Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Lefschetz theorem"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (tex encoded by computer)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Lefschetz' fixed-point theorem, or the Lefschetz–Hopf theorem, is a theorem that makes it possible to express the number of fixed points of a continuous mapping in terms of its [[Lefschetz number|Lefschetz number]]. Thus, if a [[Continuous mapping|continuous mapping]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580001.png" /> of a finite [[CW-complex|CW-complex]] (cf. also [[Cellular space|Cellular space]]) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580002.png" /> has no fixed points, then its Lefschetz number <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580003.png" /> is equal to zero. A special case of this assertion is Brouwer's fixed-point theorem (cf. [[Brouwer theorem|Brouwer theorem]]).
+
<!--
 +
l0580001.png
 +
$#A+1 = 70 n = 1
 +
$#C+1 = 70 : ~/encyclopedia/old_files/data/L058/L.0508000 Lefschetz theorem
 +
Automatically converted into TeX, above some diagnostics.
 +
Please remove this comment and the {{TEX|auto}} line below,
 +
if TeX found to be correct.
 +
-->
  
 +
{{TEX|auto}}
 +
{{TEX|done}}
  
 +
Lefschetz' fixed-point theorem, or the Lefschetz–Hopf theorem, is a theorem that makes it possible to express the number of fixed points of a continuous mapping in terms of its [[Lefschetz number|Lefschetz number]]. Thus, if a [[Continuous mapping|continuous mapping]]  $  f :  X \rightarrow X $
 +
of a finite [[CW-complex|CW-complex]] (cf. also [[Cellular space|Cellular space]])  $  X $
 +
has no fixed points, then its Lefschetz number  $  L ( f  ) $
 +
is equal to zero. A special case of this assertion is Brouwer's fixed-point theorem (cf. [[Brouwer theorem|Brouwer theorem]]).
  
 
====Comments====
 
====Comments====
 
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.J. Greenberg,   J.R. Harper,   "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.J. Greenberg, J.R. Harper, "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981) {{MR|643101}} {{ZBL|0498.55001}} </TD></TR></table>
  
Lefschetz' hyperplane-section theorem, or the weak Lefschetz theorem: Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580004.png" /> be an algebraic subvariety (cf. [[Algebraic variety|Algebraic variety]]) of complex dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580005.png" /> in the complex projective space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580006.png" />, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580007.png" /> be a hyperplane passing through all singular points of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580008.png" /> (if any) and let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l0580009.png" /> be a hyperplane section of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800010.png" />; then the relative homology groups (cf. [[Homology group|Homology group]]) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800011.png" /> vanish for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800012.png" />. This implies that the natural homomorphism
+
Lefschetz' hyperplane-section theorem, or the weak Lefschetz theorem: Let $  X $
 +
be an algebraic subvariety (cf. [[Algebraic variety|Algebraic variety]]) of complex dimension $  n $
 +
in the complex projective space $  \mathbf C P  ^ {N} $,  
 +
let $  P \subset  \mathbf C P  ^ {N} $
 +
be a hyperplane passing through all singular points of $  X $(
 +
if any) and let $  Y = X \cap P $
 +
be a hyperplane section of $  X $;  
 +
then the relative homology groups (cf. [[Homology group|Homology group]]) $  H _ {i} ( X , Y , \mathbf Z ) $
 +
vanish for $  i < n $.  
 +
This implies that the natural homomorphism
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800013.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
H _ {i} ( Y ; \mathbf Z )  \rightarrow  H _ {i} ( X ; \mathbf Z )
 +
$$
  
is an isomorphism for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800014.png" /> and is surjective for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800015.png" /> (see ).
+
is an isomorphism for $  i < n- 1 $
 +
and is surjective for $  i = n- 1 $(
 +
see ).
  
 
Using universal coefficient formulas (cf. [[Künneth formula|Künneth formula]]) one obtains corresponding assertions for arbitrary cohomology groups. In every case, for cohomology with coefficients in the field of rational numbers the dual assertions hold: The homomorphism of cohomology spaces
 
Using universal coefficient formulas (cf. [[Künneth formula|Künneth formula]]) one obtains corresponding assertions for arbitrary cohomology groups. In every case, for cohomology with coefficients in the field of rational numbers the dual assertions hold: The homomorphism of cohomology spaces
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800016.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
H  ^ {i} ( X ; \mathbf Q )  \rightarrow  H  ^ {i} ( Y ; \mathbf Q )
 +
$$
  
induced by the imbedding <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800017.png" /> is an isomorphism for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800018.png" /> and is injective for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800019.png" /> (see ).
+
induced by the imbedding $  Y \subset  X $
 +
is an isomorphism for $  i < n- 1 $
 +
and is injective for $  i = n- 1 $(
 +
see ).
  
