# Difference between revisions of "Exterior and interior boundary value problems"

(TeX) |
|||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | Boundary value problems for elliptic partial differential equations in the finite (interior) domain | + | {{TEX|done}} |

+ | Boundary value problems for elliptic partial differential equations in the finite (interior) domain $D^+$, respectively in the infinite (exterior) domain $D^-$ into which a given closed smooth surface $S$, homeomorphic to a sphere, subdivides the Euclidean space $\mathbf R^3$. | ||

The principal difference between exterior and interior boundary value problems consists in the fact that in the former case the boundary condition must be supplemented by a stipulation as to a certain behaviour at infinity, which ensures that the solution is unique and which is natural from the point of view of the physical origin of the problem itself. | The principal difference between exterior and interior boundary value problems consists in the fact that in the former case the boundary condition must be supplemented by a stipulation as to a certain behaviour at infinity, which ensures that the solution is unique and which is natural from the point of view of the physical origin of the problem itself. | ||

− | For instance, in the exterior boundary value problems for the Poisson equation | + | For instance, in the exterior boundary value problems for the Poisson equation $\Delta u=f$ (the function $f$ is assumed to be sufficiently smooth and of compact support) it is sufficient to stipulate that the solution $u(M)$ be regular at infinity, i.e. that |

− | + | \begin{equation}\lim_{r\to\infty}u(M)=0,\quad r=|OM|.\label{1}\end{equation} | |

− | In the case of the Poisson equation | + | In the case of the Poisson equation $\Delta u=f$ in an infinite domain in the plane, $D^-\subset\mathbf R^2$, the regularity condition at infinity is reduced to stipulating that the solution $u(M)$ be bounded at infinity: |

− | + | \begin{equation}u(M)=O(1),\quad r\to\infty.\label{2}\end{equation} | |

− | In the case of the exterior boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation | + | In the case of the exterior boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation $\Delta u+k^2u=f$, $k^2>0$, the stipulation of regularity at infinity proves to be insufficient to obtain a unique solution. Here the so-called [[Radiation conditions|radiation conditions]] are employed. For the domain $D^-$ in $\mathbf R^3$: |

− | + | \begin{equation}u(M)=O(r^{-1}),\label{3}\end{equation} | |

− | + | $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\pm iku=O(r^{-1}),\quad r\to\infty,$$ | |

− | and for | + | and for $D^-\subset\mathbf R^2$: |

− | + | \begin{equation}u(M)=O(r^{-1/2}),\label{4}\end{equation} | |

− | + | $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\pm iku=O(r^{-1/2}),\quad r\to\infty,$$ | |

the signs being chosen depending on the conditions of the problem and the choice of a [[Principal fundamental solution|principal fundamental solution]]. About other conditions at infinity see [[Limit-absorption principle|Limit-absorption principle]]; [[Limiting-amplitude principle|Limiting-amplitude principle]]. | the signs being chosen depending on the conditions of the problem and the choice of a [[Principal fundamental solution|principal fundamental solution]]. About other conditions at infinity see [[Limit-absorption principle|Limit-absorption principle]]; [[Limiting-amplitude principle|Limiting-amplitude principle]]. | ||

Line 27: | Line 28: | ||

Consider a boundary value problem for a linear elliptic equation of general form | Consider a boundary value problem for a linear elliptic equation of general form | ||

− | + | \begin{equation}Lu\equiv\sum_{i,k=1}^na_{ik}\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x_i\partial x_k}+\sum_{i=1}^nb_j\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}+cu=f\label{5}\end{equation} | |

− | in the domains | + | in the domains $D^+$ and $D^-$ of the Euclidean space $\mathbf R^n$, $n\geq2$, separated by a closed smooth hypersurface $S$ that is homeomorphic to the sphere in $\mathbf R^n$, the functions $a_{ik}$, $b_i$, $c$, and $f$ being assumed sufficiently smooth, and $f$ being of compact support. The conditions of regularity at infinity of type \eqref{1} or \eqref{2} will be sufficient in exterior boundary value problems if $n\geq3$ or $n=2$, if the maximum principle is satisfied by the operator $L$ and if there exists a single unique principal fundamental solution; in particular, a necessary condition for it is $c\leq0$ (see [[#References|[1]]], [[#References|[2]]], [[#References|[3]]]). The problem of the applicability of the radiation conditions, the principle of limit absorption and the limiting-amplitude principle in their general form has not yet (1977) been exhaustively investigated. |

− | In addition to the difference between the conditions at infinity, an exterior and interior boundary value problem may also differ by the conditions for existence of the solution. Thus, in the case of the interior [[Neumann problem]] for the Laplace equation | + | In addition to the difference between the conditions at infinity, an exterior and interior boundary value problem may also differ by the conditions for existence of the solution. Thus, in the case of the interior [[Neumann problem]] for the Laplace equation $\Delta u=0$ in a finite domain $D^+\subset\mathbf R^3$, a necessary condition for the existence of a solution has the form |

− | + | $$\int_S\psi(M)dS=0,$$ | |

− | where | + | where $\psi(M)$ is the given boundary function in the Neumann condition $\partial u/\partial n=\psi(M)$. However, this condition is no longer necessary in the exterior Neumann problem in an infinite domain $D^-\subset\mathbf R_3$. |

====References==== | ====References==== |

## Revision as of 22:11, 10 December 2018

Boundary value problems for elliptic partial differential equations in the finite (interior) domain $D^+$, respectively in the infinite (exterior) domain $D^-$ into which a given closed smooth surface $S$, homeomorphic to a sphere, subdivides the Euclidean space $\mathbf R^3$.

