Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Higher-dimensional category"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 112 formulas out of 116 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.)
Line 1: Line 1:
''<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200702.png" />-category''
+
<!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article,
 +
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist
 +
was used.
 +
If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category.
  
Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200703.png" /> be a natural number. An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200705.png" />-category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200706.png" /> [[#References|[a16]]] consists of sets <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200707.png" />, where the elements of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h1200708.png" /> are called <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007010.png" />-arrows and are, for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007011.png" />, equipped with a [[Category|category]] structure for which <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007012.png" /> is the set of objects and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007013.png" /> is the set of arrows, where the composition is denoted by <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007014.png" /> (for composable <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007015.png" />), such that, for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007016.png" />, there is a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007017.png" />-category (cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) with <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007018.png" />, as set of objects, arrows and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007019.png" />-arrows, respectively, with vertical composition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007020.png" />, and with horizontal composition <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007021.png" />. The sets <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007022.png" /> with the source and target functions <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007023.png" /> form the underlying globular set (or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007025.png" />-graph) of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007026.png" />. For <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007027.png" /> and for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007028.png" /> with the same <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007029.png" />-source and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007030.png" />-target, there is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007031.png" />-category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007032.png" /> whose <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007033.png" />-arrows (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007034.png" />) are the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007035.png" />-arrows <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007036.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007037.png" />. In particular, for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007038.png" />-arrows <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007039.png" /> (also called objects), there is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007040.png" />-category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007041.png" />. This provides the basis of an alternative definition [[#References|[a17]]] of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007042.png" />-category using recursion and enriched categories [[#References|[a32]]] It follows that there is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007043.png" />-category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007044.png" />-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007045.png" />, whose objects are <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007046.png" />-categories and whose <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007047.png" />-arrows are <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007049.png" />-functors. For infinite <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007050.png" />, the notion of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007052.png" />-category [[#References|[a44]]] is obtained. An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007054.png" />-groupoid is an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007055.png" />-category such that, for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007056.png" />, each <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007057.png" />-arrow is invertible with respect to the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007058.png" />-composition (for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007059.png" /> infinite, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007061.png" />-groupoid is used in [[#References|[a9]]] rather than <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007062.png" />-groupoid, by which they mean something else).
+
Out of 116 formulas, 112 were replaced by TEX code.-->
  
One reason for studying <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007063.png" />-categories was to use them as coefficient objects for non-Abelian cohomology (cf. [[Cohomology|Cohomology]]). This required constructing the nerve of an <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007065.png" />-category which, in turn, required extending the notion of computad (cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) to <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007067.png" />-computad, defining free <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007069.png" />-categories on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007070.png" />-computads, and formalising <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007071.png" />-pasting [[#References|[a46]]]; [[#References|[a22]]]; [[#References|[a47]]]; [[#References|[a23]]]; [[#References|[a41]]].
+
{{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|partial}}
 +
''$n$-category''
  
Ever since the appearance of bicategories (i.e. weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007073.png" />-categories, cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) in 1967, the prospect of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007075.png" />-categories (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007076.png" />) has been contemplated with some trepidation [[#References|[a37]]], p. 1261. The need for monoidal bicategories arose in various contexts, especially in the theory of categories enriched in a bicategory [[#References|[a53]]], where it was realized that a monoidal structure on the base was needed to extend results of usual enriched category theory [[#References|[a32]]]. The general definition of a monoidal bicategory (as the one object case of a tricategory) was not published until [[#References|[a19]]]; however, in 1985, the structure of a braiding [[#References|[a26]]] was defined on a monoidal (i.e. tensor) category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007077.png" /> and was shown to be exactly what arose when a tensor product (independent of specific axioms) was present on the one-object bicategory <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007078.png" />. The connection between braidings and the [[Yang–Baxter equation|Yang–Baxter equation]] was soon understood [[#References|[a52]]], [[#References|[a25]]]. This was followed by a connection between the Zamolodchikov equation and braided monoidal bicategories [[#References|[a29]]], [[#References|[a30]]] using more explicit descriptions of this last structure. The categorical formulation of tangles in terms of braiding plus adjunction (or duality; cf. also [[Adjunction theory|Adjunction theory]]) was then developed [[#References|[a18]]]; [[#References|[a45]]]; [[#References|[a43]]]. See [[#References|[a31]]] for the role this subject plays in the theory of [[Quantum groups|quantum groups]].
+
Let $n$ be a natural number. An $n$-category $A$ [[#References|[a16]]] consists of sets $A _ { 0 } , \ldots , A _ { n }$, where the elements of $A _ { m }$ are called $m$-arrows and are, for all $0 \leq k &lt; m \leq n$, equipped with a [[Category|category]] structure for which $A _ { k }$ is the set of objects and $A _ { m }$ is the set of arrows, where the composition is denoted by $a \circ_{k} b$ (for composable $a , b \in A _ { m }$), such that, for all $0 \leq h &lt; k &lt; m \leq n$, there is a $2$-category (cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) with $A _ { h } , A _ { k } , A _ { m }$, as set of objects, arrows and $2$-arrows, respectively, with vertical composition $a \circ_{k} b$, and with horizontal composition $a \circ_{h} b$. The sets $A _ { m }$ with the source and target functions $A _ { m } \rightarrow A _ { m - 1 }$ form the underlying globular set (or $n$-graph) of $A$. For $0 \leq k \leq n$ and for $a , b \in A _ { k }$ with the same $( k - 1 )$-source and $( k - 1 )$-target, there is an $( n - k - 1 )$-category $A ( a , b )$ whose $m$-arrows ($k &lt; m \leq n$) are the $m$-arrows $c : a \rightarrow b$ of $A$. In particular, for $0$-arrows $a , b$ (also called objects), there is an $( n + 1 )$-category $A ( a , b )$. This provides the basis of an alternative definition [[#References|[a17]]] of $n$-category using recursion and enriched categories [[#References|[a32]]] It follows that there is an $( n + 1 )$-category $n$-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007045.png"/>, whose objects are $n$-categories and whose $1$-arrows are $n$-functors. For infinite $n$, the notion of an $\omega$-category [[#References|[a44]]] is obtained. An $n$-groupoid is an $n$-category such that, for all $0 &lt; m \leq n$, each $m$-arrow is invertible with respect to the $( m - 1 )$-composition (for $n$ infinite, $\infty$-groupoid is used in [[#References|[a9]]] rather than $\omega$-groupoid, by which they mean something else).
  