An analogous assertion is true for homotopy groups: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800020.png" /> for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800021.png" />. In particular, the canonical homomorphism <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800022.png" /> is an isomorphism for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800023.png" /> and is surjective for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800024.png" /> (the Lefschetz theorem on the fundamental group). There is a generalization of this theorem to the case of an arbitrary algebraically closed field (see ), and also to the case when <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800025.png" /> is a normal complete intersection of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800026.png" /> (see ).
+
An analogous assertion is true for homotopy groups: $  \pi _ {i} ( X , Y ) = 0 $
 +
for $  i < n $.  
 +
In particular, the canonical homomorphism $  \pi _ {1} ( Y) \rightarrow \pi _ {1} ( X) $
 +
is an isomorphism for $  n \geq  3 $
 +
and is surjective for $  n = 2 $(
 +
the Lefschetz theorem on the fundamental group). There is a generalization of this theorem to the case of an arbitrary algebraically closed field (see ), and also to the case when $  Y $
 +
is a normal complete intersection of $  X $(
 +
see ).
  
 
The hard Lefschetz theorem is a theorem about the existence of a Lefschetz decomposition of the cohomology of a complex [[Kähler manifold|Kähler manifold]] into primitive components.
 
The hard Lefschetz theorem is a theorem about the existence of a Lefschetz decomposition of the cohomology of a complex [[Kähler manifold|Kähler manifold]] into primitive components.
  
Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800027.png" /> be a compact Kähler manifold of dimension <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800028.png" /> with Kähler form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800029.png" />, let
+
Let $  V $
 +
be a compact Kähler manifold of dimension $  n $
 +
with Kähler form $  \omega $,  
 +
let
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800030.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
\eta  \in  H  ^ {1,1} ( Y , \mathbf C )  \subset  H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
be the cohomology class of type <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800031.png" /> corresponding to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800032.png" /> under the de Rham isomorphism (cf. [[De Rham cohomology|de Rham cohomology]]; if <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800033.png" /> is a projective algebraic variety over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800034.png" /> with the natural Hodge metric, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800035.png" /> is the cohomology class dual to the homology class of a hyperplane section) and let
+
be the cohomology class of type $  ( 1 , 1 ) $
 +
corresponding to $  \omega $
 +
under the de Rham isomorphism (cf. [[De Rham cohomology|de Rham cohomology]]; if $  V $
 +
is a projective algebraic variety over $  \mathbf C $
 +
with the natural Hodge metric, then $  \eta $
 +
is the cohomology class dual to the homology class of a hyperplane section) and let
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800036.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
L : H  ^ {i} ( V , \mathbf C )  \rightarrow  H  ^ {i+} 2 ( V , \mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
be the linear operator defined by multiplication by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800037.png" />, that is,
+
be the linear operator defined by multiplication by $  \eta $,  
 +
that is,
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800038.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
Lz  = z \cdot \eta ,\  z \in H  ^ {i} ( V , \mathbf C ) .
 +
$$
  
 
One has the isomorphism (see )
 
One has the isomorphism (see )
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800039.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
L  ^ {k} : H  ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C )  \rightarrow  H  ^ {n+} k ( V , \mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
for any <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800040.png" />. The kernel of the operator
+
for any $  k = 0 \dots n $.  
 +
The kernel of the operator
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800041.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
L  ^ {k+} 1 : H  ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C )  \rightarrow  H  ^ {n+} k+ 2 ( V , \mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
is denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800042.png" /> and is called the primitive part of the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800044.png" />-cohomology of the variety <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800045.png" />. The elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800046.png" /> are called primitive cohomology classes, and the cycles corresponding to them are called primitive cycles. The hard Lefschetz theorem establishes the following decomposition of the cohomology into the direct sum of primitives (called the Lefschetz decomposition):
+
is denoted by $  H _ {0}  ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
and is called the primitive part of the $  ( n- k ) $-
 +
cohomology of the variety $  V $.  
 +
The elements of $  H _ {0}  ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
are called primitive cohomology classes, and the cycles corresponding to them are called primitive cycles. The hard Lefschetz theorem establishes the following decomposition of the cohomology into the direct sum of primitives (called the Lefschetz decomposition):
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800047.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
H  ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C )  = \oplus _ { k= } 0 ^ { {[ }  m/2 ] } L  ^ {k} H _ {0}  ^ {m-} 2k ( V , \mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800048.png" />. The mappings
+
for all $  m = 0 \dots 2n $.  
 +
The mappings
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800049.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
L  ^ {k} : H _ {0}  ^ {m-} 2k ( V , \mathbf C )  \rightarrow  H  ^ {m} ( V ,\
 +
\mathbf C ) ,\  k = 0 \dots [ m/2 ] ,
 +
$$
  