The principal difference between exterior and interior boundary value problems consists in the fact that in the former case the boundary condition must be supplemented by a stipulation as to a certain behaviour at infinity, which ensures that the solution is unique and which is natural from the point of view of the physical origin of the problem itself.

For instance, in the exterior boundary value problems for the Poisson equation $\Delta u=f$ (the function $f$ is assumed to be sufficiently smooth and of compact support) it is sufficient to stipulate that the solution $u(M)$ be regular at infinity, i.e. that

\begin{equation}\lim_{r\to\infty}u(M)=0,\quad r=|OM|.\label{1}\end{equation}

In the case of the Poisson equation $\Delta u=f$ in an infinite domain in the plane, $D^-\subset\mathbf R^2$, the regularity condition at infinity is reduced to stipulating that the solution $u(M)$ be bounded at infinity:

\begin{equation}u(M)=O(1),\quad r\to\infty.\label{2}\end{equation}

In the case of the exterior boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation $\Delta u+k^2u=f$, $k^2>0$, the stipulation of regularity at infinity proves to be insufficient to obtain a unique solution. Here the so-called radiation conditions are employed. For the domain $D^-$ in $\mathbf R^3$:

\begin{equation}u(M)=O(r^{-1}),\label{3}\end{equation}

$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\pm iku=O(r^{-1}),\quad r\to\infty,$$

and for $D^-\subset\mathbf R^2$:

\begin{equation}u(M)=O(r^{-1/2}),\label{4}\end{equation}

$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\pm iku=O(r^{-1/2}),\quad r\to\infty,$$

the signs being chosen depending on the conditions of the problem and the choice of a principal fundamental solution. About other conditions at infinity see Limit-absorption principle; Limiting-amplitude principle.

Consider a boundary value problem for a linear elliptic equation of general form

\begin{equation}Lu\equiv\sum_{i,k=1}^na_{ik}\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x_i\partial x_k}+\sum_{i=1}^nb_j\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}+cu=f\label{5}\end{equation}

in the domains $D^+$ and $D^-$ of the Euclidean space $\mathbf R^n$, $n\geq2$, separated by a closed smooth hypersurface $S$ that is homeomorphic to the sphere in $\mathbf R^n$, the functions $a_{ik}$, $b_i$, $c$, and $f$ being assumed sufficiently smooth, and $f$ being of compact support. The conditions of regularity at infinity of type \eqref{1} or \eqref{2} will be sufficient in exterior boundary value problems if $n\geq3$ or $n=2$, if the maximum principle is satisfied by the operator $L$ and if there exists a single unique principal fundamental solution; in particular, a necessary condition for it is $c\leq0$ (see [1], [2], [3]). The problem of the applicability of the radiation conditions, the principle of limit absorption and the limiting-amplitude principle in their general form has not yet (1977) been exhaustively investigated.

In addition to the difference between the conditions at infinity, an exterior and interior boundary value problem may also differ by the conditions for existence of the solution. Thus, in the case of the interior Neumann problem for the Laplace equation $\Delta u=0$ in a finite domain $D^+\subset\mathbf R^3$, a necessary condition for the existence of a solution has the form

$$\int_S\psi(M)dS=0,$$

where $\psi(M)$ is the given boundary function in the Neumann condition $\partial u/\partial n=\psi(M)$. However, this condition is no longer necessary in the exterior Neumann problem in an infinite domain $D^-\subset\mathbf R_3$.

#### References

[1] | V.I. Smirnov, "A course of higher mathematics" , 4 , Addison-Wesley (1964) (Translated from Russian) |

[2] | V.S. Vladimirov, "Equations of mathematical physics" , MIR (1984) (Translated from Russian) |

[3] | V.D. Kupradze, "Randwertaufgaben der Schwingungstheorie und Integralgleichungen" , Deutsch. Verlag Wissenschaft. (1956) (Translated from Russian) |

[4] | V.D. Kupradze, "The method of potentials in elasticity theory" , Moscow (1963) (In Russian) |

[5] | C. Miranda, "Partial differential equations of elliptic type" , Springer (1970) (Translated from Italian) |

#### Comments

#### References

[a1] | A.N. [A.N. Tikhonov] Tichonoff, A.A. Samarskii, "Differentialgleichungen der mathematischen Physik" , Deutsch. Verlag Wissenschaft. (1959) (Translated from Russian) |

[a2] | F. John, "Partial differential equations" , Springer (1971) |

[a3] | P.R. Garabedian, "Partial differential equations" , Wiley (1964) |

[a4] | I.G. Petrovskii, "Partial differential equations" , Saunders (1967) (Translated from Russian) |

**How to Cite This Entry:**

Exterior and interior boundary value problems.

*Encyclopedia of Mathematics.*URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Exterior_and_interior_boundary_value_problems&oldid=33908