Not every tricategory is equivalent (in the appropriate sense) to a <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007080.png" />-category: the interchange law between <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007081.png" />- and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007082.png" />-compositions needs to be weakened from an equality to an invertible coherent <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007084.png" />-cell; the groupoid case of this had arisen in unpublished work of A. Joyal and M. Tierney on algebraic homotopy <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007086.png" />-types in the early 1980s; details, together with the connection with loop spaces (cf. [[Loop space|Loop space]]), can be found in [[#References|[a8]]]; [[#References|[a5]]]. (A different non-globular higher-groupoidal homotopy <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007088.png" />-type for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007089.png" /> was established in [[#References|[a35]]].) Whereas <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007090.png" />-categories are categories enriched in the category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007092.png" />-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007093.png" /> of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007094.png" />-categories with Cartesian product as tensor product, Gray categories (or  "semi-strict 3-categories" ) are categories enriched in the monoidal category <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007096.png" />-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007097.png" /> where the tensor product is a pseudo-version of that defined in [[#References|[a20]]]. The coherence theorem of [[#References|[a19]]] states that every tricategory is (tri)equivalent to a Gray category. A basic example of a tricategory is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007098.png" /> whose objects are bicategories, whose arrows are pseudo-functors, whose <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007099.png" />-arrows are pseudo-natural transformations, and whose <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070100.png" />-arrows are modifications.
+
One reason for studying $n$-categories was to use them as coefficient objects for non-Abelian cohomology (cf. [[Cohomology|Cohomology]]). This required constructing the nerve of an $n$-category which, in turn, required extending the notion of computad (cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) to $n$-computad, defining free $n$-categories on $n$-computads, and formalising $n$-pasting [[#References|[a46]]]; [[#References|[a22]]]; [[#References|[a47]]]; [[#References|[a23]]]; [[#References|[a41]]].
  
While a simplicial approach to defining weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070102.png" />-categories for all <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070103.png" /> was suggested in [[#References|[a46]]], the first precise definition was that of J. Baez and J. Dolan [[#References|[a2]]] (announced at the end of 1995). Other, apparently quite different, definitions by M.A. Batanin [[#References|[a6]]] and Z. Tamsamani [[#References|[a50]]] were announced in 1996 and by A. Joyal [[#References|[a24]]] in 1997. Both the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions involve different generalizations of the operads of P. May [[#References|[a39]]] as somewhat foreshadowed by T. Trimble, whose operad approach to weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070104.png" />-categories had led to a definition of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070106.png" />-category (or tetracategory) [[#References|[a51]]].
+
Ever since the appearance of bicategories (i.e. weak $2$-categories, cf. [[Bicategory(2)|Bicategory]]) in 1967, the prospect of weak $n$-categories ($n &gt; 2$) has been contemplated with some trepidation [[#References|[a37]]], p. 1261. The need for monoidal bicategories arose in various contexts, especially in the theory of categories enriched in a bicategory [[#References|[a53]]], where it was realized that a monoidal structure on the base was needed to extend results of usual enriched category theory [[#References|[a32]]]. The general definition of a monoidal bicategory (as the one object case of a tricategory) was not published until [[#References|[a19]]]; however, in 1985, the structure of a braiding [[#References|[a26]]] was defined on a monoidal (i.e. tensor) category $\mathcal{V}$ and was shown to be exactly what arose when a tensor product (independent of specific axioms) was present on the one-object bicategory $\Sigma \cal V$. The connection between braidings and the [[Yang–Baxter equation|Yang–Baxter equation]] was soon understood [[#References|[a52]]], [[#References|[a25]]]. This was followed by a connection between the Zamolodchikov equation and braided monoidal bicategories [[#References|[a29]]], [[#References|[a30]]] using more explicit descriptions of this last structure. The categorical formulation of tangles in terms of braiding plus adjunction (or duality; cf. also [[Adjunction theory|Adjunction theory]]) was then developed [[#References|[a18]]]; [[#References|[a45]]]; [[#References|[a43]]]. See [[#References|[a31]]] for the role this subject plays in the theory of [[Quantum groups|quantum groups]].
 +
 
 +
Not every tricategory is equivalent (in the appropriate sense) to a $3$-category: the interchange law between $0$- and $1$-compositions needs to be weakened from an equality to an invertible coherent $3$-cell; the groupoid case of this had arisen in unpublished work of A. Joyal and M. Tierney on algebraic homotopy $3$-types in the early 1980s; details, together with the connection with loop spaces (cf. [[Loop space|Loop space]]), can be found in [[#References|[a8]]]; [[#References|[a5]]]. (A different non-globular higher-groupoidal homotopy $n$-type for all $n$ was established in [[#References|[a35]]].) Whereas $3$-categories are categories enriched in the category $2$-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007093.png"/> of $2$-categories with Cartesian product as tensor product, Gray categories (or  "semi-strict 3-categories" ) are categories enriched in the monoidal category $2$-<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007097.png"/> where the tensor product is a pseudo-version of that defined in [[#References|[a20]]]. The coherence theorem of [[#References|[a19]]] states that every tricategory is (tri)equivalent to a Gray category. A basic example of a tricategory is <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h12007098.png"/> whose objects are bicategories, whose arrows are pseudo-functors, whose $2$-arrows are pseudo-natural transformations, and whose $3$-arrows are modifications.
 +
 
 +
While a simplicial approach to defining weak $n$-categories for all $n$ was suggested in [[#References|[a46]]], the first precise definition was that of J. Baez and J. Dolan [[#References|[a2]]] (announced at the end of 1995). Other, apparently quite different, definitions by M.A. Batanin [[#References|[a6]]] and Z. Tamsamani [[#References|[a50]]] were announced in 1996 and by A. Joyal [[#References|[a24]]] in 1997. Both the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions involve different generalizations of the operads of P. May [[#References|[a39]]] as somewhat foreshadowed by T. Trimble, whose operad approach to weak $n$-categories had led to a definition of weak $4$-category (or tetracategory) [[#References|[a51]]].
  
