Difference between revisions of "Nash theorem (in game theory)"
(Importing text file) |
(Completed rendering of article in TeX. Improved clarity of exposition.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A theorem on the existence of equilibrium points in a mixed extension of a finite [[Non-cooperative game|non-cooperative game]] | + | A theorem on the existence of equilibrium points in a mixed extension of a finite [[Non-cooperative game|non-cooperative game]] $ \Gamma \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \langle J,(S_{i})_{i \in J},(H_{i})_{i \in J} \rangle $, where |
+ | * $ J $ is a finite set of players, | ||
+ | * $ (S_{i})_{i \in J} $ is their strategy profile, and | ||
+ | * $ H_{i}: S \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \prod_{i \in J} S_{i} \to \mathbb{R} $ is a pay-off function for player $ i $, for each $ i \in J $ (see also [[Games, theory of|Games, theory of]]). | ||
+ | It was established by J. Nash in [[#References|[1]]]. For each $ i \in J $, let $ M_{i} $ denote the set of all probability measures on $ S_{i} $. Nash’s theorem then asserts that there exists a measure $ \mu^{*} \in M \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \prod_{i \in J} M_{i} $ such that | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | \forall i \in J, ~ \forall \mu_{i} \in M_{i}: \qquad | ||
+ | {H_{i}}(\mu^{*}) \geq {H_{i}}(\mu^{*} \| \mu_{i}), | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $ \mu^{*} \| \mu_{i} $ denotes the measure on $ M $ that results from replacing the $ i $-th component of the vector $ \mu^{*} $ by $ \mu_{i} $, and $ {H_{i}}(\mu) \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \mathsf{E}(H_{i},\mu) $. All known proofs of Nash’s theorem rely on a fixed-point theorem, such as the [[Kakutani theorem|Kakutani Fixed-Point Theorem]] or the [[Brouwer theorem|Brouwer Fixed-Point Theorem]]. | ||
− | + | ====References==== | |
− | + | <table> | |
− | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[1]</TD><TD valign="top"> | |
− | + | J. Nash, “Non-cooperative games”, ''Ann. of Math.'', '''54''' (1951), pp. 286–295.</TD></TR> | |
− | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[2]</TD><TD valign="top"> | |
− | + | N.N. Vorob’ev, “Foundations of game theory. Non-cooperative games”, Moscow (1984). (In Russian)</TD></TR> | |
− | + | <TR><TD valign="top">[3]</TD><TD valign="top"> | |
− | + | N.N. Vorob’ev, “Game theory. Lectures for economists and system scientists”, Springer (1977). (Translated from Russian)</TD></TR> | |
− | + | </table> |
Revision as of 09:52, 14 December 2016
A theorem on the existence of equilibrium points in a mixed extension of a finite non-cooperative game $ \Gamma \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \langle J,(S_{i})_{i \in J},(H_{i})_{i \in J} \rangle $, where
- $ J $ is a finite set of players,
- $ (S_{i})_{i \in J} $ is their strategy profile, and
- $ H_{i}: S \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \prod_{i \in J} S_{i} \to \mathbb{R} $ is a pay-off function for player $ i $, for each $ i \in J $ (see also Games, theory of).
It was established by J. Nash in [1]. For each $ i \in J $, let $ M_{i} $ denote the set of all probability measures on $ S_{i} $. Nash’s theorem then asserts that there exists a measure $ \mu^{*} \in M \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \prod_{i \in J} M_{i} $ such that $$ \forall i \in J, ~ \forall \mu_{i} \in M_{i}: \qquad {H_{i}}(\mu^{*}) \geq {H_{i}}(\mu^{*} \| \mu_{i}), $$ where $ \mu^{*} \| \mu_{i} $ denotes the measure on $ M $ that results from replacing the $ i $-th component of the vector $ \mu^{*} $ by $ \mu_{i} $, and $ {H_{i}}(\mu) \stackrel{\text{df}}{=} \mathsf{E}(H_{i},\mu) $. All known proofs of Nash’s theorem rely on a fixed-point theorem, such as the Kakutani Fixed-Point Theorem or the Brouwer Fixed-Point Theorem.
References
[1] | J. Nash, “Non-cooperative games”, Ann. of Math., 54 (1951), pp. 286–295. |
[2] | N.N. Vorob’ev, “Foundations of game theory. Non-cooperative games”, Moscow (1984). (In Russian) |
[3] | N.N. Vorob’ev, “Game theory. Lectures for economists and system scientists”, Springer (1977). (Translated from Russian) |
Nash theorem (in game theory). Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Nash_theorem_(in_game_theory)&oldid=40004