 
are imbeddings. The Lefschetz decomposition commutes with the Hodge decomposition (cf. [[Hodge conjecture|Hodge conjecture]])
 
are imbeddings. The Lefschetz decomposition commutes with the Hodge decomposition (cf. [[Hodge conjecture|Hodge conjecture]])
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800050.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
H  ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C )  = \oplus _ {p+ q = m } H  ^ {p,q} ( V,\
 +
\mathbf C )
 +
$$
  
(see ). In particular, the primitive part <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800051.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800052.png" /> is defined and
+
(see ). In particular, the primitive part $  H _ {0}  ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
of $  H  ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
is defined and
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800053.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
H _ {0}  ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C )  = \oplus _ {p+ q = m } H _ {0}  ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) .
 +
$$
  
The hard Lefschetz theorem and the Lefschetz decomposition have analogues in abstract algebraic geometry for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800054.png" />-adic and crystalline cohomology (see , ).
+
The hard Lefschetz theorem and the Lefschetz decomposition have analogues in abstract algebraic geometry for l $-
 +
adic and crystalline cohomology (see , ).
  
The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800056.png" /> is a theorem about the correspondence between the two-dimensional algebraic cohomology classes of a complex algebraic variety and the cohomology classes of type <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800057.png" />.
+
The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type $  ( 1 , 1) $
 +
is a theorem about the correspondence between the two-dimensional algebraic cohomology classes of a complex algebraic variety and the cohomology classes of type $  ( 1 , 1) $.
  
Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800058.png" /> be a non-singular projective algebraic variety over the field <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800059.png" />. An element <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800060.png" /> is said to be algebraic if the cohomology class dual to it (in the sense of Poincaré) is determined by a certain [[Divisor|divisor]]. The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800061.png" /> asserts that a class <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800062.png" /> is algebraic if and only if
+
Let $  V $
 +
be a non-singular projective algebraic variety over the field $  \mathbf C $.  
 +
An element $  z \in H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $
 +
is said to be algebraic if the cohomology class dual to it (in the sense of Poincaré) is determined by a certain [[Divisor|divisor]]. The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type $  ( 1 , 1 ) $
 +
asserts that a class $  z \in H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $
 +
is algebraic if and only if
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800063.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
$$
 +
z  \in  j ( H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) ) \cap H  ^ {1,1} ( V, \mathbf C ) ,
 +
$$
  
where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800064.png" /> is the Hodge component of type <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800065.png" /> of the two-dimensional complex cohomology space <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800066.png" />, and the mapping <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800067.png" /> is induced by the natural imbedding <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800068.png" /> (see [[#References|[1]]], and also [[#References|[6]]], [[#References|[12]]]). For algebraic cohomology classes in dimensions greater than 2, see [[Hodge conjecture|Hodge conjecture]].
+
where $  H  ^ {1,1} ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
is the Hodge component of type $  ( 1 , 1 ) $
 +
of the two-dimensional complex cohomology space $  H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C ) $,  
 +
and the mapping $  j: H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) \rightarrow H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C ) $
 +
is induced by the natural imbedding $  \mathbf Z \rightarrow \mathbf C $(
 +
see [[#References|[1]]], and also [[#References|[6]]], [[#References|[12]]]). For algebraic cohomology classes in dimensions greater than 2, see [[Hodge conjecture|Hodge conjecture]].
  
