0501.46002}} {{ZBL|0235.46001}} {{ZBL|0103.08801}}
 
|-
 
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Rev}}|| D. Revuz"Markov chains" , North-Holland  (1975) {{MR|0415773}} {{ZBL|0332.60045}}  
 
 
|-
 
|-
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Sev}}||
+
|valign="top"|{{Ref|Fe}}||  
C. Severini, "Sulle successioni di funzioni ortogonali" (Italian), Atti Acc. Gioenia, (5) 3 10 S, (1910) pp. 1−7 {{ZBL|41.0475.04}}
+
F.R. Gantmacher, "The theory of matrices. Vol. 1", AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, (1998).
 +
{{MR|1657129}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 16:10, 23 November 2012

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 15Axx [MSN][ZBL]


A formula aimed at expressing the determinant of the product of two matrices $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$ and $B\in\mathrm{M}_{n,m}(\mathbb{R})$, in terms of the sum of the products of all possible higher order minors of $A$ with corresponding minors of the same order of $B$. More precisely, if $\alpha=(1,\ldots,m)$ and $\beta$ denotes any multi-index $(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_m)$ with $1\leq \beta_1<\ldots<\beta_m\leq n$ of length $m$, then \[ \det(AB)=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\,\beta}\det B_{\beta\,\alpha}, \] where $A_{\alpha\,\beta}=(a_{\alpha_i\beta_j})$ and $B_{\beta\,\alpha}=(a_{\beta_j\alpha_i})$. In case $m>n$, no such $\beta$ exists and the right-hand side above is set to be $0$ by definition.

Note that if $n=m$ the formula reduces to \[ \det (AB)=\det A\,\det B. \] More generally, if $A\in\mathrm{M}_{m,n}(\mathbb{R})$, $B\in\mathrm{M}_{n,q}(\mathbb{R})$ and $p\leq\min\{m,q\}$, then any minor of order $p$ of the product matrix $AB$ can be expressed as follows by Cauchy-Binet's formula \[ \det((AB)_{\alpha\,\gamma})=\sum_\beta\det A_{\alpha\,\beta}\det B_{\beta\,\gamma}, \] where $\alpha=(\alpha_1\ldots,\alpha_p)$ with $1\leq\alpha_1<\ldots<\alpha_p\leq m$, $\gamma=(\gamma_1,\ldots,\gamma_p)$ with $1\leq\gamma_1<\ldots<\gamma_p\leq q$, and $\beta=(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_m)$ with $1\leq \beta_1<\ldots<\beta_m\leq n$.

A number of interesting consequence of Cauchy-Binet's formula is listed below. First of all, an inequality for the rank of the product matrix follows straightforwardly, i.e., \[ \mathrm{rank}(AB)\leq\min\{\mathrm{rank}A,\mathrm{rank}B\}. \] Moreover, if $m=2$, $\mathbf{a}$, $\mathbf{b}\in\mathbb{R}^n$ are two vectors, by taking $$A=\begin{pmatrix} a_{1}&\dots&a_{n}\\ b_{1}&\dots&b_{n}\\ \end{pmatrix} \quad\text{and}\quad B=\begin{pmatrix} a_{1}&b_{1}\\ \dots&\dots\\ a_{n}&b_{n}\\ \end{pmatrix} $$ Cauchy-Binet's formula yields \[ \sum_{1\leq i<j\leq n}\begin{vmatrix} a_{i}&a_{j}\\ b_{i}&b_{j}\\ \end{vmatrix}^2= \begin{vmatrix} \|\mathbf{a}\|^2&\langle\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\rangle\\ \langle\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b}\rangle&\|\mathbf{b}\|^2\\ \end{vmatrix}, \] in turn implying Cauchy-Schwartz's inequality. Here, $\|\cdot\|$ and $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$ are the Euclidean norm and scalar product, respectively.

Let us finally interpret geometrically the result. Take $B=A^T$, then $\det(A_{\alpha\beta})=\det(A^T_{\beta,\alpha})$, so that by Cauchy-Binet's formula \[\label{p} \det(A^T\,A)=\sum_\beta(\det(A_{\alpha\beta}))^2. \] This is a generalization of the Pythagorean formula, corresponding to $m=1$. Indeed, if $\mathcal{B}:\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}^m$ is the linear map associated to $A^T$, and $Q\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ is the unitary cube, the $n$-th dimensional volume of the parallelepiped $\mathcal{A}(Q)\subset\mathbb{R}^m$ is given by $\sqrt{\det(A^T\,A)}$ due to polar decomposition of $A$, recall that $n\leq m$.

Formula (1) above then expresses the square of the $n$-th dimensional volume of $\mathcal{A}(Q)$ as the sum of the squares of the volumes of the projections on all coordinates $n$ planes (cp. with Area formula).


References

[EG] L.C. Evans, R.F. Gariepy, "Measure theory and fine properties of functions" Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992. MR1158660 Zbl 0804.2800
[Fe]

F.R. Gantmacher, "The theory of matrices. Vol. 1", AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, (1998). MR1657129

How to Cite This Entry:
Matteo.focardi/sandbox. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Matteo.focardi/sandbox&oldid=28513