# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Luzin-N-property"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics

m |
(you mean "piecewise constant"?) |
||

Line 2: | Line 2: | ||

Item 1 assumptions must be sharpened, certainly piecewise continuous functions are f'=0 almost everywhere, but they have Luzin property N. | Item 1 assumptions must be sharpened, certainly piecewise continuous functions are f'=0 almost everywhere, but they have Luzin property N. | ||

+ | |||

+ | :Probably you mean "piecewise constant"? I guess, ''f'' should be continuous, but I am not sure. | ||

+ | : And please sign your messages (on talk pages) with four tildas: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 12:12, 30 October 2015 (CET) |

## Latest revision as of 11:12, 30 October 2015

Should we separate Lusin-N-Property and Banach-S-property? --Nikita2 (talk) 10:46, 26 November 2012 (CET)

Item 1 assumptions must be sharpened, certainly piecewise continuous functions are f'=0 almost everywhere, but they have Luzin property N.

- Probably you mean "piecewise constant"? I guess,
*f*should be continuous, but I am not sure. - And please sign your messages (on talk pages) with four tildas: ~~~~. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2015 (CET)

**How to Cite This Entry:**

Luzin-N-property.

*Encyclopedia of Mathematics.*URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Luzin-N-property&oldid=36812