For an arbitrary complex-analytic manifold <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800069.png" /> there is an analogous characterization of elements of the group <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800070.png" /> that are Chern classes of complex line bundles over <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800071.png" /> (see [[#References|[11]]]).
+
For an arbitrary complex-analytic manifold $  V $
 +
there is an analogous characterization of elements of the group $  H  ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $
 +
that are Chern classes of complex line bundles over $  V $(
 +
see [[#References|[11]]]).
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz,   "L'analysis situs et la géométrie algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars (1950)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz,   "On certain numerical invariants of algebraic varieties with applications to Abelian varieties" ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''22''' (1921) pp. 327–482</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz,   "On the fixed point formula" ''Ann. of Math. (2)'' , '''38''' (1937) pp. 819–822</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Berthelot,   "Cohomologie cristalline des schémas de caractéristique <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800072.png" />" , Springer (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne (ed.) N.M. Katz (ed.) , ''Groupes de monodromie en géométrie algébrique. SGA 7.II'' , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''340''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.A. Griffiths,   J.E. Harris,   "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Grothendieck,   "Cohomologie locale des faisceaux cohérents et théorèmes de Lefschetz locaux et globaux" , ''SGA 2'' , North-Holland &amp; Masson (1968)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne,   "Ample subvarieties of algebraic varieties" , Springer (1970)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford,   "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.W. Milnor,   "Morse theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1963)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[11]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.O. Wells jr.,   "Differential analysis on complex manifolds" , Springer (1980)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[12]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.S. Chern,   "Complex manifolds without potential theory" , Springer (1979)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[13]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Weil,   "Introduction à l'Aeetude des variétés kahlériennes" , Hermann (1958)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[14]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne,   "La conjecture de Weil" ''Publ. Math. IHES'' , '''43''' (1974) pp. 273–307</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz, "L'analysis situs et la géométrie algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars (1950) {{MR|0033557}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz, "On certain numerical invariants of algebraic varieties with applications to Abelian varieties" ''Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''22''' (1921) pp. 327–482 {{MR|1501180}} {{MR|1501178}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lefschetz, "On the fixed point formula" ''Ann. of Math. (2)'' , '''38''' (1937) pp. 819–822 {{MR|1503373}} {{ZBL|0018.17703}} {{ZBL|63.0563.02}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Berthelot, "Cohomologie cristalline des schémas de caractéristique <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800072.png" />" , Springer (1974) {{MR|0384804}} {{ZBL|0298.14012}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne (ed.) N.M. Katz (ed.) , ''Groupes de monodromie en géométrie algébrique. SGA 7.II'' , ''Lect. notes in math.'' , '''340''' , Springer (1973) {{MR|0354657}} {{ZBL|}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P.A. Griffiths, J.E. Harris, "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978) {{MR|0507725}} {{ZBL|0408.14001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[7]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Grothendieck, "Cohomologie locale des faisceaux cohérents et théorèmes de Lefschetz locaux et globaux" , ''SGA 2'' , North-Holland &amp; Masson (1968) {{MR|0476737}} {{ZBL|1079.14001}} {{ZBL|0159.50402}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[8]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R. Hartshorne, "Ample subvarieties of algebraic varieties" , Springer (1970) {{MR|0282977}} {{ZBL|0208.48901}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[9]</TD> <TD valign="top"> D. Mumford, "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1974) {{MR|2514037}} {{MR|1083353}} {{MR|0352106}} {{MR|0441983}} {{MR|0282985}} {{MR|0248146}} {{MR|0219542}} {{MR|0219541}} {{MR|0206003}} {{MR|0204427}} {{ZBL|0326.14012}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[10]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.W. Milnor, "Morse theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1963) {{MR|0163331}} {{ZBL|0108.10401}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[11]</TD> <TD valign="top"> R.O. Wells jr., "Differential analysis on complex manifolds" , Springer (1980) {{MR|0608414}} {{ZBL|0435.32004}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[12]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S.S. Chern, "Complex manifolds without potential theory" , Springer (1979) {{MR|0533884}} {{ZBL|0444.32004}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[13]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Weil, "Introduction à l'Aeetude des variétés kahlériennes" , Hermann (1958)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[14]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil" ''Publ. Math. IHES'' , '''43''' (1974) pp. 273–307 {{MR|0340258}} {{ZBL|0456.14014}} {{ZBL|0314.14007}} {{ZBL|0287.14001}} {{ZBL|0219.14022}} </TD></TR></table>
  
 
''V.A. Iskovskikh''
 
''V.A. Iskovskikh''
Line 81: Line 172:
 
For a modern treatment of the classical Lefschetz hyperplane-section theorems see [[#References|[a1]]].
 