 
With precise definitions available, the question of their equivalence is paramount. A modified version [[#References|[a21]]] of the Baez–Dolan definition together with generalized computad techniques from [[#References|[a7]]] are expected to show the equivalence of the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions.
 
With precise definitions available, the question of their equivalence is paramount. A modified version [[#References|[a21]]] of the Baez–Dolan definition together with generalized computad techniques from [[#References|[a7]]] are expected to show the equivalence of the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions.
  
The next problem is to find the correct coherence theorem for weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070108.png" />-categories: What are the appropriately stricter structures generalizing Gray categories for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070109.png" /> Strong candidates seem to be the  "teisi"  (Welsh for  "stacks" ) of [[#References|[a12]]], [[#References|[a13]]], [[#References|[a14]]]. Another problem is to find a precise definition of the weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070110.png" />-category of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070111.png" />-categories.
+
The next problem is to find the correct coherence theorem for weak $n$-categories: What are the appropriately stricter structures generalizing Gray categories for $n = 3 ?$ Strong candidates seem to be the  "teisi"  (Welsh for  "stacks" ) of [[#References|[a12]]], [[#References|[a13]]], [[#References|[a14]]]. Another problem is to find a precise definition of the weak $( n + 1 )$-category of weak $n$-categories.
  
The geometry of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070112.png" />-categories (<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070113.png" />) is only at its early stages [[#References|[a40]]], [[#References|[a18]]], [[#References|[a33]]], [[#References|[a3]]]; however, there are strong suggestions that this will lead to constructions of invariants for higher-dimensional manifolds and have application to conformal field theory [[#References|[a10]]], [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a11]]], [[#References|[a36]]].
+
The geometry of weak $n$-categories ($n &gt; 2$) is only at its early stages [[#References|[a40]]], [[#References|[a18]]], [[#References|[a33]]], [[#References|[a3]]]; however, there are strong suggestions that this will lead to constructions of invariants for higher-dimensional manifolds and have application to conformal field theory [[#References|[a10]]], [[#References|[a1]]], [[#References|[a11]]], [[#References|[a36]]].
  
