Namespaces
Variants
Actions

Difference between revisions of "Fuzzy programming"

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Importing text file)
 
m (AUTOMATIC EDIT (latexlist): Replaced 33 formulas out of 40 by TEX code with an average confidence of 2.0 and a minimal confidence of 2.0.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!--This article has been texified automatically. Since there was no Nroff source code for this article,
 +
the semi-automatic procedure described at https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/User:Maximilian_Janisch/latexlist
 +
was used.
 +
If the TeX and formula formatting is correct, please remove this message and the {{TEX|semi-auto}} category.
 +
 +
Out of 40 formulas, 33 were replaced by TEX code.-->
 +
 +
{{TEX|semi-auto}}{{TEX|partial}}
 
Fuzzy programming deals with [[Mathematical programming|mathematical programming]] problems under non-probabilistic uncertainty. The idea of fuzzy programming was first given by R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh [[#References|[a1]]] and then developed by H. Tanaka [[#References|[a2]]] and H.-J. Zimmermann [[#References|[a3]]]. Those approaches treat soft constraints and vagueness of aspiration levels of objective function values and are called flexible programming. Later, C.V. Negoita, S. Minoiu and E. Stan [[#References|[a4]]] dealt with the ambiguity of coefficients in mathematical programming problems by fuzzy set theory (cf. also [[Non-precise data|Non-precise data]]). This fuzzy programming is called robust programming. D. Dubois [[#References|[a5]]] proposed the treatment of fuzzy coefficients in fuzzy programming problems based on possibility theory. Fuzzy programming based on possibility theory is called possibilistic programming. Until now (2000), a lot of fuzzy programming approaches have been proposed, as shown in [[#References|[a6]]], [[#References|[a7]]], [[#References|[a8]]].
 
Fuzzy programming deals with [[Mathematical programming|mathematical programming]] problems under non-probabilistic uncertainty. The idea of fuzzy programming was first given by R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh [[#References|[a1]]] and then developed by H. Tanaka [[#References|[a2]]] and H.-J. Zimmermann [[#References|[a3]]]. Those approaches treat soft constraints and vagueness of aspiration levels of objective function values and are called flexible programming. Later, C.V. Negoita, S. Minoiu and E. Stan [[#References|[a4]]] dealt with the ambiguity of coefficients in mathematical programming problems by fuzzy set theory (cf. also [[Non-precise data|Non-precise data]]). This fuzzy programming is called robust programming. D. Dubois [[#References|[a5]]] proposed the treatment of fuzzy coefficients in fuzzy programming problems based on possibility theory. Fuzzy programming based on possibility theory is called possibilistic programming. Until now (2000), a lot of fuzzy programming approaches have been proposed, as shown in [[#References|[a6]]], [[#References|[a7]]], [[#References|[a8]]].
  
 
The traditional linear programming problem can be written as (cf. also [[Linear programming|Linear programming]])
 
The traditional linear programming problem can be written as (cf. also [[Linear programming|Linear programming]])
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302801.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \left\{ \begin{array} { l l } { \operatorname { min } } &amp; { \mathbf{c} ^ { T } \mathbf{x} } \\ { \operatorname {s.t.} } &amp; { A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b}. } \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}
  
In this problem, the decision variable vector <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302802.png" /> is imposed to satisfy the constraints <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302803.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302804.png" /> satisfies <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302805.png" /> but <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302806.png" /> is never considered as a candidate for the solution even when <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302807.png" /> is extremely small. However, in the real world it frequently occurs that the right-hand values are not determined as rigorous restrictions and sometimes the right-hand values show the aspiration levels of the left-hand function values elicited from the decision maker. In such cases, the constraints should be treated  "softly" . Fuzzy programming can treat such soft constraints. Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302808.png" />; then the constraints of the above linear programming problem can be represented as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f1302809.png" />. In fuzzy programming, replacing <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028010.png" /> by a fuzzy set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028011.png" /> representing a  "set of values approximately smaller than b" , one treats the soft constraints as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028012.png" />, by controlling the membership value <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028013.png" />. Such a fuzzy set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028014.png" /> is called a fuzzy constraint.
+
In this problem, the decision variable vector $\mathbf{x}$ is imposed to satisfy the constraints $A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ satisfies $A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b} + \varepsilon$ but $A \mathbf{x} \not\le \mathbf{b}$ is never considered as a candidate for the solution even when $\varepsilon &gt; \mathbf 0 $ is extremely small. However, in the real world it frequently occurs that the right-hand values are not determined as rigorous restrictions and sometimes the right-hand values show the aspiration levels of the left-hand function values elicited from the decision maker. In such cases, the constraints should be treated  "softly" . Fuzzy programming can treat such soft constraints. Let $B = \{ \mathbf{r} : \mathbf{r} \leq \mathbf{b} \}$; then the constraints of the above linear programming problem can be represented as $A \mathbf{x} \in B$. In fuzzy programming, replacing $B$ by a fuzzy set $\tilde{B}$ representing a  "set of values approximately smaller than b" , one treats the soft constraints as $A \mathbf{x} \in \tilde { B }$, by controlling the membership value $\mu _ { B } ( A {\bf x} )$. Such a fuzzy set $\tilde{B}$ is called a fuzzy constraint.
  