For a modern treatment of the classical Lefschetz hyperplane-section theorems see [[#References|[a1]]].
  
Weak and hard (strong) Lefschetz theorems also hold in étale cohomology [[#References|[a4]]] and in [[Intersection homology|intersection homology]] [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. For the proof of the hard Lefschetz theorem in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/l/l058/l058000/l05800073.png" />-adic cohomology, see [[#References|[a2]]].
+
Weak and hard (strong) Lefschetz theorems also hold in étale cohomology [[#References|[a4]]] and in [[Intersection homology|intersection homology]] [[#References|[a5]]], [[#References|[a6]]]. For the proof of the hard Lefschetz theorem in l $-
 +
adic cohomology, see [[#References|[a2]]].
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Lamotke,   "The topology of complex projective varieties after S. Lefschetz" ''Topology'' , '''20''' (1981) pp. 15–51</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne,   "La conjecture de Weil II" ''Publ. Math. IHES'' , '''52''' (1980) pp. 137–252</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.J. Greenberg,   J.R. Harper,   "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.S. Milne,   "Etale cohomology" , Princeton Univ. Press (1980)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Goresky,   "Stratified Morse theory" , Springer (1988)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Beilinson,   J. Bernstein,   P. Deligne,   "Faisceaux pervers" ''Astérisque'' , '''100''' (1982)</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> K. Lamotke, "The topology of complex projective varieties after S. Lefschetz" ''Topology'' , '''20''' (1981) pp. 15–51 {{MR|0592569}} {{ZBL|0445.14010}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil II" ''Publ. Math. IHES'' , '''52''' (1980) pp. 137–252 {{MR|0601520}} {{ZBL|0456.14014}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M.J. Greenberg, J.R. Harper, "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981) {{MR|643101}} {{ZBL|0498.55001}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top"> J.S. Milne, "Etale cohomology" , Princeton Univ. Press (1980) {{MR|0559531}} {{ZBL|0433.14012}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top"> M. Goresky, "Stratified Morse theory" , Springer (1988) {{MR|0932724}} {{ZBL|0639.14012}} </TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top"> A. Beilinson, J. Bernstein, P. Deligne, "Faisceaux pervers" ''Astérisque'' , '''100''' (1982) {{MR|0751966}} {{ZBL|0536.14011}} </TD></TR></table>

Latest revision as of 22:16, 5 June 2020


Lefschetz' fixed-point theorem, or the Lefschetz–Hopf theorem, is a theorem that makes it possible to express the number of fixed points of a continuous mapping in terms of its Lefschetz number. Thus, if a continuous mapping $ f : X \rightarrow X $ of a finite CW-complex (cf. also Cellular space) $ X $ has no fixed points, then its Lefschetz number $ L ( f ) $ is equal to zero. A special case of this assertion is Brouwer's fixed-point theorem (cf. Brouwer theorem).

Comments

References

[a1] M.J. Greenberg, J.R. Harper, "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981) MR643101 Zbl 0498.55001

Lefschetz' hyperplane-section theorem, or the weak Lefschetz theorem: Let $ X $ be an algebraic subvariety (cf. Algebraic variety) of complex dimension $ n $ in the complex projective space $ \mathbf C P ^ {N} $, let $ P \subset \mathbf C P ^ {N} $ be a hyperplane passing through all singular points of $ X $( if any) and let $ Y = X \cap P $ be a hyperplane section of $ X $; then the relative homology groups (cf. Homology group) $ H _ {i} ( X , Y , \mathbf Z ) $ vanish for $ i < n $. This implies that the natural homomorphism

$$ H _ {i} ( Y ; \mathbf Z ) \rightarrow H _ {i} ( X ; \mathbf Z ) $$

is an isomorphism for $ i < n- 1 $ and is surjective for $ i = n- 1 $( see ).

Using universal coefficient formulas (cf. Künneth formula) one obtains corresponding assertions for arbitrary cohomology groups. In every case, for cohomology with coefficients in the field of rational numbers the dual assertions hold: The homomorphism of cohomology spaces

$$ H ^ {i} ( X ; \mathbf Q ) \rightarrow H ^ {i} ( Y ; \mathbf Q ) $$

induced by the imbedding $ Y \subset X $ is an isomorphism for $ i < n- 1 $ and is injective for $ i = n- 1 $( see ).