The theory of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070114.png" />-categories, even for <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070115.png" />, is also in its infancy [[#References|[a15]]], [[#References|[a38]]]. Reasons for developing this theory, from the computer science viewpoint, are described in [[#References|[a42]]]. There are applications to concurrent programming and term-rewriting systems; see [[#References|[a48]]], [[#References|[a49]]] for references.
+
The theory of weak $n$-categories, even for $n = 3$, is also in its infancy [[#References|[a15]]], [[#References|[a38]]]. Reasons for developing this theory, from the computer science viewpoint, are described in [[#References|[a42]]]. There are applications to concurrent programming and term-rewriting systems; see [[#References|[a48]]], [[#References|[a49]]] for references.
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Baez,  J. Dolan,  "Higher-dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory"  ''J. Math. Phys.'' , '''36'''  (1995)  pp. 6073–6105</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Baez,  J. Dolan,  "Higher-dimensional algebra III: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070116.png" />-categories and the algebra of opetopes"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''135'''  (1998)  pp. 145–206</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Baez,  L. Langford,  "Higher-dimensional algebra IV: <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070117.png" />-tangles"  ''http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/hda4.ps''  (1999)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Baez,  M. Neuchl,  "Higher-dimensional algebra I: braided monoidal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070118.png" />-categories"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''121'''  (1996)  pp. 196–244</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Balteanu,  Z. Fierderowicz,  R. Schwaenzl,  R. Vogt,  "Iterated monoidal categories"  ''Preprint Ohio State Math. Research Inst.'' , '''5'''  (1998)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.A. Batanin,  "Monoidal globular categories as natural environment for the theory of weak <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070119.png" />-categories"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''136'''  (1998)  pp. 39–103</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.A. Batanin,  "Computads for finitary monads on globular sets" , ''Higher Category Theory (Evanston, Ill, 1997)'' , ''Contemp. Math.'' , '''230''' , Amer. Math. Soc.  (1998)  pp. 37–57</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Berger,  "Double loop spaces, braided monoidal categories and algebraic <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070120.png" />-types of space"  ''Prépubl. Univ. Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Lab. Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné'' , '''491'''  (1997)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a9]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Brown,  P.J. Higgins,  "The equivalence of crossed complexes and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070121.png" />-groupoids"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''22'''  (1981)  pp. 371–386</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a10]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S.M. Carmody,  "Cobordism categories"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. Cambridge''  (1995)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a11]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Crane,  D.N. Yetter,  "A categorical construction of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070122.png" /> topological quantum field theories"  L.H. Kauffman (ed.)  R.A. Baadhio (ed.) , ''Quantum Topology'' , World Sci.  (1993)  pp. 131–138</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a12]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. Crans,  "Generalized centers of braided and sylleptic monoidal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070123.png" />-categories"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''136'''  (1998)  pp. 183–223</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a13]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. Crans,  "A tensor product for Gray-categories"  ''Theory Appl. Categ.'' , '''5'''  (1999)  pp. 12–69</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a14]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. Crans,  "On braidings, syllepses, and symmetries"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.''  (to appear)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a15]</TD> <TD valign="top">  B.J. Day,  R. Street,  "Monoidal bicategories and Hopf algebroids"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''129'''  (1997)  pp. 99–157</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a16]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Ehresmann,  "Catégories et structures" , Dunod  (1965)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a17]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. Eilenberg,  G.M. Kelly,  "Closed categories" , ''Proc. Conf. Categorical Algebra, La Jolla'' , Springer  (1966)  pp. 421–562</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a18]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J. Fischer,  "2-categories and 2-knots"  ''Duke Math. J.'' , '''75'''  (1994)  pp. 493–526</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a19]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Gordon,  A.J. Power,  R. Street,  "Coherence for tricategories"  ''Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''117''' :  558  (1995)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a20]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J.W. Gray,  "Coherence for the tensor product of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070124.png" />-categories, and braid groups" , ''Algebra, Topology, and Category Theory (a collection of papers in honour of Samuel Eilenberg)'' , Acad. Press  (1976)  pp. 63–76</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a21]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Hermida,  M. Makkai,  J. Power,  "On weak higher dimensional categories" , http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/M/MakkaiM/papers/multitopicsets/  (1999)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a22]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Johnson,  "Pasting diagrams in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070125.png" />-categories with applications to coherence theorems and categories of paths"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. Sydney, Australia''  (1987)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a23]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Johnson,  "The combinatorics of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070126.png" />-categorical pasting"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''62'''  (1989)  pp. 211–225</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a24]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A. Joyal,  "Disks, duality and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070127.png" />-categories"  ''Preprint and Talk at the Amer. Math. Soc. Meeting in Montréal, September''  (1997)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a25]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A. Joyal,  R. Street,  "Tortile Yang–Baxter operators in tensor categories"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''71'''  (1991)  pp. 43–51</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a26]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A. Joyal,  R. Street,  "Braided tensor categories"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''102'''  (1993)  pp. 20–78</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a27]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Combinatorial-geometric aspects of polycategory theory: pasting schemes and higher Bruhat orders (List of results)"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 11–27</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a28]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Groupoids and homotopy types"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 29–46</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a29]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070128.png" />-Categories and Zamolodchikov tetrahedra equations" , ''Proc. Symp. Pure Math.'' , '''56''' , Amer. Math. Soc.  (1994)  pp. 177–259</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a30]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Braided monoidal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070129.png" />-categories and Manin–Schechtman higher braid groups"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''92'''  (1994)  pp. 241–267</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a31]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C. Kassel,  "Quantum groups" , ''Graduate Texts Math.'' :  155 , Springer  (1995)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a32]</TD> <TD valign="top">  G.M. Kelly,  "Basic concepts of enriched category theory" , ''Lecture Notes London Math. Soc.'' :  64 , Cambridge Univ. Press  (1982)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a33]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V. Kharlamov,  V. Turaev,  "On the definition of the <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070130.png" />-category of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070131.png" />-knots" ''Transl. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''174'''  (1996) pp. 205–221</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a34]</TD> <TD valign="top">  L. Langford,  "<img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070132.png" />-Tangles as a free braided monoidal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070133.png" />-category with duals"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. California at Riverside'' (1997)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a35]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J.-L. Loday,  "Spaces with finitely many non-trivial homotopy groups" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''24'''  (1982)  pp. 179–202</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a36]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Mackay,  "Spherical <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070134.png" />-categories and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070135.png" />-manifold invariants" ''Adv. Math.'' , '''143'''  (1999) pp. 288–348</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a37]</TD> <TD valign="top">  S. MacLane,  "Possible programs for categorists" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''86''' , Springer (1969) pp. 123–131</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a38]</TD> <TD valign="top">  F. Marmolejo,  "Distributive laws for pseudomonads''Theory Appl. Categ.'' , '''5'''  (1999)  pp. 91–147</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a39]</TD> <TD valign="top">  P. May,  "The geometry of iterated loop spaces" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''271''' , Springer (1972)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a40]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. McIntyreT. Trimble,  "The geometry of Gray-categories"  ''Adv. Math.''  (to appear)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a41]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A.J. Power,  "An <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070136.png" />-categorical pasting theorem" A. Carboni (ed.) M.C. Pedicchio (ed.) G. Rosolini (ed.) , ''Category Theory, Proc. Como 1990'' , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''1488''' , Springer (1991)  pp. 326–358</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a42]</TD> <TD valign="top">  A.J. Power,  "Why tricategories?"  ''Inform. Comput.'' , '''120'''  (1995)  pp. 251–262</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a43]</TD> <TD valign="top">  N.Yu. Reshetikhin,  V.G. Turaev,  "Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups"  ''Comm. Math. Phys.'' , '''127'''  (1990)  pp. 1–26</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a44]</TD> <TD valign="top">  J.E. Roberts,  "Mathematical aspects of local cohomology" , ''Proc. Colloq. Operator Algebras and Their Application to Math. Physics, Marseille 1977'' , CNRS (1979)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a45]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M.C. Shum,  "Tortile tensor categories"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''93'''  (1994)  pp. 57–110  (PhD Thesis Macquarie Univ. Nov. 1989)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a46]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Street,  "The algebra of oriented simplexes"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''49'''  (1987)  pp. 283–335</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a47]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Street,  "Parity complexes"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 315–343  (Corrigenda: 35 (1994) 359-361)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a48]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Street,  "Categorical structures"  M. Hazewinkel (ed.) , ''Handbook of Algebra'' , '''I''' , Elsevier  (1996)  pp. 529–577</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a49]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Street,  "Higher categories, strings, cubes and simplex equations"  ''Appl. Categorical Struct.'' , '''3'''  (1995)  pp. 29–77 and 303</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a50]</TD> <TD valign="top">  Z. Tamsamani,  "Sur des notions de <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070137.png" />-categorie et <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/h/h120/h120070/h120070138.png" />-groupoide non-stricte via des ensembles multi-simpliciaux"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse''  (1996)  (Also available on alg-geom 95-12 and 96-07)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a51]</TD> <TD valign="top">  T. Trimble,  "The definition of tetracategory"  ''Handwritten diagrams,'' , '''August'''  (1995)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a52]</TD> <TD valign="top">  V.G. Turaev,  "The Yang–Baxter equation and invariants of links"  ''Invent. Math.'' , '''92'''  (1988)  pp. 527–553</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a53]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R.F.C. Walters,  "Sheaves on sites as Cauchy-complete categories"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''24'''  (1982)  pp. 95–102</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top">  J. Baez,  J. Dolan,  "Higher-dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory"  ''J. Math. Phys.'' , '''36'''  (1995)  pp. 6073–6105</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top">  J. Baez,  J. Dolan,  "Higher-dimensional algebra III: $n$-categories and the algebra of opetopes"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''135'''  (1998)  pp. 145–206</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top">  J. Baez,  L. Langford,  "Higher-dimensional algebra IV: $2$-tangles" ''http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/hda4.ps''  (1999)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top">  J. Baez,  M. Neuchl,  "Higher-dimensional algebra I: braided monoidal $2$-categories" ''Adv. Math.'' , '''121'''  (1996)  pp. 196–244</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top">  C. Balteanu,  Z. Fierderowicz,  R. Schwaenzl,  R. Vogt,  "Iterated monoidal categories"  ''Preprint Ohio State Math. Research Inst.'' , '''5'''  (1998)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top">  M.A. Batanin,  "Monoidal globular categories as natural environment for the theory of weak $n$-categories" ''Adv. Math.'' , '''136'''  (1998)  pp. 39–103</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top">  M.A. Batanin,  "Computads for finitary monads on globular sets" , ''Higher Category Theory (Evanston, Ill, 1997)'' , ''Contemp. Math.'' , '''230''' , Amer. Math. Soc.  (1998)  pp. 37–57</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a8]</td> <td valign="top">  C. Berger,  "Double loop spaces, braided monoidal categories and algebraic $3$-types of space" ''Prépubl. Univ. Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Lab. Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné'' , '''491'''  (1997)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a9]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Brown,  P.J. Higgins,  "The equivalence of crossed complexes and $\infty$-groupoids" ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''22'''  (1981)  pp. 371–386</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a10]</td> <td valign="top">  S.M. Carmody,  "Cobordism categories"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. Cambridge''  (1995)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a11]</td> <td valign="top">  L. Crane,  D.N. Yetter,  "A categorical construction of $4 D$ topological quantum field theories" L.H. Kauffman (ed.)  R.A. Baadhio (ed.) , ''Quantum Topology'' , World Sci.  (1993)  pp. 131–138</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a12]</td> <td valign="top">  S. Crans,  "Generalized centers of braided and sylleptic monoidal $2$-categories" ''Adv. Math.'' , '''136'''  (1998)  pp. 183–223</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a13]</td> <td valign="top">  S. Crans,  "A tensor product for Gray-categories"  ''Theory Appl. Categ.'' , '''5'''  (1999)  pp. 12–69</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a14]</td> <td valign="top">  S. Crans,  "On braidings, syllepses, and symmetries"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.''  (to appear)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a15]</td> <td valign="top">  B.J. Day,  R. Street,  "Monoidal bicategories and Hopf algebroids"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''129'''  (1997)  pp. 99–157</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a16]</td> <td valign="top">  C. Ehresmann,  "Catégories et structures" , Dunod  (1965)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a17]</td> <td valign="top">  S. Eilenberg,  G.M. Kelly,  "Closed categories" , ''Proc. Conf. Categorical Algebra, La Jolla'' , Springer  (1966)  pp. 421–562</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a18]</td> <td valign="top">  J. Fischer,  "2-categories and 2-knots"  ''Duke Math. J.'' , '''75'''  (1994)  pp. 493–526</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a19]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Gordon,  A.J. Power,  R. Street,  "Coherence for tricategories"  ''Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''117''' :  558  (1995)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a20]</td> <td valign="top">  J.W. Gray,  "Coherence for the tensor product of $2$-categories, and braid groups" , ''Algebra, Topology, and Category Theory (a collection of papers in honour of Samuel Eilenberg)'' , Acad. Press  (1976)  pp. 63–76</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a21]</td> <td valign="top">  C. Hermida,  M. Makkai,  J. Power,  "On weak higher dimensional categories" , http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/M/MakkaiM/papers/multitopicsets/  (1999)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a22]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Johnson,  "Pasting diagrams in $n$-categories with applications to coherence theorems and categories of paths" ''PhD Thesis Univ. Sydney, Australia''  (1987)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a23]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Johnson,  "The combinatorics of $n$-categorical pasting" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''62'''  (1989)  pp. 211–225</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a24]</td> <td valign="top">  A. Joyal,  "Disks, duality and $\Theta$-categories" ''Preprint and Talk at the Amer. Math. Soc. Meeting in Montréal, September''  (1997)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a25]</td> <td valign="top">  A. Joyal,  R. Street,  "Tortile Yang–Baxter operators in tensor categories"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''71'''  (1991)  pp. 43–51</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a26]</td> <td valign="top">  A. Joyal,  R. Street,  "Braided tensor categories"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''102'''  (1993)  pp. 20–78</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a27]</td> <td valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Combinatorial-geometric aspects of polycategory theory: pasting schemes and higher Bruhat orders (List of results)"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 11–27</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a28]</td> <td valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Groupoids and homotopy types"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 29–46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a29]</td> <td valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "$2$-Categories and Zamolodchikov tetrahedra equations" , ''Proc. Symp. Pure Math.'' , '''56''' , Amer. Math. Soc.  (1994)  pp. 177–259</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a30]</td> <td valign="top">  M.M. Kapranov,  V.A. Voevodsky,  "Braided monoidal $2$-categories and Manin–Schechtman higher braid groups" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''92'''  (1994)  pp. 241–267</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a31]</td> <td valign="top">  C. Kassel,  "Quantum groups" , ''Graduate Texts Math.'' :  155 , Springer  (1995)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a32]</td> <td valign="top">  G.M. Kelly,  "Basic concepts of enriched category theory" , ''Lecture Notes London Math. Soc.'' :  64 , Cambridge Univ. Press  (1982)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a33]</td> <td valign="top">  V. Kharlamov,  V. Turaev,  "On the definition of the $2$-category of $2$-knots" ''Transl. Amer. Math. Soc.'' , '''174'''  (1996)  pp. 205–221</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a34]</td> <td valign="top">  L. Langford,  "$2$-Tangles as a free braided monoidal $2$-category with duals"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. California at Riverside''  (1997)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a35]</td> <td valign="top">  J.-L. Loday,  "Spaces with finitely many non-trivial homotopy groups" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''24'''  (1982)  pp. 179–202</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a36]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Mackay,  "Spherical $2$-categories and $4$-manifold invariants"  ''Adv. Math.'' , '''143'''  (1999) pp. 288–348</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a37]</td> <td valign="top">  S. MacLane,  "Possible programs for categorists" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''86''' , Springer (1969)  pp. 123–131</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a38]</td> <td valign="top">  F. Marmolejo,  "Distributive laws for pseudomonads" ''Theory Appl. Categ.'' , '''5'''  (1999)  pp. 91–147</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a39]</td> <td valign="top">  P. May,  "The geometry of iterated loop spaces" , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''271''' , Springer (1972)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a40]</td> <td valign="top">  M. McIntyre,  T. Trimble,  "The geometry of Gray-categories" ''Adv. Math.''  (to appear)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a41]</td> <td valign="top">  A.J. Power,  "An $n$-categorical pasting theoremA. Carboni (ed.)  M.C. Pedicchio (ed.)  G. Rosolini (ed.) , ''Category Theory, Proc. Como 1990'' , ''Lecture Notes Math.'' , '''1488''' , Springer (1991)  pp. 326–358</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a42]</td> <td valign="top">  A.J. Power,  "Why tricategories?" ''Inform. Comput.'' , '''120'''  (1995) pp. 251–262</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a43]</td> <td valign="top">  N.Yu. ReshetikhinV.G. Turaev,  "Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups"  ''Comm. Math. Phys.'' , '''127'''  (1990) pp. 1–26</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a44]</td> <td valign="top">  J.E. Roberts,  "Mathematical aspects of local cohomology" , ''Proc. Colloq. Operator Algebras and Their Application to Math. Physics, Marseille 1977'' , CNRS  (1979)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a45]</td> <td valign="top"> M.C. Shum,  "Tortile tensor categories" ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''93'''  (1994)  pp. 57–110  (PhD Thesis Macquarie Univ. Nov. 1989)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a46]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Street,  "The algebra of oriented simplexes"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''49'''  (1987)  pp. 283–335</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a47]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Street,  "Parity complexes"  ''Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat.'' , '''32'''  (1991)  pp. 315–343  (Corrigenda: 35 (1994) 359-361)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a48]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Street,  "Categorical structures"  M. Hazewinkel (ed.) , ''Handbook of Algebra'' , '''I''' , Elsevier (1996) pp. 529–577</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a49]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Street,  "Higher categories, strings, cubes and simplex equations"  ''Appl. Categorical Struct.'' , '''3'''  (1995)  pp. 29–77 and 303</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a50]</td> <td valign="top">  Z. Tamsamani,  "Sur des notions de $n$-categorie et $n$-groupoide non-stricte via des ensembles multi-simpliciaux"  ''PhD Thesis Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse''  (1996)  (Also available on alg-geom 95-12 and 96-07)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a51]</td> <td valign="top">  T. Trimble,  "The definition of tetracategory"  ''Handwritten diagrams,'' , '''August'''  (1995)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a52]</td> <td valign="top">  V.G. Turaev,  "The Yang–Baxter equation and invariants of links"  ''Invent. Math.'' , '''92'''  (1988)  pp. 527–553</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a53]</td> <td valign="top">  R.F.C. Walters,  "Sheaves on sites as Cauchy-complete categories"  ''J. Pure Appl. Algebra'' , '''24'''  (1982)  pp. 95–102</td></tr></table>