The coefficients <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028015.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028016.png" /> in the above linear programming problem are supposed to be given as real numbers. However, in real world problems one's knowledge is often insufficient to determine the coefficients as real numbers, even when the possible ranges of coefficients is known, such as  "ci is about 3" . Such possible ranges can be modelled by fuzzy sets. Let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028017.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028018.png" /> be fuzzy sets representing possible ranges of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028019.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028020.png" />. Then the possible range of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028021.png" /> is obtained as the fuzzy set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028022.png" /> defined by the membership function:
+
The coefficients $\mathbf{c}$ and $A$ in the above linear programming problem are supposed to be given as real numbers. However, in real world problems one's knowledge is often insufficient to determine the coefficients as real numbers, even when the possible ranges of coefficients is known, such as  "ci is about 3" . Such possible ranges can be modelled by fuzzy sets. Let $\tilde{\mathbf{c}}$ and $\tilde{A}$ be fuzzy sets representing possible ranges of $\mathbf{c}$ and $A$. Then the possible range of $A \mathbf{x}$ is obtained as the fuzzy set $\tilde{A} \mathbf{x}$ defined by the membership function:
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028023.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
\begin{equation*} \mu _ { \tilde{A} \mathbf{x} } ( \mathbf{z} ) = \operatorname { sup } _ { \mathbf{z} = A \mathbf{x} } \mu _ { \tilde{A} } ( A ). \end{equation*}
  
The possibility and necessity degrees of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028024.png" /> are defined by:
+
The possibility and necessity degrees of $A \mathbf{x} \in \tilde { B }$ are defined by:
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028025.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td style="width:94%;text-align:center;" valign="top"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028025.png"/></td> </tr></table>
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028026.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td style="width:94%;text-align:center;" valign="top"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028026.png"/></td> </tr></table>
  
The possible range of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028027.png" /> and the possibility and necessity degrees of <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028028.png" /> are defined similarly, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028029.png" /> is a fuzzy set.
+
The possible range of $\mathbf{c} ^ { T } \mathbf{x}$ and the possibility and necessity degrees of $\mathbf{c} ^ { \text{T} } \mathbf{x} \in \widetilde { G }$ are defined similarly, where $\tilde { G }$ is a fuzzy set.
  
Soft constraints with ambiguous coefficients are treated as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028030.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028031.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028032.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028033.png" /> are constants given by the decision maker. In order to treat the objective function with ambiguous coefficients, a fuzzy set <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028034.png" /> of satisfactory values for the decision maker is established. Such a fuzzy set is called a fuzzy goal. Then the objective function is treated as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028035.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028036.png" />. Namely, in the former case, the problem is formulated as
+
Soft constraints with ambiguous coefficients are treated as <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028030.png"/> and $N _ { \widetilde{A}\mathbf{x} } ( \widetilde { B } ) \geq h ^ { N }$, where $h ^ { \Pi } \in [ 0,1 ]$ and $h ^ { N } \in [ 0,1 ]$ are constants given by the decision maker. In order to treat the objective function with ambiguous coefficients, a fuzzy set $\tilde { G }$ of satisfactory values for the decision maker is established. Such a fuzzy set is called a fuzzy goal. Then the objective function is treated as $\operatorname { max}  \Pi_ { \tilde{\mathbf{c}}^{ \text{T}}  \mathbf{x} } ( \tilde { G } )$ or $\operatorname { max }N_{\tilde{\mathbf{c}}^{T}\mathbf{x}} ( \tilde { G } )$. Namely, in the former case, the problem is formulated as
  
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028037.png" /></td> </tr></table>
+
<table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td style="width:94%;text-align:center;" valign="top"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/f/f130/f130280/f13028037.png"/></td> </tr></table>
  
 
It is known that such problems can be reduced to linear programming problems under certain reasonable assumptions that are applicable to real world problems [[#References|[a8]]].
 
It is known that such problems can be reduced to linear programming problems under certain reasonable assumptions that are applicable to real world problems [[#References|[a8]]].
  