An analogous assertion is true for homotopy groups: $ \pi _ {i} ( X , Y ) = 0 $ for $ i < n $. In particular, the canonical homomorphism $ \pi _ {1} ( Y) \rightarrow \pi _ {1} ( X) $ is an isomorphism for $ n \geq 3 $ and is surjective for $ n = 2 $( the Lefschetz theorem on the fundamental group). There is a generalization of this theorem to the case of an arbitrary algebraically closed field (see ), and also to the case when $ Y $ is a normal complete intersection of $ X $( see ).

The hard Lefschetz theorem is a theorem about the existence of a Lefschetz decomposition of the cohomology of a complex Kähler manifold into primitive components.

Let $ V $ be a compact Kähler manifold of dimension $ n $ with Kähler form $ \omega $, let

$$ \eta \in H ^ {1,1} ( Y , \mathbf C ) \subset H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C ) $$

be the cohomology class of type $ ( 1 , 1 ) $ corresponding to $ \omega $ under the de Rham isomorphism (cf. de Rham cohomology; if $ V $ is a projective algebraic variety over $ \mathbf C $ with the natural Hodge metric, then $ \eta $ is the cohomology class dual to the homology class of a hyperplane section) and let

$$ L : H ^ {i} ( V , \mathbf C ) \rightarrow H ^ {i+} 2 ( V , \mathbf C ) $$

be the linear operator defined by multiplication by $ \eta $, that is,

$$ Lz = z \cdot \eta ,\ z \in H ^ {i} ( V , \mathbf C ) . $$

One has the isomorphism (see )

$$ L ^ {k} : H ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) \rightarrow H ^ {n+} k ( V , \mathbf C ) $$

for any $ k = 0 \dots n $. The kernel of the operator

$$ L ^ {k+} 1 : H ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) \rightarrow H ^ {n+} k+ 2 ( V , \mathbf C ) $$

is denoted by $ H _ {0} ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) $ and is called the primitive part of the $ ( n- k ) $- cohomology of the variety $ V $. The elements of $ H _ {0} ^ {n-} k ( V , \mathbf C ) $ are called primitive cohomology classes, and the cycles corresponding to them are called primitive cycles. The hard Lefschetz theorem establishes the following decomposition of the cohomology into the direct sum of primitives (called the Lefschetz decomposition):

$$ H ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C ) = \oplus _ { k= } 0 ^ { {[ } m/2 ] } L ^ {k} H _ {0} ^ {m-} 2k ( V , \mathbf C ) $$

for all $ m = 0 \dots 2n $. The mappings

$$ L ^ {k} : H _ {0} ^ {m-} 2k ( V , \mathbf C ) \rightarrow H ^ {m} ( V ,\ \mathbf C ) ,\ k = 0 \dots [ m/2 ] , $$

are imbeddings. The Lefschetz decomposition commutes with the Hodge decomposition (cf. Hodge conjecture)

$$ H ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C ) = \oplus _ {p+ q = m } H ^ {p,q} ( V,\ \mathbf C ) $$

(see ). In particular, the primitive part $ H _ {0} ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) $ of $ H ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) $ is defined and

$$ H _ {0} ^ {m} ( V , \mathbf C ) = \oplus _ {p+ q = m } H _ {0} ^ {p,q} ( V , \mathbf C ) . $$

The hard Lefschetz theorem and the Lefschetz decomposition have analogues in abstract algebraic geometry for $ l $- adic and crystalline cohomology (see , ).

The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type $ ( 1 , 1) $ is a theorem about the correspondence between the two-dimensional algebraic cohomology classes of a complex algebraic variety and the cohomology classes of type $ ( 1 , 1) $.

Let $ V $ be a non-singular projective algebraic variety over the field $ \mathbf C $. An element $ z \in H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $ is said to be algebraic if the cohomology class dual to it (in the sense of Poincaré) is determined by a certain divisor. The Lefschetz theorem on cohomology of type $ ( 1 , 1 ) $ asserts that a class $ z \in H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $ is algebraic if and only if

$$ z \in j ( H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) ) \cap H ^ {1,1} ( V, \mathbf C ) , $$

where $ H ^ {1,1} ( V , \mathbf C ) $ is the Hodge component of type $ ( 1 , 1 ) $ of the two-dimensional complex cohomology space $ H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C ) $, and the mapping $ j: H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) \rightarrow H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf C ) $ is induced by the natural imbedding $ \mathbf Z \rightarrow \mathbf C $( see [1], and also [6], [12]). For algebraic cohomology classes in dimensions greater than 2, see Hodge conjecture.