Revision as of 16:46, 1 July 2020

$n$-category

Let $n$ be a natural number. An $n$-category $A$ [a16] consists of sets $A _ { 0 } , \ldots , A _ { n }$, where the elements of $A _ { m }$ are called $m$-arrows and are, for all $0 \leq k < m \leq n$, equipped with a category structure for which $A _ { k }$ is the set of objects and $A _ { m }$ is the set of arrows, where the composition is denoted by $a \circ_{k} b$ (for composable $a , b \in A _ { m }$), such that, for all $0 \leq h < k < m \leq n$, there is a $2$-category (cf. Bicategory) with $A _ { h } , A _ { k } , A _ { m }$, as set of objects, arrows and $2$-arrows, respectively, with vertical composition $a \circ_{k} b$, and with horizontal composition $a \circ_{h} b$. The sets $A _ { m }$ with the source and target functions $A _ { m } \rightarrow A _ { m - 1 }$ form the underlying globular set (or $n$-graph) of $A$. For $0 \leq k \leq n$ and for $a , b \in A _ { k }$ with the same $( k - 1 )$-source and $( k - 1 )$-target, there is an $( n - k - 1 )$-category $A ( a , b )$ whose $m$-arrows ($k < m \leq n$) are the $m$-arrows $c : a \rightarrow b$ of $A$. In particular, for $0$-arrows $a , b$ (also called objects), there is an $( n + 1 )$-category $A ( a , b )$. This provides the basis of an alternative definition [a17] of $n$-category using recursion and enriched categories [a32] It follows that there is an $( n + 1 )$-category $n$-, whose objects are $n$-categories and whose $1$-arrows are $n$-functors. For infinite $n$, the notion of an $\omega$-category [a44] is obtained. An $n$-groupoid is an $n$-category such that, for all $0 < m \leq n$, each $m$-arrow is invertible with respect to the $( m - 1 )$-composition (for $n$ infinite, $\infty$-groupoid is used in [a9] rather than $\omega$-groupoid, by which they mean something else).

One reason for studying $n$-categories was to use them as coefficient objects for non-Abelian cohomology (cf. Cohomology). This required constructing the nerve of an $n$-category which, in turn, required extending the notion of computad (cf. Bicategory) to $n$-computad, defining free $n$-categories on $n$-computads, and formalising $n$-pasting [a46]; [a22]; [a47]; [a23]; [a41].

