Difference between revisions of "Noetherian ring"
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (tex encoded by computer) |
Ulf Rehmann (talk | contribs) m (Undo revision 47979 by Ulf Rehmann (talk)) Tag: Undo |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
''left (right)'' | ''left (right)'' | ||
− | A [[Ring|ring]] | + | A [[Ring|ring]] <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668501.png" /> satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions: |
− | satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions: | ||
− | 1) | + | 1) <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668502.png" /> is a left (or right) [[Noetherian module|Noetherian module]] over itself; |
− | is a left (or right) [[Noetherian module|Noetherian module]] over itself; | ||
− | 2) every left (or right) ideal in | + | 2) every left (or right) ideal in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668503.png" /> has a finite generating set; |
− | has a finite generating set; | ||
− | 3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in | + | 3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668504.png" /> breaks off after finitely many terms. |
− | breaks off after finitely many terms. | ||
An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator. | An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator. | ||
Line 29: | Line 13: | ||
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions). | Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions). | ||
− | A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let | + | A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668505.png" /> be the ring of matrices of the form |
− | be the ring of matrices of the form | ||
− | + | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668506.png" /></td> </tr></table> | |
− | |||
− | where | + | where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668507.png" /> is a rational integer and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668508.png" /> and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n0668509.png" /> are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685010.png" /> is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form |
− | is a rational integer and | ||
− | and | ||
− | are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then | ||
− | is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form | ||
− | + | <table class="eq" style="width:100%;"> <tr><td valign="top" style="width:94%;text-align:center;"><img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685011.png" /></td> </tr></table> | |
− | |||
does not have a finite generating set. | does not have a finite generating set. | ||
Line 48: | Line 25: | ||
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian. | Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian. | ||
− | If | + | If <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685012.png" /> is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685013.png" />. The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685014.png" /> or <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685015.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685016.png" /> is a field and <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685017.png" /> the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685018.png" /> relative to some multiplicative system <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685019.png" /> is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685020.png" />, <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685021.png" /> is an ideal such that no element of the form <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685022.png" />, where <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685023.png" />, is a divisor of zero, then <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685024.png" />. This means that any such ideal <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685025.png" /> defines on <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685026.png" /> a separable <img align="absmiddle" border="0" src="https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/legacyimages/n/n066/n066850/n06685027.png" />-adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined. |
− | is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring | ||
− | The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form | ||
− | or | ||
− | where | ||
− | is a field and | ||
− | the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every [[Artinian ring|Artinian ring]] is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring | ||
− | relative to some multiplicative system | ||
− | is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring | ||
− | |||
− | is an ideal such that no element of the form | ||
− | where | ||
− | is a divisor of zero, then | ||
− | This means that any such ideal | ||
− | defines on | ||
− | a separable | ||
− | adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
<table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> | <table><TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD> <TD valign="top"> B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , '''1–2''' , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD> <TD valign="top"> S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974)</TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD> <TD valign="top"> C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , '''1''' , Springer (1973)</TD></TR></table> |
Revision as of 14:52, 7 June 2020
left (right)
A ring satisfying one of the following equivalent conditions:
1) is a left (or right) Noetherian module over itself;
2) every left (or right) ideal in has a finite generating set;
3) every strictly ascending chain of left (or right) ideals in breaks off after finitely many terms.
An example of a Noetherian ring is any principal ideal ring, i.e. a ring in which every ideal has one generator.
Noetherian rings are named after E. Noether, who made a systematic study of such rings and carried over to them a number of results known earlier only under more stringent restrictions (for example, Lasker's theory of primary decompositions).
A right Noetherian ring need not be left Noetherian and vice versa. For example, let be the ring of matrices of the form
where is a rational integer and and are rational numbers, with the usual addition and multiplication. Then is right, but not left, Noetherian, since the left ideal of elements of the form
does not have a finite generating set.
Quotient rings and finite direct sums of Noetherian rings are again Noetherian, but a subring of a Noetherian ring need not be Noetherian. For example, a polynomial ring in infinitely many variables over a field is not Noetherian, although it is contained in its field of fractions, which is Noetherian.
If is a left Noetherian ring, then so is the polynomial ring . The corresponding property holds for the ring of formal power series over a Noetherian ring. In particular, polynomial rings of the form or , where is a field and the ring of integers, and also quotient rings of them, are Noetherian. Every Artinian ring is Noetherian. The localization of a commutative Noetherian ring relative to some multiplicative system is again Noetherian. If in a commutative Noetherian ring , is an ideal such that no element of the form , where , is a divisor of zero, then . This means that any such ideal defines on a separable -adic topology. In a commutative Noetherian ring every ideal has a representation as an incontractible intersection of finitely many primary ideals. Although such a representation is not unique, the number of ideals and the set of prime ideals associated with the given primary ideals are uniquely determined.
References
[1] | B.L. van der Waerden, "Algebra" , 1–2 , Springer (1967–1971) (Translated from German) |
[2] | S. Lang, "Algebra" , Addison-Wesley (1974) |
[3] | C. Faith, "Algebra: rings, modules, and categories" , 1 , Springer (1973) |
Noetherian ring. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Noetherian_ring&oldid=49330