For an arbitrary complex-analytic manifold $ V $ there is an analogous characterization of elements of the group $ H ^ {2} ( V , \mathbf Z ) $ that are Chern classes of complex line bundles over $ V $( see [11]).

References

[1] S. Lefschetz, "L'analysis situs et la géométrie algébrique" , Gauthier-Villars (1950) MR0033557
[2] S. Lefschetz, "On certain numerical invariants of algebraic varieties with applications to Abelian varieties" Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 22 (1921) pp. 327–482 MR1501180 MR1501178
[3] S. Lefschetz, "On the fixed point formula" Ann. of Math. (2) , 38 (1937) pp. 819–822 MR1503373 Zbl 0018.17703 Zbl 63.0563.02
[4] P. Berthelot, "Cohomologie cristalline des schémas de caractéristique " , Springer (1974) MR0384804 Zbl 0298.14012
[5] P. Deligne (ed.) N.M. Katz (ed.) , Groupes de monodromie en géométrie algébrique. SGA 7.II , Lect. notes in math. , 340 , Springer (1973) MR0354657
[6] P.A. Griffiths, J.E. Harris, "Principles of algebraic geometry" , Wiley (Interscience) (1978) MR0507725 Zbl 0408.14001
[7] A. Grothendieck, "Cohomologie locale des faisceaux cohérents et théorèmes de Lefschetz locaux et globaux" , SGA 2 , North-Holland & Masson (1968) MR0476737 Zbl 1079.14001 Zbl 0159.50402
[8] R. Hartshorne, "Ample subvarieties of algebraic varieties" , Springer (1970) MR0282977 Zbl 0208.48901
[9] D. Mumford, "Abelian varieties" , Oxford Univ. Press (1974) MR2514037 MR1083353 MR0352106 MR0441983 MR0282985 MR0248146 MR0219542 MR0219541 MR0206003 MR0204427 Zbl 0326.14012
[10] J.W. Milnor, "Morse theory" , Princeton Univ. Press (1963) MR0163331 Zbl 0108.10401
[11] R.O. Wells jr., "Differential analysis on complex manifolds" , Springer (1980) MR0608414 Zbl 0435.32004
[12] S.S. Chern, "Complex manifolds without potential theory" , Springer (1979) MR0533884 Zbl 0444.32004
[13] A. Weil, "Introduction à l'Aeetude des variétés kahlériennes" , Hermann (1958)
[14] P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil" Publ. Math. IHES , 43 (1974) pp. 273–307 MR0340258 Zbl 0456.14014 Zbl 0314.14007 Zbl 0287.14001 Zbl 0219.14022

V.A. Iskovskikh

Comments

For a modern treatment of the classical Lefschetz hyperplane-section theorems see [a1].

Weak and hard (strong) Lefschetz theorems also hold in étale cohomology [a4] and in intersection homology [a5], [a6]. For the proof of the hard Lefschetz theorem in $ l $- adic cohomology, see [a2].

References

[a1] K. Lamotke, "The topology of complex projective varieties after S. Lefschetz" Topology , 20 (1981) pp. 15–51 MR0592569 Zbl 0445.14010
[a2] P. Deligne, "La conjecture de Weil II" Publ. Math. IHES , 52 (1980) pp. 137–252 MR0601520 Zbl 0456.14014
[a3] M.J. Greenberg, J.R. Harper, "Algebraic topology, a first course" , Benjamin/Cummings (1981) MR643101 Zbl 0498.55001
[a4] J.S. Milne, "Etale cohomology" , Princeton Univ. Press (1980) MR0559531 Zbl 0433.14012
[a5] M. Goresky, "Stratified Morse theory" , Springer (1988) MR0932724 Zbl 0639.14012
[a6] A. Beilinson, J. Bernstein, P. Deligne, "Faisceaux pervers" Astérisque , 100 (1982) MR0751966 Zbl 0536.14011
How to Cite This Entry:
Lefschetz theorem. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Lefschetz_theorem&oldid=12850
This article was adapted from an original article by Yu.B. Rudyak (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article