 
====References====
 
====References====
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[a1]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R.E. Bellman,  L.A. Zadeh,  "Decision-making in a fuzzy environment"  ''Management Sci.'' , '''17B'''  (1970)  pp. 141–164</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a2]</TD> <TD valign="top">  H. Tanaka,  T. Okuda,  K. Asai,  "On fuzzy mathematical programming"  ''J. Cybernet.'' , '''3'''  (1974)  pp. 37–46</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a3]</TD> <TD valign="top">  H.-J. Zimmermann,  "Description and optimization of fuzzy systems"  ''Int. J. General Syst.'' , '''2'''  (1976)  pp. 209–215</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a4]</TD> <TD valign="top">  C.V. Negoita,  S. Minoiu,  E. Stan,  "On considering imprecision in dynamic linear programming"  ''ECECSR J.'' , '''3'''  (1976)  pp. 83–95</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a5]</TD> <TD valign="top">  D. Dubois,  "Linear programming with fuzzy data"  J.C. Bezdek (ed.) , ''Analysis of Fuzzy Information'' , '''3: Applications in Engineering and Sci.''' , CRC  (1987)  pp. 241–263</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a6]</TD> <TD valign="top">  R. Słowinski,  J. Teghem,  "Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty" , Kluwer Acad. Publ.  (1990)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a7]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Sakawa,  "Fuzzy sets and interactive multiobjective optimization" , Plenum  (1993)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[a8]</TD> <TD valign="top">  M. Inuiguchi,  J. Ramik,  "Fuzzy linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem"  ''Fuzzy Sets and Syst.'' , '''111'''  (2000)  pp. 3–28</TD></TR></table>
+
<table><tr><td valign="top">[a1]</td> <td valign="top">  R.E. Bellman,  L.A. Zadeh,  "Decision-making in a fuzzy environment"  ''Management Sci.'' , '''17B'''  (1970)  pp. 141–164</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a2]</td> <td valign="top">  H. Tanaka,  T. Okuda,  K. Asai,  "On fuzzy mathematical programming"  ''J. Cybernet.'' , '''3'''  (1974)  pp. 37–46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a3]</td> <td valign="top">  H.-J. Zimmermann,  "Description and optimization of fuzzy systems"  ''Int. J. General Syst.'' , '''2'''  (1976)  pp. 209–215</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a4]</td> <td valign="top">  C.V. Negoita,  S. Minoiu,  E. Stan,  "On considering imprecision in dynamic linear programming"  ''ECECSR J.'' , '''3'''  (1976)  pp. 83–95</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a5]</td> <td valign="top">  D. Dubois,  "Linear programming with fuzzy data"  J.C. Bezdek (ed.) , ''Analysis of Fuzzy Information'' , '''3: Applications in Engineering and Sci.''' , CRC  (1987)  pp. 241–263</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a6]</td> <td valign="top">  R. Słowinski,  J. Teghem,  "Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty" , Kluwer Acad. Publ.  (1990)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a7]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Sakawa,  "Fuzzy sets and interactive multiobjective optimization" , Plenum  (1993)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top">[a8]</td> <td valign="top">  M. Inuiguchi,  J. Ramik,  "Fuzzy linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem"  ''Fuzzy Sets and Syst.'' , '''111'''  (2000)  pp. 3–28</td></tr></table>

Revision as of 16:46, 1 July 2020

Fuzzy programming deals with mathematical programming problems under non-probabilistic uncertainty. The idea of fuzzy programming was first given by R.E. Bellman and L.A. Zadeh [a1] and then developed by H. Tanaka [a2] and H.-J. Zimmermann [a3]. Those approaches treat soft constraints and vagueness of aspiration levels of objective function values and are called flexible programming. Later, C.V. Negoita, S. Minoiu and E. Stan [a4] dealt with the ambiguity of coefficients in mathematical programming problems by fuzzy set theory (cf. also Non-precise data). This fuzzy programming is called robust programming. D. Dubois [a5] proposed the treatment of fuzzy coefficients in fuzzy programming problems based on possibility theory. Fuzzy programming based on possibility theory is called possibilistic programming. Until now (2000), a lot of fuzzy programming approaches have been proposed, as shown in [a6], [a7], [a8].

