A system of two species, one feeding on the other (cf. [a1], [a2], [a3], [a4], [a5], [a6]). A variety of mathematical approaches is used when modelling a predator-prey system, since there are many factors that can influence its evolution, e.g. predation-mediated coexistence, the size of habitat, hierarchical ranking, voracity and fertility of species, competition, inhomogeneity with respect to the age structure, latent, infection and incubation lags, seasonal changes, space diffusion, pollution, spatial environment heterogeneity, finite acceptance time for external signals, carrying capacity, permanence (persistence), etc. Isolating those factors which have to be taken into consideration and neglecting the others, one obtains different mathematical predator-prey models, described by different types of equations: ordinary, partial or functional differential equations, deterministic or stochastic, discrete or continuous etc.
This model, which takes into account only intrinsic phenomena (voracity and fertility), has the form
Here, is the number of preys, is the number of predators, and the are positive constants ( is the rate of birth of preys, is the rate of death of predators, is a measure of susceptibility of preys to predation, and is the predatory ability). The system (a1) has a unique non-zero equilibrium position, which is a stable centre. At the same time, the solutions of (a1) are not structurally stable with respect to disturbance of initial conditions (cf. Rough system).
Models with intraspecific strife.
Within the restrictive domain of quadratic differential equations, those which include competition as well as predation should be somewhat more realistic. An example of a model with competition inside preys is given by:
where characterizes competition inside preys. Under biologically reasonable assumptions, , and (a2) has a unique positive equilibrium which is an asymptotically-stable focus or node (cf. Focus; Node; Asymptotically-stable solution).
Kolmogorov predator-prey model.
This model can be written in the form
under appropriate conditions on the functions , and their derivatives, reflecting a number of real phenomena, such as satiation. Node, focus and limit cycles (cf. Limit cycle) are among the possible behaviours of (a3).
To achieve some degree of realism, delay effects have to be taken into account. Moreover, many phenomena, like instability, oscillation and periodic change, cannot be explained without implementing delays into the model. To account for delay of feeding on reproduction, V. Volterra introduced the equations
where and are finite positive continuous functions. The system (a4) leads to a stable aperiodic oscillation. Other types of integro-differential [a7] and, more general, functional-differential equations [a8], [a9], [a10] are widely used to develop predator-prey models of moderate mathematical complexity while not sacrificing biological realism.
The discrete version of (a3) is:
where the functions and relate the predator-influenced reproductive efficiency of the prey and the searching of the predator, respectively. Even a simple version of (a5) can exhibit rich dynamics, from stability to chaos. For example, the equation (with a constant parameter)
has an asymptotically-stable fixed point for , an invariant circle for , and an attracting set for .
Predator-prey system with spatial inhomogeneity.
Such a system can be modelled by partial differential equations. Let , denote the prey and predator densities at time at the space point . Then, under the assumption that all dispersal occurs solely by simple diffusion processes, the predator-prey model has the form of reaction-diffusion equations (cf. Reaction-diffusion equation):
where are the diffusion rates and is the Laplace operator. If the diffusion rates are increasing, then , become spatially homogeneous for large , i.e. the behaviour of this predator-prey system can be described by (a3). Diffusion in (a6) can generate instability, just opposite to its usual interpretation as a smoothing mechanism. In order to incorporate different realistic effects, it is often necessary to introduce time delays into the governing equations (a6) as well.
Predator-prey models with uncertainties of various origins.
These can be described by stochastic equations, e.g. of the form (a3), (a5) or (a6), where and are stochastic processes (cf. also Stochastic differential equation).
|[a1]||V. Volterra, "Théorie mathématique de la lutte pour la vie" , Gauthier-Villars (1931)|
|[a2]||A.J. Lotka, "Elements of physical biology" , Williams and Witkins (1925)|
|[a3]||A.N. Kolmogoroff, "Sulla theoria di Volterra della lotta per l'esistenza" Giorn. Inst. Ital. Attuari , 7 (1936) pp. 74–80|
|[a4]||V.A. Kostitzin, "Mathematical biology" , Harrap (1939)|
|[a5]||M. Smith, "Models in ecology" , Cambridge Univ. Press (1974)|
|[a6]||J. Murray, "Mathematical biology" , Springer (1989)|
|[a7]||C.M. Cushing, "Integro-differential equations and delay models in population dynamics" , Lecture Notes in Biomathematics , 20 , Springer (1977)|
|[a8]||V.B. Kolmanovskii, A.D. Myshkis, "Applied theory of functional differential equations" , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1992) (In Russian)|
|[a9]||Y. Kuang, "Delay differential equations with applications in population dynamics" , Acad. Press (1993)|
|[a10]||K. Gopalsamy, "Equations of mathematical ecology" , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1992)|
Predator-prey system. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Predator-prey_system&oldid=15777