# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Absolute continuity"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics

(Why not) |
|||

Line 7: | Line 7: | ||

* calligraphic is being used already for $\sigma$-algebras | * calligraphic is being used already for $\sigma$-algebras | ||

--[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 12:57, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | --[[User:Jjg|Jjg]] 12:57, 30 July 2012 (CEST) | ||

+ | |||

+ | : Why not? --[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST) |

## Revision as of 11:21, 30 July 2012

I moved some portions of the old article in Signed measure. I have not had the time to add all Mathscinet and Zentralblatt references. Camillo 22:54, 29 July 2012 (CEST)

Could I suggest using $\lambda$ rather than $\mathcal L$ for Lebesgue measure since

- it is very commonly used, almost standard
- it would be consistent with the notation for a general measure, $\mu$
- calligraphic is being used already for $\sigma$-algebras

--Jjg 12:57, 30 July 2012 (CEST)

- Why not? --Boris Tsirelson 13:21, 30 July 2012 (CEST)

**How to Cite This Entry:**

Absolute continuity.

*Encyclopedia of Mathematics.*URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Absolute_continuity&oldid=27247