Difference between revisions of "Talk:First integral"
From Encyclopedia of Mathematics
(thank you) |
(thank you) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly. | In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly. | ||
| − | :Thank you. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET) | + | :Thank you. |
| + | :And please sign your messages (on talk pages) by four tildas: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] ([[User talk:Boris Tsirelson|talk]]) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 14 January 2015
The reference to Arnol'd is a bit misleading. Indeed Arnol'd writes about first integrals, but not in particular in the referenced book. A much better reference would be his book titled Ordinary Differential Equations. Consider as a reference: Arnol'd, V.I., Ordinary Differential Equations (New York, 1992)
In chapter 2 section 10.5, page 125, Arnol'd explains this subject very clearly.
- Thank you.
- And please sign your messages (on talk pages) by four tildas: ~~~~. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:28, 14 January 2015 (CET)
How to Cite This Entry:
First integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=First_integral&oldid=36262
First integral. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=First_integral&oldid=36262