Ever since the appearance of bicategories (i.e. weak $2$-categories, cf. Bicategory) in 1967, the prospect of weak $n$-categories ($n > 2$) has been contemplated with some trepidation [a37], p. 1261. The need for monoidal bicategories arose in various contexts, especially in the theory of categories enriched in a bicategory [a53], where it was realized that a monoidal structure on the base was needed to extend results of usual enriched category theory [a32]. The general definition of a monoidal bicategory (as the one object case of a tricategory) was not published until [a19]; however, in 1985, the structure of a braiding [a26] was defined on a monoidal (i.e. tensor) category $\mathcal{V}$ and was shown to be exactly what arose when a tensor product (independent of specific axioms) was present on the one-object bicategory $\Sigma \cal V$. The connection between braidings and the Yang–Baxter equation was soon understood [a52], [a25]. This was followed by a connection between the Zamolodchikov equation and braided monoidal bicategories [a29], [a30] using more explicit descriptions of this last structure. The categorical formulation of tangles in terms of braiding plus adjunction (or duality; cf. also Adjunction theory) was then developed [a18]; [a45]; [a43]. See [a31] for the role this subject plays in the theory of quantum groups.

Not every tricategory is equivalent (in the appropriate sense) to a $3$-category: the interchange law between $0$- and $1$-compositions needs to be weakened from an equality to an invertible coherent $3$-cell; the groupoid case of this had arisen in unpublished work of A. Joyal and M. Tierney on algebraic homotopy $3$-types in the early 1980s; details, together with the connection with loop spaces (cf. Loop space), can be found in [a8]; [a5]. (A different non-globular higher-groupoidal homotopy $n$-type for all $n$ was established in [a35].) Whereas $3$-categories are categories enriched in the category $2$- of $2$-categories with Cartesian product as tensor product, Gray categories (or "semi-strict 3-categories" ) are categories enriched in the monoidal category $2$- where the tensor product is a pseudo-version of that defined in [a20]. The coherence theorem of [a19] states that every tricategory is (tri)equivalent to a Gray category. A basic example of a tricategory is whose objects are bicategories, whose arrows are pseudo-functors, whose $2$-arrows are pseudo-natural transformations, and whose $3$-arrows are modifications.

While a simplicial approach to defining weak $n$-categories for all $n$ was suggested in [a46], the first precise definition was that of J. Baez and J. Dolan [a2] (announced at the end of 1995). Other, apparently quite different, definitions by M.A. Batanin [a6] and Z. Tamsamani [a50] were announced in 1996 and by A. Joyal [a24] in 1997. Both the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions involve different generalizations of the operads of P. May [a39] as somewhat foreshadowed by T. Trimble, whose operad approach to weak $n$-categories had led to a definition of weak $4$-category (or tetracategory) [a51].

With precise definitions available, the question of their equivalence is paramount. A modified version [a21] of the Baez–Dolan definition together with generalized computad techniques from [a7] are expected to show the equivalence of the Baez–Dolan and Batanin definitions.

The next problem is to find the correct coherence theorem for weak $n$-categories: What are the appropriately stricter structures generalizing Gray categories for $n = 3 ?$ Strong candidates seem to be the "teisi" (Welsh for "stacks" ) of [a12], [a13], [a14]. Another problem is to find a precise definition of the weak $( n + 1 )$-category of weak $n$-categories.

The geometry of weak $n$-categories ($n > 2$) is only at its early stages [a40], [a18], [a33], [a3]; however, there are strong suggestions that this will lead to constructions of invariants for higher-dimensional manifolds and have application to conformal field theory [a10], [a1], [a11], [a36].

The theory of weak $n$-categories, even for $n = 3$, is also in its infancy [a15], [a38]. Reasons for developing this theory, from the computer science viewpoint, are described in [a42]. There are applications to concurrent programming and term-rewriting systems; see [a48], [a49] for references.