The traditional linear programming problem can be written as (cf. also Linear programming)

\begin{equation*} \left\{ \begin{array} { l l } { \operatorname { min } } & { \mathbf{c} ^ { T } \mathbf{x} } \\ { \operatorname {s.t.} } & { A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b}. } \end{array} \right. \end{equation*}

In this problem, the decision variable vector $\mathbf{x}$ is imposed to satisfy the constraints $A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ satisfies $A \mathbf{x} \leq \mathbf{b} + \varepsilon$ but $A \mathbf{x} \not\le \mathbf{b}$ is never considered as a candidate for the solution even when $\varepsilon > \mathbf 0 $ is extremely small. However, in the real world it frequently occurs that the right-hand values are not determined as rigorous restrictions and sometimes the right-hand values show the aspiration levels of the left-hand function values elicited from the decision maker. In such cases, the constraints should be treated "softly" . Fuzzy programming can treat such soft constraints. Let $B = \{ \mathbf{r} : \mathbf{r} \leq \mathbf{b} \}$; then the constraints of the above linear programming problem can be represented as $A \mathbf{x} \in B$. In fuzzy programming, replacing $B$ by a fuzzy set $\tilde{B}$ representing a "set of values approximately smaller than b" , one treats the soft constraints as $A \mathbf{x} \in \tilde { B }$, by controlling the membership value $\mu _ { B } ( A {\bf x} )$. Such a fuzzy set $\tilde{B}$ is called a fuzzy constraint.

The coefficients $\mathbf{c}$ and $A$ in the above linear programming problem are supposed to be given as real numbers. However, in real world problems one's knowledge is often insufficient to determine the coefficients as real numbers, even when the possible ranges of coefficients is known, such as "ci is about 3" . Such possible ranges can be modelled by fuzzy sets. Let $\tilde{\mathbf{c}}$ and $\tilde{A}$ be fuzzy sets representing possible ranges of $\mathbf{c}$ and $A$. Then the possible range of $A \mathbf{x}$ is obtained as the fuzzy set $\tilde{A} \mathbf{x}$ defined by the membership function:

\begin{equation*} \mu _ { \tilde{A} \mathbf{x} } ( \mathbf{z} ) = \operatorname { sup } _ { \mathbf{z} = A \mathbf{x} } \mu _ { \tilde{A} } ( A ). \end{equation*}

The possibility and necessity degrees of $A \mathbf{x} \in \tilde { B }$ are defined by:

The possible range of $\mathbf{c} ^ { T } \mathbf{x}$ and the possibility and necessity degrees of $\mathbf{c} ^ { \text{T} } \mathbf{x} \in \widetilde { G }$ are defined similarly, where $\tilde { G }$ is a fuzzy set.

Soft constraints with ambiguous coefficients are treated as and $N _ { \widetilde{A}\mathbf{x} } ( \widetilde { B } ) \geq h ^ { N }$, where $h ^ { \Pi } \in [ 0,1 ]$ and $h ^ { N } \in [ 0,1 ]$ are constants given by the decision maker. In order to treat the objective function with ambiguous coefficients, a fuzzy set $\tilde { G }$ of satisfactory values for the decision maker is established. Such a fuzzy set is called a fuzzy goal. Then the objective function is treated as $\operatorname { max} \Pi_ { \tilde{\mathbf{c}}^{ \text{T}} \mathbf{x} } ( \tilde { G } )$ or $\operatorname { max }N_{\tilde{\mathbf{c}}^{T}\mathbf{x}} ( \tilde { G } )$. Namely, in the former case, the problem is formulated as

It is known that such problems can be reduced to linear programming problems under certain reasonable assumptions that are applicable to real world problems [a8].

References

[a1] R.E. Bellman, L.A. Zadeh, "Decision-making in a fuzzy environment" Management Sci. , 17B (1970) pp. 141–164
[a2] H. Tanaka, T. Okuda, K. Asai, "On fuzzy mathematical programming" J. Cybernet. , 3 (1974) pp. 37–46
[a3] H.-J. Zimmermann, "Description and optimization of fuzzy systems" Int. J. General Syst. , 2 (1976) pp. 209–215
[a4] C.V. Negoita, S. Minoiu, E. Stan, "On considering imprecision in dynamic linear programming" ECECSR J. , 3 (1976) pp. 83–95
[a5] D. Dubois, "Linear programming with fuzzy data" J.C. Bezdek (ed.) , Analysis of Fuzzy Information , 3: Applications in Engineering and Sci. , CRC (1987) pp. 241–263
[a6] R. Słowinski, J. Teghem, "Stochastic versus fuzzy approaches to multiobjective mathematical programming under uncertainty" , Kluwer Acad. Publ. (1990)
[a7] M. Sakawa, "Fuzzy sets and interactive multiobjective optimization" , Plenum (1993)
[a8] M. Inuiguchi, J. Ramik, "Fuzzy linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem" Fuzzy Sets and Syst. , 111 (2000) pp. 3–28
How to Cite This Entry:
Fuzzy programming. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Fuzzy_programming&oldid=13383
This article was adapted from an original article by Masahiro Inuiguchi (originator), which appeared in Encyclopedia of Mathematics - ISBN 1402006098. See original article