Bernoulli experiment
of size
The special case of a statistical experiment (cf. also Probability space; Statistical experiments, method of) consisting of a set
of probability measures
on a
-algebra
of subsets of a set
, where
(
,
the set of natural numbers),
is the
-algebra of all subsets of
and
. Here, the probability measure
describes the probability
![]() |
for a given probability of success that
will be observed. Clearly, decision-theoretical procedures associated with Bernoulli experiments are based on the sum
of observations
because of the corresponding sufficient and complete data reduction (cf. [a2] and [a3]). Therefore, uniformly most powerful, as well as uniformly most powerful unbiased, level tests for one-sided and two-sided hypotheses about the probability
of success are based on
(cf. [a2]; see also Statistical hypotheses, verification of). Moreover, based on the quadratic loss function, the sample mean
![]() |
is admissible on account of the Rao–Cramér inequality (cf. [a3]) and the estimator (cf. also Statistical estimator)
![]() |
is minimax by means of equalizer decision rules (cf. [a2]). Furthermore, the Lehmann–Scheffé theorem implies that is a uniform minimum-variance unbiased estimator (an UMVU estimator; cf. also Unbiased estimator) for the probability
of success (cf. [a2] and [a3]).
All UMVU estimators, as well as all unbiased estimators of zero, might be characterized in connection with Bernoulli experiments by introducing the following notion for general statistical experiments : A
, being square-integrable for all
, is called an UMVU estimator if
![]() |
for all . The covariance method tells that
is a UMVU estimator if and only if
,
, for all unbiased estimators
of zero, i.e. if
,
(cf. [a3]). In particular, the covariance method implies the following properties of UMVU estimators:
i) (uniqueness) ,
, UMVU estimators with
,
, implies
-a.e. for all
.
ii) (linearity) , UMVU estimators,
(
the set of real numbers),
, implies that
is also an UMVU estimator.
iii) (multiplicativity) ,
, UMVU estimators with
or
bounded, implies that
is also an UMVU estimator.
iv) (closedness) ,
, UMVU estimators satisfying
for some
and all
implies that
is an UMVU estimator.
In the special case of a Bernoulli experiment of size one arrives by the property of uniqueness i) and the property of linearity ii), together with an argument based on interpolation polynomials, at the following characterization of UMVU estimators:
is a UMVU estimator if and only if one of the following conditions is valid:
v) is a polynomial in
,
,
, of degree not exceeding
;
vi) is symmetric (permutation invariant).
Moreover, the set of all real-valued parameter functions admitting some
with
,
, coincides with the set consisting of all polynomials in
of degree not exceeding
. In particular,
is an unbiased estimator of zero if and only if its symmetrization
, defined by
![]() |
![]() |
vanishes. Therefore, the set consisting of all estimators
is equal to the direct sum
, where
, stands for
and
is equal to
. In particular,
,
and
.
If one is interested, in connection with general statistical experiments , only in locally minimum-variance unbiased estimators at some
, one might start from
satisfying
![]() |
![]() |
Then the covariance method yields again the properties of uniqueness, linearity and closedness (with respect to ), whereas the property of multiplicativity does not hold, in general, for locally minimum-variance unbiased estimators; this can be illustrated by infinite Bernoulli experiments, where the probability
of success is equal to
, as follows.
Let () be the special statistical experiment with
,
coinciding with the set of all subsets of
, and
being the set of all binomial distributions
with integer-valued parameter
and probability of success
(cf. also Binomial distribution). Then the covariance method, together with an argument based on interpolation polynomials, yields the following characterization of locally optimal unbiased estimators:
is locally optimal at
for all
(
fixed) among all estimators
with
,
, if and only if
is a polynomial in
of degree not exceeding
. In particular,
is a UMVU estimator if and only if
is already deterministic. Moreover, the property of multiplicativity of locally optimal unbiased estimators is not valid.
There is also the following version of the preceding characterization of locally optimal unbiased estimators for realizations of independent, identically distributed random variables with some binomial distribution
,
, as follows. Let
, let
be the set of all subsets of
, let
, where
denotes the
-fold direct product of
having the binomial distribution
. Then
is locally optimal at
for all
(
fixed) among all estimators
with
,
, if
is a symmetric polynomial in
and a polynomial in
keeping the remaining variables
,
fixed,
, of degree not exceeding
. In particular, for
the sample mean
![]() |
is not locally optimal at for any
and some fixed
.
Finally, there are also interesting results about Bernoulli experiments of size with varying probabilities of success, which, in connection with the randomized response model (cf. [a1]), have the form
,
, with
,
, fixed and
. Then there exists an UMVU estimator for
based on
if and only if
or
for all
. In this case
![]() |
is a UMVU estimator for .
If the probabilities of success are functions
,
, with
as parameter space, there exists a symmetric and sufficient data reduction of
if and only if there are functions
,
such that
![]() |
In particular, the sample mean is sufficient in this case.
References
[a1] | A. Chaudhuri, R. Mukerjee, "Randomized response" , M. Dekker (1988) |
[a2] | T.S. Ferguson, "Mathematical statistics: a decision theoretic approach" , Acad. Press (1967) |
[a3] | E.L. Lehmann, "Theory of point estimation" , Wiley (1983) |
Bernoulli experiment. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Bernoulli_experiment&oldid=11211