References

[a1] J. Baez, J. Dolan, "Higher-dimensional algebra and topological quantum field theory" J. Math. Phys. , 36 (1995) pp. 6073–6105
[a2] J. Baez, J. Dolan, "Higher-dimensional algebra III: $n$-categories and the algebra of opetopes" Adv. Math. , 135 (1998) pp. 145–206
[a3] J. Baez, L. Langford, "Higher-dimensional algebra IV: $2$-tangles" http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/hda4.ps (1999)
[a4] J. Baez, M. Neuchl, "Higher-dimensional algebra I: braided monoidal $2$-categories" Adv. Math. , 121 (1996) pp. 196–244
[a5] C. Balteanu, Z. Fierderowicz, R. Schwaenzl, R. Vogt, "Iterated monoidal categories" Preprint Ohio State Math. Research Inst. , 5 (1998)
[a6] M.A. Batanin, "Monoidal globular categories as natural environment for the theory of weak $n$-categories" Adv. Math. , 136 (1998) pp. 39–103
[a7] M.A. Batanin, "Computads for finitary monads on globular sets" , Higher Category Theory (Evanston, Ill, 1997) , Contemp. Math. , 230 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1998) pp. 37–57
[a8] C. Berger, "Double loop spaces, braided monoidal categories and algebraic $3$-types of space" Prépubl. Univ. Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Lab. Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné , 491 (1997)
[a9] R. Brown, P.J. Higgins, "The equivalence of crossed complexes and $\infty$-groupoids" Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat. , 22 (1981) pp. 371–386
[a10] S.M. Carmody, "Cobordism categories" PhD Thesis Univ. Cambridge (1995)
[a11] L. Crane, D.N. Yetter, "A categorical construction of $4 D$ topological quantum field theories" L.H. Kauffman (ed.) R.A. Baadhio (ed.) , Quantum Topology , World Sci. (1993) pp. 131–138
[a12] S. Crans, "Generalized centers of braided and sylleptic monoidal $2$-categories" Adv. Math. , 136 (1998) pp. 183–223
[a13] S. Crans, "A tensor product for Gray-categories" Theory Appl. Categ. , 5 (1999) pp. 12–69
[a14] S. Crans, "On braidings, syllepses, and symmetries" Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat. (to appear)
[a15] B.J. Day, R. Street, "Monoidal bicategories and Hopf algebroids" Adv. Math. , 129 (1997) pp. 99–157
[a16] C. Ehresmann, "Catégories et structures" , Dunod (1965)
[a17] S. Eilenberg, G.M. Kelly, "Closed categories" , Proc. Conf. Categorical Algebra, La Jolla , Springer (1966) pp. 421–562
[a18] J. Fischer, "2-categories and 2-knots" Duke Math. J. , 75 (1994) pp. 493–526
[a19] R. Gordon, A.J. Power, R. Street, "Coherence for tricategories" Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. , 117 : 558 (1995)
[a20] J.W. Gray, "Coherence for the tensor product of $2$-categories, and braid groups" , Algebra, Topology, and Category Theory (a collection of papers in honour of Samuel Eilenberg) , Acad. Press (1976) pp. 63–76
[a21] C. Hermida, M. Makkai, J. Power, "On weak higher dimensional categories" , http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/M/MakkaiM/papers/multitopicsets/ (1999)
[a22] M. Johnson, "Pasting diagrams in $n$-categories with applications to coherence theorems and categories of paths" PhD Thesis Univ. Sydney, Australia (1987)
[a23] M. Johnson, "The combinatorics of $n$-categorical pasting" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 62 (1989) pp. 211–225
[a24] A. Joyal, "Disks, duality and $\Theta$-categories" Preprint and Talk at the Amer. Math. Soc. Meeting in Montréal, September (1997)
[a25] A. Joyal, R. Street, "Tortile Yang–Baxter operators in tensor categories" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 71 (1991) pp. 43–51
[a26] A. Joyal, R. Street, "Braided tensor categories" Adv. Math. , 102 (1993) pp. 20–78
[a27] M.M. Kapranov, V.A. Voevodsky, "Combinatorial-geometric aspects of polycategory theory: pasting schemes and higher Bruhat orders (List of results)" Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat. , 32 (1991) pp. 11–27
[a28] M.M. Kapranov, V.A. Voevodsky, "Groupoids and homotopy types" Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat. , 32 (1991) pp. 29–46
[a29] M.M. Kapranov, V.A. Voevodsky, "$2$-Categories and Zamolodchikov tetrahedra equations" , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. , 56 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1994) pp. 177–259
[a30] M.M. Kapranov, V.A. Voevodsky, "Braided monoidal $2$-categories and Manin–Schechtman higher braid groups" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 92 (1994) pp. 241–267
[a31] C. Kassel, "Quantum groups" , Graduate Texts Math. : 155 , Springer (1995)
[a32] G.M. Kelly, "Basic concepts of enriched category theory" , Lecture Notes London Math. Soc. : 64 , Cambridge Univ. Press (1982)
[a33] V. Kharlamov, V. Turaev, "On the definition of the $2$-category of $2$-knots" Transl. Amer. Math. Soc. , 174 (1996) pp. 205–221
[a34] L. Langford, "$2$-Tangles as a free braided monoidal $2$-category with duals" PhD Thesis Univ. California at Riverside (1997)
[a35] J.-L. Loday, "Spaces with finitely many non-trivial homotopy groups" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 24 (1982) pp. 179–202
[a36] M. Mackay, "Spherical $2$-categories and $4$-manifold invariants" Adv. Math. , 143 (1999) pp. 288–348
[a37] S. MacLane, "Possible programs for categorists" , Lecture Notes Math. , 86 , Springer (1969) pp. 123–131
[a38] F. Marmolejo, "Distributive laws for pseudomonads" Theory Appl. Categ. , 5 (1999) pp. 91–147
[a39] P. May, "The geometry of iterated loop spaces" , Lecture Notes Math. , 271 , Springer (1972)
[a40] M. McIntyre, T. Trimble, "The geometry of Gray-categories" Adv. Math. (to appear)
[a41] A.J. Power, "An $n$-categorical pasting theorem" A. Carboni (ed.) M.C. Pedicchio (ed.) G. Rosolini (ed.) , Category Theory, Proc. Como 1990 , Lecture Notes Math. , 1488 , Springer (1991) pp. 326–358
[a42] A.J. Power, "Why tricategories?" Inform. Comput. , 120 (1995) pp. 251–262
[a43] N.Yu. Reshetikhin, V.G. Turaev, "Ribbon graphs and their invariants derived from quantum groups" Comm. Math. Phys. , 127 (1990) pp. 1–26
[a44] J.E. Roberts, "Mathematical aspects of local cohomology" , Proc. Colloq. Operator Algebras and Their Application to Math. Physics, Marseille 1977 , CNRS (1979)
[a45] M.C. Shum, "Tortile tensor categories" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 93 (1994) pp. 57–110 (PhD Thesis Macquarie Univ. Nov. 1989)
[a46] R. Street, "The algebra of oriented simplexes" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 49 (1987) pp. 283–335
[a47] R. Street, "Parity complexes" Cah. Topol. Géom. Diff. Cat. , 32 (1991) pp. 315–343 (Corrigenda: 35 (1994) 359-361)
[a48] R. Street, "Categorical structures" M. Hazewinkel (ed.) , Handbook of Algebra , I , Elsevier (1996) pp. 529–577
[a49] R. Street, "Higher categories, strings, cubes and simplex equations" Appl. Categorical Struct. , 3 (1995) pp. 29–77 and 303
[a50] Z. Tamsamani, "Sur des notions de $n$-categorie et $n$-groupoide non-stricte via des ensembles multi-simpliciaux" PhD Thesis Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (1996) (Also available on alg-geom 95-12 and 96-07)
[a51] T. Trimble, "The definition of tetracategory" Handwritten diagrams, , August (1995)
[a52] V.G. Turaev, "The Yang–Baxter equation and invariants of links" Invent. Math. , 92 (1988) pp. 527–553
[a53] R.F.C. Walters, "Sheaves on sites as Cauchy-complete categories" J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 24 (1982) pp. 95–102
How to Cite This Entry:
Higher-dimensional category. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Higher-dimensional_category&oldid=19090
This article was adapted from an original article by Ross Street (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article